<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Andy Slavitt | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2018-05-14T15:51:56+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/andy-slavitt" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/andy-slavitt/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/andy-slavitt/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Andy Slavitt</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Republican cold war on the Affordable Care Act]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/5/14/17350818/affordable-care-act-repeal-attacks-gop-medicaid-preexisting-condition-health" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/5/14/17350818/affordable-care-act-repeal-attacks-gop-medicaid-preexisting-condition-health</id>
			<updated>2018-05-14T11:51:56-04:00</updated>
			<published>2018-05-14T09:20:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Health Care" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="The Big Idea" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[At the end of last year&#8217;s prolonged health care battle, many Americans breathed a&#160;sigh of relief. Some may have let down their guard too soon. That&#8217;s because&#160;it&#8217;s clear&#160;the&#160;war on&#160;health care&#160;is&#160;far from&#160;over. Or, more precisely, the war has shifted from a&#160;ground&#160;war to a&#160;cold war. It&#8217;s shifted from major clashes in Washington, DC,&#160;heavily covered by the media, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="President Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage by the House of the American Health Care Act, which would have repealed Obamacare, in May 2017. | Alex Wong/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Alex Wong/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/10835185/GettyImages_678692572.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	President Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage by the House of the American Health Care Act, which would have repealed Obamacare, in May 2017. | Alex Wong/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>At the end of last year&rsquo;s prolonged health care battle, many Americans breathed a&nbsp;sigh of relief. Some may have let down their guard too soon.</p>

<p>That&rsquo;s because&nbsp;it&rsquo;s clear&nbsp;the&nbsp;war on&nbsp;health care&nbsp;is&nbsp;far from&nbsp;over. Or, more precisely, the war has shifted from a&nbsp;ground&nbsp;war to a&nbsp;cold war. It&rsquo;s shifted from major clashes in Washington, DC,&nbsp;heavily covered by the media, to&nbsp;more obscure battlefields: the states and&nbsp;the&nbsp;offices at the Health and Human Services Department where&nbsp;regulatory policymaking&nbsp;is&nbsp;done.</p>

<p>Yet this quieter fight could prove&nbsp;to be just as&nbsp;dangerous to the public.</p>

<p>The defeat of the Republican legislative push to repeal Obamacare was essential. Had it been passed by Congress, the American Health Care Act, which passed the House almost exactly a year ago,&nbsp;would&nbsp;have caused 23 million&nbsp;Americans to lose&nbsp;coverage&nbsp;by the middle of the next&nbsp;decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Most&nbsp;of those losing coverage would have been&nbsp;lower-income&nbsp;or&nbsp;older citizens.</p>

<p>Preexisting&nbsp;condition protections affecting&nbsp;as many as 130 million Americans would have been substantially weakened. Insurance companies&nbsp;would have been permitted&nbsp;to add surcharges&nbsp;of&nbsp;hundreds of thousands of dollars for people with, for example, a&nbsp;prior&nbsp;cancer diagnosis.</p>

<p>And the Medicaid program&nbsp;would have seen hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts and&nbsp;an end to Medicaid expansion, cutting off&nbsp;low-income adults. The program&rsquo;s open-ended commitment to low-income people, children, seniors, and people with disabilities&nbsp;would have ended, replaced by a capped program.</p>

<p>The frontal assault was turned back, but Republicans this year pivoted to a more covert attack on the ACA. This cold war has the same aims as last year&rsquo;s controversial legislation. All that&rsquo;s different are the tactics.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The president is using his bully pulpit to shake confidence in the Obamacare markets</h2>
<p>In December, the administration&nbsp;finally achieved its goal of eliminating the individual mandate, tucking the provision into a package that cut rates for corporations, people with wealthy estates, and, to a lesser and varying degree, individuals.</p>

<p>This month, former Secretary&nbsp;of Health and Human Services Tom&nbsp;Price acknowledged that he knows this move will increase premiums. As healthy people forgo coverage, the price for everyone else goes up. That statement contradicted his repeated assertions while in office that despite what all the experts said, the mandate somehow was driving premiums <em>up</em>.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The individual mandate was a central tenet of the ACA.&nbsp;The CBO concluded that eliminating it&nbsp;would increase health insurance premiums by about 10 percent almost every year over the next decade in the individual market.</p>

<p>President Trump continues to use his bully pulpit to&nbsp;tear down, rather than&nbsp;bolster, the insurance markets that continue to exist (thanks to Obamacare).&nbsp;He&nbsp;has routinely called the ACA &ldquo;dead&rdquo; and &ldquo;over,&rdquo;&nbsp;rhetoric that has the effect of depressing potential competition&nbsp;and increasing the pricing power of&nbsp;insurance companies.&nbsp;Trump&rsquo;s bombastic statements don&rsquo;t always have consequences, but markets do respond to psychology, and insurers often won&rsquo;t expand if they believe policies won&rsquo;t be supported.</p>

<p>Last fall, the administration cut the&nbsp;marketing budget&nbsp;for ACA enrollment&nbsp;by&nbsp;90&nbsp;percent; even before that, it had slashed the budget for programs that provide &ldquo;assisters&rdquo; to match people up with good health care plans.&nbsp;Those ads had targeted younger people, so these cuts were a double whammy, reducing enrollment&nbsp;and&nbsp;increasing premiums (since young people tend to be healthy and therefore subsidize coverage for other Americans).</p>

<p>Virginia became&nbsp;the first state to file preliminary insurance rates for 2019,&nbsp;and the numbers show the&nbsp;effect of these actions.&nbsp;The state will see&nbsp;<a href="http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/386294-obamacare-insurers-in-virginia-propose-major-premium-hikes-for-2019#.WuzyIFGKcck">rate increases of up to 64&nbsp;percent</a>, before factoring in premium subsidies to those who qualify.&nbsp;Insurers pointedly blame&nbsp;Trump policies&nbsp;for the&nbsp;rise. Other states that have released filings are showing similar effects.</p>

<p>Protections for people with<strong>&nbsp;</strong>preexisting conditions<strong>&nbsp;</strong>&mdash;&nbsp;as many as 130 million Americans, and growing every day&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;are also under attack. The Trump administration is using its executive authority to approve the sale of junk&nbsp;insurance plans&nbsp;that had been outlawed or severely limited under President Barack Obama.&nbsp;</p>
<div class="wp-block-vox-media-highlight vox-media-highlight"><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Join the conversation</h2>
<p>Are you interested in more discussions around health care policy? Join our&nbsp;<a href="http://bit.ly/2lbzgPq"><strong>Facebook community</strong></a>&nbsp;for conversation and updates.</p>
</div>
<p>Such plans&nbsp;aren&rsquo;t subject to the rules requiring 85&nbsp;percent&nbsp;of premiums to be spent on medical costs, nor by rules that forbid the insurance companies to decide what to cover and what not to.&nbsp;These plans would exist outside the ACA system.&nbsp;ACA plans would still be available, but they would become less&nbsp;viable and more expensive as insurers become more reluctant to offer plans that cover more if they have to compete with plans that cover less.</p>

<p>Medicaid, which Republicans&nbsp;had&nbsp;targeted&nbsp;for a major rollback last year, has not&nbsp;escaped this new phase of the Republican assault either.&nbsp;Using state-by-state&nbsp;waivers, the&nbsp;administration&nbsp;is aiming to add features to the Medicaid program that cause people to lose coverage.</p>

<p>Rules have been proposed and approved in Kentucky, Arkansas, and New Hampshire (with other states considering similar moves) that would cause people to lose coverage if they&rsquo;re not working, and that charge very poor people premiums or lock them out of coverage for not registering with the program annually.</p>

<p>The stated reason for these changes is to give people the incentive to work. The real purpose is to cut&nbsp;Medicaid&nbsp;rolls. There&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/many-working-people-could-lose-health-coverage-due-to-medicaid-work-requirements">no evidence&nbsp;that employment will be&nbsp;positively&nbsp;affected</a>, and there are estimates in each of these states that many will lose coverage.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The number of uninsured Americans is rising</h2>
<p>The&nbsp;cold war on Obamacare is having an&nbsp;effect. The&nbsp;uninsured rate has begun to&nbsp;creep back up&nbsp;since Trump became&nbsp;president. After several years of major declines under Obama, the uninsured rate has grown from 10.9 percent to 12.2 percent, according to <a href="http://news.gallup.com/poll/225383/uninsured-rate-steady-fourth-quarter-2017.aspx">Gallup</a>. It&rsquo;s not hard to imagine,&nbsp;in&nbsp;just&nbsp;one Trump term,&nbsp;that we could see half of the gains made under the ACA, which led to 20 million Americans being newly covered, erased.</p>

<p>Poll after poll&nbsp;shows&nbsp;the public wants this assault on the ACA to stop.&nbsp;After all this time,&nbsp;the program remains at a record level of popularity.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kff.org/interactive/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-the-publics-views-on-the-aca/#?response=Favorable--Unfavorable&amp;aRange=twoYear">Fifty percent&nbsp;approve</a>,&nbsp;even as the administration badmouths and undercuts it.</p>

<p>Mostly, Americans want&nbsp;this assault on&nbsp;their ability to care for their families to end&nbsp;so we can begin the process of building back what has been allowed to erode. Americans want to pay less, not more, for health insurance. They don&rsquo;t want insurance companies&nbsp;to&nbsp;be given unlimited authority again.</p>

<p>They want&nbsp;to see Medicaid strengthened, not weakened. They want the&nbsp;basic&nbsp;dignity of being able to afford medication and an&nbsp;end&nbsp;to&nbsp;the constant fear that grips so many that if they get sick, they will lose everything.</p>

<p>Americans didn&rsquo;t want last year&rsquo;s war on Obamacare, and they don&rsquo;t want this new cold war either. &nbsp;</p>

<p><em>Andy Slavitt served as the acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under President Obama. Find him on Twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/ASlavitt"><em>@ASlavitt</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<p><a href="http://vox.com/the-big-idea">The Big Idea</a> is Vox&rsquo;s home for smart discussion of the most important issues and ideas in politics, science, and culture &mdash; typically by outside contributors. If you have an idea for a piece, pitch us at <a href="mailto:thebigidea@vox.com">thebigidea@vox.com</a>.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
