<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Alissa Wilkinson | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2024-06-26T19:20:54+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/alissa-wilkinson" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/alissa-wilkinson/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/alissa-wilkinson/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The movies to watch for this fall]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23875200/poor-things-boy-and-the-heron-anatomy-of-a-fall-tiff-nyff-venice-telluride" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/23875200/poor-things-boy-and-the-heron-anatomy-of-a-fall-tiff-nyff-venice-telluride</id>
			<updated>2024-06-26T15:20:54-04:00</updated>
			<published>2023-12-22T13:05:11-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Recommendations" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Vox Guides" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Every fall brings its crop of new movies from around the world &#8212; comedies, dramas, documentaries, and more uncategorizable films that capture what it is to live in this historical moment. Audiences around the world get to see them at festivals first, whether they&#8217;re big buzzy international fests or smaller regional events. Many of those [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="American Fiction and Perfect Days are two standouts on the fall festival circuit. | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924620/headshots_1694795026681.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	American Fiction and Perfect Days are two standouts on the fall festival circuit. | Toronto International Film Festival	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Every fall brings its crop of new movies from around the world &mdash; comedies, dramas, documentaries, and more uncategorizable films that capture what it is to live in this historical moment. Audiences around the world get to see them at festivals first, whether they&rsquo;re big buzzy international fests or smaller regional events.</p>
<div class="wp-block-vox-media-highlight vox-media-highlight"><h2 class="wp-block-heading">This story was featured in the <a href="https://www.vox.com/23862213/vox-recommends-newsletter-launch">Vox Recommends</a> newsletter.</h2>
<p>Sign up <a href="https://www.vox.com/pages/editors-picks-newsletter-best-of-vox">here</a> for curated picks of the best Vox journalism to read, watch, and listen to every week, from our editors.</p>
</div>
<p>Many of those films start their journey in early fall at festivals in Venice, Toronto, Telluride, and New York,<strong> </strong>and they&rsquo;re worth keeping tabs on as they roll out across the country. So here are the best movies we&rsquo;ve seen at this year&rsquo;s fall fests, and why you might want to see them, too.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>About Dry Grasses</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="About Dry Grasses — Trailer" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hscgnixcjv8?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>In a remote village in the Eastern Anatolian steppes, Samet (Deni&#775;z Celi&#775;lo&#287;lu) teaches art to schoolchildren, pursues a girlfriend and a transfer to a better locale, and is shocked to find that he and his fellow teacher Kenan (Musab Eki&#775;ci&#775;) are the target of accusations from several girls in their classes. The story unfolds over a languid but engrossing 197 minutes, with the eminent director Nuri Bilge Ceylan exploring Samet&rsquo;s misery and unlikeability with a wry and even generous eye. It&rsquo;s a gorgeous film, in Ceylan&rsquo;s typical naturalistic style, and one that follows the novelistic impulse, complete with a self-absorbed antihero at its center.</p>

<p>How to watch it:&nbsp;<em>About Dry Grasses</em>&nbsp;is awaiting a US release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>All of Us Strangers</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="All of Us Strangers | Official Trailer | Searchlight Pictures" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/O97iSjvqBlY?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Adam (Andrew Scott), a writer, lives alone in a high-rise on the outskirts of London. The building seems unoccupied except for Harry (Paul Mescal), who he sees one day from the window. Two strangers alone in a building: How could they not strike up a relationship? But Andrew Haigh&rsquo;s <em>All of Us Strangers</em> keeps veering away into the unexpected, weaving a story that feels deeply personal. How do we live with wondering what our parents think, or would think, about us if they really knew us? What does it really mean to open up to someone else? Emotional and lyrical, <em>All of Us Strangers</em> is a meditation on what it means to really be a human.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>All of Us Strangers</em>&nbsp;is playing in select theaters.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>American Fiction</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924555/American_Fiction.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A Black man in a white button-down and glasses stands with a big beach house in the background." title="A Black man in a white button-down and glasses stands with a big beach house in the background." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Jeffrey Wright in &lt;em&gt;American Fiction.&lt;/em&gt; | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" />
<p>At once broadly comedic and bitingly barbed, <em>American Fiction</em> is the story of Thelonious &ldquo;Monk&rdquo; Ellison (an outstanding Jeffrey Wright), a writer and malcontent who unwillingly finds himself back in his East Coast hometown. There he is confronted with the family turmoil he tries to avoid, heightened by growing irritation with the expectations he feels from the literary establishment about what &ldquo;Black literature&rdquo; ought to be. It&rsquo;s an extremely funny movie that lands some sharp blows, and a stellar feature debut from seasoned TV writer Cord Jefferson (<em>Succession, The Good Place, Watchmen, Master of None</em>).</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>American Fiction</em> will be released by MGM in limited theaters on December 15 and wide on December 22.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Anatomy of a Fall</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Anatomy of a Fall - Official Trailer" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fTrsp5BMloA?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Justine Triet&rsquo;s courtroom drama (which won the Palme d&rsquo;Or at its Cannes premiere in May) stars the great Sandra Huller as a writer whose son discovers his father lying on the ground outside their chalet near Grenoble with blood seeping from a head wound. What happened here? That&rsquo;s the question, and the film slowly peels apart its layers, exploring how truths and facts become fictions in the retellings, whether they&rsquo;re told in a courtroom or in a novel. Nothing is as objective and straightforward as our enlightened modern legal systems like to pretend, and our cultural prejudices about gender, emotion, and memory are all part of the story we tell.&nbsp;<em>Anatomy of a Fall</em>&nbsp;turns that fact into a scintillating, provocative thriller.</p>

<p>How to watch it:<strong>&nbsp;</strong><em>Anatomy of a Fall</em>&nbsp;will be released by Neon on October 13.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Days of Happiness</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924558/Days_of_Happiness.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A young woman in a black shirt conducts an orchestra, a baton in her hand." title="A young woman in a black shirt conducts an orchestra, a baton in her hand." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Sophie Desmarais in &lt;em&gt;Days of Happiness&lt;/em&gt;. | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" />
<p>It&rsquo;s unfortunate that Chlo&eacute; Robichaud&rsquo;s drama about a young conductor on the cusp of stardom (Sophie Desmarais) probably won&rsquo;t escape the shadow of <em>T&aacute;r</em>, because it&rsquo;s a strong and self-assured film on its own merits. Desmarais turns in a compelling performance as Emma, who&rsquo;s desperate to take the next step in her career but is held back by her agent, who also happens to be her domineering father, and by her budding relationship with cellist Na&euml;lle (Nour Belkhiria). <em>Days of Happiness</em> examines familiar territory &mdash; the musician battling her demons &mdash; but with a fresh, engaging touch.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Days of Happiness</em> is awaiting US distribution.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Boy and the Heron</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="THE BOY AND THE HERON | Official Teaser Trailer" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/f7EDFdA10pg?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>The renowned Hayao Miyazaki (<em>Spirited Away, My Neighbor Totoro</em>) returns with <em>The Boy and the Heron</em>, one of his most looping, imaginative films. Set in 1943, it centers on Mahito Maki (Soma Santoki), whose mother is killed in a fire during the war. His father remarries, and Mahito goes to live in the country with his stepmother, who is also his mother&rsquo;s younger sister. Lonely and unsure of how to handle his grief, Mahito drops into a dreamworld of confusion and chaos, reflecting his longing to restore the world. <em>The Boy and the Heron</em> revisits many of Miyazaki&rsquo;s themes &mdash; loneliness, fear, sorrow &mdash; with his signature imagination and underlying reflection of Japanese history.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>The Boy and the Heron</em> is awaiting a US release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World | Teaser | NYFF61" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wM2trhlR060?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>A lot of movies get called &ldquo;unhinged,&rdquo; but Romanian director Radu Jude&rsquo;s 2021 feature <em>Bad Luck Banging or Loony Porn</em> actually lived up to the description (and landed on A.O. Scott&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/06/movies/best-movies.html">best of the year list</a>). Now he&rsquo;s back with the equally wild <em>Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World</em>, a dark comedy that&rsquo;s sort of about labor exploitation, sort of about the gig economy, and sort of about how disconnected corporations are from their workers. Mostly it&rsquo;s a madcap spin through a day in the life of one production assistant/wannabe social media star (semi-spoofing Andrew Tate) who is hustling like mad to keep her head above water. Few movies are as surgical and scintillating in their societal critique.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World</em> was acquired by Mubi and is awaiting a US release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Dream Scenario</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924562/Dream_Scenario.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A bearded, bald, middle-aged man stands in a parking lot, looking confused. Behind him is a car with “LOSER” spray-painted onto it." title="A bearded, bald, middle-aged man stands in a parking lot, looking confused. Behind him is a car with “LOSER” spray-painted onto it." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Nicholas Cage in &lt;em&gt;Dream Scenario.&lt;/em&gt; | A24" data-portal-copyright="A24" />
<p>Talk about a dream of a premise: Paul Matthews (Nicholas Cage), a mild-mannered professor of evolutionary biology, discovers to his excitement, and then consternation, that he&rsquo;s been appearing in the dreams of random people all over the world. He doesn&rsquo;t know why. He can&rsquo;t make it stop. And it&rsquo;s wrecking his life. Director Kristoffer Borgli&rsquo;s comedy <em>Dream Scenario</em> (co-produced by horror maven Ari Aster) makes joking feints toward being &ldquo;about&rdquo; cancel culture or internet fame, but it&rsquo;s pretty clear he doesn&rsquo;t have a particular ax to grind. He&rsquo;s really just interested in razzing the audience a little, in the mold of his previous film <em>Sick of Myself</em>. People are terrible, illogical, and weird, but that doesn&rsquo;t mean we can&rsquo;t laugh at them.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Dream Scenario</em> will be released in theaters by A24 on November 10.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Evil Does Not Exist</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924564/Evil_Does_Not_Exist.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A young girl wearing a coat, hat, and mittens peers into the camera, her hand shading her eyes. Winter trees are in the background." title="A young girl wearing a coat, hat, and mittens peers into the camera, her hand shading her eyes. Winter trees are in the background." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Ryo Nishikawa in &lt;em&gt;Evil Does Not Exist&lt;/em&gt;. | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" />
<p>Ryusuke Hamaguchi&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.vox.com/22977466/drive-my-car-explained-murakami-vanya-chekhov"><em>Drive My Car</em></a> and <a href="https://www.vox.com/22991225/wheel-fortune-fantasy-hamaguchi"><em>Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy</em></a> were two of 2021&rsquo;s greatest films; <em>Evil Does Not Exist</em> is a bit more modest in scope, but just as spectacular. Takumi (Hitoshi Omika) is the local odd-job man in the small Japanese village of Harasawa, where he&rsquo;s raising his daughter Hana (Ryo Nishikawa) as a single father. When representatives from a talent agency appear in town, announcing a bizarre plan to open a glamping site nearby, Takumi is drawn into the controversy. <em>Evil Does Not Exist</em> provocatively considers the kind of responsibility we bear toward our families, our friends, and even strangers. Evil isn&rsquo;t some disembodied thing, in Hamaguchi&rsquo;s worldview: it&rsquo;s something embodied by humans, who can choose whether they&rsquo;ll fight it or just give in.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Evil Does Not Exist</em> will be released by Sideshow and Janus Films.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Fallen Leaves</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Fallen Leaves (2023) | Trailer | Aki Kaurismäki Alma Pöysti | Jussi Vatanen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AI3IASNvKeQ?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Ansa (Alma P&ouml;ysti) lives in Helsinki and works a dead-end job at the supermarket, making barely enough money to live on. She meets Holappa (Jussi Vatanen), a construction worker whose main amusement comes from drinking himself into oblivion every night. The pair hit it off, but their romance is full of bumps, not least because of the misery they&rsquo;re both desperate to escape. Aki Kaurism&auml;ki&rsquo;s deadpan dark comedy dips with style and just a hint of weird whimsy into the lives of his working-class characters, and the tableaux he crafts give off the whiff of a Finnish spin on Hopper&rsquo;s alienated figures.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Fallen Leaves</em> will be released by Mubi.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Ferrari</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="FERRARI - Official Teaser Trailer - In Theaters Christmas" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KZHxT2yb2cE?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Adam Driver stars in Michael Mann&rsquo;s <em>Ferrari</em>, a look at a pivotal moment in the life of ex-racer and car mogul Enzo Ferrari. It&rsquo;s the summer of 1957, and he and his wife Laura (Penelope Cruz) have essentially split up. They maintain co-ownership of the company, however, and it&rsquo;s in steep financial trouble. The Mille Miglia race is approaching, and Ferrari senses that his team&rsquo;s performance on the course will determine the future of his company &mdash; but at what hideous cost? The film is a peek into the life of a towering figure whose world is coming apart at the seams, and Driver and Cruz turn in riveting performances.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Ferrari</em> will open in theaters on December 25.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Fingernails</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924569/Fingernails.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A couple sits in a car; she is driving and he looks out the window." title="A couple sits in a car; she is driving and he looks out the window." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Jeremy Allen White and Jessie Buckley in &lt;em&gt;Fingernails&lt;/em&gt;. | Apple TV+" data-portal-copyright="Apple TV+" />
<p>Funny and ultimately heartwrenching, <em>Fingernails</em> pries open the meaning of love by way of some light science fiction. A scientific test has been invented to determine if two people are truly in love, using fingernails from a couple and a fancy machine. Anna (Jessie Buckley) and her boyfriend Ryan (Jeremy Allen White) took the test three years ago, with positive results, but Anna still finds herself drawn to the test and what it means. She takes a job at the Institute where the tests are administered, working with Amir (Riz Ahmed) to help couples deepen their connection, and starts to find herself wondering what love even is. Director Christos Nikou turns the premise into a subtle meditation on how different every partnership&rsquo;s story is &mdash; how love shifts and changes depending on who&rsquo;s in the relationship &mdash; and the result is both kind and thought-provoking.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Fingernails</em> will be released in theaters on October 27, then begin streaming on Apple TV+ on November 3.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Gasoline Rainbow</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="GASOLINE RAINBOW | Official Clip | Now Streaming" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/B-qFm8tU6pE?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>There&rsquo;s a wonderful authenticity to <em>Gasoline Rainbow &mdash; </em>and that&rsquo;s no big surprise, coming from brothers Bill and Turner Ross, who in films like <em>Bloody Nose, Empty Pockets</em> mess with the meanings of fiction and reality to probe for deep truths. For this one they turn to the road movie, with its sense of adventure, camaraderie, and discovery. Five teenagers (Tony, Micah, Nichole, Nathaly, and Makai), all of whom consider themselves misfits in their small Oregon town, embark on a road trip toward the Pacific Coast, looking for something they can barely articulate. What they find there is a sense of belonging that extends across generations of outsiders just like them. <em>Gasoline Rainbow</em> is a joyous movie for everyone who&rsquo;s ever sought community and found it waiting for them where they least expect it.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Gasoline Rainbow</em> is awaiting distribution.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Green Border</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924573/Green_Border.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A black-and-white image of a young child behind barbed wire." title="A black-and-white image of a young child behind barbed wire." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;The Green Border&lt;/em&gt; is a heartwrenching film about the migrant crisis. | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" />
<p>The great Agnieszka Holland directs an absorbing ensemble drama about the European migrant crisis. Shot in black and white, the film follows a group of refugees from Syria and Afghanistan as they&rsquo;re pushed back and forth across the Belarus-Poland border, treated as disposable pawns in the country&rsquo;s governmental disputes. Meanwhile, a group of Polish activists try to help provide what asylum seekers need most without being prosecuted by their own government. It&rsquo;s heartrending and, at times, heart-stopping &mdash; a vital addition to the growing body of European masterpieces illuminating the human cost of political and social crises.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>The Green Border</em> is awaiting US distribution.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>His Three Daughters</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924579/His_Three_Daughters.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Three women sit on a couch, huddled close to one another." title="Three women sit on a couch, huddled close to one another." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Natasha Lyonne, Elizabeth Olsen, and Carrie Coon in &lt;em&gt;His Three Daughters&lt;/em&gt;. | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" />
<p>Katie (Carrie Coon) and Christina (Elizabeth Olsen) have returned to their childhood home, a small New York apartment inhabited by their sister (Natasha Lyonne) and their dying father, who&rsquo;s too ill to leave his room. It&rsquo;s a commonplace enough setting for a family drama, anchored by brilliant performances by all three leads as their characters find friction in settling old scores. But writer and director Azazel Jacobs unspools the family&rsquo;s story little by little, exploring the absurd humor of deathbeds and the meaning of memory and grief with extraordinary love.&nbsp;</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>His Three Daughters</em> was acquired by Netflix following TIFF and is awaiting a release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Hit Man</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924592/Hit_Man.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A man with slicked-down hair and glasses looks a little confused." title="A man with slicked-down hair and glasses looks a little confused." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Glen Powell in &lt;em&gt;Hit Man&lt;/em&gt;. | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" />
<p>An absolute delight, Richard Linklater&rsquo;s <em>Hit Man</em> is a romcom wrapped in the trappings of a <a href="https://www.texasmonthly.com/true-crime/hit-man-2/">kind-of-true story</a>. Glen Powell plays Gary Johnson, an unassuming philosophy professor who occasionally works undercover for the New Orleans Police Department and finds himself pretending to be a hitman, which is how he meets Maddy (Adria Arjona). Sparks fly, though the course of true love, of course, is a little bumpy. It&rsquo;s a ton of fun to watch Powell and Arjona&rsquo;s chemistry, as well as Powell&rsquo;s evident delight as Gary grows to relish his &ldquo;hit man&rdquo; role. Most of all, though, it&rsquo;s just fun to watch good old-fashioned comedy in which love, danger, and happy endings are all part of a damn fine evening at the movies.&nbsp;</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Hit Man </em>was acquired by Netflix following TIFF and is awaiting a release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Holdovers</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="THE HOLDOVERS - Official Trailer [HD] - In Select Theaters October 27, Everywhere November 10" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AhKLpJmHhIg?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>From its first frame, Alexander Payne&rsquo;s latest self-consciously presents itself as a film from the 1970s, set in the 1970s at a New England boarding school for boys &mdash; a whimsical touch that makes the movie feel like a half-memory. Paul Giamatti stars as Paul Hunham, a dour disciplinarian who teaches ancient history and is much despised by his pupils. Stuck looking after the &ldquo;holdovers&rdquo; during Christmas break &mdash; the boys who can&rsquo;t, for whatever reason, leave campus for the holidays &mdash; he butts heads with a student named Angus (Dominic Sessa) and tries to be friendly toward Mary (Da&rsquo;Vine Joy Randolph), the cook, who is grieving her son&rsquo;s loss. It&rsquo;s a lighthearted film on the surface, but themes of grief, loss, and the fear of mortality for teenage boys who know they might be drafted and sent to Vietnam at any moment run beneath the beat of the plot. That&rsquo;s likely why it insists on its 1970s framework, which infuses a cozy holiday story with poignancy and meaning.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>The Holdovers </em>will be released by Focus Features in theaters on October 27.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>In the Rearview</em></h2><div class="vimeo-embed"><iframe title="In the Rearview (dir. Maciek Hamela) trailer" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/827156289?app_id=122963" allowfullscreen allow="encrypted-media *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Technically, <em>In the Rearview</em> is a road movie, a documentary mostly shot from inside a moving van. What matters most, though, is who the passengers are: Ukrainians fleeing their country for Poland after the Russian invasion. The driver is the film&rsquo;s director, Maciek Hamela, a Polish activist who purchased the van and started evacuating people across the border himself. Through discussions about what they&rsquo;ve left behind, where they&rsquo;re going, and what they&rsquo;re going to do, Hamela&rsquo;s passengers reveal much about the human toll of the war, as well as the ways that people facing immense upheaval pick up the pieces of their lives and keep moving forward. It&rsquo;s an extraordinary film.</p>

<p>How to watch it:<em> In the Rearview</em> is awaiting US distribution.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell | Trailer" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/10PFV_BIXLQ?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Thi&#7879;n (L&ecirc; Phong V&#361;) left his rural home for Saigon years ago, but when his sister-in-law is killed in a motorcycle accident, he must return to settle family matters and hunt down his brother. Once there, he slips into what feels like a dream state, reality and memories and dreams mixing together as he considers life, death, meaning, and his own struggle to maintain faith while others seem to maintain it so easily. The &ldquo;cocoon shell&rdquo; of the title is the trap that catches those chasing fame and forturne, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHOUy-r27Fw&amp;ab_channel=RFITi%E1%BA%BFngVi%E1%BB%87t">says</a> first-time feature director Ph&#7841;m Thi&ecirc;n &Acirc;n, and his deeply religious inquiry aims to crack open the trap by forcing Thi&#7879;n, and the audience, into a confrontation with eternity itself.</p>

<p>How to watch it:<strong> </strong><em>Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell </em>will be distributed by Kino Lorber and is awaiting a US release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Janet Planet</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24941077/janetplanet.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A middle-aged woman and a tween girl are watching something." title="A middle-aged woman and a tween girl are watching something." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Julianne Nicholson and Zoe Ziegler in Annie Baker’s &lt;em&gt;Janet Planet&lt;/em&gt;. | A24" data-portal-copyright="A24" />
<p>Playwright Annie Baker (<em>The Flick</em>, <em>John</em>) shifts to the screen with <em>Janet Planet</em>, the kind of luminous portrait of a summer where nothing happens and yet everything happens. It&rsquo;s 1991, and in western Massachusetts, rising sixth grader Lacy (Zoe Ziegler) coaxes her mom Janet (Julianne Nicholson) into letting her come home from camp. At home, she watches Janet&rsquo;s life from her perspective &mdash; the friends she makes, the men she sees &mdash; and starts to see her mother through new eyes. It&rsquo;s a perfect coming-of-age movie, but one in which both Lacy and Janet have some growing up to do.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Janet Planet</em> will be distributed by A24 and is awaiting a release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>La Chimera</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="La Chimera | Alice Rohrwacher | Josh O&#039;Connor | Isabella Rossellini | Carol Duarte" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4pOpvVpoZ5Q?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>A &ldquo;chimera&rdquo; is something you wish for, but it&rsquo;s impossible. <em>La Chimera</em>, from the great Italian director Alice Rohrwacher, follows Arthur, who lives with his own chimera. An Englishman living in Italy who&rsquo;s fallen in with a band of tombaroli &mdash; people who rob graves, looking for ancient artifacts they can sell to become rich &mdash; and has an eerie ability to find what&rsquo;s buried below. He&rsquo;s also dreaming of his lost love, Beniamina, and forming a friendship with Italia, a young woman who tends to Beniamina&rsquo;s mother. In classic Rohrwacher style, <em>La Chimera </em>lies somewhere between social commentary, folk legend, and fairy tale, slipping between reality and the surreal. Everyone, in the end, harbors some chimera.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>La Chimera</em> is awaiting a US distributor.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Maestro</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Maestro | Official Teaser | Netflix" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zU6GbM5c9aE?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>The romance between the great conductor Leonard Bernstein and his wife, the actress Felicia Montealegre, forms the backbone for <em>Maestro</em>, a swirling, swooning love story. Bradley Cooper directs as well as stars alongside an outstanding Carey Mulligan. The movie is most interested in how the rapidly changing 20th century shifted the way the pair&rsquo;s relationship was maintained, particularly because Bernstein openly maintained relationships with men alongside his long marriage to Montealegre. Those shifts are mimicked in the film&rsquo;s style, which evolves both in the performances and the visual aesthetic to roughly match the period. The film elides much of the biographical information, to a point that it skids perilously close to frustration at times, but in the end, it&rsquo;s hard not to be won over by the sheer passion of the project. In Cooper&rsquo;s hands, this is a love story for the ages, intertwined with music &mdash; a familiar theme for the director of <em>A Star Is Born</em>, and a winning one.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Maestro</em> opens in limited theaters on November 22 and begins streaming on Netflix on December 20.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>May December</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="May December | Official Social Tease | Netflix" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tSP5D_fhNMs?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Todd Haynes tells you early on that&nbsp;<em>May December</em>&nbsp;is camp, but the kind that conceals a queasy heart. He loosely bases the story on the infamous case of Mary Kay Letourneau; here, Julianne Moore plays Gracie Atherton, who went to jail after having sex with 12-year-old Joe Yoo at the pet store where she works, then had his children and married him. Now, 20 years on, they&rsquo;re still married, but their life together &mdash; marked by Gracie&rsquo;s insistence that she never really did anything wrong &mdash; takes a strange turn when an actress (Natalie Portman) who&rsquo;s going to play Gracie in a movie visits to do research and gets interested in Joe (Charles Melton). It&rsquo;s sort of a movie about guilt, sort of about conscience, sort of about exploitation, but Haynes&rsquo;s wrapping it in camp trappings reminds us that this is the stuff of tabloids, and the lightness of touch makes it entertaining and uncomfortable all at once.</p>

<p>How to watch it:&nbsp;<em>May December</em>&nbsp;will be released in theaters on November 17, then stream on Netflix starting December 1.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Menus-Plaisirs Les Troisgros</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Menus-Plaisirs Les Troisgros | Clip 1 | NYFF61" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BhxwnU7QfLI?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Frederick Wiseman has devoted his <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/5/3/16184642/frederick-wiseman-films-list-best-titicut-high-school-central-park-jackson-heights-welfare-streaming">prolific, outstanding documentary career</a> to watching humans work, play, and relate to one another. Now in his 90s, he&rsquo;s turned to perhaps his most delightful subject ever for <em>Menus-Plaisirs Les Troisgros</em>: the kitchens and dining room of Troisgros, a family-owned restaurant in central France that has earned three Michelin stars. The four-hour film (I would have watched for twice as long) follows Michel Troisgros and his two sons, C&eacute;sar and L&eacute;o, as they plan menus, train chefs, speak with diners, visit farmers, and celebrate the long history of the culinary arts in their family. True to form, Wiseman has a point in all of this &mdash; the vital need for pursuit of balance and detail in growing and making food that nourishes humans. But it&rsquo;s about as far from pedantic as you can get, instead giving viewers a long, gentle glimpse into the superior craft of the Troisgros chefs and the hospitality they hold out to those who visit them.</p>

<p>How to watch it:<strong> </strong><em>Menus-Plaisirs Les Troisgros</em> will open at New York City&rsquo;s Film Forum on November 22.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Mission</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="The Mission | Official Trailer | National Geographic Documentary Films" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/afg1V6WOM80?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>When evangelical missionary John Allen Chau disappeared in 2018, the story became international news, in part because he disappeared after trying to reach the isolated Sentinelese people. Directed by Jesse Moss and Amanda McBaine (<em>Boys State, The Overnighters</em>), <em>The Mission</em> examines, with extraordinary depth and thoughtfulness, the role of Christian missionary stories in &ldquo;firing up&rdquo; a generation of young evangelicals to give their lives in &ldquo;extreme&rdquo; ways for God. Wisely, the film doesn&rsquo;t shy away from the responsibility that National Geographic &mdash; a producer of the film &mdash; bears in exoticizing people who live in remote, &ldquo;Stone Age&rdquo; ways. It&rsquo;s a troubling, smart, must-see documentary.</p>

<p>How to watch it:<strong> </strong><em>The Mission</em> opens in theaters on October 13.<strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Taste of Things</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24976846/taste_of_things.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="In a 19th century kitchen, a man and a woman stand near two young girls." title="In a 19th century kitchen, a man and a woman stand near two young girls." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Benoît Magimel and Juliette Binoche in &lt;em&gt;The Taste of Things.&lt;/em&gt; | IFC Films" data-portal-copyright="IFC Films" />
<p>An instant candidate for one of the greatest culinary films of all time, <em>The Taste of Things</em> is a romance at its heart. Yet like any good romance, it doesn&rsquo;t reveal itself too fast. For a long stretch at the start, we&rsquo;re simply watching Eug&eacute;nie (Juliette Binoche) cook some kind of wondrous feast, her movements as choreographed and elegant as if they&rsquo;re a rehearsed ballet. She&rsquo;s accompanied by Dodin Bouffant (Beno&icirc;t Magimel), who turns out to be one of France&rsquo;s most celebrated gourmands. But all of that comes later, because the focus of <em>The Taste of Things</em> (France&rsquo;s official Oscar entry, from Vietnamese-born French director Tr&#7847;n Anh H&ugrave;ng) is the food: what it means, what it sounds like, what it feels like, how it sizzles, how the taste can prompt emotions so profound in the taster that it can&rsquo;t be put into words. Somehow a deeply philosophical film, <em>The Taste of Things</em> is an enormous inquiry into how the material world mixes with the emotional and spiritual, and what exquisite pleasure and pain come with the knowledge we won&rsquo;t be able to love this world forever.</p>

<p>How to watch it: IFC Films will release <em>The Taste of Things </em>in the US. It is awaiting a release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Pain Hustlers</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Pain Hustlers | Emily Blunt + Chris Evans | Official Teaser | Netflix" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iycLZM7ycbI?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Emily Blunt and Chris Evans star as Liza Drake and Pete Brenner, pharmaceutical executives whose singular drive toward money embroils them in a criminal conspiracy. The plot beats are predictable at this point for a movie that is, in the end, <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23672710/air-review-tetris-blackberry-affleck-jordan-howerton">about business guys</a>. Yet unlike movies like <em>Air</em> and <em>BlackBerry</em>, the stakes are extraordinarily high, since the wares they&rsquo;re peddling aren&rsquo;t sneakers or phones: they&rsquo;re opioids, and the more addicted the patients are, the more money they make. Thanks largely to Blunt&rsquo;s performance, <em>Pain Hustlers</em> manages to be lively and moving, while also illuminating exactly how broken the American health care system is and how all of us are caught in its claws.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Pain Hustlers</em> will be released in theaters on October 20, then begin streaming on Netflix on October 27.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Perfect Days</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="PERFECT DAYS (2023) | Trailer | Wim Wenders | Koji Yakusho | Tokio Emoto | Arisa Nakano" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HTgWYojq-z8?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>On first blush, <em>Perfect Days</em> could be mistaken for a paean to the noble working class; its protagonist, Hirayama (Kaji Yakusho), spends his quiet, ritualized days cleaning public toilets in Tokyo, watering his plants, reading his books, and eating noodles at the same stall. But as Wim Wenders&rsquo;s film slowly unfurls, its true aim, which hints at Hirayama&rsquo;s history, starts to paint a broader picture. <em>Perfect Days</em> is a movie about art, exploring how in the midst of chaos, it&rsquo;s not labor but the physical objects of beauty that we weave into our lives &mdash; paperback novels, cassette tapes of favorite albums, carefully tended bonsai plants, a perfectly framed photograph &mdash; that structure and give our days meaning. Reminiscent of <em>Paterson</em>, <em>Perfect Days</em> is a poem of extraordinary subtlety and beauty.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Perfect Days</em>, which is Japan&rsquo;s official Oscar entry, is awaiting a US release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Pigeon Tunnel</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="The Pigeon Tunnel — Official Trailer | Apple TV+" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9gWnuhjwNrw?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Technically, <em>The Pigeon Tunnel</em> is about the life of the famed spy novelist John le Carr&eacute;, who died in December 2020. But with Errol Morris at the helm, this is no ordinary documentary. Le Carr&eacute; &mdash; whose real name was David Cornwall &mdash; and Morris were good friends, enough to spar throughout the film about the nature of truth, reality, deception, and performance. The conversation is woven throughout Cornwall&rsquo;s unusually intimate account of his own life and memories, particularly those concerning his con artist father, as well as his more existential obsessions. But it&rsquo;s much richer than a mere biographical documentary, fascinating even to those who haven&rsquo;t read Cornwall&rsquo;s work.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>The Pigeon Tunnel</em> will be released on October 20 in select theaters and begin streaming on Apple TV+ the same day.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Poor Things</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="POOR THINGS | Official Trailer | Searchlight Pictures" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RlbR5N6veqw?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>One of the year&rsquo;s most anticipated films is also one of its most delightfully weird. <em>Poor Things</em>, a demented spin on the Frankenstein legend, stars Emma Stone as Bella, a woman with the literal mind of a child thanks to the tinkering of an experimental scientist (Willem Dafoe) whom she calls &ldquo;God.&rdquo; One day, having awoken to certain new bodily pleasures and desires, she ventures out into the world to discover what it means to have a life, and both chaos and hilarity ensue. Director Yorgos Lanthimos&rsquo;s hallmarks are highly mannered dialogue set into human social situations rendered alien by abstraction; here, his style is harnessed into a slightly more accessible form, a dark comedy that probes human nature. It&rsquo;s bawdy and weird and funny, and in its own off-kilter way, a crowdpleaser.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Poor Things</em> will be released in theaters by Searchlight Pictures on December 8.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Priscilla</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Priscilla | Official Trailer HD | A24" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DBWk6BohVXk?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Elvis Presley has been immortalized on screen dozens of times, but for <em>Priscilla,</em> writer-director Sofia Coppola turned her camera toward Priscilla Presley, to whom he was married from 1967 to 1973 and in a relationship with for much longer. It&rsquo;s a tricky story to tackle well, given that Priscilla (Cailee Spaeny) was 14 when she met 24-year-old Elvis (Jacob Elordi), but Coppola takes that uneasiness and spins it into gold. There are shades in here of Coppola&rsquo;s <em>Marie Antoinette</em> and <em>Somewhere</em>, but it&rsquo;s entirely Priscilla&rsquo;s story, one that honors her feelings and her choices without suggesting that the circumstances were normal or that the situation was simple. And it&rsquo;s a gorgeous movie, too.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Priscilla</em> opens in theaters on November 3.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Royal Hotel</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="THE ROYAL HOTEL - Official Trailer" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/U9zq_4ED-pI?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Director Kitty Green follows up her masterful feminist drama <em>The Assistant</em> (which also starred Julia Garner) with another feminist barnburner. In this one, two young women traveling in Australia find themselves low on cash and take jobs at a hardscrabble bar in an outback mining town. They think they know what to expect, but as their weeks unfold they&rsquo;re confronted with every type of twisted machismo, and slowly become worried that they will never get away. It&rsquo;s a thriller, and an uncomfortable one, in which dangers lurk around corners so common that we sometimes forget how dangerous they really are.&nbsp;</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>The Royal Hotel</em> will be released by Neon in theaters on October 6.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Settlers</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="THE SETTLERS Clip | TIFF 2023" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ny23MxpuKeE?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>A sharply critical social and historical commentary housed in a Western, <em>The Settlers</em> is both gorgeous and devastating. The story centers on Segundo (Camilo Arancibia), a Chilean <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/mestizo">mestizo</a> who is obliged to travel with an English army captain (Mark Stanley) and an American mercenary (Benjamin Westfall) as they clear the Tierra del Fuego archipelago of the natives who live there, all in service of the powerful man to whom the state has granted ownership of the land. The brutality comes back to haunt them as well as Chilean history. Director and cowriter Felipe G&aacute;lvez Haberle&rsquo;s drama fits a larger theme in this year&rsquo;s global cinema: the ways governments work to erase their unsavory history, and the ways individual people are often helpless to preserve those stories, though they continue to try. It&rsquo;s a stellar directorial debut, and a movie worth contemplating.</p>

<p>How to watch it: Mubi will release <em>The Settlers</em> in limited theaters on January 12.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Shayda</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Shayda - Official Trailer" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/npwKunbjZNo?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Shayda (Zar Amir Ebrahimi&nbsp;) has fled her abusive husband Hossein (Osamah Sami) with her young daughter Mona (Selina Zahedenia) and is living in a women&rsquo;s shelter in Australia. But as she works toward filing for divorce, she&rsquo;s left living in a liminal state, required legally to let Mona see her father and dodging his attempts to force both her and Mona back into his home. Meanwhile, Shayda starts to explore a life outside the restrictions she has known. Noora Niasari&rsquo;s drama slowly builds into a thriller, and Ebrahimi&rsquo;s enthralling performance coaxes us to lean in. Perhaps most importantly, <em>Shayda</em> refuses simplistic characterization; no matter what happens with Shayda and Mona, we know that Hossein&rsquo;s abuse will haunt their lives &mdash; and that in this way, they&rsquo;re like millions of women all over the world.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Shayda</em> will open for a one week run in NY and LA on December 1, followed by a national release in early 2024.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Sleep</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="SLEEP Trailer | TIFF 2023" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XkSZRcbjkWA?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Easily one of the best (and most fun) thrillers of the year, <em>Sleep</em> is the tale of Hyeon-Soo (Lee Sun-kyun) and Soo-jin (Jung Yu-mi), newlyweds who discover that Hyeon-soo sleepwalks. Soo-jin is a little scared of her husband&rsquo;s nighttime antics, especially when she discovers that she&rsquo;s pregnant and begins to worry that he&rsquo;ll hurt their baby in his sleep. Doctors don&rsquo;t seem to help. What&rsquo;s going on? Is he possessed? Are they haunted? Or does he just need better meds? Jason Yu crafts a twisty delight that leaves you doubting what you&rsquo;re seeing and wondering what to believe right till the last moment.&nbsp;</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Sleep</em> is awaiting a US release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Songs of Earth</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="TRAILER Songs of Earth by Margreth Olin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/InpVP3fn7a8?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>A soaring documentary portrait, <em>Songs of Earth</em> is ambitious work from Margreth Olin, who ties cosmic themes of love, grace, time, and memory together through the much smaller tale of her aging parents&rsquo; extraordinary love for one another. Cycling through the four seasons with the majestic landscape of Norway as backdrop, Olin explores how the slow movement of time changes landscapes, whether it&rsquo;s the crags in her father&rsquo;s forehead or a glacier moving slowly across a landscape over decades. A remarkable, poetic meditation, <em>Songs of Earth</em> weaves the smallness of human lifespan into the grandness of the earth&rsquo;s history, and does it all with unspeakable beauty.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Songs of Earth</em> is awaiting US distribution.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Teachers’ Lounge</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="The Teachers&#039; Lounge - Official Trailer" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6YgQBGqhTcM?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Carla Novak (Leonie Benesch) is a new teacher at a close-knit German middle school, determined to help her pupils succeed. When one of them is accused of theft, she springs into action, trying to figure out why things keep going missing at the school. But her efforts go sideways, in a manner she never could have predicted. Ilker &Ccedil;atak takes the setup for an ordinary teacher drama and pulls it taut, building out the tension so skillfully that <em>The Teachers&rsquo; Lounge</em> starts to feel like a high-stakes thriller, with no need to teach a lesson beyond the limits of do-gooder idealism. The deliciously twisted turns are enough to keep viewers riveted.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>The Teachers&rsquo; Lounge</em>, which is Germany&rsquo;s official Oscar entry, is awaiting a US release date.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Wildcat</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924594/Wildcat.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A woman in a long coat and a curly haircut stands next to a mailbox on a desolate road, reading a letter." title="A woman in a long coat and a curly haircut stands next to a mailbox on a desolate road, reading a letter." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Maya Hawke in &lt;em&gt;Wildcat&lt;/em&gt;. | Toronto International Film Festival" data-portal-copyright="Toronto International Film Festival" />
<p>The work of the great American writer Flannery O&rsquo;Connor can be prickly and off-putting, filled with its uncompromising author&rsquo;s obsessions: Catholicism, the American South, disability, morality, racism, and pious, sentimental hypocrisy. <em>Wildcat</em>, directed by Ethan Hawke, is less a biopic of O&rsquo;Connor than a work of criticism. Maya Hawke plays O&rsquo;Connor and Laura Linney her mother, but they and several other actors also appear in the stories O&rsquo;Connor is writing, remixes of the world she observes around her. Through the film, the clearness of her artistic vision contrasts with personal turmoil, yielding a dreamy movie (a bit reminiscent of <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/6/5/21279189/shirley-jackson-review-streaming-hulu"><em>Shirley</em></a>, about Shirley Jackson) that evokes O&rsquo;Connor&rsquo;s biggest project: an inquiry into the broken nature of grace.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Wildcat</em> is awaiting US distribution.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Woman of the Hour</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24924598/Woman_of_the_Hour.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Three people in ’70s garb stand on the set of The Dating Game." title="Three people in ’70s garb stand on the set of The Dating Game." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Tony Hale, Anna Kendrick, and Daniel Zovatto in &lt;em&gt;Woman of the Hour&lt;/em&gt;. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p><em>Woman of the Hour</em>, Anna Kendrick&rsquo;s capable and engrossing directorial debut, tells the true tale of Rodney Alcala (Daniel Zovatto), who was in the middle of a lengthy murder spree when he appeared on the game show <em>The Dating Game</em> in 1978. Kendrick plays Cheryl Bradshaw, the female contestant on that episode, who grows increasingly frustrated with the show&rsquo;s real reason for existing: an excuse for the audience to howl at leering comments the male contestants would level at the women. <em>Woman of the Hour</em> smartly weaves into the narrative the many ways in which women are conditioned to put up with men because, as the saying goes, they&rsquo;re afraid of being killed.</p>

<p>How to watch it: <em>Woman of the Hour</em> was acquired by Netflix and is awaiting a US release date.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Youth (Spring)</em></h2><div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Youth (Spring) / Jeunesse (Le Printemps) (2023) - Trailer (English Subs)" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MjGObrQPZ6U?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Wang Bing&rsquo;s extraordinary documentary, which runs over three and a half hours, captures the lives of migrant Chinese garment factory workers in their late teens and early 20s. They flirt, fight, eat, dream, and sew at a remarkable speed, turning out fast fashions and then negotiating rates with the factory owners, who put them up in barely livable conditions and demand long hours with little room for life. This is less a social-issue documentary and more about an extreme existential poignance, encapsulated in the title: These are young people in the prime years of their lives but without the means or mobility to move forward, living years of monotony without a break. That doesn&rsquo;t mean their lives can&rsquo;t be rich, but it does call into question the rapacious appetite for cheaply made clothing and the system that enables it.</p>

<p>How to watch it:<strong>&nbsp;</strong><em>Youth (Spring)&nbsp;</em>is awaiting US distribution.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>The Zone of Interest</em></h2><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24675621/zone.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A family picnic on the bank of a river." title="A family picnic on the bank of a river." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;The Zone of Interest&lt;/em&gt; | A24" data-portal-copyright="A24" />
<p>The year&rsquo;s most terrifying horror film comes from Jonathan Glazer &mdash; his first feature in 10 years, since the eviscerating&nbsp;<em>Under the Skin</em>. This film, loosely adapted from the late Martin Amis&rsquo;s novel, is the story of a family living in blissful tranquility right outside the walls of Auschwitz, where the father is commandant. Glazer keeps the family&rsquo;s home life in the frame, but it&rsquo;s everything going on just beyond that wall that nauseates the audience, and the film never lets you forget it. It&rsquo;s formally brilliant in its evocation of the mental distance the family has put between themselves and the atrocities, making the audience feel that discomfort and terror.&nbsp;<em>The Zone of Interest</em>&nbsp;is undoubtedly one of 2023&rsquo;s best films, and instantly ranks among the greatest films about the Holocaust.</p>

<p>How to watch it:<strong>&nbsp;</strong><em>The Zone of Interest</em>&nbsp;will be released in theaters by A24 on December 8.</p>

<p><em><strong>Update, October 16, 1:45 pm ET:</strong> This story was originally published on September 16 and has been updated several times with additional movies. </em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The year’s scariest horror film is The Zone of Interest]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23733985/zone-interest-arendt-banality-review-canes-jonathan-glazer-oscar-winner" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/23733985/zone-interest-arendt-banality-review-canes-jonathan-glazer-oscar-winner</id>
			<updated>2024-03-10T20:25:56-04:00</updated>
			<published>2023-12-15T15:20:48-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Zone of Interest, Jonathan Glazer&#8217;s first film in 10 years, is ostensibly based on a book: Martin Amis&#8217;s stomach-churning 2014 novel of the same name. But understanding the movie&#8217;s formal and thematic genius requires looking at it differently: as a sidelong horror-film adaptation of Hannah Arendt&#8217;s 1963 Eichmann in Jerusalem, one that goes way [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="A peaceful scene from The Zone of Interest, the year’s best horror film. | A24" data-portal-copyright="A24" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24675621/zone.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A peaceful scene from The Zone of Interest, the year’s best horror film. | A24	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p><em>The Zone of Interest</em>, Jonathan Glazer&rsquo;s first film in 10 years, is ostensibly based on a book: Martin Amis&rsquo;s stomach-churning 2014 novel of the same name. But understanding the movie&rsquo;s formal and thematic genius requires looking at it differently: as a sidelong horror-film adaptation of Hannah Arendt&rsquo;s 1963 <em>Eichmann in Jerusalem</em>, one that goes way beyond that book&rsquo;s well-worn idea of the &ldquo;banality of evil.&rdquo; That phrase, lifted from <em>Eichmann</em>&rsquo;s subtitle, furnishes most people&rsquo;s entire Arendt knowledge base: the idea that evil presents itself not as a devil with horns and a pitchfork, but in seemingly egoless, &ldquo;mediocre&rdquo; men like Adolf Eichmann, architect of the <a href="https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/final-solution-overview">Final Solution</a>, who carry out unspeakable atrocities.</p>

<p>That&rsquo;s not wrong, but it&rsquo;s much too simple, verging on cliche &mdash; ironic, given Arendt&rsquo;s warnings. In her reporting on Eichmann&rsquo;s trial, Arendt noted how he spoke only in &ldquo;stock phrases and self-invented cliches,&rdquo; the kinds of euphemisms that Arendt said indicated a refusal to think for oneself. In this, Eichmann was a true company man; the Third Reich was notorious for inventing language and speech codes that made following the rules seem inevitable. The Nazi Sprachregelung<em>, </em>or its particular bureaucratic vocabulary, was euphemistic in the extreme. Killing became &ldquo;dispatching&rdquo;; forced migration became &ldquo;resettlement&rdquo;; the mass murder of the Jews became Eichmann&rsquo;s &ldquo;final solution.&rdquo; When you call what you&rsquo;re doing to millions of your neighbors &ldquo;special treatment,&rdquo; you don&rsquo;t have to think about what it really is. You might even start to enjoy the challenge of doing it more officially.</p>

<p>This Sprachregelung is all over <em>The Zone of Interest</em>, in part because its characters don&rsquo;t talk about murder or genocide, but also because Glazer &mdash; whose previous film was the brilliantly unsettling <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/8/5/21352779/she-dies-tomorrow-review"><em>Under the Skin</em></a><em> &mdash;</em> replicates the characters&rsquo; internal distance through the movie&rsquo;s images and sounds. The result is unsettling in the extreme. It takes a few minutes of watching to realize what, precisely, you&rsquo;re looking at, and the nauseating shock at that moment packs a stronger punch than any horror movie I&rsquo;ve seen this year. Here is the sunny, flower-filled, orderly front garden, in front of a well-appointed and tidy home in which a large, cheerful family lives. But wait; just beyond the yard is a tall gray cement fence with barbed wire on top, and smokestacks visible in the distance.&nbsp;</p>

<p>On the other side of the garden wall is Auschwitz.</p>

<p>The home is occupied by the notorious extermination camp&rsquo;s commandant, Rudolf H&ouml;ss (a real man, played here by Christian Friedel), his wife Hedwig (<a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2016/12/29/14089486/toni-erdmann-review-maren-ade-sandra-huller-peter-simonischek">Sandra H&uuml;ller</a>), their large brood of children, and a few servants, at least one of whom seems to be Jewish. <em>The Zone of Interest</em> keeps the H&ouml;ss family in the foreground. We see them on a picnic, having family dinners, spending time playing in the garden, enjoying their greenhouse and their pool. Hedwig is a nurturing mother and hospitable housekeeper.</p>

<p>While they live out their lives in their happy house, we watch with horror. Smartly, Glazer gives us only the most minimal amount of character background; this is emphatically not a movie where there&rsquo;s a &ldquo;good Nazi&rdquo; to root for. Instead, it shows how the whole Nazi system was designed to ensure that nobody could be good. We&rsquo;re hearing the H&ouml;sses talk about life in the foreground. But there&rsquo;s an ambient noise in <em>The Zone of Interest</em>, akin to the hum of a white noise machine &mdash; except in this case it&rsquo;s omnipresent, the sound of furnaces in the distance, laced with occasional gunshots and howls. To hear what&rsquo;s going on in the house, we have to tune them out a little. I hope we can&rsquo;t.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The characters, however, have. H&ouml;ss and his colleagues have been deeply formed by the regime in which they&rsquo;ve made their careers, in which Nazi ideology is encoded in its language and systems. (They speak with awe and obedience of Himmler and of Hitler &mdash; and, of course, of Eichmann.) H&ouml;ss has made a name for himself as an executor of efficient systems: &ldquo;His particular strength is turning theory into practice,&rdquo; a letter that a colleague writes about him explains. The practice of killing, that is.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>The characters in <em>The Zone of Interest</em> know exactly what’s happening; they’ve just, essentially, dissociated</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>It would be inexcusable and deadly wrong to say that <em>The Zone of Interest</em> is about people living in blissful ignorance about what&rsquo;s going on just over the garden wall. They know exactly what&rsquo;s happening; they&rsquo;ve just, essentially, dissociated. H&ouml;ss talks about gassing thousands of Jews as if it&rsquo;s an interesting problem to be solved, but it&rsquo;s his job. What&rsquo;s more chilling is that his family knows. Hedwig &mdash; who proudly tells her mother she&rsquo;s been nicknamed the &ldquo;queen of Auschwitz&rdquo; &mdash; admires a fur coat that arrives in a shipment brought in by a prisoner, trying on the lipstick she finds in the pocket. She warns the Jewish girl who works in the house that she could &ldquo;have my husband spread your ashes&rdquo; across the fields. She speaks with her visiting mother about whether a former neighbor of theirs, a Jewish woman her mother cleaned for, is &ldquo;in there.&rdquo; There&rsquo;s a tinge of revenge, the feeling that if she is, she probably deserves it because she was probably plotting Bolshevik nonsense in days gone by.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Perhaps the most telling scene comes when two of the young sons are playing in the backyard. The older locks the younger in the greenhouse &mdash; and then makes noises of gassing at him. The only family member who seems unable to ignore the horror of what&rsquo;s happening is the baby, who screams whenever the ovens light up.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The sound design in <em>The Zone of Interest</em> is so extraordinarily effective that it&rsquo;s easy to miss what the film is doing on a visual level. The scenes of familial bliss take place in a beautiful garden or a comfortable home, but they&rsquo;re shot with a severity that belies the setting; this is a world gone flat, a paean to a fascist dream of life properly lived, yet all surfaces and no depths. To live such a life would require a hollowing out, an ability to continually ignore one&rsquo;s senses &mdash; those ovens smell awful, but Hedwig never indicates she can smell them at all &mdash; until they more or less cease functioning. The insistent bright ugliness gives way occasionally to something shocking (a few black-and-white segments reversed into photonegative, or a shot of a flower that fades to blood-red), all the better to remind us that none of this is beautiful, and we ought to be horrified.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Introducing her book <em>The Life of the Mind </em>by writing about her Eichmann observations again, Arendt could have been writing about the H&ouml;sses. She was &ldquo;struck by the manifest shallowness&rdquo; in Eichmann, which made it &ldquo;impossible to trace the uncontestable evil of his deeds to any deeper level of roots or motives.&rdquo; In fact, she wrote, while his deeds were monstrous, she saw that &ldquo;the doer &mdash; at least the very effective one now on trial &mdash; was quite ordinary, commonplace, and neither demonic nor monstrous.&rdquo;</p>

<p>What is monstrous is the insistently abstracted language the H&ouml;sses and other Nazis use in order to avoid thought, especially contrasted with the wordless screams that Mica Levi has worked into the score. H&ouml;ss is praised for his advances in &ldquo;KL practice&rdquo; (KL standing for Konzentrationslager, or concentration camp); we watch him deep in conversation about circular burn chambers that can more efficiently exterminate. &ldquo;Burn, cool, unload, reload, continuously!&rdquo; the designer tells him. We watch rooms full of Nazi commandants applaud news of the beginning of the &ldquo;mass deportation&rdquo; of Hungarian Jews, with 25 percent &ldquo;retained for labor.&rdquo; Nobody says exactly what they mean.&nbsp;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>To see others as sub-human, worthy of prejudice or slavery or torture or extermination, we need to be coached through some mental gymnastics</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>Arendt wrote that the Nazi Sprachregelung introduced a degree of separation between the users and reality, making the horrors of Hitler&rsquo;s ideas, as Arendt put it, &ldquo;somehow palatable.&rdquo; Another way to say this is that humans are capable of great cruelties and monstrosities, but we&rsquo;re also creatures of compassion and empathy. To see others as sub-human, worthy of prejudice or slavery or torture or extermination, we need to be coached through some mental gymnastics. We need words that disconnect us from reality, that put a layer of remove between us and them, between action and thought. Between our humanity and what we are capable of.</p>

<p>The effect of watching <em>The Zone of Interest</em> ought, I think, to make us feel a mounting horror &mdash; and then, from there, to make us think, an act Arendt was always writing about. In the <em>Life of the Mind </em>introduction, she argued that the antidote to the thoughtless cruelty of the autocratic systems around us might be thinking: &ldquo;Might the problem of good and evil, our faculty of telling right from wrong, be connected with our faculty of thought?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>Maybe, she wrote. &ldquo;Could this activity be among the conditions that make men abstain from evildoing or even actually &lsquo;condition&rsquo; them against it?&rdquo; she asks. In other words, could learning to think, to avoid cliched thought and stock phrases, train us out of complacency? Could being shocked and horrified and made profoundly uncomfortable, left without easy language, perpetuate a moral good?</p>

<p>What Glazer does with <em>The Zone of Interest</em> is give the audience just a taste of that shock, and then force us into thinking. He never shows the atrocities outright &mdash; not to pique our curiosity but because we do not want to see them. To depict it would be, in its own way, an atrocity. Instead, he adds a visual and aural layer of abstraction in order to let us test ourselves, to see if we are, perhaps, the sort of people willing to be in their place now.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;The dividing line,&rdquo; Arendt wrote, &ldquo;between those who want to think, and therefore have to judge by themselves, and those who do not, strikes across all social and cultural or educational differences.&rdquo; All that seems clear right now, at this point in history, is this question is eternally worth facing.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The Zone of Interest<em> is playing in theaters.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Priscilla and Sofia Coppola’s lonely girls]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23954267/priscilla-review-sofia-coppola-spaeny" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/23954267/priscilla-review-sofia-coppola-spaeny</id>
			<updated>2023-11-09T17:22:43-05:00</updated>
			<published>2023-11-10T08:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Recommendations" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Sofia Coppola&#8217;s heroines are surrounded by people and lonely as hell, enveloped in a cage visible only to them. The Priscilla of Priscilla is maybe the loneliest of all, from the movie&#8217;s first moments. We meet her sitting alone in a diner, sipping a milkshake, a new girl in a new country. She seems like [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Cailee Spaeny in Priscilla. | A24" data-portal-copyright="A24" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25071435/priscilla3.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Cailee Spaeny in Priscilla. | A24	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Sofia Coppola&rsquo;s heroines are surrounded by people and lonely as hell, enveloped in a cage visible only to them. The Priscilla of <em>Priscilla</em> is maybe the loneliest of all, from the movie&rsquo;s first moments. We meet her sitting alone in a diner, sipping a milkshake, a new girl in a new country. She seems like a girl who prefers solitude; she does not, she tells her mother, want any new friends. The whole reason she meets Elvis Presley in the first place is that she&rsquo;s visibly lonely. The reason he gives her for wanting to keep seeing her is that he&rsquo;s lonely, too.</p>

<p>He&rsquo;s not, of course; he&rsquo;s Elvis Presley (Jacob Elordi), and he&rsquo;s always attended by a pack of admirers, male and female alike. Celebrity is lonely, but in surrounding himself with family and old friends, he&rsquo;s bathed in their glow &mdash; and Priscilla&rsquo;s, of course. He has to have her too.</p>

<p>Which is how Priscilla (a brilliant Cailee Spaeny), 10 years his junior and still in high school, ends up in his home, a princess in a castle. Coppola evokes that metaphor clearly, letting Priscilla meander through Graceland&rsquo;s opulence with an air of wonderment. It&rsquo;s impossible not to think of Kirsten Dunst in <em>Marie Antoinette</em>, wandering Versailles after her marriage to the dauphin. Neither are fish out of water &mdash; each feels a sense of entitlement to be there, granted in part by their connection to a king &mdash; but they are solitary and, in a sense, trapped. Escape isn&rsquo;t the goal. But the solitude soon overwhelms.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25071436/Priscilla1.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A girl with teased hair looks up at a tall man who is out of frame." title="A girl with teased hair looks up at a tall man who is out of frame." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Cailee Spaeny as 16-year-old Priscilla Presley, just arrived at Graceland. | A24" data-portal-copyright="A24" />
<p>Of course Coppola, daughter of filmmaking royalty, resonates with this feeling of set-apart solitude. It resurfaces across her work &mdash; the sisters of <em>The Virgin Suicides</em>, the sisters of <em>The Beguiled</em>, the bored new wife of <em>Lost in Translation</em> &mdash; as a key to understanding something specific about a particular female experience. Her characters are ing&eacute;nues, mostly, young women who appeal to men for their beauty and charm but live much richer interior lives than those around them suspect. When they&rsquo;re in a room, they&rsquo;re not fully there &mdash; they&rsquo;re observing everything from some kind of psychic remove.</p>

<p>Priscilla is perhaps the most extreme example, because while she shares the most DNA with Marie Antoinette, she has far less agency. She actually loves her king, and his absences pain her because he is all she has. Elvis is always going off somewhere: back to America, out West, to shoot a movie, to play a tour. He needs her at home, &ldquo;keeping the home fires burning,&rdquo; looking pretty for the camera. What someone tells Marie Antoinette near the beginning of her film applies equally to Priscilla: &ldquo;All eyes will be upon you.&rdquo; Her safest place is in Elvis&rsquo;s bedroom.</p>

<p>But swept up by her star before she even has the chance to grow up, she is at the mercy of his whims, and he has many of them. His books. His photos. His moods. His tempers. When he&rsquo;s not there &mdash; or when he shifts away from her &mdash; she is left without much to do. She can&rsquo;t even sit in the yard and play with her puppy, lest the gawkers at the gates catch sight of her and turn it into tabloid content.</p>

<p>Coppola&rsquo;s talent is in taking this story &mdash; much harder-edged when translated to Versailles &mdash; and giving it the rosy sheen of a girl&rsquo;s memory, of feeling the intensity of a star&rsquo;s rays on her so keenly that there&rsquo;s nothing to do but bask in it, at least for a while. That sheen comes from the movie&rsquo;s source material, Priscilla Presley&rsquo;s memoirs, which recount her years with Elvis the way she remembered them. That is why Priscilla is not a &ldquo;biopic&rdquo; about Priscilla Presley; it&rsquo;s a memoir. It is a story told not <em>about,</em> but <em>through</em> its main subject.&nbsp;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25071439/priscilla2.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A woman with teased, dark hair in white." title="A woman with teased, dark hair in white." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Priscilla, as Elvis molds her into his ideal woman. | A24" data-portal-copyright="A24" />
<p>And that&rsquo;s what makes it so fertile for Coppola&rsquo;s rumination on solitude and loneliness. It&rsquo;s the same story that her other characters live: a woman set apart somehow from the world around her. The story never leaves her quite where it found her. She grows in the solitude. She is the modern discoverer of an ancient truth: that the pain of loneliness is accompanied by gaining wisdom and self-understanding, something that she can give to others in the future. In Coppola&rsquo;s films, that doesn&rsquo;t always end well; in Priscilla, it does.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There&rsquo;s a funny echo in <em>Priscilla</em> of Coppola&rsquo;s <em>Somewhere</em>, her rare film with a man as its sole protagonist. Johnny Marco (Stephen Dorff), a dissipated movie star, is living the rarefied loneliness of the celebrity in the Chateau Marmont. He&rsquo;s surrounded by publicists and pole dancers and parties and he hates being physically alone, because that&rsquo;s when he&rsquo;s confronted with how hollow he is. It&rsquo;s when his 11-year-old daughter (Elle Fanning) reenters his life that he starts to realize the difference between being surrounded by people and actually connecting with them.&nbsp;</p>

<p>At the start of <em>Somewhere</em>, he&rsquo;s driving his sporty car in circles. At the end, he drives his car in a straight line, directly into the desert. We don&rsquo;t know where he&rsquo;s going, but he seems to, a smile on his face for the first time in a long time. It&rsquo;s a moment of transformation.</p>

<p>Priscilla, too, finally ends her time at Graceland, but only after we see her subtly begin to trade Elvis&rsquo;s world for her own. She takes karate lessons; she has a dinner party with people who are her friends, not his. She ventures, in other words, outside the castle, and realizes that a life outside is what she wants. So she gets in her car, takes a deep breath, and drives straight out the Graceland gates, accompanied by Dolly Parton singing &ldquo;I Will Always Love You.&rdquo; They&rsquo;re similar transformations, in a way: growth, a new understanding of what matters in life. For Coppola, this is a lesson taught in quietness, in separation from the hubbub.&nbsp;</p>

<p>So I suppose that it&rsquo;s no wonder she makes <a href="https://www.vox.com/movies" data-source="encore">movies</a>. It&rsquo;s in her DNA, of course. But there&rsquo;s another reason, too: There&rsquo;s no better place to experience the contemplative impulse, that quietness and solitude, at least for a little while, than a cinema.</p>

<p>Priscilla<em> is playing in theaters.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The long, long Hollywood strikes have ended]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/11/9/23953723/sag-aftra-strike-end" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/11/9/23953723/sag-aftra-strike-end</id>
			<updated>2023-11-09T10:56:26-05:00</updated>
			<published>2023-11-09T10:21:03-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Labor" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Hollywood actors&#8217; strike is finally ending. Late in the evening on November 8 &#8212; 118 days after walking off set &#8212; SAG-AFTRA, the union for actors and performers, and the AMPTP, an association of Hollywood&#8217;s largest studios and production companies, announced that they&#8217;d reached a deal. According to a statement from SAG-AFTRA, the union [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Members of SAG-AFTRA on the picket line on November 8, which turned out to be the final day of the historic strike. | Mario Tama/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Mario Tama/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25070677/1782993289.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Members of SAG-AFTRA on the picket line on November 8, which turned out to be the final day of the historic strike. | Mario Tama/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The Hollywood actors&rsquo; strike is finally ending.</p>

<p>Late in the evening on November 8 &mdash; 118 days after walking off set &mdash; SAG-AFTRA, the union for actors and performers, and the AMPTP, an association of Hollywood&rsquo;s largest studios and production companies, announced that they&rsquo;d reached a deal.</p>

<p>According to a <a href="https://www.sagaftra.org/tentative-agreement-reached">statement from SAG-AFTRA</a>, the union has &ldquo;arrived at a contract that will enable SAG-AFTRA members from every category to build sustainable careers. Many thousands of performers now and into the future will benefit from this work.&rdquo;</p>

<p>&ldquo;The AMPTP is pleased to have reached a tentative agreement and looks forward to the industry resuming the work of telling great stories,&rdquo; the <a href="https://press.amptp.org/node/19253">studios announced</a>.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What does the agreement say?</h2>
<p>The details won&rsquo;t be clear until the union releases them, but SAG-AFTRA&rsquo;s statement provides the broad strokes. The union values the contract at $1 billion, with &ldquo;extraordinary scope&rdquo; that includes increases to minimum compensation and pension and health plans, &ldquo;unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation&rdquo; to protect members from threats <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23700519/writers-strike-ai-2023-wga">posed by AI</a>, and &mdash; for the first time &mdash; a &ldquo;streaming participation bonus,&rdquo; which presumably means that workers who are part of successful streaming shows and movies will be compensated accordingly.</p>

<p>The deal also involves compensation increases for background performers (a.k.a. extras) and &ldquo;critical contract provisions protecting diverse communities.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Like the WGA &mdash; Hollywood&rsquo;s writers&rsquo; guild, which <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/9/24/23888673/wga-strike-end-sag-aftra-contract">ended its own strike in late September</a> &mdash; SAG-AFTRA was seeking a number of changes in their own contract, which they characterized as essential to making sure their members are both paid fairly and have a future in the industry.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Does this mean Hollywood is going back to work today?</h2>
<p>Not quite yet, but most likely very soon.&nbsp;</p>

<p>SAG-AFTRA&rsquo;s negotiating committee <a href="https://theankler.com/p/finally-sag-aftra-tentative-deal?r=2836lm&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=email">voted unanimously</a> to recommend the agreement to the union&rsquo;s leadership and to end the strike, starting at 12:01am on November 9.</p>

<p>Now, the union&rsquo;s national board will need to approve the agreement. Should that vote be successful (and the chances look good), the membership will vote. (The AMPTP is not a union and therefore does not need to vote.)</p>

<p>Yet once actors return to work, it marks the end of a long, long labor stoppage in Hollywood, which began when the WGA went on strike on May 2. SAG-AFTRA followed in July, but many productions had already halted, due to striking writers or other crew members in unions like IATSE and the Teamsters who refused to cross a picket line. The economic burden has been heavy and had repercussions <a href="https://www.vox.com/money/23843034/wga-sag-aftra-strike-amptp-studios-netflix-warner-bros">far beyond the members of the striking unions</a>.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Does this mean everything’s going to go back to normal?</h2>
<p>No. This strike had consequences &mdash; and that&rsquo;s the point.</p>

<p>The fall TV schedule is largely full of reality and game shows, and many shows and some movies have been delayed. The Emmys, which normally take place in September, moved to January 15, 2024. Publicity for new films from struck companies (such as Martin Scorsese&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.vox.com/2023/10/20/23924481/killers-of-the-flower-moon-reviews-analysis-dark-history"><em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em></a>, from Apple and Paramount) has not included lead actors, while talent for other films (such as Sofia Coppola&rsquo;s <em>Priscilla</em>, distributed by A24, which is not an AMPTP member) has sought waivers from the guild to allow actors to do interviews and walk red carpets.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>Furthermore, many workers <a href="https://www.vox.com/money/2023/8/22/23840473/writers-strike-actors-wga-sag-workers-economy-impact">inside and outside of Hollywood</a> are hurting, and studios like Warner Bros. Discovery, which initially saw a bump to their bottom line, have projected <a href="https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/warner-bros-discovery-strikes-500-million-earnings-loss-1235713393/">lower earnings for 2023</a>, by $300 million to $500 million.</p>

<p>The strike&rsquo;s true impact in the future will lie with the agreement. But right now, most of Hollywood &mdash; especially SAG-AFTRA members &mdash; will be focused on getting back to work. The American movie industry is hurting from years of bad financial decisions, Covid delays, and existential struggles, and there&rsquo;s a lot of ground to regain.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Hollywood is missing the big picture on the opioid crisis]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23950767/pain-hustlers-sackler-dopesick-usher-opioid-epidemic" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/23950767/pain-hustlers-sackler-dopesick-usher-opioid-epidemic</id>
			<updated>2023-11-07T13:20:18-05:00</updated>
			<published>2023-11-08T07:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Health" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Public Health" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[From its first moments, Pain Hustlers sets out to distinguish itself from the pack of recent series and movies about the opioid crisis with one simple declaration: This is the one that isn&#8217;t about the Sacklers. The family most closely associated with the crisis &#8212; due to their company Purdue Pharma&#8217;s misleading marketing of OxyContin [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Emily Blunt and Chris Evans in Pain Hustlers. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25065537/painhustlers.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Emily Blunt and Chris Evans in Pain Hustlers. | Netflix	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>From its first moments, <em>Pain Hustlers</em> sets out to distinguish itself from the pack of recent series and movies about the opioid crisis with one simple declaration: This is the one that isn&rsquo;t about the Sacklers.</p>

<p>The family most closely associated with the crisis &mdash; due to their company Purdue Pharma&rsquo;s misleading marketing of OxyContin and the ensuing lawsuits &mdash; are at the center of a number of high-profile Hollywood productions, many of which are based on books by journalists. <em>Dopesick</em> is the best of the scripted bunch, a multi-Emmy-winning limited Hulu series that splits its time between Purdue executives and Appalachian victims. There are more, including the Netflix series <em>Painkiller</em>, HBO&rsquo;s documentary series <em>The Crime of the Century</em>, movies like <em>Ben Is Back</em> and <em>Hillbilly Elegy</em>, and a <a href="https://www.esquire.com/uk/culture/a44761695/opioid-crisis-movies-tv-shows/">lot of others</a>. Laura Poitras&rsquo;s excellent documentary <a href="https://www.vulture.com/article/review-all-the-beauty-and-the-bloodshed-is-incendiary.html"><em>All the Beauty and the Bloodshed</em></a>, also on HBO, centers on photographer Nan Goldin&rsquo;s activism against the Sacklers and was among 2022&rsquo;s best films. Even the most recent Netflix series from horror master Mike Flanagan, <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23914925/fall-of-the-house-of-usher-netflix-review-edgar-allen-poe-references"><em>The Fall of the House of Usher</em></a>, is based on the Poe novel but patterned more or less explicitly on the Sacklers.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25065555/usher.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A person in a bird mask stands near a family portrait." title="A person in a bird mask stands near a family portrait." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Mike Flanagan’s &lt;em&gt;The Fall of the House of Usher&lt;/em&gt; is pretty clearly about the Sackler family. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p><em>Pain Hustlers</em>, based on journalist Evan Hughes&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.panmacmillan.com/authors/evan-hughes/pain-hustlers/9781035034512">book</a>, starts with mock-documentary footage introducing us to fictional characters from the story we&rsquo;re about to watch, most of whom are composites of real people from Hughes&rsquo;s reporting. Former pharmaceutical executive Pete Brenner (Chris Evans) says, with a touch of nonchalance, &ldquo;What you need to remember is we&rsquo;re not Purdue Pharma. We didn&rsquo;t kill America. This was 2011. Strictly speaking, we&rsquo;re not even part of the opioid crisis.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>As images of people on stretchers appear on screen, he continues. &ldquo;You know, Lonafen&rdquo; &mdash; the movie&rsquo;s fictional opioid, <a href="https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a45700279/lonafen-real-drug-pain-hustlers/#:~:text=In%20the%20movie%2C%20Lonafen%20is,patients%20about%20its%20addictive%20effects.">based on the drug Subsys</a> &mdash; &ldquo;was never a street drug. But you know, people hear &lsquo;fentanyl&rsquo; and they lose all fucking perspective.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Perspective is precisely what <em>Pain Hustlers </em>aims to provide, a goal it shares with others that weave together stories of the addicted with the addictors, with varying degrees of success. <em>Pain Hustlers</em> is the story of a single mother, Liza Drake (Emily Blunt), who is living a life of not-so-quiet desperation, strapped for cash and camping out with her daughter and mother in her disapproving sister&rsquo;s garage. One night, exasperated by her job as an exotic dancer, she plops down at the bar and meets Brenner, who drunkenly offers her a job. Turns out that Zanna, the (fictional, <a href="https://www.elle.com/culture/movies-tv/a45643456/netflix-pain-hustlers-true-story-explained/">based on Insys</a>) pharmaceutical company where he works, is also in desperate straits. So is everyone who works there. So are the doctors they approach in a barely legal attempt to entice them into prescribing Lonafen to desperate cancer patients. The whole thing reeks of panic, and even when Zanna&rsquo;s coffers begin to swell, that feeling remains.</p>

<p><em>Pain Hustlers</em> proclaims that the opioid crisis is at its core a story of American desperation: a desperate medical system that doesn&rsquo;t work for anyone, a desperate legal system that unevenly applies justice, and desperate people sucked into the orbit who need money or recognition or just to be able to get through the day without wanting to die. Tonally, though, it&rsquo;s a weird movie, with overtones of <em>Wolf of Wall Street</em> but not quite the same level of commitment to the bit, meaning that Liza comes out as kind of a plucky but misguided heroine with a good heart.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25065565/painhustlers2.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Three people in businesswear stand in an office, their arms reaching toward the ceiling in victory." title="Three people in businesswear stand in an office, their arms reaching toward the ceiling in victory." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;Pain Hustlers&lt;/em&gt; has some &lt;em&gt;Wolf of Wall Street&lt;/em&gt; vibes. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p>But in telling a story decoupled from the Sacklers, <em>Pain Hustlers</em> does get at something that can sometimes get lost in other media. That media has taken a variety of genre forms: <em>Painkiller</em> plays like a disaster story (and is directed by modern disaster auteur Peter Berg); <em>Dopesick</em> is a prestige drama; <em>Fall of the House of Usher</em> is gothic horror, with overt <em>Succession</em> vibes. Other movies have taken the form of addiction stories, a popular genre for a lot of Hollywood&rsquo;s history, with <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/11/magazine/addiction-movies.html">middling success</a>.&nbsp;<em>Pain Hustlers </em>feels like one of this year&rsquo;s wildly popular <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23672710/air-review-tetris-blackberry-affleck-jordan-howerton">business-guy movies</a>, a tale of a rise and a fall that takes the suffering into account but has a different sort of arc.</p>

<p>That artists keep messing with genre in telling this story suggests a nation trying to figure out what, exactly, this story even is. What is the crisis &#8230; about? It&rsquo;s about pain and our handling of it; it&rsquo;s about desperation. It&rsquo;s about villains &mdash; the Sacklers, or maybe just pain itself &mdash; but not the kind who can, or will, be beaten by heroes.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Trying to fit the opioid crisis into a genre arc is especially hard, I think, because Hollywood&rsquo;s tendency is to point a finger at a single villain and make everyone else victims, and that doesn&rsquo;t quite work here. It would be heinously wrong to call Purdue, OxyContin, and especially the Sacklers &ldquo;scapegoats&rdquo; for the crisis; they are in fact largely responsible for it, thanks to incredible disregard for the lives of others, and should be treated accordingly.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Yet the half-million dead and their grieving families across America aren&rsquo;t suffering purely because some isolated rich people decided to take advantage of them. The tendency to overwhelmingly focus on the Sacklers risks suggesting that if they could be punished, the problem would be solved. But there&rsquo;s far more to it than that. This is not a war story.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25065573/dopesick.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A group of business people sit in a boardroom." title="A group of business people sit in a boardroom." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Michael Stuhlbarg plays Richard Sackler in &lt;em&gt;Dopesick&lt;/em&gt;. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p>That&rsquo;s why, in the end, <em>All the Beauty and the Bloodshed</em> is such a monumental achievement and still by far the greatest of the current crop of opioid movies. Poitras and Goldin weave together Goldin&rsquo;s activism and her addiction to opioids with some surprising strands. There&rsquo;s Goldin&rsquo;s photographs, particularly <em>The Ballad of Sexual Dependency, </em>in which she chronicled the lives of friends, many of whom died from drugs or HIV-related illnesses. There&rsquo;s the story of Goldin&rsquo;s family, and in particular her sister, who was repeatedly institutionalized and died at an early age due, in part, Goldin says, to her parents&rsquo; unwillingness to acknowledge what their children needed to flourish.&nbsp;</p>

<p>These are not matters that obviously relate to one another, except that they all happened to Goldin. But the juxtaposition creates meaning, especially framed within Goldin&rsquo;s (successful) attempts to force major art museums like the Guggenheim and the Tate to remove the Sackler name from their galleries and stop taking money from the family.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25065574/allthebeauty.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A woman in a beret with a drum stands outside some arches. A giant red banner reading “Abandon the Sackler Name” is in the background." title="A woman in a beret with a drum stands outside some arches. A giant red banner reading “Abandon the Sackler Name” is in the background." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;All the Beauty and the Bloodshed&lt;/em&gt; is, in part, a film about trying to remove the Sackler name and money from the art world. | HBO" data-portal-copyright="HBO" />
<p>The Sacklers, and the kinds of people who profit in <em>Pain Hustlers</em>, can only be successful in the context of a social order that allows them to be. This requires systems that shield perpetrators from consequences, as long as they&rsquo;re rich enough. It requires a public villainization of addicts. It requires a kind of delirious American optimism bent on burying anything that isn&rsquo;t optimism, and a celebration of the wealthy. It of course requires a broken medical system that can be morally and ethically bankrupt. <em>All the Beauty and the Bloodshed</em> draws these themes through other sorts of public health crises, whether it&rsquo;s HIV/AIDS or the (mis)treatment and deaths of queer people, or the immense need for better mental health care.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Poitras&rsquo;s documentary best captures all of this, putting the crisis into its larger social and, one might say, spiritual roots. A society that pathologizes rather than cares for the weak, that stuffs what&rsquo;s painful into a closet, can&rsquo;t help but foster a crisis. Add some highly addictive drugs that stand to make some people very rich and you have a flame held to a puddle of gasoline. Nobody escapes the conflagration.</p>

<p>Pain Hustlers, Painkiller, <em>and</em> The Fall of the House of Usher <em>are streaming on Netflix. </em>Dopesick <em>is streaming on Hulu.</em> All the Beauty and the Bloodshed <em>is streaming on Max.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Curse is a fully bizarre and brilliant maze of a show]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23942170/the-curse-review-explained-fielder-safdie-stone" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/23942170/the-curse-review-explained-fielder-safdie-stone</id>
			<updated>2023-11-03T16:31:37-04:00</updated>
			<published>2023-11-07T08:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Few things are more irksome than the contemporary impulse (I think we can blame it on Lost) to decode every TV show as though it&#8217;s a puzzle to be solved instead of a story to be savored. But sometimes a close reading is the point. It&#8217;s how creators force audiences to lean in, set aside [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Nathan Fielder and Emma Stone in The Curse. | Beth Garrabrant/A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME" data-portal-copyright="Beth Garrabrant/A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25050630/TheCurse_S1_KeyArt_FilmScans_0203_RT.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=8.0325644504749,22.083668543846,77.069199457259,40.567176186645" />
	<figcaption>
	Nathan Fielder and Emma Stone in The Curse. | Beth Garrabrant/A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Few things are more irksome than the contemporary impulse (I think we can blame it on <em>Lost</em>) to decode every TV show as though it&rsquo;s a puzzle to be solved instead of a story to be savored. But sometimes a close reading is the point. It&rsquo;s how creators force audiences to lean in, set aside the phone, and immerse themselves in trying to figure out what&rsquo;s going on. <em>The Curse</em> is a lean-in show if ever there was one.</p>

<p>Created by Benny Safdie (one-half of the <em>Uncut Gems</em> filmmaking duo) and evil comedic genius Nathan Fielder, and starring the pair alongside the inimitable Emma Stone, <em>The Curse</em> is &#8230; a drama? But also a comedy. And kind of a satirical take on HGTV-style house-flipping shows, except it&rsquo;s also about native land rights in northern New Mexico, but also gentrification, and marriage. Squint and some other stuff shows up, maybe: Judaism, mysticism, ethics in documentary, trendy environmentalism, guilty liberalism, and other truly undefinable swivels that I, having watched the whole series, can&rsquo;t stop thinking about. A colleague recently called me Vox&rsquo;s &ldquo;resident Nathan Fielder whisperer&rdquo; &mdash; probably because I filed around <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23319898/rehearsal-review-finale-empathy">6,000</a> <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23291914/rehearsal-hbo-nathan-fielder-explain-review-spoilers">words</a> on <em>The Rehearsal</em>, his mystifying six-episode <a href="https://www.vox.com/hbo" data-source="encore">HBO</a> miniseries that aired in the summer of 2022 &mdash; and even I have been scratching my head about <em>The Curse.</em></p>

<p>In a good way, though. There&rsquo;s not too much I can or should say about the series&rsquo; specifics, which unfolds across 10 roughly hour-long episodes (and will be released weekly). To fully enjoy it, though, it&rsquo;s helpful to know the various sandboxes in which the creators are playing.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25050651/TheCurse_101_2674_RT.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Several men on a reality TV set." title="Several men on a reality TV set." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Nathan Fielder and Benny Safdie in &lt;em&gt;The Curse&lt;/em&gt;. | Richard Foreman Jr./A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME" data-portal-copyright="Richard Foreman Jr./A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME" />
<p>The setting, for instance, poses some intriguing questions. Though the story is fictional, it&rsquo;s set in the northern New Mexican city of Espa&ntilde;ola, not far from Santa Fe, and largely shot around there. While the latter is a tiny and more or less gentrified city where some of the country&rsquo;s richest people live, the former is more working-class, a diverse city whose population includes American Indians as well as descendants of Spanish settlers. It&rsquo;s also worth noting that a major employer in Espa&ntilde;ola is Los Alamos National Laboratory, where the Manhattan Project was developed &mdash; an interesting data point for a show that&rsquo;s out the same year as <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23800888/oppenheimer-review-physics-donne-trinity-christopher-nolan-fission-fusion-manhattan-project"><em>Oppenheimer</em></a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The Espa&ntilde;ola setting and the production&rsquo;s choice to find its cast mostly in New Mexico suggest a raft of issues around which <em>The Curse</em> revolves. There&rsquo;s the interaction between native pueblos and their land rights and the long history of encroachment on native rights, particularly by white Americans. In <em>The Curse</em>, that becomes a telescoping metaphor; gentrification of the kind the characters engage in is just the latest phase in a very old story.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There&rsquo;s also the issue of nuclear energy suggested by proximity to Los Alamos, which can be environmentally friendly or destructive, depending on how it&rsquo;s harnessed. That&rsquo;s an interesting layer in a show that explores how environmental consciousness can be directed &mdash; or misdirected &mdash; in ways that have deep unintended effects on less-affluent communities.</p>

<p>But the two characters at the show&rsquo;s center aren&rsquo;t lacking for money. Asher and Whitney Siegel (played by Fielder and Stone) are a married couple with deep pockets thanks to Whitney&rsquo;s real estate baron parents (Corbin Bernsen and Constance Shulman). As the show opens, Asher and Whitney are filming a pilot for an HGTV show they call <em>Fliplanthropy</em>, in which they build energy-efficient &ldquo;passive&rdquo; homes that will attract affluent buyers to Espa&ntilde;ola. The couple are good liberal-thinking people, which means they&rsquo;re aware of what their project could mean for the town&rsquo;s residents; to defend their work, they&rsquo;re scrambling for ways to raise the standard of living across the board in the city. <em>Fliplanthropy</em>&rsquo;s show&rsquo;s producer, Asher&rsquo;s childhood friend Dougie Schecter (Safdie), is along for the ride, but less interested in the philanthropy or the houses than in the Siegels&rsquo; marriage, in which he spots some cracks.</p>

<p>There&rsquo;s some broad comedy built into the character names, if I don&rsquo;t miss my guess. Asher&rsquo;s nickname is &ldquo;Ash,&rdquo; and the name Whitney means &ldquo;white island,&rdquo; and they do indeed stand out in a sea of native, Black, and Latino residents. Their names are reminders of what they represent, a force that becomes especially (and painfully) funny as they stumble over themselves to maintain good bleeding-heart cred while also getting what they want, which is money and fame. Furthermore, Dougie&rsquo;s last name, Schecter, is an Ashkenazic Jewish name that means &ldquo;ritual slaughterer&rdquo; &mdash; a pretty good hint to his character.&nbsp;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25050659/TheCurse_101_0426_RT.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Nathan Fielder and Emma Stone in &lt;em&gt;The Curse&lt;/em&gt;. | Richard Foreman Jr./A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME" data-portal-copyright="Richard Foreman Jr./A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME" />
<p>And that points to something worth remembering as you watch <em>The Curse</em>. Both Safdie and Fielder are Jewish, and both have explored Jewish ideas and culture in their work. Benny Safdie and his brother Josh, who wrote and directed 2019&rsquo;s <em>Uncut Gems</em>, have <a href="https://slate.com/culture/2019/12/uncut-gems-director-interview-jewish-stereotypes-adam-sandler.html">said in interviews</a> that it&rsquo;s their most Jewish film, with &ldquo;explicitly Jewish&rdquo; humor. And many (<a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23319898/rehearsal-review-finale-empathy">including me</a>) have pointed out that Fielder&rsquo;s careful construction of <em>The Rehearsal</em> seems expressly designed to explore concepts in Judaism as well as the experience of being Jewish in a Christian world.</p>

<p>Those themes pop up in the pilot episode of <em>The Curse</em> almost immediately, with Asher letting a &ldquo;Jesus&rdquo; slip on camera as an expletive, then glancing at a crucifix on the wall of the home they&rsquo;re in and asking for the footage to be deleted. Later, Asher and Whitney (who has converted, with characteristic alacrity, to her husband&rsquo;s faith) celebrate Shabbat with Whitney&rsquo;s parents. Judaism and <a href="https://www.vox.com/religion" data-source="encore">religion</a> more broadly are recurring themes in the show &mdash; unsurprising for a story that is fundamentally about generational harm, guilt, and responsibility.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Naturally, all this leads to the title of the show, which I didn&rsquo;t even think about until I neared the ending. There&rsquo;s a literal meaning to &ldquo;The Curse&rdquo; that becomes evident in the first episode, an incident reportedly inspired by an experience that Fielder had in real life.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But &ldquo;the curse&rdquo; is also shorthand for what happened in the Biblical book of Genesis, when Adam and Eve ate fruit growing on a tree they&rsquo;d been ordered to avoid and were cast out of paradise. God placed a curse upon them, which in its essence said they&rsquo;d have to perform labor in order to eat, and there&rsquo;d be strife in their marriage. You can pretty easily map that onto what happens in <em>The Curse</em>, with the fun addition of Dougie as the snake that tempts them into it. When it&rsquo;s this textual and so strongly linked to the creators&rsquo; interests, that&rsquo;s hardly an accident.</p>

<p>There is so much to unpack in <em>The Curse</em>. It&rsquo;s somewhat bizarre and winding, anchored by its three leads&rsquo; extraordinary performances and a sense of vaguely threatening mystery (due in large part to the score, composed by avant-garde jazz legend John Medeski). For much of the show, you&rsquo;re not quite sure what you&rsquo;re even watching, which somehow makes it even more compelling. But with Safdie and Fielder (who directed most of the episodes) behind it, there&rsquo;s a sense of driving at something. The fun of it comes from starting to detect what the bigger story really is.</p>

<p>The Curse <em>premieres on Paramount+ with Showtime on Friday, November 10, and airs on Showtime on Sunday, November 12, at 10 pm ET. Subsequent episodes will premiere weekly.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The surprising science that explains why we love thrillers]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/23933373/mattel-horror-hickey-you-are-watch-interview-why-we-love-thrillers" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/23933373/mattel-horror-hickey-you-are-watch-interview-why-we-love-thrillers</id>
			<updated>2023-10-30T10:24:29-04:00</updated>
			<published>2023-10-30T12:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been writing about movies for a long time, but even I find myself with a lot of questions that go unanswered. Why do my palms get sweaty when I watch a horror film, even though I know it&#8217;s not real? How does &#8220;soft power&#8221; really work when it comes to Hollywood, or Japanese cinema, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Walter Hickey’s new book You Are What You Watch explores how entertainment shapes the world we live in. | Hachette Book Group" data-portal-copyright="Hachette Book Group" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25034952/IMG_0183.jpeg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Walter Hickey’s new book You Are What You Watch explores how entertainment shapes the world we live in. | Hachette Book Group	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>I&rsquo;ve been writing about <a href="https://www.vox.com/movies" data-source="encore">movies</a> for a long time, but even I find myself with a lot of questions that go unanswered. Why do my palms get sweaty when I watch a horror film, even though I know it&rsquo;s not real? How does &ldquo;soft power&rdquo; really work when it comes to Hollywood, or Japanese cinema, or Chinese epic movies? What do we even mean when we say things like &ldquo;you are what you watch&rdquo;? Are we talking about feelings and intuitions and whether kids will want to buy a particular breakfast cereal? Or is there more to it than that?&nbsp;</p>

<p>Luckily, Walter Hickey is on the case. Hickey is Insider&rsquo;s deputy editor for data and analysis, and before that he was the chief culture writer at FiveThirtyEight. That means he&rsquo;s a Pulitzer-winning data expert who writes mostly about popular culture. His new book, <em>You Are What You Watch</em>, is one of the most fun and insightful books I&rsquo;ve ever encountered about pop culture, anchored in real data and science. It&rsquo;s a beautiful hardcover full-color book in which Hickey uses his expertise to make a larger argument: that we should take pop culture seriously because it takes <em>us</em> seriously.&nbsp;</p>
<iframe frameborder="0" height="200" src="https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=VMP9709956994" width="100%"></iframe>
<p>I talked to Hickey for an episode of <em><a href="https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area" data-source="encore">The Gray Area</a></em>, in which we discussed everything from the way horror films affect our bodies to the real reason blockbuster films became big in the 1970s (it&rsquo;s not what you think). Below is an excerpt from our conversation, in which Hickey confronted the idea that Hollywood is all about profit and mentions one of the biggest drivers behind movies that we often forget about. The whole conversation is fascinating, and I hope you&rsquo;ll listen.</p>

<p><em>This excerpt has been edited and condensed for clarity.</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Hickey</h3>
<p>There&rsquo;s this idea that the only motivation in Hollywood is profit &#8230; and I do want to push back on that idea. Because it&rsquo;s not really about profit; it&rsquo;s more about not losing money, which is different than profit.&nbsp;</p>

<p>A great historical way to look at the film industry is actually to look at <a href="https://www.vox.com/theater" data-source="encore">Broadway</a>. You have reboots on Broadway &mdash; they just call them revivals. There&rsquo;s a whole Tony for it! It&rsquo;s great.</p>

<p>What [Broadway] found is that revivals are more consistent bets. [It&rsquo;s true that] the heights that a new show will go to are often far higher than a revival. The shows that have run longest were all originals, right? They weren&rsquo;t revivals. But you&rsquo;re much more likely to make it to 100 performances or a break-even point if it&rsquo;s a revival.&nbsp;</p>

<p>So we see this incentive in Hollywood all the time. When you ask yourself, &ldquo;Why are they making sequels? Why are they investing their money in reboots? Why are they taking old IP and doing it?&rdquo; It&rsquo;s not because they think it&rsquo;s going to be profitable. It&rsquo;s that they think it&rsquo;s going to make back their budget. Nobody ever lost their job by delivering back the budget. But do you lose your job by taking a big splashy risk and then it not working out? Then you&rsquo;ve lost money, and then you lose your job. So when you think about the permanent class of people who run these [movie] studios and ecosystems and produce this movie and raise this money, it&rsquo;s really not a profit motivation. It&rsquo;s a risk-aversion motivation.&nbsp;</p>

<p>When you start to see the industry from that perspective, it makes a lot more sense of why some of these decisions get made the way they do.&nbsp;</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Alissa Wilkinson</h3>
<p>I think that even helps explain some other things. <em>Barbie</em> comes out, it&rsquo;s just a monster hit, and immediately we get <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/07/10/after-barbie-mattel-is-raiding-its-entire-toybox">a story in the New Yorker</a> about how Mattel is now developing a billion Mattel movies. People say, &ldquo;Why are they doing that?&rdquo;<em> </em>Well, they see an opportunity, and this is what happens. We get a hit, and then we get a hundred imitations of that hit, which trickle down into the bargain bin of <a href="https://www.vox.com/netflix" data-source="encore">Netflix</a> Originals or something eventually.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Hickey</h3>
<p>It&rsquo;s so interesting that you bring up Mattel because I have a little bit in the book on Hasbro. They&rsquo;re a fascinating company. You can look at Hasbro&rsquo;s earnings over time, and there are spikes from year to year, and they literally come from one of three things.</p>

<p>The first one is <em><a href="https://www.vox.com/star-wars" data-source="encore">Star Wars</a></em> prequels, because George Lucas &mdash; the best independent filmmaker who ever lived &mdash; financed those movies by pre-selling the toy rights to Hasbro. That&rsquo;s where the budget for <em>The Phantom Menace</em> came from. Hasbro made off like bandits; you can literally see a $300 million spike every time one of the prequels comes out. Obviously, those were very toy-focused movies that lent themselves well to a lot of different action figures.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Alissa Wilkinson</h3>
<p>And the audience are people who are accustomed to buying action figures.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Hickey</h3>
<p>A hundred percent. I think <em>Star Wars</em> is interesting because of how toy-friendly it is. George Lucas is a very successful toy maker! Really good filmmaker, but nobody would ever design Boba Fett unless they had an interest in the toy line.</p>

<p>So you have the <em>Star Wars</em> era, and then when they run out of prequels, what do they do? They start producing the <em>Transformers</em> movies. Paramount made a little bit of money off of that when it came to the actual film distribution, but those movies are genuinely toy commercials. There&rsquo;s a toy spike every single year one is released, even for the crappy <em>Transformers</em> movies.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>“Not being naive about where this money comes from is a lot of fun”</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>And then, <em>My Little Pony</em> was a huge boon for them. They basically took their girls division from zero to several hundred million dollars over the course of only a few years.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I think not being naive about where this money comes from is a lot of fun. But I think Mattel was jealous of Hasbro for decades because they didn&rsquo;t get <em>Star Wars</em>, they didn&rsquo;t get <em>Transformers</em>. Now, finally, <em>Barbie</em>&rsquo;s a hit. So they&rsquo;re like, &ldquo;Of course we&rsquo;re gonna make the Guess Who movie.&rdquo;</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Alissa Wilkinson</h3>
<p>I know. I had to explain to someone 10 years younger than me what a Polly Pocket was. They did not know.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Hickey</h3>
<p>Do you mean, the fifth-highest-grossing film of 2027?</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Alissa Wilkinson</h3>
<p>I sure do. <a href="https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-07-26/lily-collins-mattel-polly-pocket-lena-dunham-barbie">Directed by Lena Dunham</a>.</p>

<p>This does all ring a bell for people of a certain age. The cartoons that were on TV when we were kids [in the 1980s and early 1990s] were all purely toy advertisements, right? It was even hard to tell whether the toy or the show came first because they were so integrated with one another.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Hickey</h3>
<p>That&rsquo;s Reagan for ya!</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Alissa Wilkinson</h3>
<p>So, it&rsquo;s spooky season right now. You have a couple of really delightful insights about horror in the book.&nbsp; One has to do with the secretion of a coagulant. You write that there was a study in which some people are watching a soothing documentary, and 86 percent of the participants saw a decrease in the level of this particular coagulant that indicates that the blood is more prepared for clotting. After the group watched the scary movie, 57 percent saw that coagulant rise.</p>

<p>The thing is, 57 percent of people in that movie did not think they were <em>literally</em> about to be slashed or killed. But their bodies thought they were.&nbsp;</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Hickey</h3>
<p>I did a ton of research into scientific findings and talked to a lot of scientists to do this. I actually built something called a GSR device, to measure galvanic skin response. There are tiny pores on your palm, and they secrete a little bit of sweat. The amount of sweat that they secrete goes up when you are in a more emotionally charged situation &mdash; your fight-or-flight response. It&rsquo;s basically just making you a little bit more slippery, more dextrous. It&rsquo;s your body&rsquo;s way of subliminally preparing you for whatever might come down the pipe.&nbsp;</p>

<p>So I built this cool little thing, where you have two little electrical [sensors]. One sends out electricity, one receives it, and you put them on two different fingers, and it basically measures how much of the electricity gets from point A to point B. The higher it is, the sweatier you get. So we can infer that you&rsquo;re a little bit more emotionally intense at a time. This is one of the tests in certain polygraphs.&nbsp;</p>

<p>If you put one of these on a person and show them a movie, you can actually see how they feel during the movie. I got I think a dozen and a half of my friends to do this. It was a cool experiment. I built about nine of these things. You&rsquo;re able to watch how people feel over the course of a movie. I put this on during <em>Jaws</em>, which I just think is a phenomenal film. I was just so excited when I saw the chart for it. There&rsquo;s a spike every 10 minutes, and that&rsquo;s how that movie works. It&rsquo;s basically a slasher movie where every 10 minutes, something horrible happens to somebody.</p>

<p>Then there&rsquo;s 10 minutes of quiet &mdash; too quiet. Then it happens again. It spikes right in the middle during the Fourth of July scene, which is obviously Spielberg at his finest, at his earliest, and like just kind of revealing the director that he would eventually be. And then over the course of the back half of the film, it&rsquo;s just three guys on a boat being terrorized by a shark. So you have, again, this punctuated emotional intensity that is just so fun.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But not all movies are like that. Another one &mdash; it&rsquo;s not spooky per se, but <em>Mad Max: Fury Road</em> really involves kind of a slow rise. Then right 40 minutes before the end, when it&rsquo;s that last chase, boom, [it spikes] right to the top.</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s also not just horror. I put <em>Casablanca</em> in the book right next to Spike Lee&rsquo;s <em>Do The Right Thing</em> because those charts came out looking similar. It&rsquo;s just a slow and steady increase in intensity over the course of those films. You wouldn&rsquo;t necessarily think to pair those films as peers, but when you really think about it, those are both movies in which it&rsquo;s getting hotter hour by hour. The temperature&rsquo;s going up. People have to make some big decisions. People&rsquo;s lives are going to be irrevocably changed. The emotional intensity just ratchets up minute by minute by minute in each of those films. You wouldn&rsquo;t necessarily think that they are too similar on the outside, but when you actually look at what they&rsquo;re doing to the viewers, it&rsquo;s a similar roller coaster.&nbsp;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>“The crux of the book is that this stuff is not frivolous. It really matters.”</p></blockquote></figure><h3 class="wp-block-heading">Alissa Wilkinson</h3>
<p>That matches what we intuitively feel. My senses have to be dulled a little bit because of the amount of these movies I have to watch for my job, sometimes in very close succession. But I still have that feeling that a lot of people have, where you think &ldquo;I want to watch that movie, but I don&rsquo;t want to watch it before bed.&rdquo; It&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s a real thing going on in your real body. Your body thinks that you&rsquo;ve escaped something or gone through this big emotional experience.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I think that underlines a point you keep making, which is that this is real. Entertainment is real. Pop culture is real. It&rsquo;s not just something out there that we chew on and then spit out when we&rsquo;re done with it.&nbsp;</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Hickey</h3>
<p>Yeah. The crux of the book is that this stuff is not frivolous. It really matters. It has remarkable effects on the world as a whole. Even the stuff that is frivolous isn&rsquo;t frivolous.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There&rsquo;s a chart in the book that I love of [the popularity of] baby names, where you can draw a line. You can see when [Rachel&rsquo;s baby] Emma showed up on the show <em>Friends. &hellip; </em>There&rsquo;s a chart in the book about dogs. Dog movies make people like dogs. This is a very cool finding. My favorite thing about this is the movie <em>Beethoven</em>, which involves a very big St. Bernard. The entire thesis of this film is &ldquo;Dang, this animal, woof, tough to care for.&rdquo; Nevertheless, St. Bernard adoptions spiked immediately afterward. You see this with <em>Lassie</em>. After <em>101 Dalmatians</em> got re-released in the early 1990s, Dalmatians became the eighth most popular dog in America pretty much overnight.&nbsp;</p>

<p>We laugh, and that&rsquo;s frivolous. But you&rsquo;re talking 40,000 dogs that were adopted instead of not being adopted, right? This changed the lives of 40,000 dogs &mdash; this is a massive thing. It&rsquo;s a huge reverberation. It&rsquo;s not just people, you know, buying <a href="https://www.amazon.com/squid-game-tracksuit/s?k=squid+game+tracksuit">sweatpants</a> after <em>Squid Game</em> comes out. It&rsquo;s literally like this is changing people&rsquo;s lives in a very very meaningful way.</p>

<p>You Are What You Watch <em>is </em><a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/walter-hickey/you-are-what-you-watch/9781523515899/?lens=workman-publishing-company"><em>available from booksellers</em></a><em>.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[What the end of Killers of the Flower Moon means]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23924295/killers-flower-moon-ending-explain-scorsese" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/23924295/killers-flower-moon-ending-explain-scorsese</id>
			<updated>2024-02-08T13:38:34-05:00</updated>
			<published>2023-10-20T17:30:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[To paraphrase Soren Kierkegaard: A movie must be watched forward, but the best movies beg to be understood backward. Killers of the Flower Moon, Martin Scorsese&#8217;s latest epic, is such a movie. What he&#8217;s really doing isn&#8217;t evident until the film&#8217;s very final moments. The last scenes are a rhetorical gesture calculated to knock us [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Leonardo DiCaprio and Lily Gladstone in Killers of the Flower Moon. | Paramount" data-portal-copyright="Paramount" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25015953/killers.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Leonardo DiCaprio and Lily Gladstone in Killers of the Flower Moon. | Paramount	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>To paraphrase Soren Kierkegaard: A movie must be watched forward, but the <a href="https://www.vox.com/movies" data-source="encore">best movies</a> beg to be understood backward. <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23919458/killers-flower-moon-review-martin-scorsese-leonardo-dicaprio-robert-deniro"><em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em></a>, Martin Scorsese&rsquo;s latest epic, is such a movie. What he&rsquo;s really doing isn&rsquo;t evident until the film&rsquo;s very final moments. The last scenes are a rhetorical gesture calculated to knock us flat.</p>

<p>This is not unusual for Scorsese throughout his career &mdash; people have argued about the ending of <em>Taxi Driver</em> for longer than I&rsquo;ve been alive &mdash; but something&rsquo;s been going on with him in the last decade or so. The last few shots of movies like <em>Silence</em> and <em>The Irishman</em> are revelatory filters for the hours of drama that have just transpired. Scorsese has arguably been the greatest living American filmmaker for a long time, but his late work is almost painfully reflective, introspective in a way that invites viewers to look inside themselves, if they&rsquo;re willing.&nbsp;</p>

<p>For <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em>, he once again holds his fire till the very end, though there are hints of what he&rsquo;s doing &mdash; questions about who gets to tell the story of other people&rsquo;s tragedies and whether they should at all &mdash; sprinkled throughout the film. It&rsquo;s not a twist so much as an unfolding, and a bold move from a man who has spent his life telling stories. It is perhaps his boldest ending yet. Couple it with a few other recent films and a whole project emerges. He is a man approaching the end of his life (he&rsquo;s turning 81 this November), reevaluating it all.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8565937/spoilers_below.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Image reads “spoilers below,” with a triangular sign bearing an exclamation point." title="Image reads “spoilers below,” with a triangular sign bearing an exclamation point." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Spoilers for &lt;em&gt;Silence&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;The Irishman&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Killers of the Flower Moon&lt;/em&gt; follow." data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>You could reach way back to films like <em>Shutter Island</em> and <em>Wolf of Wall Street</em>, movies about men who have one delusion about themselves and discover, a bit too late, how they really look to the people around them. But this crystallized in <em>Silence</em> (2016), which centers on Father Rodrigues (Andrew Garfield), a 17th-century Portuguese priest who has traveled to Japan with a fellow priest. They aim to convert the Japanese and minister to the Christians who&rsquo;ve been forced underground by a government hostile to European influence, including their religion.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Scorsese spoke often about the impetus for that film (adapted from a 1966 novel by the Japanese Catholic writer Sh&#363;saku End&#333;), which he tried to make for 25 years before finally succeeding. He&rsquo;d first been introduced to End&#333;&rsquo;s book after being the target of vitriol for 1988&rsquo;s <em>The Last Temptation of Christ</em>, which Scorsese considered to be an act of devotion while others, most of whom hadn&rsquo;t seen the film, disagreed. The book addresses faith, doubt, and what it might mean for God to go silent in the face of extreme pain.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There&rsquo;s a lot to say about <em>Silence</em> (in <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2016/12/21/14005760/silence-review-spoilers-martin-scorsese-andrew-garfield-adam-driver">my review</a>, I wrote that it was &ldquo;the kind of film that cuts at everyone&rsquo;s self-perceptions, including my own&rdquo;). Yet the most lingering, complicating image in the film comes right at the end, when we discover that Father Rodrigues, despite having publicly renounced his faith and lived without it for decades, has been cremated with a crucifix. That scene isn&rsquo;t in the novel; it&rsquo;s Scorsese&rsquo;s addition. Suddenly we&rsquo;re not sure what exactly to believe about Rodrigues or, indeed, about the nature of faith and apostasy itself. Scorsese, a cradle Catholic who once thought of being a priest, has spoken about his return to faith in his later years, and has <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/11/26/20975991/scorsese-career-god-sacred-profane-irishman-netflix-streets-bull-innocence-last-temptation">always been looking for God in one way or another</a>. It&rsquo;s a profound question in search of an answer, one he designed because he&rsquo;s asking the question himself. The availability of divine forgiveness (and retribution) is a recurring theme throughout Scorsese&rsquo;s movies.&nbsp;Here, though, he is asking the older man&rsquo;s question: If God is really out there, caring about the actions of humans, then what would God be willing to forgive at the end of a man&rsquo;s life?</p>

<p>That very theme deepens with <em>The Irishman</em>, which starts out, quite purposefully, as a redux of <em>Goodfellas</em>: a story of mobsters, violent men, men with egos to guard and vendettas to serve and a lot of skeletons stashed in the closet. But about an hour from the end, things flip on their head: Suddenly Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro), a hitman for the mob and the antihero of the story, is made to confront an important truth. All his life, he&rsquo;s told himself that he did what he did to protect and provide for his family, his daughters, his friends. Now, nearing the end of his life, the truth comes into focus. He hurt his family; he betrayed his friend; his favorite daughter won&rsquo;t even speak to him. At the end of his life, he is alone, wholly alone. The weight of his sins is too much to bear. He can live only through self-delusion.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25015939/irishman.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="An old man is seen through a half-open door." title="An old man is seen through a half-open door." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Robert De Niro in the final shot of &lt;em&gt;The Irishman.&lt;/em&gt; | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p>The final shot of <em>The Irishman</em> is immensely painful; it might be the saddest ending I&rsquo;ve ever seen. Having just been informed by a visiting priest at his nursing home that it&rsquo;s just about Christmas, he asks the priest to leave the door open. Through the half-ajar opening, we see the big man, once celebrated by hundreds, now utterly alone with himself. It&rsquo;s a stunning moment of self-implication for Scorsese, who in <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/martin-scorsese-profile">a recent <em>GQ </em>profile</a> spoke at length about mortality, guilt, forgiveness, and the feeling of your friends and family slipping away. &ldquo;I just wanna be as honest with myself as possible,&rdquo; Scorsese says. &ldquo;And if I&rsquo;m honest in the work, maybe I could be honest as a person. <em>Maybe</em>.&rdquo;</p>

<p>This context is good to keep in mind while watching <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em>. The film, which <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23919458/killers-flower-moon-review-martin-scorsese-leonardo-dicaprio-robert-deniro">reshuffles the elements</a> of David Grann&rsquo;s nonfiction book of the same title, centers on two characters: Mollie Kyle (Lily Gladstone), an Osage woman who marries Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio), a dissipated veteran under the sway of his uncle William Hale (Robert De Niro) and his plot to steal the Osage people&rsquo;s wealth.</p>

<p>As Grann notes in his book, <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23920002/killers-flower-moon-true-story-osage-murders-reign-of-terror-mollie-burkhart-what-happened">the Osage murders</a> &mdash; which involved dozens, maybe hundreds of people &mdash; were a media sensation after they were investigated 100 years ago, but were largely forgotten far too rapidly. Dead Osage people simply weren&rsquo;t a story to America the way dead white people would have been. In 1932, the still-nascent FBI, which had investigated the case, started <a href="https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2005/october/jfrench_radio102405">working with a radio program</a> called <em>The Lucky Strike Hour</em> to dramatize cases the bureau had worked on, with the full cooperation of J. Edgar Hoover. Among its first episodes was the Osage murders.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In the hands of a 1930s radio show &mdash; an early <a href="https://www.vox.com/true-crime" data-source="encore">true crime</a> show, really &mdash; the story became, in essence, entertainment. Grann explains that fictional scenes were written by one of the FBI agents and shared with the producers of the program. &ldquo;In one of those scenes, Ramsey shows Ernest Burkhart the gun he plans to use to kill Roan, saying, &lsquo;Look at her, ain&rsquo;t she a dandy?&rsquo;&rdquo; Grann recounts. The goal of the broadcast was, in essence, to convince the American public that the FBI was a great force for good: &ldquo;The broadcasted radio program concluded, &lsquo;So another story ends and the moral is identical with that set forth in all the others of this series &#8230; [The criminal] was no match for the Federal Agent of Washington in a battle of wits.&rdquo;</p>

<p>None of this was particularly unusual in the 1930s, when the exploits of high-profile bank robbers and fugitives like Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow, or John Dillinger, were followed breathlessly across America. Still, there&rsquo;s an obvious queasiness in turning other people&rsquo;s incredible tragedy &mdash; the exploitation and even murder of your family by men who considered themselves more worthy of their wealth simply because they were white &mdash; into entertainment. It&rsquo;s a difficult ethical wicket, and especially thorny in the case of Scorsese, whose movies have often (though not always) focused on bad men doing bad things, but less often on the people who are collateral damage.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25015946/killers5.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Four women in Osage garb sit on the ground, holding fans." title="Four women in Osage garb sit on the ground, holding fans." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;Killers of the Flower Moon&lt;/em&gt; feels like Scorsese’s attempt to grapple with responsibility, and complicity, in storytelling. | Paramount" data-portal-copyright="Paramount" />
<p>Had the movie ended with its nearly final scene &mdash; Mollie confronting Ernest about poisoning her insulin, him unable to confess, and her walking out &mdash; it would have been a stunner. But Scorsese tags on what feels, at first, like a hilarious but incongruous epilogue on the set of the radio show. We watch a narrator, vocal performers, and a foley artist re-create the rest of the story in a hokey old-timey way. It&rsquo;s funny. You have to laugh.</p>

<p>Then Scorsese himself &mdash; a man <a href="https://www.theringer.com/movies/2023/10/18/23921581/martin-scorsese-movies-cameo-appearances-taxi-driver-robert-de-niro">who has done many cameos</a>, in his own films and others&rsquo; &mdash; steps onto the radio stage. I was at the premiere screening at Cannes, and a hush instantly fell over the room. His lines are simple: He explains that Mollie&rsquo;s obituary didn&rsquo;t mention the murders. Then we cut to people of the Osage Nation, in what appears to be a contemporary ceremony, dancing in a circle, shot from overhead.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There&rsquo;s more than one legitimate way to interpret this choice by Scorsese, which amounts, I think, to essentially breaking the fourth wall. What&rsquo;s clear is that it&rsquo;s a choice designed to make you think about everything that&rsquo;s come before. As one of the film&rsquo;s Osage language consultants, Christopher Cote, pointed out at a premiere while voicing his conflicted feelings, <a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/killers-of-the-flower-moon-osage-consultant-mixed-feelings-1235620231/?fbclid=IwAR0gTf0sbesKkZ70AielY0FWhrOtugdiVXYL1RYLb9fzbZmQCIXrMrNxYXA">this is not a film for the Osage</a> (though members of the Osage nation have praised the film and participated in its making and promotion). Furthermore, having DiCaprio, one of the world&rsquo;s biggest stars, in one of the lead roles means that the center of gravity is continually getting pulled toward him.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Scorsese is no idiot; he knows this. He also knows the fact about Hollywood, which is that he and DiCaprio (and De Niro) are the reason this movie is getting made and heavily promoted. The complexity of making a movie, a work of entertainment, about a tragedy that&rsquo;s still very much living in the memories of the Burkhart family and the Osage more broadly is complex. Having to balance the Osage perspective with the white characters &mdash; even if Gladstone&rsquo;s performance is clearly the heart and soul of the film &mdash; is further messy.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Scorsese&rsquo;s appearance at the end of <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em> represents another anchor in his recent self-reflection, prompted by a lifetime of telling stories. He&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/martin-scorsese-profile">upfront in the GQ<em> </em>profile</a> about what matters to him now, in his sixth decade of filmmaking: God, family and friends, and movies. Few filmmakers have done more to promote the work of directors from underrepresented communities than Scorsese, whose <a href="https://www.criterion.com/boxsets/1021-martin-scorseses-world-cinema-project-no-1">World Cinema Project</a> and extensive work as <a href="https://mubi.com/en/cast/martin-scorsese/films/executive_producer">an executive producer</a> is stunning. He cares about the art form and about who gets to tell stories &mdash; the major reason for his <a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/11/8/20950451/martin-scorsese-marvel-movies-cinema-feige">much-maligned comments</a> about the artistry of the most successful movies in the world.&nbsp;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>Scorsese’s appearance at the end of <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em> represents another anchor in his recent self-reflection, prompted by a lifetime of telling stories</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>Showing up at the end of <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em> to specifically note how the story of the murders and of Mollie&rsquo;s family was largely ignored is a tacit acknowledgment that he knows this isn&rsquo;t a perfectly constructed story, either. Here he is, a man whose success comes at least in small part from proximity to the kind of men who murdered, asking for forbearance. For forgiveness, in a sense. An admission that these real events are not really fodder for an award-winning movie with a red-carpet Cannes premiere. None of it ever really has been.</p>

<p><em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em>, he&rsquo;s said <a href="https://scroll.in/reel/1057688/a-story-of-complicity-sin-by-omission-martin-scorsese-on-killers-of-the-flower-moon">in interviews</a>, is &ldquo;a story of complicity, silent complicity in certain cases, sin by omission.&rdquo; Read that backward over his late career and you start to see what he&rsquo;s getting at: Where have I been complicit, even silently? Where have I sinned by omission? And in an imperfect world, where is there forgiveness to be sought? That it&rsquo;s conveyed in masterpieces of cinema, made by a genius, makes it easy to forget the point: These are questions for us to ask, too.</p>

<p>Killers of the Flower Moon <em>is playing in theaters.</em></p>
<div id="coral_thread"></div>

  (function() {
      var d = document, s = d.createElement('script');
      s.src = 'https://voxbookclub.coral.coralproject.net/assets/js/embed.js';
      s.async = false;
      s.defer = true;
      s.onload = function() {
          Coral.createStreamEmbed({
              id: "coral_thread",
              autoRender: true,
              rootURL: 'https://voxbookclub.coral.coralproject.net',
              // Uncomment these lines and replace with the ID of the
              // story's ID and URL from your CMS to provide the
              // tightest integration. Refer to our documentation at
              // https://docs.coralproject.net for all the configuration
              // options.
              // storyID: '${storyID}',
              // storyURL: '${storyURL}',
          });
      };
      (d.head || d.body).appendChild(s);
  })();
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The wisest choice in Killers of the Flower Moon]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23919458/killers-flower-moon-review-martin-scorsese-leonardo-dicaprio-robert-deniro-oscar-nominee" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/23919458/killers-flower-moon-review-martin-scorsese-leonardo-dicaprio-robert-deniro-oscar-nominee</id>
			<updated>2024-03-06T17:34:54-05:00</updated>
			<published>2023-10-17T06:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Recommendations" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[There are many ways to tell a story, especially one that really happened, and this fact has lately tugged at Martin Scorsese&#8217;s mind. In movies like The Irishman and The Wolf of Wall Street, he carefully remolds his protagonists&#8217; true stories &#8212; or at least, they say they&#8217;re true &#8212; into a new angle on [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Leonardo DiCaprio and Lily Gladstone in Killers of the Flower Moon. | Paramount Pictures" data-portal-copyright="Paramount Pictures" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25006895/killers4.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Leonardo DiCaprio and Lily Gladstone in Killers of the Flower Moon. | Paramount Pictures	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>There are many ways to tell a story, especially one that really happened, and this fact has lately tugged at Martin Scorsese&rsquo;s mind. In <a href="https://www.vox.com/movies" data-source="encore">movies</a> like <em>The Irishman</em> and <em>The Wolf of Wall Street</em>, he carefully remolds his protagonists&rsquo; true stories &mdash; or at least, they say they&rsquo;re true &mdash; into a new angle on their tales, subtly repositioning the men at their center (a mob hitman, a Wall Street gangster) to reveal new angles and undermine their self-aggrandizement. The results are revelatory portraits of ego and self-delusion, unpacked by a filmmaker who&rsquo;s plenty familiar with those traits. How you tell a story determines what it&rsquo;s about &mdash; far more than the facts themselves.</p>

<p><em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em>, Scorsese&rsquo;s newest epic, is based on an exceptionally well-told nonfiction book by the journalist David Grann. The book&rsquo;s narrative structure is built into the subtitle: &ldquo;The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI.&rdquo; Much of the book, indeed, centers on the crime and the newly formed FBI&rsquo;s investigation, unpacking the origins of the bureau and the men who conducted the investigation along with the perpetrators and the victims. It&rsquo;s effective storytelling, history coupled with mystery.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But story structure on the page doesn&rsquo;t always translate effectively to the screen. In interviews, Scorsese has said that he wasn&rsquo;t happy with his first pass at the screenplay because &ldquo;I realized I was making a movie about all the white guys,&rdquo; as <a href="https://time.com/6311403/martin-scorsese-killers-of-the-flower-moon-interview/?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=editorial&amp;utm_term=entertainment_movies&amp;linkId=234643225">he told Time</a>. &ldquo;Meaning I was taking the approach from the outside in, which concerned me.&rdquo; After a private screening I attended in New York, he further elaborated, noting that he realized the center of the story <em>he </em>was telling wasn&rsquo;t the FBI at all: It was the strange love story of Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Mollie Burkhart (Lily Gladstone), a white man and his Osage wife, who lived together and raised a family while Ernest was actively involved in a slow-burning scheme to defraud Mollie&rsquo;s family, concocted by his uncle William Hale (Robert De Niro). A self-declared &ldquo;friend to the Osage,&rdquo; William wants everyone to call him &ldquo;King.&rdquo;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25006902/killers3.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="An older man and a middle-aged man talk to one another. The older man is sitting inside a car. Both are wearing circa 1920s garb." title="An older man and a middle-aged man talk to one another. The older man is sitting inside a car. Both are wearing circa 1920s garb." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Robert De Niro and Leonardo DiCaprio in &lt;em&gt;Killers of the Flower Moon.&lt;/em&gt; | Paramount Pictures" data-portal-copyright="Paramount Pictures" />
<p>Initially, DiCaprio &mdash; one of Scorsese&rsquo;s go-to leading men &mdash; was slated to play Tom White, the FBI agent leading the murder investigation; <a href="https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/flower-moon-script-changes-jesse-plemons-dicaprio-role-1234617674/">eventually he was recast</a> as Ernest Burkhart, with Jesse Plemons taking over the role. The shift was prompted, <a href="https://variety.com/2023/film/news/leonardo-dicaprio-killers-of-the-flower-moon-rewrite-changing-characters-1235727659/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20focus%20would've%20been,Osage%20saying%2C%20'Do%20something.">Gladstone has said</a>, by a simple fact: whoever the lead actor is playing will be the center of the movie. Recasting DiCaprio puts Ernest and Mollie at the center, and the grief of the Osage nation comes to the foreground.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The scheme to slowly transfer the wealth of the oil-rich Osage over to the white men around them, via a combination of marriage and murder, is the plot that powers <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em>. It did really happen, in the early 1920s. But in Scorsese&rsquo;s film, that plot is not really the story the movie is telling. In keeping with his larger body of work, <em>Killers</em> is about how organized crime, and the egos that drive it, make victims of the innocent, or even just the less bright. If <em>The Wolf of Wall Street</em> was about the organized crime-like tactics of high finance, then <em>Killers</em> is about how, when it comes right down to it, our history is rife with gangster behavior. The centuries-long effort in US history to strip indigenous people of their homes, their families, their wealth, and their dignity, often under the guise of caring for them, is just another example.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8565937/spoilers_below.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Image reads “spoilers below,” with a triangular sign bearing an exclamation point." title="Image reads “spoilers below,” with a triangular sign bearing an exclamation point." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Mild spoilers follow!" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>With its wide-open vistas and slow, droning score (composed by Robbie Robertson, <a href="https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/martin-scorsese-remembers-robbie-robertson-collaborations-friendship-1234820757/">a close friend of Scorsese&rsquo;s</a>), <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em> is drawing on a cinematic language developed and perfected in Hollywood&rsquo;s tellings of how the West was won. That&rsquo;s significant: Most of our popular conception of the West is borrowed from movies about heroes and cowboys, in which Native Americans have frequently been sidelined or positioned as outsiders. Scorsese evokes that kind of storytelling while flipping it on its head. The first moments of the movie are Osage leaders mourning that their children will &ldquo;be taught by white people&rdquo;; the next is the discovery of oil on Osage land and a jubilant dance.</p>

<p>And then, immediately, a 1920s-style film reel starts, black and white, silent, with intertitles, explaining who the Osage are (&ldquo;the richest people per capita on earth,&rdquo; the &ldquo;chosen people of chance&rdquo;). It&rsquo;s the kind of reel that curious moviegoers would have seen before a feature presentation at the theater, in which the Osage are turned into figures of curiosity: Can you believe it, <em>American Indians</em> with <em>fancy cars</em>?&nbsp;</p>

<p>Throughout <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em>, constant battles rage over who gets to tell the story, who gets to narrate what&rsquo;s happening. Does Mollie get to say what is happening to her and her family, or will Ernest and William&rsquo;s explanations be accepted? Whose version of events will make it into the obituaries and the history books? And if the answer isn&rsquo;t the Osage &mdash; why?</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25006923/1705087032.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Actors on the red carpet at Apple’s movie premiere. " title="Actors on the red carpet at Apple’s movie premiere. " data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Members of the Osage Nation with Scorsese at the &lt;em&gt;Killers of the Flower Moon&lt;/em&gt; premiere in New York (from left): Osage Nation Princess Gianna “Gigi” Sieke, Osage Nation Princess Lawren “Lulu” Goodfox, Chad Renfro, Scott George, Julie O’Keefe, Brandy Lemon, Martin Scorsese, Osage Nation Principal Chief Geoffrey Standing Bear, Julie Standing Bear, Christopher Cote, and Addie Roanhorse. | Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images" />
<p>The result of all this careful questioning is stunning. To say Scorsese has made a great movie is to announce that water is wet, but there&rsquo;s a kind of unfolding grief to <em>Killers</em>&rsquo; tone, a steady feeling of dread and sorrow, that only works in the hands of a master. You aren&rsquo;t told how to feel so much as you&rsquo;re made to feel it and then, in the end, be walloped with indignance over what happened to the story of the murders and many stories like them.</p>

<p>Key to all of this was the choice to put Ernest and Mollie&rsquo;s romance at the center, not only because Gladstone&rsquo;s elegant seriousness is a serious foil for DiCaprio&rsquo;s interpretation of Ernest as weak and silly, an easily manipulated man whom Mollie nonetheless loves. You start to understand why she stayed with him, long past when it made any sense. In fact, during the film Ernest and Mollie go to the movies and watch a 1918 film titled <em>The Lady of the Dugout</em>, a silent Western for which the advertising tagline was &ldquo;a true romance of the real west, the truth and nothing but the truth.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>That film was narrated by a real outlaw, Al Jennings, who tells a story &mdash; <a href="https://moviessilently.com/2016/08/28/the-lady-of-the-dugout-1918-a-silent-film-review/">purportedly a true one</a>, though also a bit of a tall tale &mdash; about rescuing a woman whose alcoholic husband is abusing her. Just a tiny bit of foreshadowing for Ernest and Mollie, and for Scorsese too. Who gets to tell the story matters. Who the story is about matters, too.</p>

<p>Killers of the Flower Moon <em>opens in theaters on October 20.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The actors strike negotiations have broken down]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/10/12/23914241/sag-aftra-strike-negotiations" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/10/12/23914241/sag-aftra-strike-negotiations</id>
			<updated>2023-10-12T10:51:54-04:00</updated>
			<published>2023-10-12T10:55:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Labor" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Hollywood writers strike officially ended on Tuesday, October 10, when the Writers Guild of America (WGA) voted to ratify its contract with the AMPTP (the organization that represents Hollywood&#8217;s major studios and production companies). But the actors are still very much on the picket line &#8212; and there&#8217;s no clear end in sight. SAG-AFTRA [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="SAG-AFTRA is still on strike — and negotiations have broken down again. | Apu Gomes/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Apu Gomes/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24997226/1719481404.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	SAG-AFTRA is still on strike — and negotiations have broken down again. | Apu Gomes/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The Hollywood writers strike officially ended on Tuesday, October 10, when the Writers Guild of America (WGA) <a href="https://variety.com/2023/biz/news/wga-ratify-contract-end-strike-1235749253/">voted to ratify its contract</a> with the AMPTP (the organization that represents Hollywood&rsquo;s major studios and production companies). But the actors are still very much on the picket line &mdash; and there&rsquo;s no clear end in sight.</p>

<p>SAG-AFTRA &mdash; the 160,000-member <a href="https://www.vox.com/unions" data-source="encore">union</a> that represents Hollywood&rsquo;s actors and performers &mdash; has been in talks with the AMPTP (Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers) since October 2. But late in the evening on October 11, the AMPTP released a statement announcing that talks had been suspended, illuminating the first of two major sticking points in the negotiations.</p>

<p>&ldquo;It is clear that the gap between the AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA is too great, and conversations are no longer moving us in a productive direction,&rdquo; the AMPTP&rsquo;s statement <a href="https://strikegeist.substack.com/p/studios-say-actors-guild-talks-suspended?r=528&amp;utm_medium=ios&amp;utm_campaign=post">read</a>. The studios laid out their proposals in the statement, highlighting SAG-AFTRA&rsquo;s demand for a &ldquo;viewership bonus&rdquo; that the studios claim would cost an additional $800 million per year, an &ldquo;untenable economic burden.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>The viewership bonus would increase compensation for performers whose projects are very successful, a measure that would require the studios to make public the viewership for streaming content &mdash; something they&rsquo;ve resisted.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But it seems there&rsquo;s another major issue at play, in addition to issues of compensation. In the wee hours of October 12, SAG-AFTRA released <a href="https://x.com/sagaftra/status/1712368110253285730?s=20">its own counterstatement</a>, in which the union said that the AMPTP had &ldquo;presented an offer that was, shockingly, worth less than they proposed before the strike began.&rdquo; The union also accused the AMPTP of having &ldquo;misrepresented to the press the cost of the above proposal &mdash; overstating it by 60%.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24997274/1728361398.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A SAG-AFTRA on strike picket sign, with the written words “Greed is not good! Gordon Gekko was a bad guy.”" title="A SAG-AFTRA on strike picket sign, with the written words “Greed is not good! Gordon Gekko was a bad guy.”" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="SAG-AFTRA has been on strike since July 14, and it’s not clear when their strike will end. | Michael Tullberg/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Michael Tullberg/Getty Images" />
<p>Yet, <a href="https://x.com/sagaftra/status/1712368120630022439?s=20">according to SAG-AFTRA</a>, the AMPTP&rsquo;s proposal also &ldquo;claim[s] to protect performer consent,&rdquo; but would &ldquo;demand &lsquo;consent&rsquo; on the first day of employment for use of a performer&rsquo;s digital replica for an entire cinematic universe (or any franchise project).&rdquo; This has been a sore point since the strike began in July. At the press conference <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/7/13/23793828/sag-aftra-strike-wga-hollywood">announcing the start of the strike</a>, the union&rsquo;s National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Duncan Crabtree-Ireland said that the AMPTP&rsquo;s proposal for <a href="https://www.vox.com/2023/4/28/23702644/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-technology" data-source="encore">AI</a> &ldquo;proposed that our background actors should be able to be scanned, get paid for one day&rsquo;s pay, and their company should own that scan, their image, their likeness and to be able to use it for the rest of eternity in any project they want with no consent and no compensation.&rdquo; Many of SAG-AFTRA&rsquo;s members rely on income from working as a background actor (the industry&rsquo;s term for &ldquo;extras&rdquo;) or in minor roles; a proposal like this would severely cut into that work.</p>

<p>For now, talks have been suspended. But as the industry inches toward Oscar season and the content well dries up, both sides of the negotiation feel mounting pressure.</p>

<p>While SAG-AFTRA is on strike, actors do not perform in or promote struck work. While the union has granted <a href="https://www.indiewire.com/gallery/movies-filming-during-sag-aftra-strike-interim-agreement-waivers-strike-exemptions/">waivers</a> to non-AMPTP projects, the usual star-studded red carpets at fall festivals have been considerably less crowded, and some <a href="https://www.vox.com/movies" data-source="encore">movies</a> (such as <em>Dune: Part Two</em>) have moved out of the fall schedule altogether. Until SAG-AFTRA and the AMPTP come to an agreement, things are at a relative standstill.</p>

<p>Yet, like the WGA &mdash; which won nearly everything it asked for after the second-longest strike in its history &mdash; SAG-AFTRA says that this is an existential moment for their profession, an inflection point in determining whether acting will be a profession going forward. If the writers strike demonstrates anything, this may, in the end, be a waiting game.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
