<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Adam Chandler | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2022-03-23T20:22:32+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/adam-chandler" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/adam-chandler/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/adam-chandler/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adam Chandler</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The best $0 I ever spent: Watching someone else shop]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22967724/best-money-walgreens-receipt-stranger" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22967724/best-money-walgreens-receipt-stranger</id>
			<updated>2022-03-23T16:22:32-04:00</updated>
			<published>2022-03-27T08:50:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[It all started in April 2021 with some children&#8217;s cherry cough syrup, a baby humidifier, and a 32-ounce box of Aunt Jemima pancake and waffle mix. That was the first receipt to hit my inbox from Walgreens &#8203;&#8203;store #3924 in El Paso, Texas. Total: $67.89 on a Visa debit card with 63 cents earned in [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Dana Rodriguez for Vox" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23299848/Walgreens.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>It all started in April 2021 with some children&rsquo;s cherry cough syrup, a baby humidifier, and a 32-ounce box of Aunt Jemima pancake and waffle mix. That was the first receipt to hit my inbox from Walgreens &#8203;&#8203;store #3924 in El Paso, Texas. Total: $67.89 on a Visa debit card with 63 cents earned in Walgreens rewards.</p>

<p>The thing is, the receipt wasn&rsquo;t mine; I live 2,000 miles away in New York. Whoever had signed up for the Walgreens&rsquo; loyalty program in El Paso had put down my email address and, in doing so, had primed my Gmail for a wacky collision course with American drugstore commerce. And ever since that fateful day, each time they buy something at Walgreens, I get an auto-generated receipt telling me all about it.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Under more normal circumstances, this would be a run-of-the-mill modern annoyance, a very specific and righteous itch that can only be scratched by hitting unsubscribe and never leaving feedback. But during the pre-vax, isolated days of the pandemic, as social circles shrank and political spheres spun even further apart, these insights into life beyond the two square miles around me were oddly fortifying. Over the next several months, I would get an unearned peek at a consumer life that fascinated me and made me feel connected to a stranger many, many brightly lit aisles away. In ways both unexpected and unlikely, these digital scraps would teach me about how people are getting by in a time of unmatched physical and social separation.</p>

<p>Fortunately for everyone, what would ultimately keep this bit of digital voyeurism from veering even further into creepiness was the reality that the Walgreens receipts offered no identifying data about the shopper. Other than store location, items purchased, and method of payment, there would be no (legal) way to suss out who this shopper actually was.&nbsp;</p>

<p>And, as it turns out, it&rsquo;s pretty tough to pin down a Walgreens customer anyway. According to the analytics firm Numerator, roughly two-thirds (!) of the American shopping public <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/typical-walgreens-shopper-demographic-suburban-boomer-earning-80k-income-2021-9">patronizes</a> the drugstore chain. Its typical shopper is a white suburban boomer who makes $80,000 a year, drops in roughly once every three weeks, and spends about $22 each trip. My mystery shopper, however, lived in a mid-sized city and came back the very next afternoon, triggering another email.</p>

<p>This time around, the shopping log included sleeves of 16-ounce clear plastic cups (70 for $7), 90 paper plates for $4, a six-pack refill of Dollar Shave Club disposable razors, and a bar of something called Duke Cannon Big American Bourbon Soap, which claims to be made with Buffalo Trace bourbon. The sniffly baby apparently still a concern, a RaZbaby-brand RaZberry Silicone Baby Teether Toy and some Zarbee&rsquo;s Naturals Baby Gum Massage Gel were also procured. Total: $47.54 on a Visa debit card, 44 cents earned in Walgreens cash rewards. A mental picture of my shopper began to sharpen.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>Whatever socialized self-consciousness there may be about buying toilet paper in public disintegrates like discount one-ply</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>The best and most surreal thing about drugstore shopping is that basically anything goes. Whatever socialized self-consciousness there may be about buying toilet paper in public disintegrates like discount one-ply. Judgment about someone else&rsquo;s bunion pads or <a href="https://www.walgreens.com/store/c/nice!-circus-peanuts-soft-and-chewy-candy/ID=prod6108368-product">banana-flavored peanuts</a> is (generally) reserved. Buying Reese&rsquo;s Minis at a 35 percent markup just to get another one at half price is the kind of bad deal that you make when you&rsquo;re inside a chain drugstore. There&rsquo;s something to all the shelves: They&rsquo;re so irreducibly filled with reminders of our obligations and infirmities and mortality, they drive us to shop with our ids.&nbsp;</p>

<p>And so, when my mystery shopper ambled to the Walgreens counter at 2:57 pm on a Thursday to drop $69.73 on a 24-ounce tallboy of Modelo, two more bars of Duke Cannon soap (this time infused with Old Milwaukee beer), two bottles of Stella Rose blackberry-flavored wine, a pack of Camel Menthols, and a full pound of Oscar Mayer bologna in two 8-ounce packages, I knew we&rsquo;d entered a new dimension. A higher truth about life.</p>

<p>It was late April, 12 days after that first email. Over half of US adults had received their first Covid-19 shots and cases had dropped drastically in more than half of states. In my household back in New York, the contours of dinner invites and travel plans were nervously-but-optimistically being sketched up.&nbsp;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>A heady combination of booze and bologna</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>I will never know what had prompted the El Paso shopper&rsquo;s latest spree, but it definitely seemed celebratory. More than that, it felt normal. Sure, I wondered if not having ever bought a pound of bologna for $4 at Walgreens placed me inside or outside of the American mainstream, but this latest receipt presented proof that regular life was still happening. I didn&rsquo;t even need to catch a whiff of the weird Mother&rsquo;s Day scented candles in the store or hear the Vanessa Carlton lilting airily overhead to sense that things were finally steadying.</p>

<p>This heady combination of booze and bologna also spoke of American resilience for historical reasons. One hundred years before, in the aftermath of another pandemic, Walgreens <a href="https://vinepair.com/wine-blog/walgreens-whiskey-prescriptions-prohibition/">had undertaken</a> a massive domestic expansion during Prohibition by way of selling alcohol &mdash; usually whiskey &mdash; that was medically prescribed for a litany of often dubious ailments. This (legal) gambit transformed Walgreens from a regional store with a few dozen outposts in the mid-1920s into a national chain of hundreds across 30 states in 1934.</p>

<p>By that time, Oscar Mayer had already been a fixture of deli-centered goodwill for decades because it had eschewed the unsanitary practices of other meat purveyors infamously outlined in muckraking tomes like <em>The Jungle</em>. If Walgreens and Oscar Mayer could thrive through troublesome years by being vigilant, maybe so could we.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>Outside my email tabs, a giddy energy had begun to take hold</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>It was nearly May. Outside my email tabs, a giddy energy had begun to take hold. Hot vax summer <a href="https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22410017/dating-post-vaccine-kinsey-relationships-hookups">was surely approaching</a>, threatening to let loose a flood tide of repressed horniness and good cheer. Sixty-four percent of the country <a href="https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/abc-news-biden-congress-divisions-2021">expressed optimism</a> about the coming year. By the month&rsquo;s end, more than a half-million new jobs <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/06/04/business/economy-stock-market-news#biden-economy-jobs">would be logged</a> by the Labor Department.</p>

<p>Still, even the specter of normalcy has its limitations. After their late April spree, I didn&rsquo;t hear from my novelty soap obsessive for over three weeks &mdash; roughly the statistical cadence for a normal Walgreens shopper. By the third week in May, they had switched to a newer store (#9173) about three miles west, next door to a Jack in the Box and across the street from a competing CVS.&nbsp;</p>

<p>They were making less splashy purchases, too &mdash; items absent of either mirth or malady. A gallon of whole milk, two 20-ounce Red Bulls, and another pack of Camels. At only eight cents of Walgreens cash rewards earned, they weren&rsquo;t going to score a free pack of Hi-Chew anytime soon.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Zooming out, it seemed fair to ask if there would be a cost to the return of regular routines. Would we shed our new habits and discard whatever perspective we&rsquo;d gained? Would we lose a dangerous status quo just to simply slip back into a dysfunctional one? As if on cue, following that modest Walgreens run on the third Saturday in May, the El Paso shopper went totally dark.</p>

<p>One overarching irony of the pandemic is that, as consumers, many of us drift toward health as much as we drift toward comfort. One <a href="https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/47/3/373/5840732?redirectedFrom=fulltext">study</a> from <em>The</em> <em>Journal of Consumer Research</em> summed this up as a divide between Big Macs and kale salads, both of which have seen surges in popularity over the past two years. The dramatic loss of control with the pandemic means we seek out the familiar while also fending off death and disease with healthier practices. These impulses could just as easily explain why, as the delta variant descended, millions ultimately quit jobs that they didn&rsquo;t like, that didn&rsquo;t adequately protect them, or that just kind of seemed silly in the context of everything else.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I admit that not hearing from the El Paso shopper throughout the fizzle of our collective summer of redemption made me worry for them. It was heartening to see that, even as news from everywhere else dimmed, El Paso <a href="https://www.texastribune.org/2021/09/13/coronavirus-texas-el-paso/">had managed</a> to avoid the worst of the delta surge. Like a Big Mac or a BOGO bag of Goldfish, the silver linings were a temporary interruption from the free-floating dread.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Finally, in October, the El Paso shopper (inadvertently) dropped me a line. After shopping exclusively in northwest El Paso, they&rsquo;d moved on to a Walgreens outpost on the east side of town. Around 10 pm on a Monday, they&rsquo;d dropped in for a pack of Peanut M&amp;Ms, two boxes of Raisinets, a box of Milk Duds, a Snickers bar, a theater-sized box of Reese&rsquo;s Pieces, and four pouches of Welch&rsquo;s Berries &rsquo;n Cherries fruit snacks. This time they paid the $7.50 in cash.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The following Tuesday night, they came back for two packs of Peanut M&amp;Ms, an Almond Joy, and more Raisinets and Milk Duds. From afar, I imagined that an irresistible coupon had been the culprit in bringing them back again. Still, I was pleased to know our Walgreens membership had saved us 51 cents.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In another meaningful development, I noticed that Walgreens had also redesigned the format of its emails since the ones I&rsquo;d received in the spring. The receipts were now warmer and less spartan, studded with colored icons that looked a bit like emojis: A shopping bag, a blue megaphone announcing Member Savings, and a banner above a bar code to emphasize the ease of making a return. The email footer also now contained a link to unsubscribe from digital receipts. I would never click it.</p>

<p><em>Adam Chandler is a journalist and author who lives in New York.&nbsp;</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Adam Chandler</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How we fell for the Fitbit]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2020/3/12/21163690/fitness-trackers-fitbit-applewatch-garmin" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2020/3/12/21163690/fitness-trackers-fitbit-applewatch-garmin</id>
			<updated>2020-03-04T11:35:22-05:00</updated>
			<published>2020-03-12T07:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to pinpoint exactly when fitness trackers truly entered the mainstream. Perhaps it was when President Obama was spotted wearing one while hanging out with Jerry Seinfeld in an old Corvette Stingray. Maybe it was when David Sedaris limned cleverly on his experiences sporting one in the English countryside. Maybe that was when the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Approximately 70 million Americans report wearing a fitness tracker. | Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19765390/GettyImages_895081880.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Approximately 70 million Americans report wearing a fitness tracker. | Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>It&rsquo;s hard to pinpoint exactly when fitness trackers truly entered the mainstream. Perhaps it was when President Obama was spotted <a href="https://www.geekwire.com/2016/smartwatch-president-barack-obama-wears/">wearing one</a> while hanging out with Jerry Seinfeld in an old Corvette Stingray. Maybe it was when David Sedaris <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/30/stepping-out-3">limned cleverly</a> on his experiences sporting one in the English countryside. Maybe that was when the backlash against them <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-dark-side-of-your-fitbit-and-fitness-app">began</a>. According to Google Trends, 2015 <a href="https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&amp;q=10000%20steps">seems to be</a> the year that we started counting our steps en masse. Whatever the specifics, at some point in the past few years, 10,000 steps supplanted the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbNlMtqrYS0">much less manageable 500 miles</a> mandated by The Proclaimers in 1993 as the cultural standard for measured exertion.</p>

<p>Ever since, the capacity to digitally track ourselves with the help of Fitbits, Garmins, Apple Watches, <a href="https://www.katespade.com/accessories/wearable-tech/">Kate Spade</a> smartwatches, and Xiaomis has become a fixture of modern life. And while plenty of people use these devices to check email, buy scones, and board trains, a recent Gallup survey <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/269096/one-five-adults-health-apps-wearable-trackers.aspx">found</a> that 19 percent of Americans monitor their health stats through fitness trackers and mobile apps. In another recent survey from the Pew Research Center, 21 percent of Americans claimed to <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/09/about-one-in-five-americans-use-a-smart-watch-or-fitness-tracker/">have embraced wearable tech</a> &mdash; a figure equal to nearly 70 million people.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>21 percent of Americans claimed to have embraced wearable tech — a figure equal to nearly 70 million people.  </p></blockquote></figure>
<p>But what&rsquo;s more interesting than the sheer volume of wearable tech users is the breadth of them. Though fitness trackers haven&rsquo;t proven to be as accessible to lower-income groups &mdash; they range from $30 for a Neekfox tracker to $1,500 for a Herm&egrave;s-branded Apple Watch &mdash; Pew and other observers have noted a broad adoption across a slew of demographic categories, from age to ethnicity to geography.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Fitness trackers and their high-tech ilk are now the tools of suburban walking groups, mahjong leagues, city-dwelling tech workers, <a href="https://fitnesstracker24.com/best-smartwatch-pilots/">amateur pilots</a>, Crossfit junkies, <a href="https://www.ted.com/talks/gary_wolf_the_quantified_self">Quantified Self cultists</a>, and your uncle Howard. Nefarious corporate powers have used them to <a href="https://www.technologyreview.com/f/613434/amazons-system-for-tracking-its-warehouse-workers-can-automatically-fire-them/">ruthlessly surveil</a> their employees while nefarious parents <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/consumer-electronics/portable-devices/my-first-fitbit">have used them</a> to ruthlessly surveil their children. Big insurers <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/11/19/668266197/as-insurers-offer-discounts-for-fitness-trackers-wearers-should-step-with-cautio">have implemented them</a> into health schemes and incorporated them into Orwellian-esque &ldquo;workplace wellness programs.&rdquo; In 2018, a surreal-yet-humanizing heat map <a href="https://twitter.com/musalbas/status/957681871860785152">purported to show</a> the data trails of Korean troops traversing both sides of the DMZ. And last month, seven members of the Senate were seen <a href="https://www.rollcall.com/2020/01/21/senators-bend-the-rules-by-wearing-apple-watches-to-trump-trial/">wearing Apple Watches</a> at President Trump&rsquo;s impeachment trial, in violation of the ban on electronics.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Despite this (slightly goofy) permeation, the rise of semi-obsessive data monitoring wasn&rsquo;t a given. After all, fitness and technology trends are notoriously fickle and fadist. &ldquo;It has, essentially, one line of products, with variations on the theme,&rdquo; Vauhini Vara <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/will-fitbit-go-the-way-of-the-palm-pilot">offered</a> in a story for The New Yorker titled &ldquo;Will Fitbit Go the Way of the Palm Pilot?&rdquo; in 2015. Indeed, the story of how we fell in love with our Fitbits is a complicated one, one that centers on informational overload and ambient stress as much as it revolves around technology and the quest for healthy living.&nbsp;</p>

<p>One limited, but pretty straightforward explanation for the continued appeal of wearable tech is that, unlike the Thighmaster or 8-Minute Abs before it, the products have evolved from electronic pedometers to reflect the endless curiosities consumers have about their lifestyles. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s the diversity of applications that&rsquo;s attractive to the diversity of the population using them,&rdquo; says Dr. Walter Thompson, the associate dean for graduate studies and research at Georgia State University. In other words, if a user is interested in digitally tracking their sleep, their heart rate, their menstrual cycle, their caloric intake, their running route or mile pace, or their blood oxygen levels, the possibilities increasingly exist. &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t pay attention to my heart rate, I don&rsquo;t pay attention to my caloric balance,&rdquo; Thompson says, &ldquo;but I&rsquo;m really impacted by my sitting time and when my watch tells me I have to stand up.&rdquo;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>“It’s the diversity of applications that’s attractive to the diversity of the population using them.”</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>Each year, Thompson <a href="https://journals.lww.com/acsm-healthfitness/fulltext/2019/11000/worldwide_survey_of_fitness_trends_for_2020_.6.aspx">coordinates</a> the publication of the Worldwide Survey of Fitness Trends, a global ranking of the 20 most popular fitness trends as chosen by a consortium of doctors, trainers, kinesiologists, and other health professionals. And since 2015, wearable technology has dominated the field, holding the top spot all but one year. Thompson attributes the staying power to the new wide-ranging features that have staved off the obsolescence that typically accompanies an ordinary fitness fad. &ldquo;The Apple Watch now <a href="https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208955">can provide</a> for you an electrocardiogram [EKG],&rdquo; he explains. &ldquo;I tested it out myself it&rsquo;s pretty accurate. &hellip; My guess is the next thing that they will do is give you the ability to send that to your doctor.&rdquo;</p>

<p>This trajectory hints at another obvious aspect of wearable tech&rsquo;s popularity: It occupies an unlikely overlap between seeming both cutting edge <em>and</em> highly practical. Beyond the countless hard-data features, consumers can now use trackers to battle everything from <a href="https://ourlovely.com/">subpar intimacy</a> to <a href="https://www.techradar.com/news/best-golfing-gps-watch">lousy golf scores</a>. A culturally standardized fascination with fitness data doesn&rsquo;t just speak volumes about present-day attitudes about health, but offers a peek of what the future of medicine might look like if the trend holds.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Wearable tech may one day help a physician know whether a patient secretly counts folding laundry as part of a medically-recommended daily exercise regimen or considers having a Coors Light as basically the same thing as drinking a glass of water. &ldquo;What I can tell you is that a few years from now, I truly believe that all research studies that involve some behavioral component or behavior-change interventions, most of the studies, if not all, will involve either a smartphone or some of these devices,&rdquo; says Dr. Spyros Kitsiou, a professor at the College of Applied Health Sciences at the University of Illinois, Chicago. &ldquo;This is the future of research.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Predictions like these are likely to inspire a variety of Luddite appeals for a return to the analog world, especially as wearable tech companies consolidate and get swallowed up by bigger companies. Much to the chagrin of privacy advocates, Google <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/1/20943318/google-fitbit-acquisition-fitness-tracker-announcement">purchased Fitbit</a> in November 2019 for $2.1 billion, roughly the same adjusted-for-inflation amount that it paid for YouTube in 2006. (Notably, by then Fitbit <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2017/2/22/14703108/fitbit-bought-pebble-for-23-millionw">had purchased</a> its competitor Pebble, months before another competitor, Jawbone, <a href="https://www.tomsguide.com/us/fitness-trackers-to-replace-jawbone,news-25500.html">was sold off</a> to creditors for parts.) Broader concerns about security, data privacy, and the use of personal information gathered by fitness trackers and third-party apps have been aired by everyone from <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/a2pk5e/best_fitness_tracker_options_that_preserve_privacy/">Redditors</a> to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-fitbit-m-a-alphabet-eu/eu-privacy-body-warns-of-privacy-risks-in-google-fitbit-deal-idUSKBN20E1J9">EU consumer privacy watchdogs</a>, and not without good reason. In 2018, for example, an Australian college student on his summer break exposed a security flaw in the fitness app Strava, which <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-reviews-fitness-tracker-use-over-security-concerns-fitbit/">revealed extensive user data</a> including the locations of several US military bases in war zones around the world.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>Critics also point out the consuming nature of fitness tracking itself, which <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/nov/10/counting-steps-fitness-trackers-take-over-our-lives-quantified-self">gets lumped</a> into contemporary tech ailments like digital distraction and excessive screen time. And then there are those who <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/aug/02/athleisure-barre-kale-tyranny-ideal-woman-labour">view technology&rsquo;s seep</a> into an already suffocating wellness culture with not-unfounded concern. It&rsquo;s easy to see the pathologies of the Instagram and Optimization Eras and fret about their potential influence on personal fitness. There <a href="https://www.runnersneed.com/p/runners-need-men-s-pause-my-garmin-slogan-t-shirt-K1314254.html">are</a>, after all, &ldquo;If you see me collapse, pause my Garmin&rdquo; T-shirts out there, a reference to athletic strivers pushing themselves to break their personal records at the risk of keeling over along the way.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-instagram wp-block-embed-instagram alignnone"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/B9HR1F6DUJu/?utm_source=ig_embed&#038;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"><div> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B9HR1F6DUJu/?utm_source=ig_embed&#038;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank"> <div> <div></div> <div> <div></div> <div></div></div></div><div></div> <div></div><div> <div>View this post on Instagram</div></div><div></div> <div><div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div></div><div> <div></div> <div></div></div><div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div></div></div> <div> <div></div> <div></div></div></a><p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B9HR1F6DUJu/?utm_source=ig_embed&#038;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by Garmin Fitness &#038; Wellness (@garminfitness)</a></p></div></blockquote>
</div></figure>
<p>But beyond their shiny, wide-ranging possibilities or a high-minded station in the Internet of Things, the fact that wearables <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/30/spending-on-wearables-predicted-to-hit-52-billion-next-year.html">are projected</a> to be a $52 billion industry in 2020 may also have to do with a bigger sense of powerlessness among consumers. As Americans contend with lifestyles geared toward inactivity and increasingly blurred lines between work and home, some view fitness trackers as potential correctives. &ldquo;I think people are looking for ways to integrate more movements into their life considering that we&rsquo;re so sedentary today,&rdquo; says Dr. Kit Yarrow, a consumer psychologist and the author of <em>Decoding the New Consumer Mind</em>. &ldquo;Most of our jobs don&rsquo;t involve movement or are just staring at a computer and so, we&rsquo;re looking for the antidote to that.&rdquo;</p>

<p>In assessing the fitness-tracker trend, Yarrow notes a culture where scheduling and socializing are bygone pastimes and where misinformation and anxiety are rampant.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Within this paradigm, wearable tech appeals not because of their features, but because they stay consistent in a contemporary life where new diets, superfoods, or exercise fads crash into disrepute as quickly as they rise.&nbsp;</p>

<p>We live in an ecosystem in which concrete data about ourselves can seem like the only reliable compass. Even the most minute particulars can create baselines in an environment bent on constantly demanding more from everyone at all times. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re just given so much information that scares us and makes us a little paranoid,&rdquo; Yarrow explains. &ldquo;We are more craving of reassurance. I think this trend falls more into the category of calming our fears and reinforcing that we&rsquo;re doing okay and that everything is all right.&rdquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;<a href="http://vox.com/goods-newsletter"><em>Sign up for The Goods newsletter.</em></a><em> Twice a week, we&rsquo;ll send you the best Goods stories exploring what we buy, why we buy it, and why it matters.&nbsp;</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
