<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Amanda Northrop | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2023-01-19T15:39:28+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/amanda-northrop" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/amanda-northrop/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/amanda-northrop/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brian Resnick</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Amanda Northrop</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Byrd Pinkerton</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How scientists discovered the universe is really freaking huge]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/unexplainable/22547100/henrietta-leavitt-cosmic-ruler-podcast" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/unexplainable/22547100/henrietta-leavitt-cosmic-ruler-podcast</id>
			<updated>2023-01-19T10:39:28-05:00</updated>
			<published>2023-01-19T10:39:25-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Podcasts" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Science" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Space" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Unexplainable" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[In the early 1900s, the universe seemed to be a much, much smaller place. Back then, astronomers believed the Milky Way galaxy was all there was. They didn&#8217;t know there were billions of other galaxies; they didn&#8217;t know how small we really are. They didn&#8217;t know this because they couldn&#8217;t measure distances to far-flung stars. [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="The first image released from the Webb space telescope shows a section of the distant universe in detail. The very faintest, smallest blips of light in this photos are images of galaxies as they existed more than 13 billion years ago, near the very beginning of time (that light has been traveling through space ever since) | NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Webb ERO" data-portal-copyright="NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Webb ERO" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24371303/STScI_01G8H1NK4W8CJYHF2DDFD1W0DQ.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	The first image released from the Webb space telescope shows a section of the distant universe in detail. The very faintest, smallest blips of light in this photos are images of galaxies as they existed more than 13 billion years ago, near the very beginning of time (that light has been traveling through space ever since) | NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Webb ERO	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>In the early 1900s, the universe seemed to be a much, much smaller place. Back then, astronomers believed the Milky Way galaxy was all there was. They didn&rsquo;t know there were billions of other galaxies; they didn&rsquo;t know how small we really are.</p>

<p>They didn&rsquo;t know this because they couldn&rsquo;t measure distances to far-flung stars. Why? There was a pretty simple problem in astronomy: A bright, faraway star looks almost the same as a dim star that&rsquo;s close by.</p>
<iframe src="https://embed.podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/henrietta-leavitt-and-the-end-of-the-universe/id1554578197?i=1000595167324&amp;itsct=podcast_box_player&amp;itscg=30200&amp;ls=1&amp;theme=auto" height="175px" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay *; encrypted-media *; clipboard-write"></iframe>
<p>It&rsquo;s the same here on Earth. Imagine you&rsquo;re on the beach at night and see two lighthouse lights glowing in the distance, but one seems brighter than the other. If you knew<em> </em>both lighthouses used the same lightbulb, you could conclude that the dimmer light is farther away. But it&rsquo;s also possible that the dimmer light just comes from a lower-wattage lightbulb, perhaps nearer to you.</p>

<p>Scientists needed a way to find out the intrinsic brightness of stars &mdash; <a href="http://web.csulb.edu/~htahsiri/Astronomy%20100/Arny's%20Astronomy%20New******/Arny%20and%20Seed%20Test%20&amp;%20more%20/new%20astro%20,%20use%20for%20UCI/LAB12.PDF">to figure out their wattage</a>, so to speak. That&rsquo;s when <a href="https://www.aavso.org/henrietta-leavitt-%E2%80%93-celebrating-forgotten-astronomer">Henrietta Leavitt</a>, a Massachusetts-born &ldquo;computer&rdquo; who worked at the Harvard College Observatory, came along. In 1908, <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1908AnHar..60...87L">she published a discovery that </a>may sound small but is one of the most important in the history of astronomy. As we discuss on this week&rsquo;s Unexplainable podcast (see the embed above), it cracked open the universe.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22681500/starscomic_final_01.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Amanda Northrop/Vox" /><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Blinking lights provide a yardstick to measure the universe</h2>
<p>Before Henrietta Leavitt, many astronomers <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/star-v1.html">looked at the stars </a>in what&rsquo;s today known as the Andromeda galaxy &mdash; some<a href="https://astronomy.com/magazine/ask-astro/2019/01/andromeda-distance"> 2.5 million light-years away</a> &mdash; and mistakenly thought they were part of our own Milky Way galaxy (which is only<a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/expelled-star.html"> around 100,000 </a>light-years in diameter).</p>

<p>Those Andromeda stars were orders of magnitude further away. Scientists just didn&rsquo;t know it.</p>

<p>At the time, astronomers <a href="https://www.space.com/30417-parallax.html#:~:text=If%20we%20divide%20the%20baseline,1%20parsec%20from%20our%20sun.">had some<em> </em>methods</a> to figure out distances to stars, but they only worked for stars relatively close to Earth. Leavitt&rsquo;s discovery &mdash; linking the pulse of one type of star to their actual brightness, as described in the graphic above &mdash;  was the key to measuring objects farther and farther out into space.</p>

<p>If astronomers wanted to measure&nbsp;faraway things, Leavitt&rsquo;s discovery showed, they just had to look out for cepheids. Her&nbsp;formula led astronomers to chart out relative distances to stars: They could use it to compare two stars and figure out which one was closer.</p>

<p>It took some more work by other scientists to calibrate this yardstick, to put concrete numbers on it. But once they did, and started measuring with it, the cosmos grew and grew.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leavitt paved the way for Edwin Hubble to discover galaxies beyond our own</h2>
<p>Fifteen years after Henrietta Leavitt&rsquo;s discovery, the preeminent astronomers <a href="https://apod.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/1920/shapley_obit.html">Harlow Shapley</a> and <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1944ApJ....99..245M">Heber Curtis</a> were locked in <a href="http://www.nasonline.org/about-nas/history/archives/milestones-in-NAS-history/the-great-debate-of-1920.html">a heated debate</a>.</p>

<p>Curtis believed that Andromeda was a separate galaxy far, far away from the Milky Way. At the time, this was an outlandish idea. Shapley represented the <a href="https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/hubble/overview/hubble_bio.html">more mainstream view</a> &mdash; that Andromeda was just a hazy, cloudy region within our galaxy, which he had recently estimated to be around <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/star-v1.html">300,000 light-years across</a>. That was also the assumed size of the entire universe.</p>

<p>If Curtis was right, it would mean the universe was double or triple the size that Shapley estimated &mdash; at least.</p>

<p>To settle the debate, <a href="https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/hubble/overview/hubble_bio.html">Edwin Hubble</a> &mdash; the namesake of the famous space telescope &mdash; looked for Cepheid stars in Andromeda.&nbsp;<a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=Gmdthgi8_CkC&amp;pg=PA148&amp;lpg=PA148&amp;dq=hubble,+curtis&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=Of5RI6oUH0&amp;sig=D61MWpCMyTRY-SrD6uxFKV9LUeA&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwiFtPfKhrPQAhWIIJAKHRj_BREQ6AEILDAG#v=onepage&amp;q=hubble%2C%20curtis&amp;f=false">Night after night</a>, he took photographs of Andromeda, searching for cepheids. In October 1923, he found one, blinking in one of Andromeda&rsquo;s spiral arms. Another week of&nbsp;<a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=vE91XkNA4i8C&amp;pg=PA53&amp;dq=edwin+hubble,+andromeda&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwic3PHV67LQAhUB1SYKHaE0AN4Q6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&amp;q=edwin%20hubble%2C%20andromeda&amp;f=false">observations</a>&nbsp;allowed him to follow Leavitt&rsquo;s formula and determine its distance.</p>

<p>Hubble estimated it to be around a million light-years from Earth &mdash; well outside the boundaries of Shapley&rsquo;s universe. (Hubble was a little<em> </em>off: Andromeda is closer to 2.5 million light-years away.) After reading about Hubble&rsquo;s finding, Shapley reportedly <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/star-v1.html">said</a>:&nbsp;&ldquo;Here is the letter that destroyed my universe.&rdquo;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22686269/551318main_hs_2011_15_a.jpeg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="This is a picture of the cepheid star Hubble observed in Andromeda, called “variable number one” — or V1 — &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/star-v1.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;captured&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by Hubble’s namesake telescope in 2011. V1 has been &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/star-v1.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;called&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; “the most important star in the history of cosmology.” | NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team" data-portal-copyright="NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team" />
<p>Scientists kept building on Leavitt&rsquo;s ruler to measure the universe. And as they used these measuring tools, their understanding of the universe evolved. They realized it was far bigger than previously thought, there are billions of galaxies, and it&rsquo;s expanding: Those galaxies are moving further and further away from one another.</p>

<p>Astronomers also realized that the universe had a beginning. If galaxies are moving away from one another now, it means they were closer together in the past &mdash; which led scientists to the idea of the Big Bang.</p>

<p>It also led them to realize that the universe may, eventually, end.</p>

<p><a href="https://open.spotify.com/episode/7AWhAEFw5aBy12Zga0fLUl?si=63ca16088cf242db">This week&rsquo;s episode of <em>Unexplainable</em></a>, Vox&rsquo;s podcast about unanswered questions in science, tells that story and more.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Amanda Northrop</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>German Lopez</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How to weigh the risk of going out in the coronavirus pandemic, in one chart]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2020/5/22/21266756/coronavirus-pandemic-covid-risks-social-distancing-chart" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2020/5/22/21266756/coronavirus-pandemic-covid-risks-social-distancing-chart</id>
			<updated>2020-07-02T13:25:57-04:00</updated>
			<published>2020-07-03T12:15:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Covid-19" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Future Perfect" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Health" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Science" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Since coronavirus lockdowns began in the US, most Americans have drastically changed their patterns: following instructions to stay home, limiting almost all contact with others, and venturing out only for essential trips and exercise. As states have eased social distancing restrictions, and with the July Fourth weekend approaching, people are beginning to have more options. [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Amanda Northrop/Vox" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19993738/risks.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Since <a href="https://www.vox.com/coronavirus-covid19">coronavirus</a> lockdowns began in the US, most Americans have drastically changed their patterns: following instructions to stay home, limiting almost all contact with others, and venturing out only for essential trips and exercise.</p>

<p>As states have eased social distancing restrictions, and with the July Fourth weekend approaching, people are beginning to have more options. Between those wanting to patronize newly reopened businesses or socialize in person, and more employers calling people back to work, <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/313082/views-pandemic-worsen-social-distancing-plateaus.aspx">survey</a> and <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/national/map-us-still-staying-home-coronavirus/">cellphone</a> <a href="https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/index.html?hl=en">data</a> suggests people are already starting to trickle out of their homes.</p>

<p>But for many people, it&rsquo;s really not clear which kinds of gatherings are safe and which aren&rsquo;t. And that uncertainty can spark anxiety.</p>

<p>Fortunately, health experts know more about the coronavirus than they did when the lockdowns began, and they can point us to different levels of risk as we begin to reengage. There&rsquo;s also advice on how to minimize harm.</p>

<p>&ldquo;There&rsquo;s been a polarization between two purported options of staying home indefinitely &hellip; versus going back to business as usual,&rdquo; Julia Marcus, an infectious disease epidemiologist at Harvard, told me. &ldquo;The idea of harm reduction gives us a way of thinking about risk as a continuum and thinking about the middle ground between those two options.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Marcus and Boston University epidemiologist Eleanor Murray <a href="https://twitter.com/JuliaLMarcus/status/1263482847337287680">created an infographic showing the different scales of risk</a>. We at Vox were inspired by it and, with Marcus and Murray&rsquo;s permission, adapted it:</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19993954/risk0522.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Table showing how different places present more risks during the coronavirus pandemic: Your home is the safest place. Outdoor environments present moderate and higher risk. Indoor spaces with people you don’t live with present the highest risk." title="Table showing how different places present more risks during the coronavirus pandemic: Your home is the safest place. Outdoor environments present moderate and higher risk. Indoor spaces with people you don’t live with present the highest risk." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Amanda Northrop/Vox" />
<p>&ldquo;A lot of people, when they hear that you can&rsquo;t completely get rid of your risk, they think, &lsquo;Well, that means that it&rsquo;s inevitable, and I&rsquo;ll just go and do everything that I was normally doing before, and if I get sick, I get sick,&rsquo;&rdquo; Murray told me. &ldquo;But there are lots of things you can do in between nothing and everything.&rdquo;</p>

<p>First and foremost, the advice that has been repeated for much of the past few months remains true: Your home is still the safest place to be during this pandemic. You should continue trying to stay home as much as possible, because the virus is still circulating at a very high rate in many communities. (If you want to be extra careful, some resources, like <a href="https://covidactnow.org/">Covid Act Now</a>, help show how much transmission there is in your area.)</p>

<p>But whether you need to for work or you&rsquo;re simply tired of looking at your home&rsquo;s walls, there are ways to mitigate risk when you go out.</p>

<p>For one, outdoors is generally safer, thanks to the <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/4/23/21231377/florida-beaches-reopening-coronavirus-social-distancing">open air</a> &mdash; where the virus can more easily disperse &mdash; and, potentially, the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/4/29/21231906/coronavirus-pandemic-summer-weather-heat-humidity-uv-light">warm, sunny weather</a>. As Duke health policy expert Mark McClellan <a href="https://www.vox.com/21262268/coronavirus-tips-covid-social-distancing-harm-reduction">told me</a>, &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a good year for outdoor dining and outdoor shopping and outdoor all kinds of activities.&rdquo;</p>

<p>It also matters who you&rsquo;re hanging out with. It&rsquo;s okay to closely interact with people you live with (unless one of you gets sick; then whoever&rsquo;s sick should isolate). But you should try to keep your distance from people you don&rsquo;t live with. And you should try to avoid interacting with too many people at once; even if it&rsquo;s theoretically possible to keep 6 feet from others in a crowded space, it&rsquo;s still better to avoid it. That&rsquo;s true for the outdoors, but it&rsquo;s <em>especially</em> true for the indoors.</p>

<p>When you go out, also take the now-familiar precautions: Wash your hands. Don&rsquo;t touch your face. Wear a mask, particularly in indoor public spaces. Avoid shared surfaces and crowded settings, and keep physical distance &mdash; at least 6 feet &mdash; from people you don&rsquo;t live with. If you&rsquo;re <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/3/23/21190033/coronavirus-covid-19-deaths-by-age">65 or older</a> or have <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/groups-at-higher-risk.html">chronic health conditions</a> that could exacerbate Covid-19, you should take all of this advice more seriously.</p>

<p>Separately, experts say it&rsquo;s a good idea to space out trips outside your home as much as possible &mdash; ideally, by two weeks, to match the virus&rsquo;s incubation period. You could also establish a &ldquo;closed circle&rdquo; with people you want to regularly interact with, in which both sides agree to minimize contact with anyone else (although some experts <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/4/2/21202903/coronavirus-covid-19-social-distancing-closed-circle-single-alone">are skeptical of this idea</a>).</p>

<p>With these tips, you can&rsquo;t completely eliminate the risk of leaving your home. But you can greatly reduce that risk. For some, that could make the prospects of going out &mdash; with the benefits that going out can entail for your physical and mental health &mdash; much more feasible.</p>

<p>It all begins, though, with the understanding that risk during the coronavirus pandemic is really a spectrum, not a black-and-white choice.</p>

<p>&ldquo;People will take risks, whether&nbsp;we&nbsp;like it or not,&rdquo; Marcus said. &ldquo;The best thing we can do is give them strategies to reduce harm in those situations. If we don&rsquo;t do that, we&rsquo;re missing an opportunity.&rdquo;</p>

<p>For more detailed tips for going out and the explanations for them, read <a href="https://www.vox.com/21262268/coronavirus-tips-covid-social-distancing-harm-reduction">Vox&rsquo;s full explainer</a>.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Rani Molla</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Ryan Mark</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Amanda Northrop</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How the tech unicorns of 2019 are doing on the stock market]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/6/20/18650993/tech-ipo-tracker-uber-lyft-slack-zoom" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/6/20/18650993/tech-ipo-tracker-uber-lyft-slack-zoom</id>
			<updated>2019-09-26T13:26:58-04:00</updated>
			<published>2019-09-26T13:27:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Big Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Future of Work" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Lyft" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Slack" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Stock market" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Uber" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[After years of only sporadic tech IPOs, the spigot has opened. 2019 will likely be a banner year for multibillion dollar companies hitting public markets. Tech companies have stayed private longer than they have in the past, and they&#8217;re worth more than ever. As of mid June, the US has 177 active tech unicorns &#8212;&#160;the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Javier Zarracina / Vox" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/16386176/zoom_slack_ipo.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>After <a href="https://news.crunchbase.com/news/2018-bring-ipos-tech-promised-years/">years of only sporadic tech IPOs</a>, the spigot has opened. 2019 will likely be a <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-13/get-ready-for-a-flood-of-big-tech-ipos">banner year for multibillion dollar companies</a> hitting public markets.</p>

<p>Tech companies have stayed private longer than they have in the past, and they&rsquo;re worth more than ever. As of mid June, the US has 177 active tech unicorns &mdash;&nbsp;the term for startups valued at more than a billion dollars &mdash; according to financial data software company <a href="https://pitchbook.com/">PitchBook</a>. A decade ago, there were only nine. Additionally, tech companies like Uber, WeWork, and Airbnb have become household names &mdash; meaning people outside the tech community are more likely to invest in them, and by extension have more to lose if these unproven companies fail.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Failure is a distinct possibility. Some 84 percent of US tech companies that went public last year did so <a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/3/6/18249997/lyft-uber-ipo-public-profit">without turning a profit</a>. The last time unprofitable tech companies went public at this rate was in 2000, the year the dot-com bubble burst. In 2019, these companies are riding high on venture capital money and investors&rsquo; hunger for growth above all else.</p>

<p>Even more concerning, these companies are going public at a time when <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/finance/431423-three-fourths-of-economists-predict-recession-by-2021-survey">economists are predicting a new recession</a> may hit within the next couple of years. An economic slump isn&rsquo;t good for anyone, especially newly public companies like Uber and Lyft with lots of debt. This new crop of IPOs in 2019 will be canaries in the coal mine for the economic prospects of other technology companies, as well as the economy at large &mdash; which is <a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/4/2/18290482/gender-wage-tech-economy-hired">increasingly dominated by tech</a>.</p>

<p>To help keep an eye on things, we&rsquo;ve built an IPO tracker that will update stock prices every few minutes. So far, we&rsquo;re tracking Lyft, Zoom, Pinterest, Uber, Fiverr, Slack, and <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/8/27/20835839/peloton-ipo-filing-messaging-happiness">Peloton</a>, which are listed in order of IPO date. In the coming year or so, we can also expect <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/9/23/20879656/wework-mess-explained-ipo-softbank">WeWork</a> and Airbnb to go public. This tool is meant to give you a quick visual perspective on how these tech companies are performing in the stock market compared to their debut prices (what the companies first traded at on the public market).&nbsp;</p>
<div class="vox media-embed"><a href="https://apps.voxmedia.com/at/vox-ipo-tracker/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">View Link</a></div>
<p>Of the public stocks on our tracker, only Zoom is making a profit. The other companies, like most tech companies going public lately, are in the red. As of publication, Lyft is trading below its debut price while Uber is slightly above its debut price. We&rsquo;ve also listed the offer price for each stock &mdash; the usually less expensive price at which large-scale investors get to purchase the stock before it begins trading.</p>

<p>We&rsquo;ll update our tracker as other tech companies go public throughout the year.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<p><em>Recode and Vox have joined forces to uncover and explain how our digital world is changing &mdash; and changing us. Subscribe to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.vox.com/recode-podcasts"><em><strong>Recode podcasts</strong></em></a><em>&nbsp;to hear Kara Swisher and Peter Kafka lead the tough conversations the technology industry needs today.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Amanda Northrop</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Turbin</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Yvonne Leow</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How the heart became ♥]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/videos/2016/2/12/10978960/heart-shape-symbol-emoji-history" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/videos/2016/2/12/10978960/heart-shape-symbol-emoji-history</id>
			<updated>2019-02-14T13:00:44-05:00</updated>
			<published>2019-02-13T13:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Video" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The heart symbol has made its way into our daily lives. It&#8217;s in our emoji, our Valentine&#8217;s Day cards, and our chocolates. It even caused an uproar when Twitter changed its &#8220;favorite&#8221; button to a &#8220;like&#8221; button, replacing the star symbol with a ruby red heart. But why doesn&#8217;t it look like the real thing? [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>The heart symbol has made its way into our daily lives. It&#8217;s in our emoji, our Valentine&#8217;s Day cards, and our chocolates. It even <a href="http://www.vox.com/2015/11/3/9663720/twitter-heart-star-jokes">caused an uproar</a> when Twitter changed its &#8220;favorite&#8221; button to a &#8220;like&#8221; button, replacing the star symbol with a ruby red heart. But why doesn&#8217;t it look like the real thing?</p>

<p>Zachary Crockett at <a href="http://priceonomics.com/">Priceonomics</a> has <a href="http://priceonomics.com/why-is-the-heart-emoji-so-anatomically-incorrect/">looked into the history</a> of the symbol.</p>

<p>He says that there are relics resembling the heart shape from 3000 BC. But these shapes stood for ivy or fig leaves, not the heart. It wasn&rsquo;t until several centuries later that the heart became a symbol representing &ldquo;love.&rdquo;</p>

<p>But the problem was, they didn&rsquo;t really know what the heart looked like partially because the Catholic church prohibited autopsies. So when artists tried to draw the heart as a symbol of love, like in this French manuscript from 1250 it looked &#8230; like this.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13756527/Roman_de_la_poire_heart_metaphor.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Roman de la Poire | Atelier du Maître de Bari via Wikimedia Commons" data-portal-copyright="Atelier du Maître de Bari via Wikimedia Commons" />
<p>By the time detailed anatomical drawings appeared, like those of Leonardo Da Vinci in the early 16th century, the simplified symbol had already taken root. It became a popular image in Catholic symbolism as well as secular things like decks of cards.</p>

<p>Eventually New York City&rsquo;s 1977 campaign turned the heart symbol into a verb, &rdquo;I &hearts; New York!&rdquo;</p>

<p>Now it&rsquo;s used in everything romantic: Valentine&rsquo;s Day cards, emojis, chocolate. But you can also find it in video games, on Twitter, and in ads for heart healthy food.</p>

<p>It might be a poor likeness for the human heart, but that&rsquo;s what makes it such an enduring and versatile symbol.</p>

<p>You can get more videos like these by subscribing to the Vox <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/voxdotcom"><strong>YouTube channel</strong></a>.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Zack Beauchamp</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Javier Zarracina</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Ryan Mark</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Amanda Northrop</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[A visual guide to the key events in the Trump-Russia scandal]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/world/2017/11/27/16670950/trump-russia-timeline" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/world/2017/11/27/16670950/trump-russia-timeline</id>
			<updated>2018-01-08T12:17:48-05:00</updated>
			<published>2017-12-01T12:19:24-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Russia" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump&#8217;s former national security adviser, pleaded guilty to one count of lying to the FBI. It&#8217;s the biggest development yet in special counsel Robert Mueller&#8217;s investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election. Flynn admits to lying about his conversations with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9737555/RUSSIAN_TIMELINElead_export.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump&#8217;s former national security adviser, pleaded guilty to one count of lying to the FBI. It&#8217;s the biggest development yet in special counsel Robert Mueller&#8217;s investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election.</p>

<p>Flynn admits to lying about his conversations with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about sanctions and about a United Nations vote when interviewed by the FBI earlier this year. He&#8217;s expected in court at 10:30 am on Friday.</p>

<p>But getting to this point took a long time, and trying to follow the Trump-Russia scandal can feel intimidating, if not impossible. The key events take place over the course of about an entire year, and include dozens of different players and secret meetings. Figuring out which dates and events are genuinely important, and which are likely to be red herrings, can be a struggle.</p>

<p>What follows is a timeline that pares down the saga to its most vital moments and explains how each one fits into the fundamental question looming over them all: whether team Trump colluded with Moscow to swing the 2016 election.</p>
<div data-analytics-viewport="autotune" data-analytics-label="russia-timeline" id="russia-timeline__graphic" data-iframe="https://apps.voxmedia.com/at/vox-russia-timeline/" data-iframe-height="150" data-iframe-layout="standard" data-iframe-resizable></div>

(function() {
  var l = function() {
    new pym.Parent(
      'russia-timeline__graphic',
      'https://apps.voxmedia.com/at/vox-russia-timeline/');
  };
  if(typeof(pym) === 'undefined') {
    var h = document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0],
        s = document.createElement('script');
    s.type = 'text/javascript';
    s.src = 'https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pym/0.4.5/pym.js';
    s.onload = l;
    h.appendChild(s);
  } else {
    l();
  }
})();
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Amanda Northrop</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Iimay Ho</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Confessions of a wealthy immigrant: “model minority” is a myth]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/first-person/2017/5/1/15426166/model-minority-myth-immigration" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/first-person/2017/5/1/15426166/model-minority-myth-immigration</id>
			<updated>2017-05-18T13:26:58-04:00</updated>
			<published>2017-05-01T12:10:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[We were celebrating the Lunar New Year, practicing rituals, honoring ancestors, and eating dozens of dumplings. I watched in confusion and horror as the news broke in my family&#8217;s living room via Chinese satellite TV, struggling to pick up what was happening. As the hours went by and we heard of reports of people being [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8442539/Screen_Shot_2017_05_01_at_11.32.18_AM.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8443259/threecoins_MAY.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>We were celebrating the Lunar New Year, practicing rituals, honoring ancestors, and eating dozens of dumplings. I watched in confusion and horror as the news broke in my family&rsquo;s living room via Chinese satellite TV, struggling to pick up what was happening.</p>

<p>As the hours went by and we heard of reports of people being detained at the border, my mom fumed with her sisters and brothers. Like many immigrant families, we still have relatives abroad and make frequent trips to see them. She felt, on a visceral level, the injustice and inhumanity of being denied entry to your home after leaving to maintain family ties. I was proud of her for setting the tone, for being loud and furious and fighting against the instinct to keep our heads down and not talk about it. But inevitably at the end of a rant, she would turn the conversation to what she and the family should do to protect our money.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8441123/hand_coin_MAYarticle_copy.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p><strong>This moment of reaching for security through money sums up all of the conflicting and complicated feelings I have about being part of a wealthy immigrant family.</strong></p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8440601/imay01_MAYarticle.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>Here are the facts:</p>

<p>&bull; I am a descendant of Chinese landlords, military clerks, and military officers. &nbsp;</p>

<p>&bull; My grandfathers fought for the Kuomintang nationalist army and fled to Taiwan with their families when they lost the war in the late 1940s<strong>. &nbsp;</strong></p>

<p><strong>&bull; </strong>My parents attended college in Taiwan and &nbsp;immigrated here as graduate students in 1977.</p>

<p>&bull; They both got white-collar professional jobs in North Carolina.</p>

<p>&bull; My mom has made most of our family&rsquo;s wealth&nbsp;through her insurance business, and the vast &nbsp;majority of her customer base is other Chinese &nbsp;immigrants and their families.</p>

<p>Here&rsquo;s how my family&rsquo;s immigration story can be told with three different spins.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8441725/modelminority_MAYarticle_copy.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>Here&rsquo;s the &ldquo;model minority&rdquo; spin on my family&rsquo;s story: My parents are the scrappy immigrants who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, came here legally, and played by the rules. They got their home in the suburbs with the two-car garage and sent their three kids to college. This is a story we will use to protect ourselves by being the &ldquo;good&rdquo; immigrants.</p>

<p>The &#8220;model minority&#8221; success story is used as a wedge to deny systemic economic and racial injustice, reinforcing myths of criminality in the &ldquo;bad&rdquo; undocumented immigrants and &ldquo;laziness&rdquo; in immigrants and black people. Because if families like mine could &#8220;succeed,&#8221; what&#8217;s holding back other immigrants and families of color?</p>

<p>And perversely, the more we use it, the more it hurts us. The &#8220;model minority&#8221; is an invention to reinforce white supremacy. It requires assimilation into a white supremacist society, which means we&#8217;ve had to deny or hide certain aspects of our culture and background.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8440579/immhustle_MAYarticle.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>There&rsquo;s also the immigrant hustle version: My parents dealt with constant racism, worked multiple jobs to make a living, and bought our clothes at yard sales and Kmart. My mom battled her way into an industry dominated by white men to carve out a place for herself and to advocate for other Chinese immigrants. This is the story I use when I want to minimize the distance between me and my friends who also had immigrant parents but lived in one-bedroom apartments and barely saw their parents because they worked multiple shifts at a restaurant. This is the story I use to hide the role of class privilege in my life, that tries to flatten being an immigrant into a uniform experience of hardship and struggle.</p>

<p class="is-lead"><strong>Of course it was hard for my parents. But I&rsquo;ve learned how to tell their story adding a class privilege X-ray to their journey.</strong></p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8440433/xray_1801_MAYarticle.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8441117/realstory_MAYarticle.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>My grandparents were landowners who fought against the communists. My parents came from class-privileged families in China who could afford to send them to college and abroad.</p>

<p>They immigrated legally after the Chinese Exclusion Act, a decades-long ban on Chinese immigrants, was repealed and during a time of more open immigration policy, to receive advanced degrees. They speak fluent English. Affirmative action made my mom&rsquo;s professional breakthrough possible. They were able to buy a $300,000 four-bedroom home in 1993, when we were one of two East Asian families in a 99 percent white neighborhood. Black people had been redlined out of that same neighborhood, a racist practice when a bank disproportionately denies mortgages to people of color, especially black people.</p>

<p class="is-lead"><strong>None of this negates my parents&rsquo; struggle or the racism they experienced. But their class privilege served as a buffer and a safety net. They&rsquo;re also not black in a violently anti-black society.</strong></p>

<p>So I only have compassion for my mom when she starts to stress about money, even though she has more than enough. Money for her represents safety in a hostile climate. Money and class privilege got our family out of trouble in the past and made it possible to immigrate twice in two generations.</p>

<p>But I know the ICE raids and the Trump bans aren&rsquo;t targeting my family. They are targeting the most vulnerable&#8202; &mdash; &#8202;poor and working-class immigrants of color without legal status. People who work hard but never reached the financial security our family has because of all the barriers stacked against them.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8441303/rightleft_MAY.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>The stories we tell about immigrants are class stories. For progressives, immigrants represent the myth of the American dream, the oh-so-enticing lie that if you just work hard enough, you can climb the class ladder. For the right, immigrants are all poor (read: criminals) who are drains on the economy. Placed in this dichotomy, it&rsquo;s easy to see why families like mine fight so hard to be the &ldquo;good&rdquo; immigrants.</p>

<p class="is-lead"><strong>But both narratives reinforce classism, the system that has created a world where you have to &ldquo;earn&rdquo; a right to be treated with basic dignity as a human being.</strong></p>

<p>I share my family&rsquo;s story with you to show that all immigrant families&rsquo; &mdash; indeed, all families&rsquo; &mdash; stories and histories are class stories. If we aren&rsquo;t honest and clear about our class backgrounds, class stories can be used to divide and conquer, pushing people to compete against each other for individual security over the collective good.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8440581/tree_bee_MAYarticle.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>Learning how to tell the truth about how our family is implicated in, benefits from, and resists violent systems of exploitation is an ongoing process. I have felt everything from guilt to anger to pride as I have learned more about our story, but as my mom and I talk about class, our shared values, and the world we want, we&#8217;ve realized we want a political system that protects our communities, not our wealth. Recognizing and challenging myths about immigration helps make the space for all of us to be in community with others. In the process, we&rsquo;re able to more forcefully challenge the systemic injustices throughout our immigration and political system.</p>

<p>For us, that means using our wealth and class privilege to support local organizations led by people most impacted by xenophobic and racist immigration policies. Poor and working-class black and brown communities, especially Muslim and Latinx communities, are among those who have been on the front lines of fighting for immigrant justice. It&#8217;s time for people like my mom and me to stand behind them.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8440667/imayandmom_MAYarticle.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" />
<p>Here are my recommendations:</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Don’t flatten the experience of immigrants.</li><li>Protecting and defending immigrants means including all immigrants. Don’t reinforce the classist “good immigrant/bad immigrant” binary.</li><li>Do assert that people have inherent value, dignity, and humanity beyond their contribution to the economy.</li><li>Do remember that this threat against immigrant communities, while escalating, is not new. Throughout history, discriminatory immigration policies have been deployed to promote white supremacy and divide a multiracial working class against itself to protect the interests of the majority-white upper class  —  regardless of the political party in power.</li><li>Remember that America is not a country made up of all immigrants, as many like to say. Using this framing erases colonization and Native lives and experiences, as well makes invisible the forced removal and migration of Africans through slavery.</li><li>Do learn about and tell your family class story. The more we can connect class with systems, policies, and history, the less powerful the bootstrap and “self-made” myths become.</li></ul>
<p><em>Iimay Ho is the executive director of Resource Generation, a national multiracial, membership-based organization of people ages 18 to 35 with access to wealth who are using their money, power, and resources to support social, economic, and racial justice. Prior to Resource Generation, she was the director of operations and finance at the Management Center and student leadership development manager at OCA &mdash; &#8202;Asian Pacific American Advocates. </em></p>

<p><em>Born and raised in North Carolina, Iimay was politicized through interning with Southerners on New Ground (SONG). She is currently on the board of the Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice.</em></p>

<p><strong>Illustrations by Amanda Northrop.</strong></p>

<p><em>Class privilege X-ray based on original illustration by Molly Hein for </em>Classified: How to Stop Hiding Your Privilege and Use It for Social Change!<em> by Karen Pittelman.</em></p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<p><a href="http://www.vox.com/first-person"><strong>First Person</strong></a> is Vox&#8217;s home for compelling, provocative narrative essays. Do you have a story to share? Read our <a href="http://www.vox.com/2015/6/12/8767221/vox-first-person-explained"><strong>submission guidelines</strong></a>, and pitch us at <a href="mailto:firstperson@vox.com"><strong>firstperson@vox.com</strong></a>.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
