<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Abdallah Fayyad | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2025-09-26T14:32:03+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/abdallah-fayyad" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/abdallah-fayyad/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/abdallah-fayyad/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why voters keep shrugging off Trump’s corruption]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/politics/462706/trump-corruption-tom-homan-bribery" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=462706</id>
			<updated>2025-09-26T10:32:03-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-09-25T07:30:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Donald Trump" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Explainers" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Tom Homan, the White House border czar, allegedly accepted $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents posing as business executives during a sting operation last year, according to MSNBC. The payment was made after Homan implied that he could help the agents secure government contracts in a second Trump administration.&#160; In layperson’s terms, this is [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Trump in a meeting" data-caption="President Donald Trump holds a law enforcement roundtable on sanctuary cities at the White House on March 20, 2018. | Kevin Dietsch/Pool/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Kevin Dietsch/Pool/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/09/gettyimages-935194598.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	President Donald Trump holds a law enforcement roundtable on sanctuary cities at the White House on March 20, 2018. | Kevin Dietsch/Pool/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Tom Homan, the White House border czar, allegedly accepted $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents posing as business executives during a sting operation last year, <a href="https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/tom-homan-cash-contracts-trump-doj-investigation-rcna232568">according to MSNBC</a>. The payment was made after Homan implied that he could help the agents secure government contracts in a second Trump administration.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In layperson’s terms, this is what bribery looks like: officials promising favors in exchange for money. In this case, Homan was not a government official at the time of the sting, though he had said during the 2024 election that he would likely have a role <a href="https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/tom-homan-cash-contracts-trump-doj-investigation-rcna232568">in a second Trump term</a>. The investigation related to Homan — which was launched during the Biden administration and was first reported by MSNBC this past weekend — was only recently shut down. FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche claimed that prosecutors “found no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Now, we don’t know the full details of the case, and, in the absence of a full investigation or a trial, we can’t know that Homan is guilty of hatching a bribery scheme. But to say this should raise eyebrows is an understatement.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The Homan story raises a question that has come up over and over again since President Donald Trump catapulted himself to the White House: Do American voters actually care about corruption? After all, Trump has so far gotten away with <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/403900/trump-musk-conflicts-of-interest-ethics-rules">maintaining unprecedented conflicts of interest</a>, <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/412901/trump-qatar-plane-gift-air-force-one">accepting gifts from foreign governments</a>, and <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/460757/trump-crypto-presidency-profits-corruption">turning the presidency into a giant cash grab</a>. And despite his history of fraud and corruption, he still won a second term last November.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Yet <a href="https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/51398-most-americans-see-corruption-as-serious-problem">polls consistently indicate</a> that a majority of Americans think that corruption is a serious problem that plagues Congress, the presidency, and the Supreme Court. And there’s evidence that corruption scandals can drag down politicians. One recent example is Eric Adams, the mayor of New York City, who was indicted last year on corruption charges. An overwhelming majority of New Yorkers <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/04/nyregion/eric-adams-resign-poll.html">believe that Adams should resign</a>, and his reelection bid seems all but doomed: Most <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/polls/nyc-mayoral-election-polls-2025.html">recent polls show</a> Adams’s support is in single-digits.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So why is it that no level of corruption in the Trump administration — no matter how brazen or how high up it goes, from Homan to <a href="https://www.citizen.org/article/tracker-trump-appointees-in-the-pocket-of-big-corporations/">other members of Trump’s Cabinet</a> to the <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/460757/trump-crypto-presidency-profits-corruption">first family</a> and <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/412901/trump-qatar-plane-gift-air-force-one">the president himself</a> — seems to ever stick?</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Trump broke one of the biggest guardrails against corruption</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Since Trump’s first term, a lot has been said about his attacks on institutions and his utter disregard for the rules and norms that preserve American democracy. But one of the biggest guardrails that Trump quickly shattered isn’t any kind of institution or law; it’s the effectiveness of public shaming.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Public shaming can be a powerful weapon for citizens protesting their government. It creates an environment that makes the shamed person lose legitimacy, and it puts pressure on institutions or other people in power to take action. And the prospect of public shaming likely deters some politicians from taking shortcuts or engaging in petty corruption, not out of principle or ethics but out of fear of getting caught. After all, public shaming was a tool that ultimately helped push many politicians to resign in disgrace, from President Richard Nixon to former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump has discovered that not caving to shame eventually leads people to let go and move on. His seeming inability to feel shame has allowed him to plow through scandals — like <a href="https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/07/10/american-carnage-excerpt-access-hollywood-tape-227269/">the <em>Access Hollywood</em> tape</a> — that would have easily ended other politicians’ careers. It’s also allowed him to maintain a sprawling web of conflicts of interest without feeling the need to answer to anyone. Throughout his time in politics, Trump has shown little remorse for his misdeeds, and his strategy to simply power through scandals, often with no apologies, has proven remarkably effective.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">And other politicians have taken notice. For example, Cuomo, who <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/10/nyregion/andrew-cuomo-resigns.html">resigned amid allegations of sexual misconduct</a> in 2021, has tried to stage a comeback by running for mayor of New York City. But that doesn’t mean that shaming no longer works at all. Cuomo couldn’t outrun his past as his opponents <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/01/nyregion/cuomo-sexual-harassment-women.html">reminded voters</a> of why he resigned in the first place, and he eventually went on to lose the Democratic primary earlier this year. And, if the polls are accurate, he is on track to lose the general election in November as well. But when it comes to Trump, Americans have yet to find the scandal that can shame his way to political irrelevance.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Trump’s assault on public shaming has disempowered voters</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">There are two main reasons why Trump and his administration are so often able to avoid any accountability for potential corruption, even though there is evidence that voters do care about corrupt governance, as Eric Adams’s downfall shows. First, Trump’s core supporters are willing to look the other way because their priority is supporting Trump’s broader political project. In some cases, some of the president’s supporters might not believe any of the allegations of corruption or might point to how the president’s opponents are corrupt as well. In fact, <a href="https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-democrats-more-corrupt-than-republicans-poll-1235396092/">many American voters believe</a> the Democratic Party is more corrupt than the GOP.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Second, and more importantly, while the president’s opponents might care about the corruption in his administration, Trump’s ability to wiggle out of any consequences and ignore public shaming tactics has made people feel powerless. He won a second term, for example, despite being <a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-carroll-trial-fe68259a4b98bb3947d42af9ec83d7db">found liable for sexual abuse and defamation</a> and <a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-trial-deliberations-jury-testimony-verdict-85558c6d08efb434d05b694364470aa0">getting convicted</a> of crimes, including falsifying business records to conceal hush money payments. So while incidents of potential corruption might draw a lot of voters’ ire, they’re unlikely to break through and become full-fledged scandals because many Democratic voters seem resigned to the fact that Trump will likely get away with the story of the day, just as he has over and over again since his first campaign for president in 2016.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Part of what might be driving that general sense of apathy in the opposition is that Trump is term-limited, and unlike his first term, he can’t run for reelection. That leaves many people in the mindset of waiting out Trump’s second term instead of actively resisting it as they did during his first presidency. So while they know they’re stuck with him for now, they also know they’re not going to be stuck with him forever.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That’s not to say that corruption and abuse of power won’t ever galvanize resistance to Trump, especially as the midterms get underway next year. Democrats hoping to win back the House will likely highlight how a Democratic majority in at least one chamber of Congress would be a check on the president’s corruption. In fact, some Democratic operatives are pushing Democrats to embrace that message and focus on Trump’s “culture of corruption” as their midterm strategy, <a href="https://www.thebulwark.com/p/every-day-another-grotesque-secret">according to a memo obtained by the Bulwark</a> earlier this month.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Whether Democrats go with that advice will depend on whether they believe Americans care enough about Trump’s corruption. And so far this year, it seems the answer to that question is no. But that might not always be the case, especially if an anti-corruption coalition finds the right messenger.&nbsp;</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The growing consensus that Israel is committing genocide]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/politics/461977/un-commission-report-israel-genocide-gaza" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=461977</id>
			<updated>2025-09-24T11:48:48-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-09-19T06:45:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Palestine" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[A United Nations commission published a 72-page report on Tuesday that concluded Israel has committed a genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.&#160; “It is clear that there is an intent to destroy the Palestinians in Gaza through acts that meet the criteria set forth in the Genocide Convention,” said Navi Pillay, chair of the commission. The [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="South African judge Navi Pillay stands in front of a blue wall with white logo." data-caption="South African judge Navi Pillay, who chaired the independent United Nations commission of inquiry, speaking at a press conference in Geneva. | Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/09/gettyimages-2220027447.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	South African judge Navi Pillay, who chaired the independent United Nations commission of inquiry, speaking at a press conference in Geneva. | Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">A United Nations commission published a <a href="https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session60/advance-version/a-hrc-60-crp-3.pdf">72-page report</a> on Tuesday that concluded Israel has committed a genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“It is clear that there is an intent to destroy the Palestinians in Gaza through acts that meet the criteria set forth in the Genocide Convention,” <a href="https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds">said Navi Pillay</a>, chair of the commission. The commission’s findings specifically determined that Israel has perpetrated at least four of the five acts of genocide as defined by the 1948 Genocide Convention.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The report adds yet another voice to the growing consensus that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza constitutes a genocide. Leading <a href="https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/">international</a>, <a href="https://www.alhaq.org/publications/25781.html">Palestinian</a>, and <a href="https://www.btselem.org/press_releases/20250728_our_genocide">Israeli</a> human rights organizations have already released reports saying so. More recently, the International Association of Genocide Scholars <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/01/israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza-worlds-top-scholars-on-the-say">passed a resolution</a> that stated the same conclusion. They have been joined by <a href="https://zeteo.com/p/who-says-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-list-politicians-countries">at least 20</a> members of Congress who have called the war in Gaza a genocide.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The two latest members of Congress to make that statement did so after the UN commission’s report was released. “The intent is clear. The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza,” Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders <a href="https://www.sanders.senate.gov/op-eds/it-is-genocide/">wrote</a> in an op-ed on Wednesday. In another op-ed, Rep. Becca Balint, a Democrat from Vermont, echoed the sentiment.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“Today, I believe the Israeli government is committing a genocide against the Palestinian people,” <a href="https://couriernewsroom.com/news/rep-becca-balint-i-believe-israel-is-committing-a-genocide-in-gaza/">Balint wrote</a>. “As the granddaughter of a man murdered in the Holocaust, it is not easy for me to say that. But the trauma of the Holocaust serves as a reminder of the power of speaking out.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">This growing consensus comes as Israel faces more and more pressure from the international community to stop the war, especially since the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — the world’s leading authority on hunger crises — determined that <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/422622/israel-famine-gaza-history-weaponizing-starvation-war">Israeli policy has created</a> a famine in Gaza. But Israel has ignored those calls and has instead <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/09/15/israel-gaza-city-occupation-ground-offensive">recently launched</a> a ground offensive to invade and occupy Gaza City.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What the UN commission’s report says</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The commission — officially called the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel — was created in 2021 by the UN Human Rights Council. And since the start of the war in Gaza, it has been investigating violations of international humanitarian and human rights law.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The Genocide Convention <a href="https://www.un.org/en/genocide-prevention/definition">lays out five acts</a> that constitute genocide if any of them are undertaken with the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The newly released report concludes that Israel is responsible for four of the five: “(i) killing members of the group; (ii) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (iii) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and (iv) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group,” specifically by destroying health care infrastructure, including maternity wards and a fertility clinic. The report said there’s no evidence of the <a href="https://www.un.org/en/genocide-prevention/definition#:~:text=A%20physical%20element%2C%20which%20includes,in%20whole%20or%20in%20part">fifth act of genocide</a>, which is forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The report outlines various statements from Israeli officials to underscore intent. “Several statements by Israeli officials advocated for collective punishment against the Palestinian people as a whole or the population of Gaza in particular,” the <a href="https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session60/advance-version/a-hrc-60-crp-3.pdf">report said</a>. “Some statements recognised that there was a difference between civilians and combatants but urged that all Gazans should be punished for the actions of the militants on 7 October 2023.”</p>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for example, invoked <a href="https://jewishcurrents.org/facing-amalek">violent biblical references</a> in a letter to Israeli soldiers. “Remember what Amalek did to you,” he wrote. “This is a war between the sons of light and the sons of darkness.” In the Book of Samuel, God tells the Israelites to “go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.” </li>



<li>The Israeli president, Isaac Herzog, implied that all Palestinians in Gaza should be held accountable for Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel: “It’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. It is not true, this rhetoric about civilians who were not aware and not involved. It is absolutely not true.”&nbsp;</li>



<li>Yoav Gallant, then the Israeli defense minister, further dehumanized Palestinians, stating that Israel was fighting “human animals” and must “act accordingly.” Gallant also said, “Gaza won’t return to what it was before. There will be no Hamas. We will eliminate everything. If it doesn’t take one day, it will take a week. It will take weeks or even months, we will reach all places.”</li>
</ul>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But if these official statements leave room for doubt, the report doesn’t solely rely on them to infer intent but also focuses on Israel’s pattern of conduct. That includes Israel blocking humanitarian aid from entering Gaza and the forced starvation of Palestinians; targeting Gaza’s health care system; destroying the enclave’s educational, religious, and cultural facilities; perpetrating sexual and gender-based violence; and deliberately targeting children.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Here’s one example, according to the report: </p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">Sexual violence [against Palestinians in Gaza] was used as a means of punishment and intimidation from the moment of arrest and throughout detention, including during interrogations and searches. Several male detainees reported that Israeli security forces personnel had beaten, kicked, pulled or squeezed their genitals, often while the detainees were naked. One detainee stated that he had been forced to strip and ordered to kiss the Israeli flag. When he refused, he had been beaten, and his genitals had been kicked so severely that he had vomited and lost consciousness.</p>
</blockquote>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The report also said that the commission received credible information concerning “many cases of rape” and added that Israeli forces “sexually harassed and publicly shamed” Palestinian women.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The commission also documented how the mass killing of civilians — the death toll in Gaza has now reached <a href="https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-wars-09-17-2025-902e4a41eb3c5802fd18c598083d247a">more than 65,000 people</a> — has often been deliberate. “The Commission found that the Israeli security forces had clear knowledge of the presence of Palestinian civilians along the evacuation routes and within the safe areas but nevertheless they shot at and killed civilians, some of whom (including children) were holding makeshift white flags,” the report said. “Some children, including toddlers, were shot in the head by snipers.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">These are just a few of the horrific details among the commission’s findings, which are worth <a href="https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session60/advance-version/a-hrc-60-crp-3.pdf">reading in full</a>. But Israel has denied the allegations made in the report, resorting to tired tactics of calling it “fake,” <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/09/16/gaza-genocide-un-israel/?utm_campaign=wp_main&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=social">accusing</a> the report’s writers of being antisemitic, and even “serving as Hamas proxies.”</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What impact will this report have?</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That this report is coming from an independent commission established by the UN only lends further credence to the piling charges and expert determinations that Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Even for some skeptics, that conclusion is becoming harder and harder to avoid. Last month, for example, the president of J Street, a liberal-leaning Zionist lobbying group, <a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/j-street-head-says-hes-now-convinced-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/">said</a> that while he might not use the term “genocide” himself, he “cannot and will not argue any more against those using the term. I simply won’t defend the indefensible,” adding that he has “been persuaded rationally by legal and scholarly arguments that international courts will one day find that Israel has broken the <a href="https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf">international genocide convention</a>.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The report was also published just before the UN General Assembly is set to convene next week, which will likely highlight Israel’s growing international isolation as world leaders gather to discuss the most pressing concerns around the globe. More and more Western states, for example, <a href="https://www.vox.com/world-politics/458013/recognizing-palestinian-state-uk-france-australia">have already pledged</a> to recognize Palestine as a state, and the report’s conclusions will only add more pressure for states to take action to stop the genocide, such as arms embargos, boycotts, and sanctions.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But the report only adds to a growing chorus of experts and observers who have concluded that Israel is committing the crime of crimes. On its own, though, that will not carry much weight without corresponding government measures. And if Israel’s allies — chiefly, the United States — continue to support its military campaign while imposing few, if any, conditions on aid, then there is no end to the horror in sight.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Donald Trump is lying about political violence]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/politics/461314/charlie-kirk-death-trump-political-violence-source" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=461314</id>
			<updated>2025-09-11T18:47:42-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-09-11T17:35:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Democracy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Donald Trump" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Political Violence" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk, the influential right-wing activist, was shot and killed Wednesday on a college campus in Utah. The shooter is still at large, and as of this writing, little is publicly known about the shooter’s identity or the potential ideological motive behind the attack. But instead of waiting for facts of the case to emerge, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Charlie Kirk walking through campus with a hand up" data-caption="Charlie Kirk appears at a Utah Valley University event on September 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. He was speaking on campus when he was shot and killed. | Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/09/gettyimages-2234095044.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Charlie Kirk appears at a Utah Valley University event on September 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. He was speaking on campus when he was shot and killed. | Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Charlie Kirk, the influential right-wing activist, was shot and killed Wednesday on a college campus in Utah. The shooter is still at large, and as of this writing, little is publicly known about the shooter’s identity or the potential ideological motive behind the attack. But instead of waiting for facts of the case to emerge, many conservatives <a href="https://time.com/7316315/republicans-far-right-reacts-charlie-kirk-death-blame-left-crackdown/">quickly to jumped to conclusions</a> in the immediate aftermath.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Shortly after Kirk was shot, Elon Musk <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1965859343351558352">posted on his platform X</a>, “The Left is the party of murder.” Fox News host Jesse Watters <a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/jesse-watters-charlie-kirk-assassination-war-b2824273.html">said</a>, “They are at war with us, whether we want to accept it or not. They are at war with us.” And conservative activist Christopher Rufo made a call to crack down on left-wing groups. “The last time the radical Left orchestrated a wave of violence and terror, J. Edgar Hoover shut it all down within a few years,” <a href="https://x.com/realchrisrufo/status/1965866248341987579">Rufo posted on X</a>. “It is time, within the confines of the law, to infiltrate, disrupt, arrest, and incarcerate all of those who are responsible for this chaos.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Most alarmingly, President Donald Trump, in an Oval Office address later that evening, echoed those sentiments. “Radical left political violence has hurt too many innocent people and taken too many lives,” <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/09/10/nx-s1-5537187/trump-charlie-kirk-blames-left">Trump said</a>. “For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world&#8217;s worst mass murderers and criminals. This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we&#8217;re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now.”&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump also hinted at the kind of crackdown that his administration might impose in the wake of Kirk’s killing, saying they would find “those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">There are two major problems with the right’s rush to blame the incident, and political violence more broadly, on the left. First, even if the shooter turns out to be a left-wing extremist — certainly within the realm of possibility — the urge to immediately blame the left before facts emerge is reckless. As we learned from the assassination attempt on Trump last year on the campaign trail, shooters <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-update-trump-assassination-attempt/story?id=113218466">might not always have clear ideological motives</a>. Second, and more importantly, the attempt to frame political violence as a problem that solely plagues the left is not just irresponsible; it’s factually inaccurate.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">What Trump conveniently left out of his speech, for example, is violent right-wing extremism — the very sort of violence that he incited after he lost the 2020 election, culminating in an assault on the US Capitol. But that omission isn’t a one-off. For years, Trump and his allies have tried to paint Democrats and the left as not only extreme but violent. He has called Democrats the “<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-democrats-are-party-crime-we-fact-checked-his-n920451">party of crime</a>,” <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/03/trump-shooting-democrats-democracy/">blamed Democrats’ rhetoric for his assassination attempt</a> last year, and warned that if Democrats gain power, they <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45340275">would “violently” assault his agenda</a>. Trump, like many other influential figures on the right, chose to capitalize on Kirk’s killing — even before the facts of the case are known — to shape the story to his own political advantage by solely focusing on left-wing political violence, and to create a dangerous environment of fear that is entirely detached from reality.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Who is to blame for the rise in political violence?</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The uncomfortable truth that Trump tried to paper over in his statement is that in recent American history, the most frequent perpetrators of domestic terrorism have been far-right extremists.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">According to a 2020 report from the <a href="https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states">Center for Strategic and International Studies</a>, since the 1990s, “far-right terrorism has significantly outpaced terrorism from other types of perpetrators, including from far-left networks.” Since that report, there has been a notable rise in political violence perpetrated by the far left, but<a href="https://www.csis.org/analysis/pushed-extremes-domestic-terrorism-amid-polarization-and-protest"> far-right extremists still account</a> for most terrorist attacks and plots in the United States.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">This should come as no surprise. Rhetoric from conservative leaders — especially since Trump’s rise to power — has <a href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/01/violence-republicans-trump-right-wing-threats.html">grown more and more extreme</a>, often promoting or even embracing violence as an answer to America’s problems.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In his 2016 campaign for president, for example, Trump implied that his opponent, Hillary Clinton, could be prevented from becoming president by getting shot, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2016/08/09/489363581/trump-implies-second-amendment-people-could-stop-clinton">saying</a> that “Second Amendment people” could do something to stop her. In 2019, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/01/us/politics/trump-border-wars.html">he mused</a> about shooting migrants in the legs at the border. In 2020, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-race-and-ethnicity-donald-trump-chris-wallace-0b32339da25fbc9e8b7c7c7066a1db0f">he struggled to condemn</a> the white supremacist group the Proud Boys. And in 2021, he <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-he-met-kyle-rittenhouse-after-verdict-calls-him-n1284513">met with and defended</a> Kyle Rittenhouse, the young right-wing vigilante who shot three people, killing two of them, in demonstrations protesting police shootings in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Trump also incited an insurrection after he lost the 2020 election, unleashing a mob on the US Capitol that included Proud Boys and members of other right-wing paramilitary groups — a marked departure from the peaceful transition of power that Americans had come to take for granted. During his 2024 campaign, he called those who took part in the Capitol siege “<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-called-jan-6-henious-attack-now-calls-day-love-rcna175942">patriots</a>,” and when he returned to the White House this year, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/01/30/nx-s1-5276336/donald-trump-jan-6-rape-assault-pardons-rioters">he pardoned them</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It’s not just Trump. Other prominent Republicans have excused or embraced violence. After Melissa Hortman, a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota, was assassinated in her home earlier this year, Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sen-mike-lee-deletes-social-media-posts-minnesota-shooting-facing-crit-rcna213565">posted on X</a>, “This is what happens When Marxists don’t get their way.” He also posted a photo of the suspect with the caption “<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sen-mike-lee-deletes-social-media-posts-minnesota-shooting-facing-crit-rcna213565">Nightmare on Waltz Street</a>” — seemingly a reference to the Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. Other influential Republicans <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/31/conservatives-disinformation-paul-pelosi-assault-00064208">peddled conspiracy theories and joked</a> about the assault on Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s husband. Contrast that with how prominent Democrats have responded to Kirk’s assassination — unequivocally <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/charlie-kirk-shooting-reaction">condemning the act and calling for nonviolence</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In public polls, while most Americans still oppose political violence, there seems to be a growing acceptance of resorting to violence to achieve political goals.<strong> </strong>When United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was killed in December 2024, for example, an Emerson poll found that 22 percent of Democratic respondents said that the <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/12/17/united-healthcare-ceo-killing-poll">killing was at least “somewhat” acceptable</a>, compared to 12 percent of Republicans. The acceptability of the killing was especially pronounced among young people. But when it comes to political violence more broadly — that is, when voters are asked about their general views on political violence rather than a specific case — Republicans were more supportive of the idea than Democrats.&nbsp; ccording to a PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist poll last year, for example, <a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/1-in-5-americans-think-violence-may-solve-u-s-divisions-poll-finds">one in five Americans believe</a> that violence could be the answer to getting the country back on track, though Republican respondents were more than twice as likely to believe that than Democratic respondents.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Political violence is a serious problem that only seems to be getting worse in the United States. But it’s still hard to say that this is a problem that plagues both sides of the political aisle equally. While Democratic leaders have certainly escalated their rhetoric when attacking Republicans, calling the MAGA movement <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/biden-trump-describe-maga-extremist-rcna117796">an existential threat to democracy</a>, they haven’t engaged in the kind of rhetoric that routinely flows from Trump and his allies — a rhetoric that <a href="https://www.npr.org/2016/08/09/489363581/trump-implies-second-amendment-people-could-stop-clinton">winks</a> and <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-bloodbath-loses-election-2024-rcna143746">nods</a> at <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/08/31/908137377/trump-defends-kenosha-shooting-suspect">resorting to violent tactics</a> and, in some cases, <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-violent-rhetoric-timeline/680403/">explicitly endorses violence</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So while there is growing concern about the rise of political violence on both the right and left, it’s important to note that Trump’s rhetoric and leadership — bolstered by a supportive party and media apparatus — is the context in which all this is happening. And so far, there is no Democratic counterpart to Trump that could equally share the blame for fanning the flames.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That context is what makes this moment especially worrisome: Despite Trump’s promotion of violence over the years, his framing of political violence as a problem that is solely coming from the left is an implicit admission that some forms of violence don’t count as violence — at least not in his eyes.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">At minimum, he does not appear to find violence from his supporters or allies, or against his political opponents, as worthy of condemnation. Doing so, after all, would undermine the narrative he wants to spin: that a violent left-wing is relentlessly attacking his supporters and the entire nation, and only he can protect them. As Trump prepares to crack down on Democrats and leftists, as he indicated he would in his Oval Office address, he’ll continue to ignore far-right extremists. That, alone, might only embolden them.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Trump’s presidency is a cash grab]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/politics/460757/trump-crypto-presidency-profits-corruption" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=460757</id>
			<updated>2025-09-09T10:16:27-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-09-09T06:30:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Donald Trump" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[According to Donald Trump, the 45th and 47th president is a very generous man. “I am proud to be the only President (with the possible exception of the Late, Great George Washington) to donate my Salary,” he said in a Truth Social post. “My first ‘Paycheck’ went to the White House Historical Association, as we [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="A cutout of US President Donald Trump holding a Bitcoin is displayed on a group of servers during The Bitcoin Conference at The Venetian Las Vegas in Las Vegas." data-caption="A cutout of President Donald Trump holding a Bitcoin at a crypto conference in Las Vegas, Nevada. | Ian Maule/AFP via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Ian Maule/AFP via Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/09/gettyimages-2216823397.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A cutout of President Donald Trump holding a Bitcoin at a crypto conference in Las Vegas, Nevada. | Ian Maule/AFP via Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">According to Donald Trump, the 45th and 47th president is a very generous man. “I am proud to be the only President (with the possible exception of the Late, Great George Washington) to donate my Salary,” he <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114982518659334871">said in a Truth Social post</a>. “My first ‘Paycheck’ went to the White House Historical Association, as we make much needed renovations to the beautiful ‘People’s House.’”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In his first term, Trump made <a href="https://www.npr.org/2017/04/04/522518472/trump-donates-salary-to-national-parks-even-as-he-tries-to-cut-interior-departme">a big show</a> about <a href="https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/president-donald-j-trump-donate-salary-department-education/">donating his government salary</a>. And he’s doing <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114982518659334871">the same now too</a>. The whole spectacle is just that: Trump is trying to imply that he doesn’t <em>need</em> the presidency, and that he’s not interested in making money through the job Americans elected him to do.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump’s <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/12/30/trump-taxes-charitable-contributions/">2020 tax returns cast doubt</a> on whether he has donated every paycheck as president. But regardless of how much of his salary Trump is actually donating, it’s clear that the presidency has greatly benefited Trump financially. From the very beginning, Trump has used the presidency as a money-making instrument, using his perch from the White House to funnel money into his businesses. When he first won the presidency in 2016, foreign governments <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-hotel-dc-foreign-countries-payments-mazars-usa-house-oversight/">started spending money</a> on his private businesses by staying at his hotels. The Secret Service <a href="https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/the-secret-service-spent-nearly-2-million-at-trump-properties/">spent millions of dollars</a> — taxpayers’ money — on Trump’s properties. And Trump <a href="https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/trumps-ethics-promises-have-not-been-kept/">never divested from his businesses</a> to ensure that there would be no conflict of interest.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Now, in his second term, the way Trump is profiting from the presidency is more brazen than ever before. While running his campaign in 2024, Trump’s media company went public, allowing <a href="https://www.vox.com/24120166/truth-social-stocks-trump-media-corruption">anyone to buy a stake</a> in his business. He has <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/articles/trump-selling-sneakers-bibles-other-101501518.html">made millions selling Trump-branded merchandise</a>, from cologne to sneakers to bibles. He even <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/412901/trump-qatar-plane-gift-air-force-one">accepted a plane worth hundreds of millions of dollars</a> — which will be transferred to his presidential library after he leaves the White House — from the Qatari government.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But to put into perspective just how much money Trump is extracting from the presidency, look no further than the Trump family’s crypto ventures. Just before his second inauguration, Trump <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9vmym2jvy9o">launched a meme coin</a>, as <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98y47vrv2jo">did his wife, Melania Trump</a> — a blatant display of how the Trumps use the presidency for financial gain. If Trump weren’t about to become president when they launched these coins, then would they have attracted as many investors as they did?&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So just how much money is Trump actually making from the presidency?&nbsp;</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Trumps just can’t quit crypto</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The amount of money Trump is making from his crypto schemes dwarfs the government salary that he routinely reminds people that he donates. Since 2001, American presidents have made a salary of <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-much-is-the-president-paid/">$400,000 a year</a>. So that’s about the amount of money Trump says he selflessly donates. But since becoming president in January, Trump and his family have made <em>billions </em>from their crypto businesses, at least on paper.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Earlier this month, the Trump family’s latest venture, World Liberty Financial — which was co-founded by Trump’s three sons and lists Trump himself as “co-founder emeritus” — opened trading on its crypto token, $WLFI. Previously, people bought WLFI tokens privately through World Liberty Financial, but weren’t able to trade them. Now, it’s all public, and WLFI tokens can be bought and sold on the open market. This latest launch alone has expanded the Trump family’s net worth by as much as $5 billion, <a href="https://www.wsj.com/finance/currencies/trump-family-amasses-6-billion-fortune-after-crypto-launch-567faec5?st=SJGJVc&amp;reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink">according to the Wall Street Journal</a>. While those gains only exist on paper for now, since the Trumps can’t sell their tokens yet, it’s a window into just how much money the presidency is generating for the Trump family. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But that’s not all. The meme coins they launched in the days before Trump’s inauguration — $TRUMP and $MELANIA — have generated hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue, <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/08/18/the-number">according to the New Yorker</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It’s hard to pin down an exact number when it comes to how much money the president and his family have made from these sorts of schemes, in large part because the Trumps aren’t exactly known for transparency into their finances. Moreover, much of the wealth they’ve generated remains unrealized, since they haven’t sold all of their assets. But while the Trump family’s various businesses — from finance to Trump-branded merchandise to his media company — have hauled in <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/08/18/the-number">hundreds of millions of dollars</a>, all of those ventures pale in comparison to the family’s crypto earnings.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">What’s clear is that Trump and his family have leveraged the presidency to draw investors to their cryptocurrencies and greatly expanded their collective wealth as a result. Since becoming president, Trump himself has more than doubled his net worth, from an estimated $2.3 billion in 2024 to more than $5 billion this year, <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2025/03/31/how-truth-social-and-crypto-helped-donald-trump-double-his-fortune-in-just-one-year/">according to Forbes</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">What makes this all the more alarming is just how nakedly corrupt these crypto investments are. Just like when Trump made Truth Social a publicly traded company, the Trump family’s crypto coins allow anyone to invest money to boost Trump’s wealth. And what might draw people to do that is not just their love or admiration for the president, but <a href="https://www.vox.com/24120166/truth-social-stocks-trump-media-corruption">the potential opportunity</a> to curry favor with him and his administration. In fact, earlier this year, Trump <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/23/us/politics/trump-crypto-dinner-attendees.html">hosted a dinner at his Virginia golf club</a> for the top investors in his $TRUMP coin. To put it more plainly, that wasn’t some kind of elite political fundraiser, where rich donors gather to fill a campaign fund for the next election. Trump was instead actively luring people to heavily invest in his private business — to enrich him personally — by promising investors an opportunity to gain access to the president of the United States.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So while Trump likes to tout his donations — particularly his paycheck giveaways — as evidence of his generosity, that is just for show. In the end, how much more brazenly corrupt could the president be than hosting a private dinner for his top investors? With Trump, it’s impossible to know the answer, because he seems to keep finding more blatant ways to turn the presidency into a money grab. </p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Cameron Peters</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Trump’s sinister America rebrand]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/today-explained-newsletter/459984/trump-white-house-remodel-gold-aesthetic-explained" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=459984</id>
			<updated>2025-09-05T15:43:59-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-09-08T06:45:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Donald Trump" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Today, Explained newsletter" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[You may have seen that President Donald Trump has been doing some remodeling around the White House, including a new Rose Garden patio and so, so much gold in the Oval Office. My colleague Abdallah Fayyad recently wrote about how that remodeling isn&#8217;t just a presidential whim — instead, it&#8217;s the most immediate representation of [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Donald Trump, center right, and South Korean president Lee Jae Myung, center left, meet in the increasingly gilded Oval Office of the White House; Vice President JD Vance sits far right and South Korean officials are seen to the left." data-caption="President Donald Trump, center right, and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, center left, meet in the increasingly gilded Oval Office of the White House on August 25, 2025. | Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/09/gettyimages-2231378170.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	President Donald Trump, center right, and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, center left, meet in the increasingly gilded Oval Office of the White House on August 25, 2025. | Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">You may have seen that President Donald Trump has been doing some remodeling around the White House, including a new Rose Garden patio and so, so much gold in the Oval Office. My colleague Abdallah Fayyad <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/459397/trump-rebranding-america-style-aesthetic-taste">recently wrote about how that remodeling isn&#8217;t just a presidential whim</a> — instead, it&#8217;s the most immediate representation of Trump&#8217;s efforts to rebrand America in his image.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">I sat down with Abdallah to talk about that rebranding for Vox’s daily newsletter Today, Explained. Our conversation is below, and you can also sign up for the newsletter&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/pages/today-explained-newsletter-signup">here</a>&nbsp;for more conversations like this.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><strong>You write that Trump is remodeling America. What does that look like?</strong></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">One thing that I&#8217;ve been interested in about Trump for a long time is his whole aesthetic, how tacky it can be, and how much he flaunts his wealth and power in the most ostentatious ways. We saw this in his first term, and we&#8217;re seeing it again in his second term, in how he&#8217;s imposing his particular style onto the American public, most recently with his makeover of the White House, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/01/trump-oval-office-gold-before-after-decor-white-house-makeover">all the gold in the Oval Office</a>, planning a $200 million <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/31/trump-ballroom-white-house-construction-september/85461691007/">ballroom extension to the East Wing</a>. It&#8217;s all done in Trump style. It mimics his residences, be it his penthouse in New York or Mar-a-Lago.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">I was thinking about how he is more than just a political figure. Trump is, whether we like it or not, a cultural icon and has been for a long time. Understanding the cultural element of Trump — how he portrays himself in the media, his ostentatious displays, understanding that aspect of his presidency or his personality — really helps inform us about his broader political project as president of the United States.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The way that Trump is ultimately rebranding America is to so deeply intertwine himself with the state so that we can&#8217;t separate the two and so that he becomes the most enduring symbol of America. And there&#8217;s a very particular kind of America that he wants to be the symbol of, and that&#8217;s his broader vision for how he&#8217;s rebranding America.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><strong>You mentioned some of the examples of the redecorations. Where is this all coming from? What&#8217;s the Trump aesthetic?</strong></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">To really understand Trump’s style and his taste, what he values, you have to go back to when he was catapulted into the American zeitgeist through sheer force of will. That&#8217;s New York in the 1980s and, specifically, the lifestyles of the rich and famous in New York in the 1980s. Everything that we know that Trump values today, whether it&#8217;s Time magazine covers, television ratings, things like that — all of those were markers of clout in that time and place, and he has been chasing that kind of clout since then, and he has never really let go.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That era, specifically, was defined by greed. It was defined by these ostentatious displays of wealth, these attention-grabbing attempts to flaunt your wealth. And Trump has never really shied away or been coy about how wealthy he is. That&#8217;s how he has tried to ingratiate himself with the elite circles of American society, with the upper echelons of American society. And, you know, he&#8217;s always kind of viewed himself maybe as an outsider, even though he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. But he has this kind of vulgar impulse to just flaunt his wealth and power as a way to prove that he has made it, that he is the elite of the elites.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">He had long had this obsession with having the tallest and biggest buildings in the world. He has had this obsession with putting his name in gold on everything that he builds. He puts his name on everything; he wants to be everywhere. And I think that that defines the cultural aspect of Trump himself, which is that Trump was never just interested in fame.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">He doesn&#8217;t just want to be a celebrity. He just wants to be everywhere. And so, when you think about Trump that way, it&#8217;s not that he just wants to become president; he wants you to think about him. He wants you to see him. What he really has always been chasing his entire adult life has been omnipresence.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><strong>What does this sort of fixation mean for his policy agenda?</strong></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">A lot of this rebrand, I think, has sinister motives. There&#8217;s a certain type of America that Trump is only comfortable associating with. There are sides of America that Trump doesn&#8217;t like to be associated with. The specific America that Trump does not want to be associated with is the America that elected Barack Obama, the kind of multiracial, cross-class coalition that formed a decisive majority in 2008 and 2012.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Part of this rebrand is to fundamentally challenge what it means to be an American. We see this through this kind of everlasting nostalgia for a whiter America that permeates Trump&#8217;s White House. We see this through his harsh immigration crackdowns. We see this through his censorship of speech. We see this with the kowtowing to Trump by businesses, or universities, or media conglomerates.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The first aspect of this rebrand is to change how America is perceived and what the typical American way of life is, and one tangible example of this is looking at his <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/399885/trump-kennedy-center-shonda-rhimes">takeover of the Kennedy Center</a>. He&#8217;s kind of trying to dictate the kind of art that Americans should enjoy. He wants to change American gender norms. Masculinity is very much intertwined with that image of America. He&#8217;s trying to change American culture, and this has real impacts on people&#8217;s lives. It really informs his policy approach, be it through targeting transgender people, targeting immigrants, targeting American citizenship itself — those are the tangible ways we&#8217;re seeing this rebrand manifest.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Trump isn’t just remodeling the White House. He’s rebranding America.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/politics/459397/trump-rebranding-america-style-aesthetic-taste" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=459397</id>
			<updated>2025-08-27T17:57:34-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-28T06:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Donald Trump" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[In 1990, Playboy published an interview with Donald Trump in which the future president offered his thoughts on foreign affairs, the death penalty, and why he puts his name on everything. He also reflected on the meaning — or, perhaps, meaninglessness — of life. “Life is what you do while you&#8217;re waiting to die. You [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/Trump-Vox.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">In 1990, Playboy published an interview with Donald Trump in which the future president offered his thoughts on foreign affairs, the death penalty, and <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/things-with-trumps-name-on-them/3/">why he puts his name on everything</a>. He also reflected on the meaning — or, perhaps, meaninglessness — of life. “Life is what you do while you&#8217;re waiting to die. You know, it is all a rather sad situation,” <a href="https://www.ebroadsheet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/playboy-interview-donald-trump-1990">he said</a>. “We&#8217;re here and we live our 60, 70, or 80 years and we&#8217;re gone. You win, you win, and in the end, it doesn&#8217;t mean a hell of a lot.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It’s no secret that every president cares about how they’ll be remembered. But that pithy, 35-year-old quote explains a whole lot about Trump, his rise to power, and how he governs today. He doesn’t only want a legacy, be it good or bad. Even winning the presidency twice doesn’t suffice. What Trump really wants is to — in some way or another — live forever, and he’s only just getting started.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">By now, Trump’s imprint on the world is indelible. His ability to wiggle out of legal consequences for his corruption and lawlessness has ushered in a new era of presidential immunity. His inability to admit defeat in 2020 nearly resulted in a coup d’etat and <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/651185/partisan-split-election-integrity-gets-even-wider.aspx">seriously undermined voters’ faith</a> in American elections. And his harsh immigration crackdowns, his fixation on birthright citizenship, and his censorship of speech have challenged the very ideals of what it means to be an American.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But to fully understand Trump’s broader political project and how he has successfully transformed America, you have to recognize that he isn’t only a political figure, but something much bigger: a cultural icon in the crudest sense.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It’s that side of Trump that begins to explain one of the weirdest aspects of his presidency: his focus on aesthetics and how aggressively he is forcing his particular style and taste onto America. Whether it’s making the White House look more like his private residences or turning the arts into his own pet project, Trump is trying to fundamentally change how America’s government is perceived. Put another way, when we look at the government’s buildings and institutions, Trump wants us to see only him — even after he’s gone.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It’s not entirely accurate to say that Trump has always sought fame. Because what Trump has really been chasing his entire adult life has been omnipresence. Celebrity status, untold fortune, and television success were never going to be enough; he wants to be <em>everywhere</em>. For a big chunk of his New York business years, Trump was completely obsessed with the idea of <a href="https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/06/29/trump-robert-moses-new-york-television-city-urban-development-1980s-218836/">having the biggest and tallest buildings</a> in the world. He injected himself into the American zeitgeist decades ago, <a href="https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/2016-donald-trump-tabloids-new-york-post-daily-news-media-213842/">giving tabloids enough gossip</a> to fill their pages with scandal after scandal <a href="https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/tabloids-donald-trump-new-york-post-daily-news-gossip-1980s-1990s-213853/">since the 1970s</a>. His real estate career, his offensively lavish lifestyle, and his eventual rise as a reality TV star made him, in many ways, a caricature of American capitalism’s excesses.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That never-ending pursuit of omnipresence has shaped Trump’s political career and presidencies, perhaps more than anything else. After all, from a political standpoint, Trump has been all over the place: He has been a Democrat, independent, and a Republican. He <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/magazine/when-hillary-and-donald-were-friends.html">sought to befriend Hillary Clinton</a> — donating to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/magazine/when-hillary-and-donald-were-friends.html">her Senate campaigns</a> and <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/24/politics/trump-clinton-foundation-donation">the Clinton Foundation</a> — before eventually running against her in 2016. And while there are some policies and ideas that Trump has long been committed to, like <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/04/09/trump-tariffs-history-stock-market/">tariffs</a> or <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/01/12/trump-nikki-haley-birther-conspiracy">racist conspiracy theories</a>, he has always been more devoted to himself than any policy agenda.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">His true desire, it seems, wasn’t to simply become the president of the United States, but to become the single most enduring representation of America itself. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump’s political project, in other words, is to rebrand America. He’s seemingly not so desperate to eke out wins for the Republican Party so much as he is trying to remake America in his own image. Gone are the days where America is promoted as an idea — a nation of immigrants or an unfinished project that every generation of Americans strives to improve — because in his eyes, America is Trump.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The roots of Trump’s aesthetic</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">To understand Trump’s aesthetics, you have to go back to the 1980s lifestyles of the rich and famous in New York, the time and place that defined Trump’s rise in American culture. A lot of what Trump values today — <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/business/what-donald-trumps-plaza-deal-reveals-about-his-white-house-bid.html">real estate</a>, <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/donald-trump-tv-star-215621">television ratings</a>, <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/11/donald-trumps-obsession-with-time-magazine-makes-almost-too-much-sense/546743/">Time magazine covers</a> — can be traced back to that era, when all of those things, at least to Trump and those running in his circles, were markers of clout.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That period was <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/25/us/politics/trump-1980s-manhattan.html">defined by greed</a> and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/business/a-donald-trump-led-trip-back-to-the-gold-plated-80s.html">ostentatious displays of wealth</a>. And Trump relished that environment. In the Playboy interview, Trump was specifically asked about why he feels so comfortable showing off his riches, especially given how much poverty could be seen on the streets. “There has always been a display of wealth and always will be,” he said. “And let me tell you, a display is a <em>good</em> thing. It shows people that you can be successful. It can show you a way of life. <em>Dynasty</em> did it on TV. It&#8217;s very important that people aspire to be successful. The only way you can do it is if you look at somebody who is.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump’s quest to own the famed Plaza Hotel in New York City, which he bought for <a href="https://www.theplazany.com/history/timeline-history-of-the-plaza-hotel/">$400 million in 1988</a>, ended in spectacular failure, with the hotel <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/12/business/company-news-trump-s-plaza-hotel-bankruptcy-plan-approved.html">filing for bankruptcy</a> just a few years after the purchase. But for Trump, acquiring the Plaza Hotel wasn’t merely about making money; it was about achieving status. “To me the Plaza was like a great painting,” he said, recalling the whole ordeal <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/business/what-donald-trumps-plaza-deal-reveals-about-his-white-house-bid.html">in an interview in 2015</a>. “It wasn’t purely about the bottom line. I have many assets like that and the end result is that they are always much more valuable than what you paid for them.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Just like that venture, Trump’s vision for America today is remarkably shallow. It doesn’t matter how functional America’s institutions or even economy actually are. The only thing that matters is what America looks like on the outside. And a shiny veneer that flaunts wealth and military might — be it through a gilded White House or a <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/08/15/trump-putin-alaska-f22-b2">B-2 stealth bomber flyover</a> — is perfectly adequate, even if it’s entirely hollow or bankrupt on the inside.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So naturally, Trump has dedicated a decent chunk of his presidency to imposing his style and aesthetic onto America.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In both terms, he has <a href="https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-promoting-beautiful-federal-civic-architecture/">issued executive orders</a> to change <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/promoting-beautiful-federal-civic-architecture/">the look of federal buildings</a>, discarding new architectural styles and instead promoting grand neoclassical buildings that mimic ancient empires. He has been in a long-simmering feud with Boeing since his first term over the new Air Force One — the iconic aircraft that carries the president across the country and around the world — and has been <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48625986">deeply involved</a> in the design of the plane, which <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-shares-mock-ups-of-a-new-air-force-one-featuring-colors-remarkably-similar-to-his-private-jet/2019/06/13/945b9c50-8dc3-11e9-adf3-f70f78c156e8_story.html">looks suspiciously similar to his own private jet</a>. And he has completely redecorated the White House, decking out the Oval Office in gold, turning the Rose Garden into a patio <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/07/rose-garden-mar-a-lago-yellow-umbrellas-trump/85558707007/">that resembles his Mar-a-Lago club</a>, and <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/07/the-white-house-announces-white-house-ballroom-construction-to-begin/">announcing plans to build a $200 million ballroom</a> extension to the East Wing.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But Trump’s fixation on rebranding America’s image goes deeper than giving the Office of the President a makeover. Upon returning to the White House earlier this year, Trump purged the board of the Kennedy Center and appointed a new board that <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/12/arts/music/trump-kennedy-center-chairman.html">elected him to be the chair</a> — an unusual role for the president of the United States to take on. The move showed how invested Trump personally is in the culture wars, so much so that he wants to be directly involved in decisions about what kind of art Americans should enjoy.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump is now even planning on hosting the Kennedy Center Honors this year, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/08/13/nx-s1-5500305/kennedy-center-honors-announcement-kiss-strait-gaynor-stallone-crawford-trump">saying</a> he was “very involved” in selecting the honorees. He also said that <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/08/13/nx-s1-5500305/kennedy-center-honors-announcement-kiss-strait-gaynor-stallone-crawford-trump">he vetoed</a> “a couple of wokesters” who were in the running. And, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/arts/music/trump-kennedy-center.html">according to the New York Times</a>, Trump has considered giving posthumous awards to Luciano Pavarotti, Elvis Presley, and Babe Ruth.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">He is also targeting the nation’s museums and historical displays in an attempt to recast America’s history in a much more favorable light that sweeps all the bad parts under the rug. For instance, he <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/restoring-truth-and-sanity-to-american-history/">issued an executive order</a> that discourages the Smithsonian Institution from putting up displays that portray America and its past negatively. “The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future,” Trump <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115056914674717313">said in a recent social media post</a>. “We have the ‘HOTTEST’ Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">To be sure, the United States has always been <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html">deeply invested</a> in how it is perceived, both domestically and abroad, and has always projected itself as the “shining city upon a hill,” as Ronald Reagan <a href="https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/farewell-address-nation">often liked to say</a>. And while there’s no shortage of big egos among presidents, they <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fe751kMBwms">often, at the very least, tried to gesture</a> that America was <a href="https://www.joinmoreperfect.us/a/reagan-on-the-american-spirit">bigger than just them</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">What is different about Trump is that he is not so interested in the idealistic vision of America — or in presenting America as an idea, a neverending endeavor of creating a more perfect union. He’s only interested in grandeur and the authoritarian tendency to so thoroughly intertwine himself with his country that the two can’t be separated. And whether it’s the Oval Office redesign, the Kennedy Center takeover, or — in quintessential dictatorship fashion — <a href="https://newrepublic.com/post/199561/trump-dictator-banner-face-labor-department">banners of Trump&#8217;s</a> portrait <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/05/22/trump-lincoln-national-mall-usda/">cropping up</a> around the nation&#8217;s capital, the message Trump is sending is clear: We are changing how America is perceived, we will aggressively flaunt our power and wealth, and we will iconize Trump so that he becomes just as much of a symbol of the United States as its own flag.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The sinister motives behind this rebrand</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">On the one hand, Trump’s fixation on aesthetics can seem inconsequential — moves that can be easily undone by a future administration. On the other hand, they’re a window into Trump’s broader political project. After all, the way Trump is imposing his style and taste onto the American public is a projection of his ideals, and an attempt to change not just America’s politics but its culture, too.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">There are two major components of Trump’s attempt to rebrand America. The first is to establish new American norms — changing the perception of what the average American way of life looks like.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Take Trump’s desire to reinforce gender norms and project a certain type of hypermasculinity, all of which permeate his entire aesthetic. Some parts are less subtle than others: Kicking off his Kennedy Center takeover, for example, Trump <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2025/feb/24/trump-kennedy-center-takeover">announced</a> on social media in February that he would “immediately terminate multiple individuals from the Board of Trustees, including the Chairman, who do not share our Vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture.” That vision, apparently, had a lot to do with drag shows. “Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth — THIS WILL STOP,” <a href="https://www.them.us/story/trump-fires-kennedy-center-drag-shows">the president wrote</a>. “NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA — ONLY THE BEST,” he <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113981872435350592">added</a> in another post.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump also likes to promote traditional images of strength as a representation of both himself and America. His now-famous photo after he was almost assassinated last year — with his fist pumped in the air and blood dripping down his face as he yelled, “Fight, fight, fight” — was <a href="https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1910764795382349948">turned into a painting</a> that <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-moves-obama-portrait-painting-trump-assassination-attempt-rcna200965">replaced a portrait of Barack Obama</a> in Trump’s White House. And his social media channels often promote photoshopped images of Trump as a <a href="https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1943493150644777199">superhero</a> or with a <a href="https://www.menshealth.com/trending-news/a30044380/donald-trump-sylvester-stallone-rocky-photoshop/">muscular build</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The Department of Homeland Security in particular has been fond of <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/13/politics/homeland-security-department-social-media">sharing nostalgic paintings</a> — like John Gast’s “American Progress,” representing the imperialist manifest destiny doctrine, or Thomas Kinkade’s “Morning Pledge,” depicting American schoolchildren gathered around the US flag in an idyllic suburb — with not-so-subtle captions like “<a href="https://x.com/DHSgov/status/1940164863793549747">Protect the Homeland</a>” or “<a href="https://x.com/DHSgov/status/1944875154745778525">Remember your Homeland’s Heritage</a>.” (In a recruitment ad for Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE), DHS also <a href="https://x.com/DHSgov/status/1952718231455592667">posted on X</a>, “Defend your culture!”)</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">All of this imagery, from the gaudy Oval Office overhaul to the kitsch paintings being shared on social media, tries to hark back to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/21/us/politics/trump-diversity-black-americans.html">an old-fashioned idea</a> of what America is supposed to look like. What Trump is really selling is the notion that the America that elected Barack Obama — <a href="https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/12/ObamaCoalition-4-INTRO.pdf">the multiracial and cross-class coalition</a> that formed a decisive majority in 2008 and 2012 —&nbsp;never really existed. And there seems to be an everlasting nostalgia for a whiter America in Trump’s White House, even in rhetoric articulated by top officials <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/stephen-miller-now-yelling-immigrants-091931300.html">like Stephen Miller</a>. “Why is it that Democrats are so insistent that unlimited numbers of illegals from countries that are incapable of managing their own affairs come here?” Miller <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/stephen-miller-now-yelling-immigrants-091931300.html">said earlier this summer</a>. “Countries like Somalia, countries like Haiti, countries that have no history of successful self-government, and they want unlimited numbers of illegals from those countries and refugees from those countries to come here.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Ultimately, this is all reflected in Trump’s policy agenda. His mass deportation campaign, his executive order on birthright citizenship, and his attack on fundamental rights of immigrants, including free speech, underscore how one of his principal goals as president is to redefine what it really means to be American.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">This is the kind of America that, as noted above, Miller and DHS are trying to promote. It’s also the America that Trump feels comfortable being associated with. After all, this is the same Donald Trump who, along with his father, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/politics/donald-trump-housing-race.html">was sued by the Justice Department in the 1970s for</a> keeping Black tenants out of their buildings.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How Trump’s rebrand reinforces individualistic tropes</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The second and final component of the rebrand is for Trump to personally embody <em>that</em> America — to transform himself into the ultimate figure to aspire to. And that part has to do with reviving the old American ideal of individualism and self-reliance, the false notion that the most successful Americans are somehow self-made, and that there is no collective ideal worth pursuing more than one’s own individual success. Trump’s whole aesthetic, and the way he’s specifically projecting his style onto American government, is a celebration of that philosophy. It’s all an ode to himself, not the American people or the generations before him that made his own fortunes possible in the first place.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That individualistic philosophy is why Trump is so invested in remodeling the White House, the Kennedy Center, and even museums in his own style — to exhibit his image as the greatest marker of success. It’s why, on the right, there&#8217;s such an overwhelming cult following around a single individual. There&#8217;s an obsession with personifying America, and Trump desperately wants to be that personification.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The America Trump wants to project, in other words, is not the Statue of Liberty welcoming “huddled masses yearning to breathe free” or a country of shared collective interests, but one that adheres to the concept of the survival of the fittest. And Trump seems to believe — or at the very least wants to convey — that he’s the fittest of us all.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Much of what has informed Trump’s whole philosophy is his simplistic idea of success: that his many failures <a href="https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-rationalizes-his-failures-im-not-going-blame-myself-msna1029696">aren&#8217;t necessarily a reflection on him</a>, but that <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/donald-trump-father-loan-1-million-dollars-215154">his success and wealth</a> were achieved <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html">solely because of him</a>. So the aesthetic Trump is trying his very best to push onto Americans — displays of sheer rugged strength, of vast wealth, of supposed success — points to a picture of an individualistic society that doesn&#8217;t really care about its past sins. Because in Trump’s world, so long as you amass an enormous amount of wealth and power (as both he and America have), then it&#8217;s all worth showing off.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It’s like he told Playboy back in 1990: “Let me tell you, a display is a <em>good</em> thing…It&#8217;s very important that people aspire to be successful. The only way you can do it is if you look at somebody who is.”&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That’s why Trump doesn’t just want to be a political or historical figure, but a cultural icon that can represent American greatness long after he’s gone. He wants the whole world to forever look at him.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[What makes Israel’s starvation of Gaza stand apart]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/policy/422622/israel-famine-gaza-history-weaponizing-starvation-war" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=422622</id>
			<updated>2025-08-22T11:21:26-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-22T10:10:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Israel" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Palestine" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[“We are imposing a complete siege on [Gaza]. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel — everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we must act accordingly.” That was Yoav Gallant, then the Israeli defense minister, two days after Hamas’s attack on October 7, 2023, killed some 1,200 Israelis and took 250 [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="A line of Palestinians carrying pots as they wait to receive food aid. " data-caption="Israel’s use of starvation as a weapon of war has been well-documented by human rights organizations since 2023.﻿ | Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Anadolu via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Anadolu via Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/gettyimages-2227416498.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Israel’s use of starvation as a weapon of war has been well-documented by human rights organizations since 2023.﻿ | Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Anadolu via Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">“We are imposing a complete siege on [Gaza]. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel — everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we must act accordingly.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That was Yoav Gallant, then the Israeli defense minister, <a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/18/israel-starvation-used-weapon-war-gaza">two days</a> after Hamas’s attack on October 7, 2023, killed some 1,200 Israelis and took 250 more hostage. The following week, Israel’s national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, echoed a similar sentiment: “So long as Hamas does not release the hostages,” he <a href="https://x.com/itamarbengvir/status/1714340519487176791">posted on X</a>, “the only thing that should enter Gaza is hundreds of tons of air force explosives — not an ounce of humanitarian aid.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Israel, in other words, did not engineer a famine in Gaza overnight. From the war’s outset, Israel has been blocking humanitarian aid from entering the Gaza Strip, to varying degrees, resulting in the <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/369872/polio-gaza-who-vaccination-campaign-israel">spread of preventable diseases</a>, including malnutrition, across the territory. In fact, <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/4328169-cindy-mccain-says-gaza-on-the-brink-of-famine/">since late 2023</a>, international organizations have been <a href="https://www.ipcinfo.org/ipcinfo-website/alerts-archive/issue-97/en/#:~:text=Famine%20Review%20of%20the%20IPC%20Analysis&amp;text=The%20findings%20of%20the%20FRC,March%202024%20to%20May%202024.">warning that Gaza has been on the brink of famine</a>. In April of last year, <a href="https://www.savethechildren.net/news/it-s-not-fair-die-hunger-lives-malnourished-children-gaza-endangered-obliteration-and">Save the Children confirmed</a> that children had been dying from starvation. And now, the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — the world’s leading authority on hunger crises — <a href="https://www.ipcinfo.org/ipcinfo-website/countries-in-focus-archive/issue-134/en/">has officially determined</a> that there is a famine in Gaza City and its surrounding areas, adding a warning that famine will rapidly spread to other parts of the Gaza Strip without immediate intervention.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So why is it that it took this long for the world to turn its attention to this humanitarian disaster?&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Part of the answer is that in recent weeks, the situation really has gotten much more dire, after Israel ended its 42-day ceasefire with Hamas in March and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/08/01/world/middleeast/gaza-hunger-aid-sites-deaths-israel.html">stopped allowing any aid</a> into Gaza for two months, as my colleague Joshua Keating <a href="https://www.vox.com/world-politics/421741/gaza-hunger-crisis-aid-israel-starvation">recently wrote</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But there’s another factor: The images coming out of Gaza have been absolutely heart-wrenching. <a href="https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2025/07/world/photos-starvation-in-gaza-intl-cnnphotos/">Photos and videos</a> have gone viral — on news sites and on social media — clearly showing malnourished babies starving to death, as well as those showing children and adults with their skin clinging to their bones with barely anything in between. “It is tragic that it takes those types of really graphic, really horrible images to break through,” said Alex de Waal, an expert on famine who serves as the executive director of the World Peace Foundation at Tufts University. “And that is such a terrible commentary on just a gargantuan failure.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">This, of course, is nowhere near <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/29/israel-carrying-out-live-streamed-genocide-in-gaza-amnesty-says">the first time horrific images from Gaza</a> have surfaced and sparked outrage around the world. But there’s something about the visibility of a human-made famine that, for many people — including some of <a href="https://x.com/RitchieTorres/status/1950710137792213448">Israel’s most ardent supporters</a> — crosses a moral threshold.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Starving an entire population cannot be spun as collateral damage or merely the cost of war — a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ5HHMxXXhA">messaging tactic</a> that <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/benjamin-netanyahu-calls-civilian-deaths-202022275.html">Israel has turned</a> to to justify its killing of innocent people <a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/08/01/gaza-israeli-killings-of-palestinians-seeking-food-are-war-crimes">despite plenty</a> of <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/13/timeline-israels-attacks-on-hospitals-throughout-its-war-on-gaza">evidence that it</a> has <a href="https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/06/1164496">routinely targeted civilians</a>. “You can’t starve anyone by accident. It has to be deliberate and sustained,” de Waal said. “It is beyond dispute that you have to starve people systematically because it takes so long.”&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Indeed, Israel’s use of starvation as a weapon of war <a href="https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/07/gaza-evidence-points-to-israels-continued-use-of-starvation-to-inflict-genocide-against-palestinians/">has been well-documented</a> by <a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/18/israel-starvation-used-weapon-war-gaza">human rights organizations</a> since 2023, and both Gallant and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court, including <a href="https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/11/1157286">the use of starvation as a method of warfare</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Israel’s mass starvation of Gaza is, by definition, a form of collective punishment — imposing potentially fatal consequences on every Palestinian living in the enclave, whether they are a combatant or an innocent civilian. That’s why using starvation as a weapon of war is illegal under international law.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But that wasn’t always the case. What Israel is doing is part of a long history of weaponizing food and basic resources. Still, while there are many examples of countries intentionally creating or exacerbating famine conditions on populations, there are also aspects of Israel’s current policies in Gaza that are unique.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How countries have used starvation as a weapon of war</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Using starvation as a weapon of war wasn’t always explicitly illegal under international law. The siege of Leningrad by the Nazis and their allies, which lasted from 1941 to 1944, was one of the deadliest sieges in history, killing <a href="https://apnews.com/article/russia-siege-blockade-petersburg-leningrad-liberation-nazis-b1fba0a2b90eb280e9e6055fa11a5b8c">more than 1 million people</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Many of these deaths were attributed to starvation. An American-run tribunal, however, <a href="https://cjil.uchicago.edu/print-archive/siege-starvation-war-crime-societal-torture">determined</a> that the forced starvation was compatible with international law. After all, it was a tactic that <a href="https://cjil.uchicago.edu/print-archive/siege-starvation-war-crime-societal-torture">the Allies themselves had used</a> as well, notably in their blockades of German-occupied territories and in Japan.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">There are many examples throughout history of famines that were either entirely engineered or deliberately made worse through reckless colonial and war policies. In 1943, as the British empire’s colonial rule of the Indian subcontinent was nearing its end, the Bengal famine <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68311520">killed up to 3 million people</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Since then, studies have <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/29/winston-churchill-policies-contributed-to-1943-bengal-famine-study">uncovered scientific evidence</a> that the famine was not a result of climate conditions like serious drought. Instead, British policies, under Prime Minister Winston Churchill — which included confiscating rice and boats from the coastal parts of Bengal and exporting rice from India to other parts of the empire — seriously exacerbated famine conditions. Churchill denied this, saying that the reason there was a famine was because <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/29/winston-churchill-policies-contributed-to-1943-bengal-famine-study">Indians were “breeding like rabbits”</a> and suggesting that if the situation was indeed as dire as people claimed, then Mahatma Gandhi would be dead.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Another example is <a href="https://www.vox.com/videos/2022/3/25/22996165/ukraine-holodomor-famine-russia-cover-up">the Holodomor</a>, the famine that killed millions of Ukrainians under the Soviet Union in the early 1930s. Joseph Stalin pursued a range of policies that engineered famine conditions — including restricting the movement of people, seizing grain even when there wasn’t enough to feed the local population, and exporting grain even as Ukrainians starved — in part, <a href="https://www.history.com/articles/ukrainian-famine-stalin">historians argue</a>, to tamp down Ukrainian nationalist movements. <a href="https://www.cato.org/commentary/holodomor-90-years-later">Several countries</a> and scholars <a href="https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20221209IPR64427/holodomor-parliament-recognises-soviet-starvation-of-ukrainians-as-genocide">have since recognized</a> the famine as an act of genocide.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The US also used blockades as a means to advance its war interests. One of its military campaigns against Japan during World War II was <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07075332.2024.2354246" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07075332.2024.2354246">named “Operation Starvation”</a> — which aimed to destroy Japan’s economy by limiting the distribution of food and other imports. The military assault deprived Japan of essential raw materials and <a href="https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1959/november/japans-nightmare-mine-blockade">led to food shortages</a>. That, along with naval blockades and America’s destruction of agricultural infrastructure contributed to <a href="https://navyhistory.au/japanese-surrender-at-the-end-of-world-war-ii/">widespread malnutrition and starvation</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It was only after World War II that the Geneva Conventions of 1949 established <em>some </em>rules about the responsibility to allow food and other essentials into enemy territory for vulnerable populations. But even then, by and large, <a href="https://cjil.uchicago.edu/print-archive/siege-starvation-war-crime-societal-torture">starvation tactics were still permissible</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“The reason it was permitted was because the Americans and the British rather liked using it,” de Waal said. “It really wasn’t until the British and the Americans had abandoned their colonial wars — the American one being Vietnam in the ’70s — that they thought, ‘Okay, now we’re not going to fight these kinds of wars, and we can get around to banning it.’”&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, which were agreed to in 1977, finally <a href="https://cjil.uchicago.edu/print-archive/siege-starvation-war-crime-societal-torture">prohibited</a> the “starvation of civilians as a method of warfare [or combat].” And just over 20 years later, in 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court officially <a href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/NR/rdonlyres/ADD16852-AEE9-4757-ABE7-9CDC7CF02886/283503/RomeStatutEng1.pdf">codified weaponizing starvation as a war crime</a>.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How Israel’s starvation of Gaza is different</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Any food shortages in Gaza have been <a href="https://www.nybooks.com/online/2024/03/30/the-road-to-famine-in-gaza/?lp_txn_id=1633468">directly triggered by the Israeli siege</a>, not by any market failures or climate disasters, since Israel <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/31/the-mathematics-of-starvation-how-israel-caused-a-famine-in-gaza">has the capacity</a> to allow more food in <a href="https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/08/1165552#:~:text=During%20the%20ceasefire%20earlier%20this,%2C%E2%80%9D%20the%20UNRWA%20head%20said.">at a moment’s notice</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“Here, what we see is all the ingredients coming together in a deliberate way. We see the [Israeli leaders’] statements; we see <a href="https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/06/29/israel-is-destroying-the-subsistence-of-gaza-s-population-from-agriculture-to-fishing_6742832_4.html">the total bombing</a> of all the <a href="https://www.un.org/unispal/document/building-to-starvation-systematic-attacks-on-fishing-in-gaza-and-implications-for-livelihoods-and-protection-may-2025/">food production</a>,” said Neve Gordon, a professor of human rights law at Queen Mary University of London. “I don’t think there’s [another] case in history, because other cases had to do with other stuff going on that were not human-made. Here, the whole starvation — from beginning to end — is human-made.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Israel has also <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/23/world/middleeast/aid-groups-gaza-starvation.html">significantly limited</a> traditional aid groups’ operations and, for months, <a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/03/05/israel-again-blocks-gaza-aid-further-risking-lives">entirely blocked aid from entering Gaza</a>. Generally,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.un.org/en/our-work/deliver-humanitarian-aid">UN-coordinated</a> aid providers, which include UN agencies and established NGOs, have been able to enter and operate in war zones.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But since the ceasefire ended in March, Israel has placed <a href="https://www.nrc.no/news/2025/may/Israels-new-ingo-registration-measures-are-a-grave-threat-to-humanitarian-operations-and-international-law--55-organisations-say">unprecedented</a> constraints on those organizations. Instead, since May, Israel has been coordinating with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a newly formed US- and Israel-backed private entity that <a href="https://www.vox.com/world-politics/421741/gaza-hunger-crisis-aid-israel-starvation">operates militarized distribution sites</a> in central and southern Gaza.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">GHF has <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2025/jul/22/food-aid-gaza-deaths-visual-story-ghf-israel">denied that its system is unsafe</a>. But it operates far fewer distribution sites <a href="https://x.com/UNLazzarini/status/1952717201435185309">than experts recommend</a> — dramatically <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/08/01/world/middleeast/gaza-hunger-aid-sites-deaths-israel.html#">decreasing the number of aid sites</a> that were in place before Israel instituted its total blockade in March, making it <a href="https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/gaza-humanitarian-foundation-aid-distribution-system-must-be-dismantled">more and more difficult</a> for Palestinians to access food.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Israeli troops have also shot at aid-seekers at GHF’s distribution sites, and, <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/31/inside-israels-role-in-the-killings-at-gazas-food-aid-sites">according to the UN</a>, some 1,000 Palestinians have been killed trying to get aid from GHF. Gordon calls GHF “a famine profiteering company,” adding that it “does not actually provide the necessary food, while producing these hunger games that everyone was watching, [showing] starving people are going to get food and getting shot at.”&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Israeli government officials have defended GHF and <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/malnutrition-deaths-gaza-hamas-health-ministry/story?id=124128635">instead blamed Hamas</a> for the food shortages, accusing the group of looting humanitarian supplies despite Israeli military officials <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/26/world/middleeast/hamas-un-aid-theft.html">saying that there’s no proof</a> that Hamas has systematically stolen aid. But the UN and <a href="https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/human-rights-legal-organizations-warn-privatized-humanitarian-operators-in-gaza-of-the-risk-of-legal-liability-for-complicity-in-serious-violations-of-international-law/">many NGOs</a> have <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn5kk1w00xyo">called for GHF to be shut down</a>, calling it dangerous and ineffective — a departure from established international humanitarian relief systems and <a href="https://press.un.org/en/2025/sc16121.doc.htm">a rejection of basic humanitarian principles</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">While Egypt <a href="https://jacobin.com/2024/06/egypt-palestine-gaza-genocide-al-sisi">has been complicit in enforcing the blockade</a> through its border with Gaza, the reality is that even aid going into Gaza through the Egyptian border has to <a href="https://apnews.com/article/israel-gaza-rafah-aid-us-senators-2bc2a3c5e5f8af8e2d3f0b7242c1a885">go through Israeli inspection</a>. The result is that Israel has effectively vacuum-sealed Gaza, with full control of what aid gets in.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Israel could have chosen to prevent a famine at any point. Instead, it has repeatedly hampered or entirely rejected efforts to deliver life-saving aid to Palestinians — all in contravention of international law. “Israel is not unique at all in using hunger as a weapon of war,” de Waal said. “What <em>is</em> unique about the Israeli one is just how rigorous and how sustained it is, and how it is in defiance of an international humanitarian capacity that can respond <em>just like that</em>. So if Netanyahu wanted every [child in Gaza] to have breakfast tomorrow, it can be organized.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">One example of Israel’s (and the world’s) capacity to stop the worst from happening is the polio vaccination campaign that happened last year. When polio — which had been eradicated from Gaza for 25 years — resurfaced as a result of the humanitarian and sanitation crisis imposed by Israel’s war, governments around the world pressured Israel to <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/369872/polio-gaza-who-vaccination-campaign-israel">agree to a humanitarian pause</a> in combat, in order to vaccinate children across the Gaza Strip. In the middle of the war, the vaccination campaigns were successful, reaching <a href="https://www.who.int/news/item/19-02-2025-mass-polio-vaccination-campaign-to-continue-in-the-gaza-strip">95 percent of the target population</a>. An effort to stop malnutrition can be similarly efficient.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The faster Israel relents and allows unimpeded aid delivery, the more lives can be saved. But unfortunately, it’s already too late for far too many Palestinians in Gaza. “Even if there was divine intervention — and we had a ceasefire and the best doctors and the right kind of food — I think we’d still have hundreds [or] thousands of deaths,” Gordon said. “But we’re not going to have that divine intervention.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em><strong>Update, August 22, 10:10 am ET:</strong> This article was originally published on August 7, 2025, and has been updated to include news of the IPC’s classification of famine in Gaza.</em></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why Trump thinks DC can&#8217;t govern itself]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/politics/458191/trump-dc-police-federal-takeover-racist-history-statehood" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=458191</id>
			<updated>2025-08-14T17:26:19-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-15T07:30:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Just a few years ago, the movement for Washington, DC, statehood was gaining steam. In 2020 and 2021, Democrats in the House passed bills to make DC the 51st state, re-energizing the fight to grant residents of the nation’s capital representation in Congress.  Those bills were ultimately doomed because of strong Republican opposition. But now, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="National guardsman leaning on a Humvee with the Washington monument in the background." data-caption="DC statehood has always been an uphill battle because of the paternalistic roots of the federal government’s relationship with the nation’s capital. | Win McNamee/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Win McNamee/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/gettyimages-2229820185.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	DC statehood has always been an uphill battle because of the paternalistic roots of the federal government’s relationship with the nation’s capital. | Win McNamee/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Just a few years ago, the movement for Washington, DC, statehood was gaining steam. In <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/2020-daily-trail-markers-dc-statehood-bill-passes-the-house-2020-06-26/">2020</a> and <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-statehood-house-vote/2021/04/22/935a1ece-a1fa-11eb-a7ee-949c574a09ac_story.html">2021</a>, Democrats in the House passed bills to make DC the 51st state, re-energizing the fight to grant residents of the nation’s capital representation in Congress. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Those bills were ultimately doomed because of <a href="https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/03/republicans-oppose-dc-statehood?srsltid=AfmBOopZy8qTStW4rtSm4lZCH70QMCDJ87M_LKyyrLywNqD3pyQY64Z2">strong Republican opposition</a>. But now, statehood for Washington, DC, seems even more far-fetched. Earlier this week, <a href="https://www.vox.com/donald-trump/457829/donald-trump-washington-dc-police-home-rule-act">President Donald Trump took the extraordinary step</a> of <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/08/11/trump-national-guard-dc-crime-crackdown/">ordering a federal takeover</a> of DC’s local police department. He also mobilized the DC National Guard, deploying troops in the city to <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/08/12/nx-s1-5498728/trump-washington-dc-police-takeover">allegedly</a> fight crime. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">This didn’t necessarily come as a surprise. For some time, Trump has fantasized about taking over DC altogether, <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/02/20/trump-dc-federal-government-takeover-home-rule-bowser">saying</a> that the federal government would do a much better job running the city than its current mayor, Muriel Bowser.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So, how did DC go from building a growing movement for statehood to a hostile federal takeover in just a few short years? </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The simple answer is that Republicans are now in power, and they’d like to make an example out of DC. But even without Republican control of the White House or Congress, statehood and full self-governance have always been an uphill battle, because there’s also a deeper history of the federal government’s paternalistic relationship with the nation’s capital.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>DC’s self-governance has always been controversial</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Washington, DC, was specifically established to serve as the nation’s capital. The US Constitution gave Congress the <a href="https://statehood.dc.gov/page/faq">power to create a small federal district</a> that doesn’t exceed 10 square miles to serve as the seat of the federal government. In 1790, Congress passed the Residence Act, which paved the way to build a new capital along the Potomac River. And so, DC was established by carving out land from Maryland and Virginia (which <a href="https://boundarystones.weta.org/2016/07/08/alexandria-retrocession-1846">later took its portion back</a>) and was under Congress’s jurisdiction. That meant there would be no democratically elected mayor or local government. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But DC grew into a full city, with residents living there on a permanent basis — not just to serve the federal government. And, for most of the city’s history, those residents were entirely disenfranchised — unable to get representation in Congress or even vote for president. That changed during the civil rights era, when DC’s voting rights (or lack thereof) garnered more attention, in no small part because of the city’s large Black population, which, by 1960, had <a href="https://planning.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/op/publication/attachments/District%2520of%2520Columbia%2520Black%2520Population%2520Demographic%2520Characteristics.pdf">become the majority</a>. As a result, the constitution was <a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-xxiii/interpretations/155">officially amended in 1961</a> to grant DC residents the right to vote for president, but the amendment stopped short of granting them representation in Congress. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Even then, DC didn’t have a democratically elected local government. So, in 1974, Congress passed the <a href="https://www.acludc.org/news/dc-home-rule-what-it-how-it-works-and-why-it-matters/">DC Home Rule Act</a>, which allowed residents to elect their own mayor and council. That finally gave the nation’s capital some form of self-governance, but Congress ultimately retained its power to overrule local laws and budgets if it so pleased.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The federal government’s resistance to giving DC autonomy is ultimately rooted in racism. Known as Chocolate City, DC was the epicenter of Black arts, culture, and politics. And since it gained the right to vote for local officials, DC has only ever elected Black mayors. As a result, opposition to DC statehood has <a href="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/03/opinion/call-republican-opposition-dc-statehood-what-it-is-racist/">often leaned on the paternalistic and racist notion</a> that Black people can’t be trusted to govern themselves — that the city’s residents simply don’t know what’s best for them. That’s why conservative lawmakers have pointed to issues like crime or corruption as evidence that DC can’t be trusted to be a state.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In 2021, for example, Steve Scalise, the Republican House majority leader, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/21/it-would-be-lot-easier-if-republicans-just-said-they-didnt-want-dc-have-two-senators/">wrote</a>, “Why should the District of Columbia be granted statehood when it can’t even perform basic governmental duties like protecting its residents from criminals?” Scalise also said that the city was simply too corrupt to be a state. These kinds of arguments have been repeated by <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/republican-leaders-sound-off-against-dc-as-too-corrupt-financially-insecure-to-be-a-state/2019/09/19/bb4dc412-da23-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html">people on the right</a> for decades, despite the fact that states, <a href="https://www.nola.com/opinions/article_37b5e0eb-0a70-5f20-8863-3e90d00e7357.html">including Scalise’s own</a> Louisiana, are well-known for their corruption and crime. So even if those issues were a legitimate concern (<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/republican-leaders-sound-off-against-dc-as-too-corrupt-financially-insecure-to-be-a-state/2019/09/19/bb4dc412-da23-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html">they shouldn’t be</a>), then why should the residents of DC be treated any differently than other Americans?</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Part of the reason in recent years has less to do with explicit racism and more to do with partisan politics. If DC were to get full representation in Congress, it would undoubtedly benefit Democrats, since the city is overwhelmingly Democratic. (Trump, for example, only <a href="https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2024-General-Election">got 6.5 percent of the vote in DC in 2024</a>.) That explains why Democrats are on board with DC statehood while Republicans are fiercely opposed. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But this is the natural extension of the overt racism that has long defined opposition for DC self-governance. Before the Home Rule Act, President Lyndon B. Johnson reorganized how the district was governed and <a href="https://historicsites.dcpreservation.org/items/show/1044">appointed Walter Washington to serve as the mayor-commissioner</a> of DC. When Washington, who was Black, submitted his first budget to Congress, the response was astonishingly racist; John McMillan, a Democrat from South Carolina who chaired the House Committee on the District of Columbia, <a href="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/03/opinion/call-republican-opposition-dc-statehood-what-it-is-racist/">sent Washington a truckload of watermelons</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Now, Republicans might not play the same tactics, but the degree to which they ignore Black Washingtonians and their rights is unmistakable. “Yes, Wyoming is smaller than Washington by population, but it has three times as many workers in mining, logging, and construction, and ten times as many workers in manufacturing,” Tom Cotton, the Republican senator from Arkansas, said in <a href="https://www.cotton.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cotton-speaks-against-dc-statehood">2021 in a speech opposing</a> DC statehood. “In other words, Wyoming is a well-rounded working-class state.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But, as <a href="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/03/opinion/call-republican-opposition-dc-statehood-what-it-is-racist/">I noted then</a>, roughly 140,000 people in DC’s labor force were considered working class in 2016, <a href="https://www.americanprogressaction.org/article/makes-working-class/">according to the Center for American Progress</a>, while about 220,000 workers in Wyoming were considered working class. The most notable difference in those two populations is that the vast majority of DC’s working class was made up of people of color, while 84 percent of Wyoming’s working class was white.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The consequences of federal control</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Federal intervention in DC’s affairs has often poorly served residents, and not just because they have, through the years, been denied voting rights, self-governance, and representation in Congress. Congress’s meddling in local laws has ultimately served the interests of lawmakers from other states and not the interests of the people living in the city.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">One of the most notable examples of this was during the AIDS epidemic. In the 1990s, DC spent money on needle exchange programs, which <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/05/upshot/politics-are-tricky-but-science-is-clear-needle-exchanges-work.html">research has shown</a> is critical in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/syringe-services-programs/php/safety-effectiveness.html">preventing the spread of infectious diseases</a>, including HIV/AIDS. But, Congress banned the city from using its own funds on needle exchange programs — a ban that lasted nine years. During that time, the city saw a surge in infections and <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/07/us-aids-policy-lingering-epidemic/594445/">had the highest rate of HIV per capita in the country</a>, even exceeding rates in developing countries. And, because DC was a majority Black city, the policy disproportionately affected Black people. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Trump’s plan to federalize the local police force follows those exact footsteps — placing his own interests above those of DC residents and their elected officials. The move is a blatantly political one. Trump is using DC <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/13/mayor-dc-trump-national-guard">as a warning to other cities</a>: If you pass progressive criminal justice laws, then he will try his best to intervene.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">It’s a paternalistic instinct, one that is anti-democratic at its core, taking local control away from the hands of voters. And what’s unfortunate for DC is that Trump’s move is not entirely unprecedented. It falls in line with how the federal government has long viewed DC’s self-governance: at best an inconvenience, and at worst, a threat. </p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[What recognizing a Palestinian state actually achieves]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/world-politics/458013/recognizing-palestinian-state-uk-france-australia" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=458013</id>
			<updated>2025-08-20T12:51:04-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-14T06:45:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Explainers" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[On Monday, Australia joined a growing number of Western countries that say they will soon recognize a Palestinian state. That list includes France, the United Kingdom, and Canada, while other Western nations, including Norway, Spain, and Ireland, formally recognized a Palestinian state last year.&#160; The rhetorical shift indicates just how much Israel has isolated itself [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Photo from behind a protester walking across a bridge in Sydney while waving a Palestinian flag." data-caption="A protester waves the Palestinian flag in Sydney, Australia. | Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/gettyimages-2227603044.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A protester waves the Palestinian flag in Sydney, Australia. | Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">On Monday, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/aug/11/australia-recognise-palestinian-state-palestine-statehood">Australia joined</a> a growing number of Western countries that say they will soon recognize a Palestinian state. That list includes <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg5g4p3245o">France</a>, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/uk-starmer-palestinian-state-israel-gaza-recognition-bf50123e56404382ca0f7cfbd4161d14">the United Kingdom</a>, and <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceqyx35d9x2o">Canada</a>, while other Western nations, including Norway, Spain, and Ireland, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/eu-palestinian-state-spain-israel-gaza-6efe351e53761befc2c539c535bbcc0c">formally recognized a Palestinian state last year</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The rhetorical shift indicates just how much Israel has isolated itself from even some of its allies as it continues its relentless assault on Gaza — a horrific military campaign that has destroyed the enclave, <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/422622/israel-famine-gaza-history-weaponizing-starvation-war">starved the population</a>, and <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/israel-gaza-war-children-death-toll/">killed more than 60,000 Palestinians</a>, with <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/15/opinion/israel-gaza-holocaust-genocide-palestinians.html">experts</a> and <a href="https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/">leading human rights organizations</a> deeming Israel’s actions an ongoing genocide. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Israel has denounced the move to recognize a Palestinian state as “<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/aug/11/australia-recognise-palestinian-state-palestine-statehood">shameful</a>.” Responding to the UK’s announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu <a href="https://www.politico.eu/article/us-keir-starmer-palestinian-statehood-hamas-israel-gaza-united-nations-benjamin-netanyahu/">said in a post on X</a> that such a move only “rewards Hamas’s monstrous terrorism &amp; punishes its victims.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed similar criticisms, saying that <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/11/australia/australia-palestinian-state-september-intl-hnk">recognitions of a Palestinian state have</a> “emboldened Hamas and made it harder to achieve peace.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But, if anything, the recent announcements are coming in a little late. The State of Palestine has already been recognized by 147 out of the 193 member states of the United Nations. Most notably, if France and the UK follow through and recognize Palestine, the US would be the only permanent member of the UN Security Council that doesn’t recognize a Palestinian state — adding international pressure on the US to change its position in the future.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But just because there’s widespread (and growing) recognition of a Palestinian state doesn’t mean that Israel’s occupation will suddenly end. After all, Israel still occupies the West Bank and Gaza, continues to illegally build settlements in Palestinian territories, and has full military control between the river and the sea. And Israel’s recent announcement that it plans to <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/08/10/nx-s1-5497905/netanyahu-israel-plan-gaza-united-nations">seize Gaza City</a> only deepens and perpetuates its occupation of Palestine.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So what does recognizing the State of Palestine actually achieve?</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What it means to recognize a state</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Even though states exist all around us, there is <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-international-law/statehood/7DA2E8BA1D5F6C81205518E6D59FF0ED">no universally agreed upon definition</a> of statehood. But under international law, one treaty — the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, which went into effect in 1934 — is often cited to outline the criteria that make up a state. The convention <a href="https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/LON/Volume%20165/v165.pdf">lists the following qualifications</a>: “(a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">International law experts <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/world/middleeast/palestinian-statehood-israel.html">tend to agree</a> that Palestine meets this definition. But even when states check these boxes, without widespread recognition, they would be limited in their ability to exercise their sovereignty or enter diplomatic agreements with much of the world.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So, on a technical level, recognizing Palestine as a state is important. It allows Palestine to be party to various <a href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/palestine#:~:text=On%202%20January%202015%2C%20The,Palestine%20on%201%20April%202015.">international treaties, like the Rome Statute</a>, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC). That’s what allowed the ICC to issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant, <a href="https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/11/1157286">charging them with war crimes and crimes against humanity</a>. (Since Israel is not party to the Rome Statute, the ICC would not have had jurisdiction over any of the territories had the State of Palestine not signed on.)</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Recognition can also deepen diplomatic ties. States that recognize Palestine could open up full embassies in Palestine and allow Palestine to open up more embassies around the world. They would also have more obligations to stand up for Palestinian sovereignty when Israel violates international law, which means they would face more pressure (both domestically and internationally) to impose more diplomatic and economic sanctions on Israel.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Ardi Imsies, an associate professor at Queen’s University Faculty of Law in Ontario, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/world/middleeast/palestinian-statehood-israel.html">recently told the New York Times</a> that recognizing a Palestinian state would provide a basis for “a complete revision of bilateral relations with Israel.” That means that states might have to review their agreements with Israel, both political and economic, to ensure that they do not impede on the Palestinian state’s rights and sovereignty. For example, if Israel’s trading partners recognize the State of Palestine and still import products manufactured in Israeli settlements in the West Bank, those states would be complicit in violating Palestine’s sovereignty according to their own acknowledgement of Palestinian statehood. </p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why the latest recognitions of statehood aren’t enough</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Recognizing a Palestinian state should be largely uncontroversial. By granting Palestine state recognition, these Western states would be in line with the two-state solution that they have been <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-the-peace-process-killed-the-two-state-solution/">pushing for decades</a>. The basic idea is to have two states — one Palestinian and one Israeli — represent two peoples, but negotiations have repeatedly failed.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That’s in large part because the two-state solution, as supported by the United States and its allies, has always aimed for creating two unequal states, with Israel maintaining its economic and military dominance and Palestinians having a permanent quasi-state that’s <a href="https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/less-than-a-state/">not fully sovereign or independent</a>. And that’s exactly what’s happening with these new recognitions of Palestine, with Western states <a href="https://theconversation.com/beyond-recognition-the-challenges-of-creating-a-new-palestinian-state-are-so-formidable-is-it-even-possible-262493">putting strict conditions</a> on what a Palestinian state looks like, including <a href="https://franceintheus.org/spip.php?article11713">requirements like not having a military</a>. (The recent plans to recognize a Palestinian state have also not articulated where its borders would be, which ultimately make it harder to establish and defend Palestinian sovereignty.)</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“What does this two-state solution look like?” said Alonso Gurmendi Dunkelberg, an international law scholar at the London School of Economics. “A demilitarized state, with Israeli control over national security in Palestinian territory, subjected to future negotiations on boundaries.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">By and large, these countries’ recognition of a Palestinian state fall far short of a tangible step towards establishing a full-fledged, sovereign nation. The UK, for example, said it would recognize a Palestinian state only if Israel fails to secure a ceasefire. That means that if a ceasefire does take hold, the UK will simply go back to the status quo of not recognizing Palestine. That does not indicate any real movement toward recognizing Palestinians’ right to self-determination.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">If these Western states want to have a real impact and put meaningful pressure on Israel, then they have to go beyond just recognizing a vague, demilitarized Palestinian state. Their recognition of Palestine would be much more forceful if it is immediately coupled with coordinated sanctions on Israel, since it is violating another nation’s sovereignty. There should also be fewer conditions that hamper Palestinians’ right to self determination and stronger commitments to ensuring equal rights for Palestinians, whether they live in Israel, Palestine, or a future state that encompasses the whole territory.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The recent wave of states recognizing Palestine is doing little more than offering a gesture toward establishing two unequal states, with Israel continuing to have much more control and autonomy over territory than the Palestinians.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“So will the underlying dynamic between Israel and Palestine shift under this set up of recognition? No it won’t,” Gurmendi Dunkelberg said. “The underlying problem of colonialism, the underlying problem of apartheid, the underlying problem of a supremacist ideology that sees Palestinians as an inconvenient people…that will still be there.”</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why are countries recognizing a Palestinian state now?</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Since these countries are not necessarily endorsing Palestinians’ right to self-determination, several other factors might be at play in the recognition movement.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The first is geopolitics. Take the last time a major wave of states recognized Palestine in 2011. According to Gurmendi Dunkelberg, the move to recognize Palestine back then was a foreign policy maneuver by Latin American countries to create distance between them and the United States — Israel’s biggest ally — on the world stage. “What can you do to signal to the United States, ‘I am angry at you’<em> </em>and ‘I am distancing myself from your foreign policy’?” he asked. “You recognize Palestine.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Similarly, Gurmendi Dunkelberg argues, European countries now are angry with the Trump administration for reasons including tariffs, limited security guarantees, and its posture towardUkraine. So, recognizing Palestine can send a similar message to the US that it is drifting away from its allies.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“I think this is a brazenly political move that has nothing to do with actual concern for [Palestinians],” Gurmendi Dunkelberg said.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The second factor is domestic politics. Throughout the Western world, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/08/11/nx-s1-5498378/uk-police-say-more-than-500-people-arrested-in-pro-palestinian-events-over-weekend">major demonstrations</a> have <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/05/world/europe/germany-gaza-israel-hunger-merz.html">repeatedly cropped</a> up <a href="https://apnews.com/article/mideast-israel-gaza-war-protests-rallies-propalestine-terror-alerts-b314ac9fc24ab91e3c0639405a15d5d0">over the last two years</a>, protesting Israel’s war in Gaza. There’s also a growing movement of voters looking for leaders who aren’t afraid to take a strong moral stance on this issue. Just as Zohran Mamdani worried establishment Democrats after winning the Democratic mayoral primary in New York City despite his pro-Palestinian views, politicians in Europe are also afraid of potential backlash for supporting Israel as it continues to turn every last corner of Gaza into rubble. So, making a largely symbolic gesture like recognizing a Palestinian state allows these governments to say they’ve been harsher on Israel without actually doing much to stop the ongoing bloodshed.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Ultimately, these recognitions from Western states can be viewed as a sign of some incremental progress. But they aren’t, on their own, going to deliver meaningful change. Without any follow through, all that these recognitions signal is a complacency with the status quo, allowing the occupation to go on with no real end in sight.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Abdallah Fayyad</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Trump&#8217;s tariffs hurt the working class. Why are some unions on board?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/politics/410527/unions-trump-tariffs-free-trade-policy" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?p=410527</id>
			<updated>2025-08-07T17:27:50-04:00</updated>
			<published>2025-08-07T10:35:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Economy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Labor" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Unions" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Editor’s note, August 7, 10:30 am ET: On August 7, Trump&#8217;s tariffs went into effect for about 90 countries. The story below was originally published on April 28. President Donald Trump’s tariffs have drawn a lot of opposition — from economists, businesses, Wall Street, and the majority of Americans. Yet Trump has received support from a [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="President Donald Trump and an United Auto Worker member standing behind a podium." data-caption="President Donald Trump invites a United Auto Worker member to speak during a trade announcement event. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/04/gettyimages-2208184579.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	President Donald Trump invites a United Auto Worker member to speak during a trade announcement event. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none"><em><strong>Editor’s note, August 7, 10:30 am ET</strong>: On August 7, Trump&#8217;s tariffs went into effect for about 90 countries. The story below was originally published on April 28.</em></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">President Donald Trump’s tariffs have drawn a lot of opposition — from <a href="https://tcf.org/content/commentary/economists-agree-trump-is-wrong-on-tariffs/">economists</a>, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/14/business/small-businesses-trump-tariffs-lawsuit/index.html">businesses</a>, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/08/business/trump-tariff-wall-street-reaction.html">Wall Street</a>, and <a href="https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/73-americans-expect-price-surge-under-trump-tariffs-reutersipsos-poll-finds-2025-04-08/">the majority of Americans</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Yet Trump has received support from a seemingly unlikely source: <a href="https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-auto-tariffs-union-workers-0de3e6f328cae87ded425380d0462516">Shawn Fain</a>, president of the United Auto Workers (UAW) union, who <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/27/business/shawn-fain-risk-taker/index.html">staunchly backed</a> former Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign and <a href="https://prospect.org/labor/2024-08-20-dnc-shawn-fain-explicates-scab/">previously called Trump</a> a “scab.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“We applaud the Trump administration for stepping up to end the free trade disaster that has devastated working-class communities for decades,” <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/uaw-shawn-fain-reacts-to-trump-auto-tariffs/">Fain said</a> when Trump announced tariffs on foreign-made cars late last month. “Ending the race to the bottom in the auto industry starts with fixing our broken trade deals, and the Trump administration has made history with today&#8217;s actions.&#8221; (The UAW did not respond to a request for an interview.)</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">He’s not the only labor leader who supported tariffs. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, one of the country’s largest labor unions, <a href="https://www.wsj.com/economy/trump-tariffs-labor-blue-collar-workers-0b8cea1f">also endorsed Trump’s policy</a>, going so far as to support not just specific levies but <a href="https://www.wsj.com/economy/trump-tariffs-labor-blue-collar-workers-0b8cea1f?mod=e2tw">across-the-board tariffs</a>. (A spokesperson <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/teamsters-labor-union-supports-tariffs-donald-trump-2057151">told Newsweek</a> that the union is hopeful about the tariffs’ long-term effects.) But that doesn’t mean all unions or their members are enthused. Other leaders and rank-and-file members <a href="https://www.wsj.com/economy/trump-tariffs-labor-blue-collar-workers-0b8cea1f">have criticized the president’s blanket approach to import tax</a>. And Liz Shuler, the president of AFL-CIO, a federation of unions in the United States, <a href="https://aflcio.org/press/releases/afl-cio-president-tariff-announcement">issued a statement</a> criticizing Trump’s overall policy.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Fain himself has since qualified his praise. “We support use of some tariffs on automotive manufacturing and similar industries. We do not support tariffs for political games about immigration or fentanyl,” <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/10/business/uaw-shawn-fain-trump.html">he said</a> in an address to UAW members after Trump announced his full tariff plan earlier this month. “We do not support reckless tariffs on all countries at crazy rates.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The mixed reviews that tariffs have received from unions reflect the awkward position some have found themselves in. For decades, unions, particularly those representing manufacturing workers, have argued against free-trade agreements and in favor of more protectionist policies, including tariffs, which they believe will help save American jobs in their industries. And now, the president of the United States is supporting that vision.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">The problem is that Trump’s tariffs will be harmful to the economy and <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/408353/trump-tariffs-trade-war-poverty-price-hikes">will likely hurt the working class</a> most — the people, in other words, who unions aim to represent. So where does this leave the long-standing union talking point that tariffs would be good for American workers?&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The fight against free trade</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Manufacturing jobs in the United States have been declining for decades, and free trade — where countries can export and import goods without restrictions — is often said to be the culprit. In particular, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) gets much of the blame for lost jobs. Trump’s tariffs might be “chaotic,” as <a href="https://www.npr.org/transcripts/nx-s1-5352409">Fain told NPR earlier this month</a>. “But, you know, we&#8217;ve sat here for the last 30-plus years, with the inception of NAFTA back in 1993–&#8217;94, and watched our manufacturing base in this country disappear.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">NAFTA eliminated trade barriers between the US, Canada, and Mexico. Since it took effect, many American factories moved to Mexico for cheaper labor — a financially appealing option for companies that could then produce goods for lower costs without having to worry about paying tariffs. Between 1997 and 2022, <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-us-factories-lost-nafta-tariffs-fact-check/">an estimated 70,500</a> US manufacturing establishments closed. Critics of the agreement <a href="https://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/">claim that this dynamic</a> has forced US-based manufacturing employees to accept lower wages out of fear their factories would relocate south of the border.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That outcome is why unions opposed NAFTA from the start. As the agreement was being negotiated, labor unions tried to stop it and the then-president of AFL-CIO called the agreement a “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/05/us/clinton-defends-trade-pact-to-skeptical-afl-cio.html">poison pill</a>.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Estimates vary on how many jobs have actually been lost. <a href="https://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/">About 700,000 positions were eliminated directly</a> as a result of NAFTA, according to the Economic Policy Institute, and many more <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-us-factories-lost-nafta-tariffs-fact-check/#">as a result of other trade agreements</a>. You can see the manufacturing industry’s decline reflected in union membership. In the 1970s, UAW had a high of 1.5 million members. By 2023, the union <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/uaw-membership-fell-33-2023-370000-workers-2024-03-29/">had fewer than 400,000 members</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">As a result, unions see NAFTA and other free trade agreements as a roadblock to higher wages and long-term job security, which is why they have often advocated for more protectionist policies.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Unions challenged the free-trade consensus</strong></h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">In the post-NAFTA era, the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/upshot/economists-actually-agree-on-this-point-the-wisdom-of-free-trade.html">prevailing consensus</a> among economists is that free trade has enjoyed broad political support from both Democrats and Republicans in Washington, while free trade might hurt some industries, its benefits outweigh the costs. Overall, free trade is still largely viewed as a <a href="https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/trade/brief/trade-has-been-a-powerful-driver-of-economic-development-and-poverty-reduction">driver of global economic growth</a>.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But free trade doesn’t mean fair trade. After China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001 — ramping up trade between the US and China — the barrage of Chinese imports into the United States cost Americans, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/02/11/g-s1-47352/why-economists-got-free-trade-with-china-so-wrong">by some estimates</a>, millions of jobs.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">As workers’ wages and job prospects struggled, evidence of the downsides of trade liberalization — particularly the widening pay gaps between workers and bosses — was hard to ignore, even by some free trade proponents. “The combination of changing patterns of trade, in which more activity takes place with low-wage economies, and new research has altered economic thinking on trade,” former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/its-worth-getting-the-tpp-trade-deal-right/2015/03/08/a1017428-c42f-11e4-ad5c-3b8ce89f1b89_story.html">wrote in 2015</a>. “The consensus view now is that trade and globalization have meaningfully increased inequality in the United States by allowing more earning opportunities for those at the top and exposing ordinary workers to more competition, especially in manufacturing.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">When President Barack Obama rallied to get support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership — a trade agreement between countries in the Pacific Rim — in 2015, he faced fierce opposition from unions but also skepticism from politicians, some of whom had long railed against free trade and others who changed their minds. Trump famously opposed the policy, as did Sen. Bernie Sanders during their 2016 presidential campaigns. And Hillary Clinton, who <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/hillary-clinton-trade-deal-229381">initially praised the proposed accord</a>, came out against it during that election season.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">That’s not to say that unions always oppose any kind of trade deal. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which Trump negotiated to replace NAFTA during his first term, <a href="https://aflcio.org/press/releases/afl-cio-endorses-usmca-after-successfully-negotiating-improvements">received union support</a> because it <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/articles/upholding-commitments-to-workers-rights/">included better labor protections</a> than its predecessor. But in general, union <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-are-unions-so-focused-on-fighting-trade-deals/">opposition to unfettered free trade has continued</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“In truth, our trade deals were not really trade deals; they were investment deals. Their goal was not to promote America’s exports — it was to make it easier for global corporations to move capital offshore and ship goods back to America,” Richard Trumka, the former president of AFL-CIO, <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-are-unions-so-focused-on-fighting-trade-deals/">said in 2015</a>. “The logical outcome was trade deficits and falling wages, and that’s exactly what we got.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">For unions, tariffs <a href="https://aflcio.org/press/releases/targeted-tariffs-are-best-way-fight-trade-cheaters">were</a> a part of the answer to failures of free trade along with other protectionist policies. But to free trade proponents, tariffs represent a break from consensus and threaten to break down trade relations across the globe.</p>

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Where this all leaves unions</strong>&nbsp;</h2>

<p class="has-text-align-none">While the way Trump has implemented tariffs has been irresponsible, the fact that he <em>has</em> is viewed as a step in the right direction. “Even though in [Fain’s] heart of hearts he realizes that Trump has rolled these [tariffs] out in a — pick your adjective — disjointed, sloppy, incoherent manner, he believes that a lot more needs to be done to protect and preserve manufacturing in the US,” said Steven Greenhouse, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation. “He rightly says that free trade has been very bad for manufacturing in the US. And in Fain’s mind, an effective way to rebuild manufacturing is through tariffs.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Tariffs can <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/406605/trump-tariff-plan-liberation-day">indeed be part of a solution</a> to bolster manufacturing industries in the United States, as long as they’re implemented strategically and coupled with a more coherent vision for boosting American industry, which would include subsidies and investments aimed at spurring growth in certain sectors. That’s how <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/406605/trump-tariff-plan-liberation-day">former President Joe Biden imposed tariffs</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But Trump’s policy is too broad, inconsistent, and lacking in clear objectives. And if the pause on the tariffs does end up being temporary, his policy could throw the United States into a recession, threatening all kinds of jobs, including those in manufacturing sectors.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So while some unions and their members might support the idea of tariffs to help shore up certain industries, it’s not clear that Trump’s policy will get Republicans more union support in the long run, especially if the forecasts about how Trump’s tariffs would impact the economy turn out to be true. And at the end of the day, it’s difficult to see how Trump’s blanket tariff policy will, on its own, revive American manufacturing. As my <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/408949/manufacturing-jobs-tariffs-trump-trade-automation">colleague Dylan Matthews wrote</a>, the American economy has changed, transitioning from manufacturing to services, and the idea that we can reverse that trend is a “false promise.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">“I fear that the horses are out of the barn,” Greenhouse said. “It’s really hard to get back those millions of manufacturing jobs.”</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>This story was featured in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/pages/within-our-means-newsletter-us-poverty-politics-solutions">Within Our Means</a>&nbsp;newsletter. Sign up&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/pages/within-our-means-newsletter-us-poverty-politics-solutions">here</a>.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
