<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Brandon Ambrosino | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2019-03-06T06:29:17+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/brandon-ambrosino" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/brandon-ambrosino/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/brandon-ambrosino/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Everything you need to know about Pope Francis]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2018/7/13/17570124/who-is-pope-francis" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2018/7/13/17570124/who-is-pope-francis</id>
			<updated>2018-07-13T17:05:53-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-08-05T15:23:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Criminal Justice" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Who is Pope Francis? Pope Francis is the 266th Bishop of Rome. Francis was elected to the papacy on March 13, 2013, to replace Benedict XVI, who resigned from office two weeks earlier. Themes that have come to define Francis&#8217; papacy include poverty, mercy, and joy. Francis is the papal name of Jorge Mario Bergoglio. Bergoglio [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/11688313/vincenzo_pinto.pg.0.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Who is Pope Francis?</h2>
<p>Pope Francis is the 266th Bishop of Rome. Francis was elected to the papacy on March 13, 2013, to replace<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/"> Benedict XVI</a>, who resigned from office two weeks earlier. Themes that have come to define Francis&#8217; papacy include poverty, mercy, and joy.</p>

<p>Francis is the papal name of Jorge Mario Bergoglio. Bergoglio was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, to two Italian immigrants, on December 17, 1936. He holds advanced degrees in <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/03/12/pope-francis-scientist-2/">chemistry</a>, philosophy, and theology. Before starting his seminary education, he worked as a janitor, a bar bouncer, and a lab assistant for a chemist. After several years of study, he entered the the Society of Jesus in 1958. After finishing his initial training, Bergoglio took vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, and became a Jesuit on March 12, 1960. He was ordained to the priesthood almost a decade later, in December 1969.</p>

<p>Prior to coming to Rome, Bergoglio served several roles as bishop in Argentina, including Metropolitan Archbishop. He was made a cardinal in 2001 by Pope John Paul II, and held several administrative positions within the Roman Curia, the central governing body of the Catholic Church.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What exactly does the Pope do?</h2>
<p>The Pope gets his name from the Greek word for &#8220;Father,&#8221; <em>pappas</em>. He&#8217;s called a father because of his role as the spiritual leader of the world&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-21443313">1.2 billion Catholics</a>. He is responsible for unifying Catholicism&#8217;s voice and centralizing its doctrine. The Pope is also the head of <a href="http://www.vaticanstate.va/content/vaticanstate/en.html">Vatican City</a>, which is the world&#8217;s smallest independent city-state.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s the Pope&#8217;s job to appoint bishops. Sure, it&#8217;s a<a href="http://www.usccb.org/about/leadership/appointing-bishops.cfm"> complicated process</a> involving several people, but the Pope has final say in these appointments. Naming bishops is an <a href="http://ncronline.org/blogs/faith-and-justice/pope-francis-after-year">important task</a>, since these men carry out the Pope&#8217;s vision at local levels. There are more than 5,000 bishops throughout the world, and it&#8217;s the Pope&#8217;s responsibility to meet with them at least once every five years.</p>

<p>The Pope also selects the College of Cardinals, which is the group that will elect Francis&#8217; successor. According to <a href="http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2010/10/20/pope-places-his-mark-on-college-of-cardinals/8490">Thomas Reese</a>, popes &#8220;appoint men who reflect [their] own views on theology and other issues facing the church.&#8221; Cardinal selection, then, is crucial to the Pope&#8217;s work since these men will continue to carry out Francis&#8217; vision for the Church even after he&#8217;s gone.</p>

<p>In addition, the pope offers a weekly blessing and a weekly address to tourists and Catholics visiting the Vatican. He also delivers messages on Church holidays, including the <a href="http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-francis-urbi-et-orbi-message">Urbi et Orbi</a>, &#8220;to the city and to the World,&#8221; given at Christmas and Easter.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Where did the name &quot;Francis&quot; come from?</h2>
<p>Since 533, it&#8217;s been customary for each newly appointed pope to choose his own papal name. The pope&#8217;s name carries a great deal of significance since it signifies the kind of pope he will be, and what kinds of passions, interests, theologies, etc. will come to define his reign.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In an</span><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/march/documents/papa-francesco_20130316_rappresentanti-media_en.html"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/march/documents/papa-francesco_20130316_rappresentanti-media_en.html" rel="noopener">address</a><span> to journalists several days after his appointment, Francis (birth name: Jorge Mario Bergoglio) recounted how he came to choose his name. During the conclave, after Bergoglio received two-thirds of the vote, thus sealing his papal fate, Cardinal Claudio Hummes whispered to him, &#8220;Don&#8217;t forget the poor!&#8221; According to Pope Francis, Hummes&#8217; words reminded him of St. Francis.</span></p>
<p>St. Francis was an Italian friar who lived from 1181 to 1226. He is the patron saint of animals and ecology, and is remembered for his solidarity with the poor, his love of animals, and his attempts at interfaith dialogue with Muslims. According to legend, following a pilgrimage to Rome, Christ appeared to him, saying, &#8220;Francis, Francis, go and repair my house which, as you can see, is falling into ruins.&#8221; Though Pope Francis has not publicly referenced this legend, some see a parallel between it and the current pope&#8217;s desire for reform.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What are the hallmarks of Francis&#039; theology?</h2>
<p>There are several theological themes dominating his papacy so far: poverty, mercy, and joy.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>During his first interview with journalists after his election, Francis said, &#8220;How I would love a church that is poor, and for the poor.&#8221; These words have provided the context for many of his actions, from</span><a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/03/14/pope-francis-circles-back-to-hotel-to-pay-bill/"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/03/14/pope-francis-circles-back-to-hotel-to-pay-bill/" rel="noopener">paying his own hotel bill</a><span> to dispensing with the traditional costly </span><a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2013/09/13/pope-francis-to-drive-his-own-popemobile-inside-vatican-city/" rel="noopener">popemobile</a><span> and</span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/what-does-a-pope-like-to-wear-francis-keeps-it-simple/2013/03/18/d43d2bc4-8ffd-11e2-9cfd-36d6c9b5d7ad_story.html"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/what-does-a-pope-like-to-wear-francis-keeps-it-simple/2013/03/18/d43d2bc4-8ffd-11e2-9cfd-36d6c9b5d7ad_story.html" rel="noopener">vestments</a><span>. In a visit with students last June, Francis remarked, &#8220;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/pope-francis-speaks-again-world-poverty" rel="noopener">Poverty is the flesh of the poor Jesus</a><span>.&#8221;</span></p><p><span>In a Lenten</span><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/homilies/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130317_omelia-santa-anna_en.html"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/homilies/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130317_omelia-santa-anna_en.html" rel="noopener">homily</a><span> from his first year as Pope, Francis preached that Jesus&#8217; &#8220;most powerful message&#8221; is &#8220;mercy.&#8221; He told</span><a href="http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/english-translation-of-pope-francis-corriere-della-sera-interview"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/english-translation-of-pope-francis-corriere-della-sera-interview" rel="noopener">Corriere della Sera</a><span> that tenderness and mercy are &#8220;the heart of the Gospel,&#8221; and without them, &#8220;one doesn&#8217;t understand Jesus Christ.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>To Francis, a church without joy is<a href="http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-francis-a-church-without-joy-is-unthinkable-s"> unthinkable</a>. As the<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/opinion/why-italians-love-francis.html?_r=0"> New York Times</a> writes, &#8220;Francis knows how to smile, and how to make others smile.&#8221; Francis&#8217; first apostolic exhortation was titled<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium_en.html"> Evangelii Gaudium</a> (<em>The Joy of the Gospel</em>), in which he encouraged Christians &#8220;to embark upon a new chapter of evangelization marked by &#8230; joy.&#8221; In contrast to former popes who were often perceived as stoic and reserved, Francis&#8217; demeanor is much more welcoming, warm, and even<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2488748/Pope-Francis-dons-red-nose-congratulate-newlyweds-volunteer-clown-therapy-charity.html"> playful</a>.<a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20792954,00.html"> Many</a><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/the-pope/10342768/Pope-Francis-to-rip-up-and-rewrite-Vatican-constitution.html"> pictures</a> of<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/the-pope/9943126/Pope-Francis-calls-for-respect-for-all-religions.html"> Francis</a> show him<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/12/pope-francis-bouncer-youth-nightclub.html"> smiling</a>, and <a href="http://www.cathnewsusa.com/2013/12/pope-francis-one-miracle-heal-suffering-children/">many</a><a href="http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20130712/world/Pope-Francis-targets-child-abuse.477640"> more</a> show his<a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/10/30/boy-just-wants-to-chill-with-pope-francis-on-stage/"> compassionate</a><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Latest-News-Wires/2013/1214/Pope-faces-criticism-for-crackdown-on-traditional-order"> way</a> with<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/15/us-pope-interview-idUSBRE9BE08H20131215"> children</a>. In his<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/homilies/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130324_palme_en.html"> first Palm Sunday address</a>, he admonished his listeners not to be &#8220;men and women of sadness,&#8221; because &#8220;a Christian can never be sad!&#8221; He echoed this same sentiment in a cheekier way when he reminded Christians not to be &#8220;sourpusses.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Francis is a Jesuit — what does that mean? And does it matter?</h2>
<p>Founded in 1540 by St. Ignatius of Loyola, the Society of Jesus is a men&#8217;s religious order that was founded for the broad purpose of &#8220;helping souls.&#8221; St. Ignatius&#8217;s Spiritual Exercises, his classic text, was developed with the intention of helping a person &#8220;overcome&#8221; anything that kept him distracted from God&#8217;s will, and to &#8220;order&#8221; his life to the service of God.</p>
<p><span>At the heart of</span><a href="http://www.jesuit.org/aboutus"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.jesuit.org/aboutus" rel="noopener">Jesuit spirituality</a><span> is the belief that God can be found in all things. Rather than seeing reality as being divided between the secular and sacred realms, Jesuits see all things as falling under the purview of spirituality. (This belief might inform Pope Francis&#8217; &#8220;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.americamagazine.org/pope-interview" rel="noopener">dogmatic certainty</a><span>&#8221; that God&#8217;s presence is in the life of every person, and that &#8220;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2013/05/22/pope_at_mass:_culture_of_encounter_is_the_foundation_of_peace/en1-694445" rel="noopener">even the atheists</a><span>&#8221; are redeemed and made in the image of God.)</span></p>
<p>Francis&#8217;s Jesuit affiliation is a relatively big deal for the papacy. For one thing, he&#8217;s the first Jesuit to hold the office. As part of their final vows to God, at the end of their training, Jesuits promise not to seek high office in the Catholic Church. (Jesuits take their orders so seriously that they are sometimes referred to as &#8220;<a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/241733/the-jesuits-gods-marines">God&#8217;s Marines</a>.&#8221;) Secondly, with their emphasis on education and missionary work, Jesuits have sometimes occupied the margins of the Catholic Church. Some Jesuits also have a reputation for being too independent, which, in part, led to Pope Clement XIV actually suppressing the Order in 1773. (Pope Pius VII reinstated them in 1814.)</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why is Pope Francis so popular?</h2><p>Francis has gained a reputation for being relatable, approachable, and down-to-earth. Some have called Francis &#8220;The People&#8217;s Pope,&#8221; and the &#8220;Pope of the 99 percent.&#8221; <em>Time</em> named him their<a href="http://poy.time.com/2013/12/11/person-of-the-year-pope-francis-the-peoples-pope/?iid=poy-main-lead"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://poy.time.com/2013/12/11/person-of-the-year-pope-francis-the-peoples-pope/?iid=poy-main-lead" rel="noopener">Person of the Year</a> in 2013, as did LGBT-interest magazine <a href="http://www.advocate.com/year-review/2013/12/16/advocates-person-year-pope-francis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Advocate</a>. &#8220;In a matter of months,&#8221; read the <em>Time</em> profile, &#8220;Francis has elevated the healing mission of the church &mdash; the church as servant and comforter of hurting people in an often harsh world &mdash; above the doctrinal police work so important to his recent predecessors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Writing for <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/07/the-pope-is-human/309390/">The Atlantic</a>, Amy Sullivan said Francis has transformed the Church&#8217;s public image, noting the way that he&#8217;s inspiring ordinary Catholics was &#8220;unthinkable just a few months&#8221; before his election.</p>

<p>In an article for <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/like-pope-francis-youll-love-jesus/2013/12/11/cf2d4fd8-610d-11e3-8beb-3f9a9942850f_story.html">The Washington Post</a>, Elizabeth Tenety tries to understand why, with the election of Francis, Catholics have suddenly become &#8220;the cool kids on the Church Street.&#8221; Tenety writes that Francis&#8217; critique of &#8220;the excesses of religion and politics,&#8221; leads people to think of him as &#8220;the long-awaited Catholic antidote to the religious right.&#8221; However, Tenety questions how much of a departure Francis has actually made from previous popes. Though Francis might feel refreshing, she argues that he&#8217;s only doing the work that has been practiced by &#8220;countless Christians in [Jesus&#8217;] name for millennia.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Has Francis done anything to address the Church&#039;s sex abuse crisis?</h2>
<p>When it comes to its record of dealing with sex abuse, &#8220;<a href="http://ncronline.org/blogs/faith-and-justice/un-committee-report-vatican-abuse-missed-opportunity">the Church deserves to be raked over the coals</a>,&#8221; according to Catholic journalist Thomas Reese. A 2004 <a href="http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/child-and-youth-protection/upload/The-Nature-and-Scope-of-Sexual-Abuse-of-Minors-by-Catholic-Priests-and-Deacons-in-the-United-States-1950-2002.pdf">John Jay report</a> found that thousands of minors were sexually abused by Catholic clergy between 1950 and 2002. More shocking is the fact that some high-ranking officials <a href="http://www.bishop-accountability.org">knew of the abuse</a> but did not remedy the situation, either by stripping the abusers of their priesthood or by turning them over to the proper civil authorities.</p>

<p>When Francis took office, many people looked to him to correct the Church&#8217;s handling of sex abuse. In a <a href="http://www.aleteia.org/en/religion/documents/in-2012-interview-cardinal-bergoglio-says-he-favors-keeping-celibacy-582001">2012 interview</a>, before he was Pope, he made it clear that Church leadership should &#8220;never turn a blind eye&#8221; to sex abuse, even when coming forward with such information risks &#8220;damaging the image of an institution.&#8221; He said it&#8217;s a &#8220;stupid idea&#8221; to quietly relocate an abusive priest to a different parish, since &#8220;the priest just takes the problem with him wherever he goes.&#8221; He also said pedophilia is not a result of, nor is it linked to, celibacy: &#8220;If a priest is a pedophile, he is so before he is a priest.&#8221;</p>
<p><span>In December 2013, </span><a target="_blank" href="http://ncronline.org/news/accountability/vatican-announces-new-papal-advisory-commission-sex-abuse" rel="noopener">Francis announced</a><span> the creation of a Vatican committee aimed at fighting sex abuse in the Church, and working with victims and their families. On March 22, 2014, Francis </span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/national_world/2014/03/23/members-named-to-sex-abuse-committee.html" rel="noopener">named 8 people</a><span> to the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. </span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.romereports.com/pg156201-find-out-who-is-who-in-the-vatican-s-commission-for-the-protection-of-minors--en" rel="noopener">Of the members</a><span>, four are women, and one &mdash; Marie Collins &mdash; is an</span><a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/appointment-to-vatican-council-a-huge-responsibility-says-marie-collins-1.1735582"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/appointment-to-vatican-council-a-huge-responsibility-says-marie-collins-1.1735582" rel="noopener">abuse survivor</a><span>. The group also includes Cardinal Sean O&#8217;Malley, archbishop of Boston, the city in which the US </span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.boston.com/globe/spotlight/abuse/" rel="noopener">sex abuse crisis story</a><span> originally broke in 2002.</span></p><p><span>In an</span><a href="http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/english-translation-of-pope-francis-corriere-della-sera-interview"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/english-translation-of-pope-francis-corriere-della-sera-interview" rel="noopener">interview</a><span> with Corriere della Sera, Francis spoke about the issue of sex abuse, and praised the former Pope Benedict for being &#8220;courageous&#8221; in his </span><a target="_blank" href="http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/international/2014/01/apnewsbreak_pope_defrocked_400_priests_in_2_years" rel="noopener">attempts</a><span> to curb it. In the same interview, Francis said that although statistics show that the majority of abuse happens outside the church, &#8220;the Church is the only one being attacked.&#8221; The editorial board of the National Catholic Reporter said Francis&#8217; comments sounded &#8220;defensive,&#8221; and encouraged Francis to meet with victims and their families and hear their complaints and concerns. Likewise, the </span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.snapnetwork.org/rome_pope_shows_archaic_defensive_mindset_snap_says" rel="noopener">Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests</a><span> criticized Francis&#8217; remarks, saying they &#8220;reflect an archaic, defensive mindset that will not make kids safer.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>In an April 11 <a href="http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/04/11/pope_francis_on_clerical_sexual_abuse:_not_one_step_back/en1-789927">speech</a> delivered to the <a href="http://www.bice.org/en/">International Catholic Child Bureau</a>, Francis asked for forgiveness on behalf of priests who abused children. The Pope&#8217;s unscripted comments were hailed as his &#8220;<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pope-francis-strongest-statement-yet-on-sex-abuse/">strongest statement yet</a>&#8221; on the sex abuse crisis. Francis said the he is aware of the &#8220;personal and moral damage &#8230; carried out by men of the Church,&#8221; and insisted the Church must be &#8220;very firm&#8221; in fighting sex abuse. &#8220;We do not want to take one step backward in dealing with this problem,&#8221; said Francis, &#8220;because you cannot take chances with children.&#8221; As <a href="http://www.snapnetwork.org/vatican_pope_apologizes_victims_respond">critics</a> point out, this might be the first time a pope has spoken out about imposing &#8220;sanctions&#8221; on guilty bishops.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is Francis&#039; attitude toward women?</h2>
<p>Francis told<a href="http://www.americamagazine.org/pope-interview"> America Magazine</a> in August 2013 that he thinks it&#8217;s &#8220;necessary to broaden the opportunities for a stronger presence of women in the church.&#8221; This echoes his earlier <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/july/documents/papa-francesco_20130728_gmg-conferenza-stampa_en.html">comment</a> on the necessity of creating a more &#8220;profound theology of womanhood.&#8221; Francis <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/july/documents/papa-francesco_20130728_gmg-conferenza-stampa_en.html">has also said</a> that that Jesus&#8217; mother Mary is &#8220;more important than the apostles,&#8221; though he notes further theological discourse is needed to explain this. He also said, &#8220;The Church is feminine: she is Church, she is Bride, she is Mother.&#8221;</p>
<p><span>When Pope Francis</span><a href="http://www.religionnews.com/2013/03/29/vatican-defends-pope-francis-washing-of-womens-feet/"> </a><a href="http://www.religionnews.com/2013/03/29/vatican-defends-pope-francis-washing-of-womens-feet/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">washed the feet of two women</a><span> during his Maundy Thursday trip to a youth prison in Rome, he set the tone for a papal shift in attitudes toward women. A 1988 letter from the Vatican&#8217;s </span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/" rel="noopener">Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments</a><span> explicitly said that only &#8220;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.ewtn.com/library/CURIA/CDWEASTR.htm#5" rel="noopener">chosen men</a><span>&#8221; were to have their feet washed during this ceremony. This wasn&#8217;t the first time Francis washed women&#8217;s feet: in 2011, then-Bergoglio made</span><a href="http://www.diario26.com.ar/bergoglio-realizo-el-tradicional-lavatorio-de-pies-a-ninos-recien-nacidos-y-embarazadas-130762.html"> </a><a href="http://www.diario26.com.ar/bergoglio-realizo-el-tradicional-lavatorio-de-pies-a-ninos-recien-nacidos-y-embarazadas-130762.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">headlines</a><span> for washing the feet of a pregnant woman.</span></p>
<p>On the topic of women&#8217;s ordination to the priesthood, Francis has said the question is &#8220;not open to discussion,&#8221; since it was settled under Pope John Paul II. Francis was referring to <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/1994/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_19940522_ordinatio-sacerdotalis_en.html">Ordinatio Sacerdotalis</a>, which is Latin for &#8220;Priestly Ordination.&#8221; According to the document, only priests can be ordained since that is the pattern Jesus established when he chose his twelve disciples.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is Francis&#039; attitude toward gay people?</h2>
<p>Though Francis hasn&#8217;t changed Church doctrine regarding LGBT issues, he has assumed a more loving, tolerant posture towards gay people than some of his predecessors. He said in a <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/july/documents/papa-francesco_20130728_gmg-conferenza-stampa_en.html">July 2013 interview</a>, &#8220;If a person is gay and seeks the Lord and has good will, well who am I to judge them? The Catechism of the Catholic Church &#8230; says, these persons must not be marginalized for this, they must be integrated into society.&#8221; (Some have <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/newsgram/articles/2014/03/14/pope-francis-the-peoples-pope-completes-his-first-year-of-papacy">noted</a> that Francis&#8217; use of the word &#8220;gay&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;homosexual&#8221; is itself a sign of progress.)</p>
<p>While this statement has not yet resulted in any reforms at the doctrinal level, its power should not be overlooked. According to the prominent LGBT magazine <em>The Advocate</em>, who selected Francis as its 2013<a href="http://www.advocate.com/year-review/2013/12/16/advocates-person-year-pope-francis"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.advocate.com/year-review/2013/12/16/advocates-person-year-pope-francis" rel="noopener">Person of the Year</a>, we should not &#8220;underestimate any pope&#8217;s capacity for persuading hearts and minds in opening to LGBT people, and not only in the U.S. but globally.&#8221;</p><p><span>Prior to his papacy, in Argentina, Bergoglio called gay marriage &#8220;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.advocate.com/politics/religion/2013/03/13/new-pope-argentina-cardinal-jorge-bergoglio-selected" rel="noopener">a destructive attack on God&#8217;s plan</a><span>.&#8221; He also said that adoption by gay parents would &#8220;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/cardinal_bergoglio_hits_out_at_same-sex_marriage" rel="noopener">seriously damage the family</a><span>.&#8221; But </span><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/03/pope-francis-supported-civil-unions-as-cardinal/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according to Sergio Rubin</a><span>, his biographer, even though Bergoglio was against same-sex marriage, he was in favor of same-sex civil unions. Theologian Marcelo Marquez, a gay rights leader, confirmed this to the</span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/20/world/americas/pope-francis-old-colleagues-recall-pragmatic-streak.html?hp&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/20/world/americas/pope-francis-old-colleagues-recall-pragmatic-streak.html?hp&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0" rel="noopener">New York Times</a><span>.</span></p>
<p>In an interview with <a href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/transcript-pope-francis-march-5-interview-with-corriere-della-sera/">Corriere della Sera</a>, Francis affirmed Church teaching on marriage &mdash; &#8220;Marriage is between a man and a woman,&#8221; he said &mdash; but also acknowledged the reality of the need that exists for secular states to &#8220;regulate economic aspects between persons, such as ensuring healthcare.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is Francis&#039; attitude toward capitalism?</h2>
<p>In<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/may/documents/papa-francesco_20130516_nuovi-ambasciatori_en.html"> a speech last year</a>, Francis spoke out against the &#8220;cult of money,&#8221; which he described as a financial &#8220;imbalance&#8221; resulting from &#8220;the absolute autonomy of markets.&#8221; &#8220;While the income of a minority is increasing exponentially,&#8221; he said, &#8220;that of the majority is crumbling.&#8221; Acknowledging his responsibility to love the rich and poor alike, Francis sees it as his &#8220;duty, in Christ&#8217;s name, to remind the rich to help the poor.&#8221; To this end, Francis has called for financial reforms at individual, clerical, and governmental levels.</p>
<p><span>Francis&#8217; first major writing as pope also contained</span><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-pope-on-the-financial-system-inequality-money-2013-11"> </a><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-pope-on-the-financial-system-inequality-money-2013-11" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a critique of the global economy</a><span>: &#8220;Just as the commandment &lsquo;Thou shalt not kill&#8217; sets a clear limit in order to safeguard the value of human life, today we also have to say &lsquo;thou shalt not&#8217; to an economy of exclusion and inequality. Such an economy kills. How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses two points?&#8221;</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>These and similar comments have earned Francis harsh criticism, most notably from</span><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/11/27/it_s_sad_how_wrong_pope_francis_is_unless_it_s_a_deliberate_mistranslation_by_leftists"> </a><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/11/27/it_s_sad_how_wrong_pope_francis_is_unless_it_s_a_deliberate_mistranslation_by_leftists" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rush Limbaugh</a><span>, who accused the Pope of sounding like a Marxist. Francis</span><a href="http://lastampa.it/2013/12/14/esteri/vatican-insider/en/never-be-afraid-of-tenderness-5BqUfVs9r7W1CJIMuHqNeI/pagina.html"> </a><a href="http://lastampa.it/2013/12/14/esteri/vatican-insider/en/never-be-afraid-of-tenderness-5BqUfVs9r7W1CJIMuHqNeI/pagina.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">responded</a><span> by saying that Marxism is &#8220;wrong,&#8221; but he wasn&#8217;t offended. He then reiterated his critique of &#8220;trickle-down economics.&#8221;</span></p><h2 class="wp-block-heading">What are Francis&#039; views on the environment?</h2>
<p>Since his appointment as Pope, Francis has &#8220;frequently shown concern for the environment,&#8221; according to the <a href="http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/pope-francis-to-emphasize-human-ecology-in-forthcoming-document-says-theolo/">National Catholic Register</a>. His choice of &#8220;Francis&#8221; for his papal name might signify his interests in environmentalism, as St. Francis &mdash; <a href="http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Oct2007/Feature1.asp">the patron saint of animals and ecology</a> &mdash; is remembered for <a href="http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/saintfran.htm">preaching to birds</a> and caring for nature.</p>

<p>In his <a href="http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/homilies/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130319_omelia-inizio-pontificato.html">inaugural mass</a>, Pope Francis implored Catholics to be protectors of &#8220;the beauty of the created world.&#8221; In an address two months later on <a href="http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2013/06/05/pope_at_audience:_counter_a_culture_of_waste_with_solidarity/en1-698604">World Environment Day</a>, Francis urged his listeners to cultivate and care for creation, and to make it a &#8220;habitable place for everyone.&#8221;</p>

<p>On January 24, 2014, Fr. Frederico Lombardi, Director of the Holy See Press Office, <a href="http://www.news.va/en/news/possible-papal-encyclical-on-ecology">announced</a> that Francis &#8220;has begun work on a draft text on the topic of ecology, which could become an encyclical.&#8221; Lombardi insisted the draft was at an early stage, and so he was unable to give a timeframe to publication. The forthcoming work, said Lombardi, would place particular emphasis on &#8220;<a href="http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/%E2%80%98-fragile-world%E2%80%99-church-teaching-ecology-and-pope-francis#.U2Osh9y0b1o">human ecology</a>&#8221; &mdash; the interrelationships of humans and their environments.</p>

<p>On May 2, 2014, the Pontifical Academy of Sciences &mdash; which is an international scientific academy housed in the Vatican &mdash; kicked off a five-day conference titled <a href="http://www.casinapioiv.va/content/accademia/en/events/2014/sustainable.html">Sustainable Humanity, Sustainable Nature: Our Responsibility</a>. Over 40 academics from various disciplines are expected to attend the conference, the theme of which is to explore the relationship of humanity and nature. Those involved will discuss various ways in which nature both satisfies and fails to satisfy human needs for food, health, and energy.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why doesn&#039;t Francis rock the traditional Pope clothes and car?</h2>
<p>Francis has <a href="http://www.americamagazine.org/pope-interview">said</a> his choice to downgrade his papal gear is the result of a &#8220;spiritual discernment that responds to a need that arises from looking at things.&#8221; In other words, his sensitivity to the fact that so many people live in poverty has caused him to be more frugal than his predecessors. Francis has stated his desire to have &#8220;<a href="http://ncronline.org/blogs/francis-chronicles/pope-francis-i-would-love-church-poor">a church that is poor, and for the poor</a>.&#8221; His aesthetics of frugality ought to be seen as small-scale signals of the financial reform he wishes to initiate throughout the Church at large.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>And Francis has taken larger-scale steps toward financial restraint. Although the Catholic Church has often been accused of financial corruption throughout its history, the </span><a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/230986/the-catholic-churchs-vatileaks-scandal-a-guide" target="_blank" rel="noopener">VatiLeaks scandal</a><span> that broke in January 2012 took the accusations to a new level. The Catholic Church manages more than $6 billion in assets. Much of that money is managed in the</span><a href="http://www.ior.va"> </a><a href="http://www.ior.va" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Instituo per le Opere di Religione</a><span> (IOR), commonly called the Vatican Bank, which is known as the</span><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/06/26/the-vatican-bank-the-most-secret-bank-in-the-world/"> </a><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/06/26/the-vatican-bank-the-most-secret-bank-in-the-world/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">most secret bank in the world</a><span>. Francis has made some</span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/pope-francis-shakes-up-vatican-bank-sets-financial-cap-for-sainthood/2014/01/15/2ecf5d20-7e21-11e3-97d3-b9925ce2c57b_story.html"> </a><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/pope-francis-shakes-up-vatican-bank-sets-financial-cap-for-sainthood/2014/01/15/2ecf5d20-7e21-11e3-97d3-b9925ce2c57b_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">big changes</a><span> to the IOR. First, he fired the bank&#8217;s longtime director. Then, he</span><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-17/pope-francis-replaces-vatican-bank-board"> </a><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-17/pope-francis-replaces-vatican-bank-board">replaced</a><span> four of the five board members overseeing the bank. But despite speculation that Francis was going to close it down, the </span><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/07/vatican-bank-reprieve-pope-francis-scandals-reform" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Vatican announced</a><span> in April that the IOR would remain open.</span></p>
<p>When reports circulated that the German &#8220;<a href="http://time.com/38336/pope-francis-bling-bishop-fires/">Bishop of Bling</a>&#8221; spent $43 million on home and church renovations, Francis suspended him pending an official church inquiry. (Francis later accepted the<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/27/world/europe/pope-accepts-resignation-of-high-spending-german-bishop.html?_r=0"> Bishop&#8217;s formal resignation</a> on March 26, 2014.)</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Has Francis made any doctrinal changes to Catholicism?</h2>
<p>As Francis has made clear, he considers himself a &#8220;son of the Church.&#8221; That means that, although he continues to soften the papal tone established by his predecessor, he has no plans to change any doctrine where &#8220;<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/09/19/224120629/church-must-find-balance-pope-says-or-fall-like-cards">the teaching of the church &#8230; is clear</a>.&#8221;</p>

<p>One comment Francis made in an interview for<a href="http://americamagazine.org/pope-interview"> America</a> is important here. He said that although &#8220;many think changes and reforms can take place in a short period of time,&#8221; he cautions that that &#8220;real, effective change&#8221; takes time. So while he hasn&#8217;t made any doctrinal changes yet, the shifts in tone he has made may actually be his way of laying the groundwork for later changes.</p>

<p>At the same time, it&#8217;s important to note that a strict dichotomy between style and substance isn&#8217;t clear within Catholic theology. It&#8217;s possible to communicate the substance of the Gospel through subtle gestures and words. Though Francis&#8217; gestures &mdash; washing women&#8217;s feet, kissing a disfigured man &mdash; are unaccompanied by commentary, there is a <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/07/world/europe/pope-francis-embrace/">theological depth</a> to them shouldn&#8217;t go unnoticed.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Who are Francis&#039; critics?</h2><p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/11/27/it_s_sad_how_wrong_pope_francis_is_unless_it_s_a_deliberate_mistranslation_by_leftists" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rush Limbaugh</a> doesn&#8217;t care for Francis&#8217; critique of the global economy, which the Pope called an &#8220;economy of exclusion and inequality.&#8221; Limbaugh called that &#8220;pure Marxism.&#8221; <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101302230" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ken Langone</a>, founder of Home Depot, doesn&#8217;t like Francis&#8217; critique of wealth, either. Langone told Cardinal Timothy Dolan that Francis needs to &#8220;be careful about generalities.&#8221; The <a href="http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/pope-francis-calls-jews-big-brothers-but-it-aint-a-compliment/2013/11/12/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jewish Press</a> called out Francis for his comment that Jews are the &#8220;<a href="http://forward.com/articles/187373/pope-francis-calls-jews-big-brothers-of-church-on/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">big brothers</a>&#8221; of Catholics &mdash; a comment which they interpreted as an &#8220;ideological attack on Jews &#8230; as evil.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is also a more traditional segment of the Church that is extremely critical of Francis. Charles Caput, Archbishop of Philadelphia, said he was &#8220;<a href="http://www.thericatholic.com/news/detail.html?sub_id=6041">disappointed</a>&#8221; that Francis hasn&#8217;t spoken much about abortion. Francis confirmed this and other behind-the-scenes criticism when he said he was &#8220;<a href="http://www.americamagazine.org/pope-interview">reprimanded</a>&#8221; for not talking enough about gay marriage, abortion, and contraception.</p>

<p>Some traditional Catholics are also attached to the the idea of conducting Church services in Latin. They see Francis&#8217; less formal style as a threat to the the Latin liturgy &mdash; the words and rituals customarily used for public worship services. Francis isn&#8217;t opposed to traditional liturgy &mdash; it&#8217;s just not the priority of his papacy. &#8220;The Church,&#8221; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/like-pope-francis-youll-love-jesus/2013/12/11/cf2d4fd8-610d-11e3-8beb-3f9a9942850f_story.html">said Francis</a>, &#8220;sometimes has locked itself up in &#8230; small-minded rules.&#8221; Rather than get locked up in debates over which language is the best for saying Mass, Francis prefers the Church&#8217;s pastoral ministry <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24166434">focus on mercy</a>.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Is Francis inspiring more people to go to church?</h2>
<p>According to a<a href="http://www.pewforum.org/2014/03/06/catholics-view-pope-francis-as-a-change-for-the-better/"> February 2014 Pew poll</a>, more than 8 in 10 Catholics have a &#8220;favorable view&#8221; of Francis. Additionally, 7 in 10 Catholics &mdash; and 56% of non-Catholics &mdash; believe &#8220;Francis represents a major change in direction for the Catholic Church.&#8221; Some have dubbed the recent surge in papal popularity the &#8220;<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/ceciliarodriguez/2013/11/17/the-pope-francis-effect-everyones-loving-it-so-far/">Pope Francis Effect</a>.&#8221; But while church attendance in<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/10/pope-francis-effect-italy-catholicism"> Italy and the UK</a> is up among Catholics, the February Pew poll shows that in the US, there&#8217;s been &#8220;no measurable rise&#8221; either in Catholic converts or church attendance. (These findings echo<a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/11/25/no-clear-pope-francis-effect-among-u-s-catholics/"> a similar poll</a> conducted in October 2013.)</p>
<p dir="ltr"> </p><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Francis is sometimes associated with &quot;liberation theology.&quot; What is that?</h2>
<p>In the 1950s and &lsquo;60s, a new way of doing theology began to develop in Latin America. Taking as its starting point the experience of the poor, this new theology interpreted Scripture through the lens of poverty.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In 1968, a meeting of the Second Latin American Bishops Conference at Medellin, Colombia proved pivotal to the increasing momentum of the movement. After the conference, the bishops published a collection of documents &mdash; </span><a href="http://www.shc.edu/theolibrary/resources/medjust.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Justice</a><span>,</span><a href="http://www.shc.edu/theolibrary/resources/medpeace.htm"> </a><a href="http://www.shc.edu/theolibrary/resources/medpeace.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Peace</a><span>, and </span><a href="http://www.shc.edu/theolibrary/resources/medpov.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Poverty</a> <span>&mdash; that outlined for the first time the major themes of Liberation Theology. One of the most important concepts institutionalized at Medellin was the phrase &#8220;</span><a href="http://ncronline.org/blogs/road-peace/gustavo-gutierrez-and-preferential-option-poor" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the preferential option for the poor</a><span>,&#8221; which is the belief that the commandments of God and Jesus give preference to society&#8217;s poorest members. Several years later, a Peruvian priest named</span><a href="http://theology.nd.edu/people/faculty/gustavo-gutierrez-o-p/"> </a><a href="http://theology.nd.edu/people/faculty/gustavo-gutierrez-o-p/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Gustavo Gutierrez</a><span> wrote a book called </span><em>A Theology of Liberation</em><span>, expounding on themes from Medellin.</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>Though it&#8217;s never been condemned by the Church, liberation theology has remained a fringe movement. Before becoming Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger issued official critiques of liberation theology in</span><a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19840806_theology-liberation_en.html"> </a><a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19840806_theology-liberation_en.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">1984</a><span> and</span><a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19860322_freedom-liberation_en.html"> </a><a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19860322_freedom-liberation_en.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">1986</a><span>. Ratzinger&#8217;s main objection was that some theologies in the movement were utilizing Marxist class analysis, which is a philosophy Catholicism rejects. There was also a concern in Rome that certain priests were advocating violence &#8211; they weren&#8217;t. Some of them, though, were sympathetic to certain movements that sought to overthrow the power structures of the ruling elite. Rome also felt that liberation theology put too much emphasis on sin as a social condition, and too little emphasis on sin as an individual spiritual state.</span></p><p><span>Since Francis is the first pope from Latin America,</span><a href="http://ncronline.org/news/theology/pope-meets-liberation-theology-pioneer"> </a><a href="http://ncronline.org/news/theology/pope-meets-liberation-theology-pioneer" target="_blank" rel="noopener">some</a><span> have speculated that the Church is entering a new era of openness to liberation theology. Francis invited</span><span> Gutierrez to the Vatican last September for a private meeting, which many took as a symbolic gesture that liberation theology was now</span><a href="http://www.religionnews.com/2013/09/09/liberation-theology-finds-new-welcome-in-pope-francis-vatican/"> </a><a href="http://www.religionnews.com/2013/09/09/liberation-theology-finds-new-welcome-in-pope-francis-vatican/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">welcome</a><span> in Rome. Francis is also friendly to the idea of a &#8220;</span><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2013/nov/26/world/la-fg-pope-mission-statement-20131127" target="_blank" rel="noopener">decentralization</a><span>&#8221; of the Church, which is a concept articulated early on in the liberation movement.</span></p>
<p>To be clear, Francis has never fully endorsed liberation theology. In the book <em>El Jesuita</em>, Bergoglio said that there are both <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/349432/pope-francis-and-liberation-theology">pros and cons</a> to it. And according to Jesuit <a href="http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/francis-jesuits-and-dirty-war">Thomas Reese</a>, &#8220;Bergoglio, like Pope John Paul II, had serious reservations about liberation theology.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">There&#039;s been some talk about Bergoglio&#039;s activities during the Dirty War. What exactly happened?</h2>
<p>Beginning in May 1976, the military junta ruling Argentina began arresting left-leaning individuals with the intention of purging Argentina of communists and other subversives. This purge, which lasted from 1976 to 1983, is known as the Dirty War.</p>

<p>The main accusation against Bergoglio is that during this time, he was involved with the arrest and torture of two left-leaning Jesuit priests named Orlando Yorio and Francisco Jalics. According to James Carroll&#8217;s <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/12/23/131223fa_fact_carroll?currentPage=all">New Yorker</a> profile on Pope Francis, the two priests &#8220;embraced a profound solidarity with the poor,&#8221; which earned them the suspicion of the military junta. Francis tried to rein in the priests, and when they continued to disobey his orders, he threatened them with expulsion.</p>

<p>Yorio and Jalics were eventually arrested. Since their brush with Bergoglio happened around the same time, the two Jesuits thought he had betrayed them to the military. However, Francis denies the accusation, saying that he &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/pope-francis-conversations-with-jorge-bergoglio-his-life-in-his-own-words-by-sergio-rubin-and-francesca-ambrogetti/2013/05/10/5a98d980-b726-11e2-92f3-f291801936b8_story.html">set the ball rolling</a>&#8221; to ensure their release &#8220;the very night&#8221; of the arrest. Whatever happened behind the scenes, the fact remains that the two priests were eventually released after five months of torture. Yorio died in 2000, convinced that Bergoglio was responsible for his arrest. Jalics, however, has since <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/22/world/americas/jesuit-priest-rejects-popes-connection-to-kidnapping.html?_r=0">denied</a> Francis&#8217; involvement with his and Yorio&#8217;s arrest, saying his original assumption of Francis&#8217; complicity was &#8220;unfounded.&#8221;</p>

<p>According to <a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/deepdish/longform/untier-of-knots/">Andrew Sullivan</a>, though the details remain murky, &#8220;it is fair to say that during this period, Bergoglio was no hero.&#8221; Sullivan points to comments Francis made during his interview with <em>America</em> Magazine that suggest he regrets how he handled the ordeal: &#8220;My style of government at the beginning had many faults &#8230; My authoritarian and quick manner of making decisions led me to have serious problems and to be accused of being ultraconservative.&#8221; Whatever conspired privately between Bergoglio and the two Jesuit priests, Sullivan believes that his activity during the Dirty War was significant in transforming authoritarian Bergoglio into the humble Francis that he is today.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Is Francis the first Pope with a Twitter account?</h2>
<p>No. Benedict was the first papal tweeter. During his reign, he sent out 39 tweets, the last of which was tweeted on Feb. 28, 2013, the official day of his resignation. When Francis took over the papacy, he also took over the<a href="https://twitter.com/Pontifex"> @pontifex</a> handle. (Pontifex means &#8220;bridge-builder&#8221; in Latin.) Benedict&#8217;s<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/elezione/stemma-benedict-xvi_en.html"> coat of arms</a> as well as his tweets were then<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/the_vatican_deletes_pope_benedict_xvis_entire_twitter_feed/"> removed</a> from the @pontifex Twitter feed, but are still available to read in an<a href="http://www.news.va/en/twitter_archive"> archive</a> at the Vatican.</p>
<p><span>@Pontifex currently has</span><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/27/pope-francis-twitter-followers-vatican-10m"> </a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/27/pope-francis-twitter-followers-vatican-10m" rel="noopener">more than 10 million followers</a><span>, but only follows his 8 foreign language accounts (i.e.</span><a href="https://twitter.com/Pontifex_fr"> </a><a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/Pontifex_fr" rel="noopener">Pape Francois</a><span> follows</span><a href="https://twitter.com/Pontifex_de"> </a><a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/Pontifex_de" rel="noopener">Papst Franziskus</a><span>, who follows</span><a href="https://twitter.com/Pontifex_ar" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1575;&#1576;&#1575; &#1601;&#1585;&#1606;&#1587;&#1610;&#1587;</a><span>). </span></p><h2 class="wp-block-heading">You didn&#039;t answer my question!</h2>
<p>This is very much a work in progress. It will continue to be updated as events unfold, new research gets published, and fresh questions emerge.</p>
<p>So if you have additional questions or comments or quibbles or complaints, send a note to Brandon Ambrosino: <a href="mailto:brandon@vox.com">brandon@vox.com</a></p><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Further Reading</h2>
<p>If you really want to know about Pope Francis, read his first apostolic exhortation, <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium_en.html">The Joy of the Gospel</a>.</p>

<p>The interview that<a href="http://americamagazine.org/pope-interview"> America</a> published is especially insightful.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Paul Vallely&#8217;s biography </span><a href="http://www.paulvallely.com/writing/latest-book.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Pope Francis: </a><a href="http://www.paulvallely.com/writing/latest-book.html">Untying the Knots</a><span> was published to positive reviews six months after Francis&#8217; election.</span></p>
<p>Andrew Sullivan has a terrific <a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/deepdish/longform/untier-of-knots/">essay</a> on Pope Francis available at <em>The Dish</em>.</p>

<p>For more information on liberation theology, read <a href="http://www.ts.mu.edu/readers/content/pdf/31/31.2/31.2.1.pdf">Notes for a Theology of Liberation</a> by Gustavo Gutierrez.</p>

<p>The Person of the Year stories in <a href="http://poy.time.com/2013/12/11/person-of-the-year-pope-francis-the-peoples-pope/?iid=poy-main-lead">Time</a> and <a href="http://www.advocate.com/year-review/2013/12/16/advocates-person-year-pope-francis">The Advocate</a> are good reads, as is James Carroll&#8217;s <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/12/23/131223fa_fact_carroll?currentPage=all">New Yorker</a> profile on Francis.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/On-Heaven-Earth-Francis-Twenty-First/dp/0770435068" target="_blank" rel="noopener">On Heaven and Earth</a><span> is a collection of conversations between Bergoglio and Rabbi Abraham Skorka, and highlights Francis&#8217; efforts at interfaith dialogue.</span></p>
<p>In general, Thomas Bokenkotter&#8217;s <a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/acmart/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780385516136">A Concise History of the Catholic Church</a><em> </em>is a good place to start if you&#8217;re interested in learning more about the history of Catholicism.</p>
<p>James Martin&#8217;s book <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ignatianspirituality.com/5326/the-jesuit-guide-to-almost-everything/" rel="noopener">The Jesuit Guide to (Almost) Everything</a> is a great introduction to Ignatian spirituality.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why are Christian movies so painfully bad?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2015/2/15/8038283/christian-movies-bad-old-fashioned-fifty-shades" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2015/2/15/8038283/christian-movies-bad-old-fashioned-fifty-shades</id>
			<updated>2019-03-04T09:03:43-05:00</updated>
			<published>2016-04-01T15:30:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Books" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Life" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Music" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Religion" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[As the world gleefully awaited the release of Fifty Shades of Grey in 2015, Evangelical Christians were awaiting &#8230; well, it would be inaccurate to call Old Fashioned the Christian version of the film, but it&#8217;s definitely meant to be the Christian response. In the film, Clay, a former frat boy who runs an antique [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Elizabeth Roberts and Rik Swartzwelder in Old Fashioned. | (Skoche Films)" data-portal-copyright="(Skoche Films)" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15261557/of1.0.0.1487447483.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Elizabeth Roberts and Rik Swartzwelder in Old Fashioned. | (Skoche Films)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>As the world gleefully awaited the release of <em>Fifty Shades of Grey </em>in 2015, Evangelical Christians were awaiting &#8230; well, it would be inaccurate to call <em>Old Fashioned</em> the Christian version of the film, but it&#8217;s definitely meant to be the Christian <em>response</em>.</p>

<p>In the film, Clay, a former frat boy who runs an antique store, meets Amber, a restless spirit who wanders around the country. When Amber rents an apartment from Clay, she quickly realizes everything she&#8217;s heard about him is right &mdash; he has really outdated, and unrealistic theories of love, mostly centered on &#8220;old-fashioned&#8221; courtship.</p>

<p>Amber learns of Clay&#8217;s theories firsthand when she asks him to come over to fix something in her house. Before he can enter her home, he makes Amber leave. He has made a promise to himself that he will never be alone in a house with a woman. He&#8217;s saving himself for marriage, you see.</p>

<p>Clay&#8217;s ideas are intriguing to Amber, who finds herself drawn to the throwback gentleman. But both of them have skeletons in their closet, and need to deal with those first if there&#8217;s any chance of making their old-fashioned courtship work.</p>

<p>Fans of <em>Fifty Shades</em> might see echoes of that book in this basic plot summary. In both stories, a man with unconventional notions of romance and sex woos a woman, getting her to at least consider his viewpoint. Except in <em>Fifty Shades</em>, this involves lots of sex, and in <em>Old Fashioned</em>, this involves, well, no sex at all.</p>

<p>To be clear, there&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with either plot. Chastity is rarely depicted onscreen, but that, of course, doesn&#8217;t mean the topic is off-limits. Plus, if Hollywood is serious about cultivating diversity of perspective, then it needs to tell more stories that portray lesser-known walks of life on screen &mdash; including religious ones.</p>

<p>But <em>Old Fashioned</em>&#8216;s problem isn&#8217;t that it&#8217;s telling a religious story. The biggest problem here is it&#8217;s desperately trying to invalidate a secular one.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Not <em>Fifty Shades of Grey</em></h2>
<p>Just watch the film&#8217;s trailer:</p>
<p><iframe frameborder="0" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-p0ozDjAQco" height="315" width="560"></iframe></p>
<p>Perhaps the film&#8217;s main selling point is that it&#8217;s <em>not</em> <em>Fifty Shades of Grey</em>.</p>

<p>Mark Borde, co-president of Freestyle Releasing, the company distributing the picture, called <em>Old Fashioned</em>&#8216;s marketing strategy a &#8220;counter-programming plan&#8221; to <em>Fifty Shades</em>. Producer Nathan Nazario acknowledged as much in a press release: &#8220;Going up against big-budget, blockbuster competition that offers a dark take on love, <em>Old Fashioned </em>puts romance and respect in the heart of relationships.&#8221;</p>

<p>Borde even compared the box office fight between the two films to David and Goliath. And the numbers certainly bear this out. Since its February 6 release, Old Fashioned has brought in about <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=oldfashioned.htm">$258,000</a>. On its opening Friday alone, <em>Fifty Shades</em> pulled in over $30 million, making it the fourth highest opening night box office of any R-rated film ever, according to<a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=4023"> Box Office Mojo</a>.</p>

<p>You get the feeling that <em>Old Fashioned</em> owes its entire existence to <em>Fifty Shades of Grey</em>. It&#8217;s as if the Christian movie industry pays attention to mainstream cinema just long enough to see what it&#8217;s up to, before raising funds to do slightly different versions of the same thing, only with less famous actors, more Jesus, and rocking chairs. (There are always rocking chairs.)</p>

<p>Any person even vaguely familiar with Evangelical subcultures will recognize the trend of copying and sanitizing whatever pop culture is doing. This trend belies a certain impulse within Evangelical Christians to separate the entire world into two categories: sheep and goats, wheat and chaff.</p>

<p>A good deal of contemporary Christian art is predicated on the sacred/secular divide: As Christian film critic <a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/why-christian-artists-dont-want-to-be-christian-artists">Alissa Wilkinson</a> noted, &#8220;Christians, and evangelicals in particular, have been really, really prolific in making pop culture products that parallel what&#8217;s going on in mainstream cultural production.&#8221;</p>

<p>To illustrate this point, Wilkinson references a poster many &#8217;90s Evangelicals will remember quite well: the &#8220;If you like that you&#8217;ll love this&#8221; chart. The chart features two columns. The first reads, &#8220;If you like that.&#8221; It contains the names of secular bands. The second reads, &#8220;You&#8217;ll love this.&#8221; It contains &mdash; you guessed it &mdash; Christian bands with similar, if sanitized, sounds.</p>

<p>If the chart were around today, it might say &#8220;If you like YouTube, you&#8217;ll love <a href="http://www.godtube.com/">GodTube</a>,&#8221; or &#8220;If you like Twitter, you&#8217;ll love <a href="http://gospelr.herokuapp.com/about">Gospelr</a>.&#8221; Or &#8220;If you like &mdash; and/or abhor &mdash; S&amp;M sex, then you&#8217;ll love this movie about chastity.&#8221; These artistic replacements are intended to satisfy the Christian&#8217;s cravings for the secular, harmful version.</p>

<p>The end result is that the Christian product seems like a knock-off, a cheap alternative.</p>

<p>It isn&#8217;t problematic that Christians &#8220;borrow ideas&#8221; from Hollywood and put their own spin on them. Every film genre does this. But given the Christian doctrine of creation, it is certainly surprising that so many Christian filmmakers &mdash; and artists in general &mdash; would choose to mimic someone else&#8217;s vision, rather than cultivate their own.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s surprising because, in Christian theological terms, God is not the one who makes knock-offs. In the opening chapters of the Bible, God creates the universe, and he tells Adam and Eve to enjoy it all &mdash; except for that one tiny tree over there. It&#8217;s Satan who comes along with a counterfeit offer: What did God really say? Did he really give you true freedom? He may have given you a garden, but I&#8217;ll give you an apple. If you like that, you&#8217;ll love this.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3409982/of3.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="of6" title="of6" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Elizabeth Roberts and Rik Swartzwelder. (Skoche Films)</p></div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">What makes a movie Christian?</h2>
<p>Often for Christian consumers of art, the question isn&#8217;t &#8220;Is this artwork Christian?&#8221; Instead, it becomes, &#8220;Is it Christian <em>enough</em>?&#8221; That <em>enough</em> is often what makes something &#8220;A Christian Thing.&#8221; That <em>enough</em> is what takes a cultural artifact from the realm of the secular to the sacred.</p>

<p>In <em>Eyes Wide Open</em>, a book that sets out to articulate a theological take on pop culture, evangelical William D. Romanowski traces the <em>enough</em> impulse to Evangelical responses to popular singer Amy Grant. In the mid-80s, Grant achieved a fame virtually unheard of in Christian music.</p>

<p>For many Christians, writes Romanowski, it was a &#8220;dream come true&#8221; to have one of their own make it that big. However, he argues, when Grant began to abandon explicitly Christian lyrics in favor of ones focused on romance, many Christians became uneasy and were forced to reconsider their paradigm for Christian art. Was Amy Grant <em>enough </em>of a Christian singer?</p>

<p>The fact that Grant resisted easy categorization prompted discussion and debate. She defied the strict sacred/secular bifurcation. Of course, the only difference between &#8220;Christian&#8221; Grant and &#8220;secular&#8221; Grant was the lyrics. Christian art, the logic went, is Christian art only if it explicitly communicates its Christian-ness.</p>

<p>So a Christian movie is a Christian movie if it states forthrightly the beliefs of the filmmaker. The communication of those beliefs is the most important thing. Everything else &mdash; including most categories of filmmaking artistry that, say, critics would primarily care about &mdash; is secondary, helpful only insofar as it helps the filmmaker win more non-Christians to the faith.</p>

<p>The goal, in other words, isn&#8217;t to make a movie. The movie is only the vehicle for achieving the goal. The real goal is engaging and converting secular culture.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The gift vs. wrapping paper</h2>
<p>As <a href="http://wipfandstock.com/who-s-afraid-of-modern-art.html">Daniel Siedell</a>, Art Historian in Residence at The King&#8217;s College in New York City, notes, &#8220;For [Evangelical Christians], culture is a tool, a more effective way of getting at political realities, or winning the battle of ideas in the public arena.&#8221;</p>

<p>Siedell uses the following analogy with his students to explain what he means.</p>

<p>Imagine a gorgeously wrapped gift sitting under a beautifully decorated Christmas tree. The presentation of the package, while pretty, is nowhere near as valuable as what&#8217;s inside.</p>

<p>Now, he says, extend that idea to Christian art. The artistic qualities of a work become the unnecessary wrapping paper. As such, it doesn&#8217;t really matter how good or bad they are.</p>

<p>That&#8217;s why it doesn&#8217;t matter that <em>Old Fashioned</em> is often very boring. It doesn&#8217;t matter that the script bursts at the seams with overwrought dialogue, or that the actors (outside of lead actress Elizabeth Roberts) offer phoned-in performances.</p>

<p>Director, writer, and lead actor Rik Swartzwelder might bear some of the blame here. After all, his <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1270318/">resume</a>, like many others in the Christian film industry, seems notably paltry. A good deal of what actors and directors know about their trade comes from on-the-job training, from working on set and in production studios under filmmakers with decades of experience. By isolating themselves from Hollywood, Christian filmmakers are passing up not only on &#8220;secular messages,&#8221; but on the mentoring that other budding talent are receiving.</p>

<p>As a result, <em>Old Fashioned</em>, rife with clich&eacute;, feels forced and unnatural at every turn. Even Amber &mdash; seemingly having read a screenwriting book or two &mdash; points out that Clay&#8217;s lofty discussions of love seem so &#8220;on the nose.&#8221; What critics might note as a flaw is seen, by much of the film&#8217;s core audience, as the whole point. The phrase &#8220;on the nose&#8221; usually connotes directly expository, even sermonizing dialogue, spoken unrealistically by the characters. But if you&#8217;re looking for a sermon in your art, as many Christian audiences are, &#8220;on the nose&#8221; becomes the reason the art exists.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3409974/of5.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="OF5" title="OF5" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Rik Swartzwelder. (Skoche Films)</p></div>
<p>There&#8217;s an old maxim in Hollywood that goes, &#8220;If you want to send a message, use Western Union.&#8221; Embedding explicit takeaways in film is something that bedevils some of the worst films out there, regardless of whether or not they&#8217;re religious. Sending a message is usually a good way to create a bland, boring mess.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.godawa.com/">Brian Godawa</a>, Christian screenwriter, thinks it&#8217;s important to note that Christian films aren&#8217;t the only ones that are explicitly preachy. All films, says Godawa, &#8220;have messages to some degree or another, and writers and directors know full well they&#8217;re embodying those messages in their storytelling.&#8221;</p>

<p>But even if Hollywood films do contain embodied messages, they&#8217;re not always as explicitly drawn out as they are in Christian movies. That&#8217;s because, says Godawa, many Evangelical Christians, who are people of the Good Book, have come to value words over images. &#8220;They don&#8217;t know how to embody their messages in the story,&#8221; he says. &#8220;They have to hear the literal words [of the Gospel].&#8221;</p>

<p>As with the bifurcation between sacred and secular, so, too, do contemporary Christian artists divide form and content, believing that what a piece of art says is of infinitely more importance than how it says it. The thing communicated is more urgent than how it&#8217;s communicated.</p>

<p>Of course, this perspective overlooks the fact that how a thing is communicated <em>is</em> the thing that&#8217;s being communicated. To put it in Marshall McLuhan&#8217;s terms, &#8220;The medium is the message.&#8221; That is, when you communicate an idea through the medium of film, the aesthetic quality of the film subsumes the idea, fundamentally altering its narrative shape.</p>

<p>For example: in the theology of <em>Old Fashioned</em>, chastity is praised as an original virtue, and loveless hookups are scorned as the perversion of it. However, this particular message of the film falls flat for the sheer fact that the entire film is <em>a knock-off of an original film</em>.</p>

<p>In other words, the content of <em>Old Fashioned</em> is at odds with its form: It&#8217;s difficult to see the sex in <em>Fifty Shades</em> as a cheap knock-off of godly sex, when <em>Old Fashioned</em> is itself a cheap knock-off.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When greatness is a sin</h2>
<p>But if what you really want out of a film is to see a particular message conveyed, then it&#8217;s possible to excuse poor filmmaking quality as, to use Siedell&#8217;s image, simply less decorative wrapping paper.</p>

<p>A scene in <em>Old Fashioned</em> illustrates this nicely. During one of their heart to hearts, Clay tells Amber how he came to run an antique store. He says that once &#8220;Jesus found him&#8221; in his senior year of college, he had a change of heart, which ended up drastically altering his life&#8217;s goals. So, asks Amber, &#8220;What do you want out of life?&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;To be decent,&#8221; he answers. &#8220;That&#8217;s it. A good person.&#8221;</p>

<p>Granted, he adds, his goals aren&#8217;t heroic, nor are they ambitious. &#8220;I guess I just wasn&#8217;t destined for greatness,&#8221; he says.</p>

<p>&#8220;I think the world has enough greatness,&#8221; Amber reassures him. &#8220;Not enough goodness.&#8221;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3409970/OF2.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="OF3" title="OF3" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Elizabeth Roberts and Rik Swartzwelder. (Skoche Films)</p></div>
<p>The brief exchange stands almost as an apology for both this movie and the entire Christian film industry. Where Hollywood (in this analogy, at least) strives for artistic greatness; Christians try to be good. Hollywood wants to make masterpieces; Christians want to communicate good (i.e. explicitly Christian) messages.</p>

<p>But why does <em>Old Fashioned</em> place greatness and goodness in opposition the way it does? As any child who&#8217;s ever prayed the familiar Christian mealtime prayer will tell you, God is both great and good at once. And in the Bible, God often seems interested in form <em>and</em> content. For example, according to the creation myth in Genesis, the trees God made are both &#8220;<a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%202:9">good for fruit and pleasing to the eye</a>.&#8221;</p>

<p><em>Old Fashioned</em>, like many Christian films of late (see: <em>God&#8217;s Not Dead, Left Behind, Heaven is For Real</em>), doesn&#8217;t understand this marriage of content and form. As a result, the lessons at the heart of the story &mdash; i.e., the <em>whole reason the film exists</em> in the eyes of its core audience &mdash; are easily dismissed by the secular masses the film is ostensibly meant to reach. This is the irony of the Christian film industry: movies that appeal mostly to Christians are marketed as if capable of bringing sinners to repentance.</p>

<p>Plenty of artists of faith cultivate their own aesthetics and tell stories that reflect their deeply held beliefs. Terrence Malick, whose films grapple with the complicated relationship of God to man, comes to mind. But too many Christian artists keep one eye fixed on secular pop culture, while the other looks sentimentally at the art they&#8217;re making. That means a lack of focus is perhaps inevitable.</p>

<p>One remedy to this might be an apocryphal anecdote attributed to Martin Luther. After a cobbler converted to Christianity, he asked the German theologian how he could be a good Christian cobbler. Luther responded, &#8220;The Christian shoemaker does his duty not by putting little crosses on the shoes, but by making good shoes, because God is interested in good craftsmanship.&#8221;</p>

<p>The answer, then, might not be in striving to convey the message most full of surface-level goodness but, rather, in pushing for artistic greatness. Then, once form and content emerge in harmony, can barriers be broken down and conversation begin.</p>

<p>Because really: no one likes a poorly made shoe.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH: &#8216;The 220-year anti-vaxxer movement, explained&#8217; </strong></p>
<p><!-- CHORUS_VIDEO_EMBED ChorusVideo:65060 --></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Matthew Yglesias</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[What is Easter all about? Resurrection or eggs and bunnies?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/3/27/11306346/meaning-of-easter-sunday-resurrection-eggs" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/3/27/11306346/meaning-of-easter-sunday-resurrection-eggs</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T01:29:17-05:00</updated>
			<published>2016-03-27T06:00:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Walk past any store&#8217;s Easter display and you&#8217;re guaranteed to see bunnies, eggs, and candy. What you probably won&#8217;t see is much evidence of the Easter story itself, as told in the Bible&#8217;s four Gospels: that Jesus was arrested, beaten, and crucified, only to be resurrected on Easter Sunday. But Easter is by most accounts [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="A hen with a golden egg is displayed in the window of Fortnum &amp; Mason on March 18, 2016, in London, England. | Tristan Fewings/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Tristan Fewings/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15743159/GettyImages-516376426.0.1539835600.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A hen with a golden egg is displayed in the window of Fortnum &amp; Mason on March 18, 2016, in London, England. | Tristan Fewings/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Walk past any store&#8217;s Easter display and you&#8217;re guaranteed to see bunnies, eggs, and candy. What you probably won&#8217;t see is much evidence of the Easter story itself, as told in the Bible&#8217;s four Gospels: that Jesus was arrested, beaten, and crucified, only to be resurrected on Easter Sunday.</p>

<p>But Easter is by most accounts the single most significant Christian holiday, since, <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+15%3A14-19&amp;version=ESV">as the Apostle Paul says</a>, without Jesus&#8217;s death and resurrection, the entire Christian faith is &#8220;in vain.&#8221;</p>

<p>So how did Easter go from the day Jesus rose again to the day giant bunnies leave pastel-colored eggs all over your house?</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The origins of the Easter Bunny</h2>
<p>The first historical references we have to an Easter Bunny date to the 16th-century German tale. According to this legend, a mysterious creature named Oschter Haws, or Easter Hare, visited children while they slept and rewarded them for their good behavior (similar to Santa). The children made nests for the hare, which would then lay colored eggs in them.</p>

<p>The tale was then brought to America by Germany immigrants in the 18th century. In the United States, the hare became a rabbit and grew in prominence as books like <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14838/14838-h/14838-h.htm"><em>The Tale of Peter Rabbit</em></a> (1902) and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Easter-Bunny-That-Overslept/dp/0060296453"><em>The Easter Bunny That Overslept</em></a> (1957) were published. In 1971, ABC aired a television special called<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2_ZdknLMIo"> <em>Here Comes Peter Cottontail</em></a> based on a 1957 book.</p>

<p>The history of why, exactly, German Protestants came to associate Easter with a magical hare is somewhat murky.</p>
<p>One theory is that hares were traditionally associated with new life, due to their high fertility rate. <a href="http://www.history.com/topics/holidays/history-of-easter/videos/bet-you-didnt-know-easter-traditions">Some have</a> theorized that there is a connection between hares and the Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre &mdash;&#8364;&#8221; the goddess from whose name &#8220;Easter&#8221; may be derived, <a href="http://www.questia.com/read/118140318/the-reckoning-of-time">according to one source</a>.</p><h2 class="wp-block-heading">The origins of the Easter egg</h2>
<p>Of course, neither rabbits nor hares lay eggs, nor are eggs involved in the biblical story of Easter.</p>

<p>One <a href="https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/activities/view.cfm?id=778">theory</a> is that eggs relate to Easter symbolically: Just as a hard shell contained new life, so the tomb of Jesus contained his resurrection body.</p>

<p>According to <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/bytopic/holidays/fastlenteastereggs.html">another legend</a>, an egg merchant named Simon of Cyrene was forced to put down his egg basket in order to help Jesus carry his cross to where he would be crucified. When Simon returned to his basket, he found that his eggs had been miraculously decorated.</p>

<p>What is clear is that by the <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3147.htm#article1">13th century</a>, it was customary for Christians to abstain from eating eggs during Lent &mdash; the 40-day pre-Easter season.</p>

<p>Hens, of course, did not abstain from <em>laying</em> eggs during Lent, so by Easter Sunday a typical village would have a massive egg surplus &mdash; making egg-related festivities convenient and practical even if they lacked a clear logical connection to the biblical text.</p>

<p>The Easter tradition of egg dyeing, though, probably originated in ancient Christian communities in Mesopotamia that colored chicken eggs red to symbolize the blood of Jesus. (To this day, <a href="http://greece.greekreporter.com/2014/04/16/why-do-greeks-dye-eggs-red-for-easter/">Orthodox</a> congregations continue this practice.)</p>

<p>Christians also may have picked up the egg symbol from Passover &mdash; the hardboiled egg is one of the <a href="http://www.chabad.org/holidays/passover/pesach_cdo/aid/1998/jewish/The-Seder-Plate.htm">seven symbols set out on the Seder plate</a>.</p>

<p>Easter and Passover are strongly connected to each other &mdash; the Last Supper Jesus shared with his disciples just before the crucifixion was a Passover Seder.</p>

<p>After the disciples began proclaiming Jesus&#8217;s resurrection, they continued to celebrate a yearly Passover in the way Jesus had instructed them to, remembering his death and, more importantly, what his death and resurrection meant for the world.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">And now Americans spend $2.2 billion on Easter candy</h2>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.candyusa.com/FunStuff/content.cfm?ItemNumber=9963">National Confectioners Association</a>, the first edible Easter eggs date to 19th-century Europe. Germans made the sweets out of sugar and pastries and slipped them into the hats and bonnets that children laid out overnight. (These bonnets were the precursors to baskets.) Easter candy continued to be popular, but it wasn&#8217;t until the 20th century that innovations in candy production allowed it to become the <a href="http://www.saveur.com/article/Kitchen/The-History-of-Easter-Candy">Easter staple</a> it now is. In the 1930s, <a href="http://www.candyfavorites.com/shop/jelly-bean-history.php">people began to associate</a> the oval shape of jelly beans with miniature eggs, thus eternally associating them with Easter.</p>

<p>In 2016, the National Retail Federation <a href="http://www.mrketplace.com/64057/easter-spending-apparel-drop-year/">estimated</a> Americans would spend almost $16 billion on Easter, including $2.2 billion on candy and more than $1 billion on flowers.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What does all of this have to do with the Easter story?</h2>
<p>On the surface, not much.</p>

<p>In fact, this is one of the reasons <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/women/2010/april/caught-between-easter-bunny-and-empty-grave.html?start=1">some Christians</a> approach the modern trappings of the holiday with caution. Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, told <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2008/march/sin-at-easter-not-peep-from-pulpit.html">Christianity Today</a> a few years ago: &#8220;All the Easter eggs and the Easter bunny are even more extraneous to the purpose of Easter than Santa is to Christmas. &#8230; I wonder whether even some Christian churches are making the connection between Christ&#8217;s death and resurrection and victory over sin &mdash; the linchpin doctrine of Christianity.&#8221;</p>

<p>Mohler&#8217;s concern may be misplaced, though. According to a <a href="http://cms2.americanbible.org/about/press-news/new-survey-shows-7-out-10-americans-celebrate-easter-religious-holiday">2012 poll</a>, seven out of 10 American adults celebrate Easter as a religious holiday.</p>

<p>The evolution of Easter celebrations demonstrates that while the stories of Christianity are timeless, they have an adaptability that opens them up to the many cultures they come into contact with.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[A Christmas Carol is a defense of charity — and capitalism]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/12/28/7450079/a-christmas-carol" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/12/28/7450079/a-christmas-carol</id>
			<updated>2019-03-03T06:17:43-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-12-25T11:28:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Books" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Criminal Justice" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Life" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Poverty" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Religion" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Marley was dead: to begin with. That&#8217;s one of the most famous opening lines of any work of English literature. It is, of course, the beginning of Charles Dickens&#8217;s A Christmas Carol, his 19th-century tale about the miserly Scrooge, who, after a visit from three holiday sprites, discovers the joy of the holidays. Dickens published [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Scrooge and Tiny Tim. | (Walt Disney Studios)" data-portal-copyright="(Walt Disney Studios)" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15116125/2009_a_christmas_carol_005-1.0.0.1494337408.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Scrooge and Tiny Tim. | (Walt Disney Studios)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p><em>Marley was dead: to begin with. </em></p>

<p>That&#8217;s one of the most famous opening lines of any work of English literature. It is, of course, the beginning of Charles Dickens&#8217;s <em>A Christmas Carol</em>, his 19th-century tale about the miserly Scrooge, who, after a visit from three holiday sprites, discovers the joy of the holidays.</p>

<p>Dickens published the novella in December 1843, and it was an instant hit, first in his home country and then across the pond in America. In fact, since it was published some 170 years ago, it hasn&#8217;t ever been out of print. But in spite of the popularity of the work, Dickens was disappointed by his earnings from the book.</p>

<p>As Jon Michael Varese notes in <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2009/dec/22/christmas-carol-flop-dickens">the Guardian</a>, the book sold its first printing of 6,000 copies by Christmas Eve 1843. By the close of the following year, the book had sold more than 15,000 copies. Dickens made &pound;726, a sum of money that he found disappointing.</p>

<p>In a letter to John Forster, his literary advisor, Dickens wrote that he&#8217;d hoped to bring in at least &pound;1,000. &#8220;What a wonderful thing it is,&#8221; <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=HAg4AAAAIAAJ&amp;pg=PA85&amp;lpg=PA85&amp;dq=What+a+wonderful+thing+it+is+that+such+a+great+success+should+occasion+me+such+intolerable+anxiety+and+disappointment!%22&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=yaQjNFRdjt&amp;sig=2EarIwqoSRSt_n2qo0r1sLzz_fI&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=G-ueVO-sA4emgwTYjoOgCQ&amp;ved=0CCMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&amp;q=What%20a%20wonderful%20thing%20it%20is%20that%20such%20a%20great%20success%20should%20occasion%20me%20such%20intolerable%20anxiety%20and%20disappointment!%22&amp;f=false">he wrote</a>, &#8220;that such a great success should occasion me such intolerable anxiety and disappointment!&#8221; Varese, too, thinks the publication wasn&#8217;t a financial success.</p>

<p>Still, it&#8217;s worth noting that &pound;726 was a lot of money in 1843. Correcting for inflation over 170 years isn&#8217;t an exact science, but the <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/education/Pages/resources/inflationtools/calculator/flash/default.aspx">Bank of England says</a> &pound;726 in 1843 is around &pound;80,000 ($125,000) in today&#8217;s money. For comparison, the protagonist of <em>A Christmas Carol, </em>Bob Cratchit, made 15 shillings, or &pound;0.75, per week. So Dickens made almost as much from two years of <em>Christmas Carol</em> sales as Cratchit would have made in 20 years of working for Mr. Scrooge.</p>

<p>Forster believed they could have made even more from the book if they&#8217;d charged more for it. The book sold for 5 shillings (&pound;0.25), which was, in fact, high for that time period. But considering Dickens&#8217;s lavish requirements for his publisher &mdash; gold lettering on the front and back, four full-page color etchings, gilded page edges, a bright red and green title page &mdash; 5 shillings was less than it could have sold for.</p>

<p>As Varese notes, Dickens set the price at an affordable rate so that it could be easily accessible to most people. And not just because he wanted to provide all of London with Christmas cheer, but because he wanted to give them a lesson in economics.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Dickens wrote <em>A Christmas Carol</em></h2>
<p>In the fall of 1843, Dickens visited Samuel Starey&#8217;s Field Lane Ragged School, a school that &#8220;educated slum children,&#8221; according to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/books/99/03/28/specials/mortimer-poorhouses.html">New York Times</a>. Dickens easily empathized with such children living in poverty, coming, as he did, from a poor childhood himself &mdash; a fact that set him apart from many other English authors, like Jane Austen and the Bront&euml; sisters, who enjoyed the social and class privilege of their births. To this day, Dickens is remembered for his empathy with those living in poverty. As his tombstone reads, &#8220;He was a sympathiser with the poor, the suffering, and the oppressed&#8230;&#8221;</p>

<p>When his father was sent to debtors&#8217; prison, 12-year-old Dickens had to take a job at a <a href="http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~jfec/ge/forster.html">blacking factory</a>, where for up to 12 hours a day he pasted labels onto pots of boot polish. He was paid 5 or 6 shillings (&pound;0.25 to &pound;0.3) a week for his labor, and that price went directly to help his family make ends meet.</p>

<p>On October 5, Dickens was asked to deliver a <a href="http://charlesdickenspage.com/speech_manchester10-05-1843.html">lecture</a> at the first annual meeting of the Manchester Athenaeum, an institution that provided education and recreation to the laboring classes. Dickens used the opportunity to speak against systemic poverty and injustice: &#8220;Thousands of immortal creatures are condemned &#8230; to tread, not what our great poet [Shakespeare] calls the &#8216;primrose path to the everlasting bonfire,&#8217; but over jagged flints and stones laid down by brutal ignorance.&#8221;</p>

<p>After delivering the address, Dickens planned to write a pamphlet titled, &#8220;An Appeal to the People of England on Behalf of the Poor Man&#8217;s Child,&#8221; treating many of the themes he&#8217;d spoken about in Manchester. However, the pamphlet was never written, as the author chose instead to give his economic ideas flesh and blood &mdash; and, importantly, a wobbly leg &mdash; in the form of a story.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Scrooge, everyman</h2>
<p>The word &#8220;Scrooge&#8221; has become synonymous with greed, the word we use for someone miserly, penny-pinching, and merciless. As Dickens writes of his main character, Scrooge was &#8220;a tight-fisted hand &#8230; a squeezing, wrenching, grasping, scraping, clutching, covetous, old sinner.&#8221;</p>

<p>But though he doesn&#8217;t give away any of his money, and though he feels no sympathy for those less fortunate than he, Scrooge, as Dickens makes clear, is no criminal. He works hard for his money, day in and day out. And though he seems heartless, he&#8217;s clearly not villainous, like Dickens&#8217;s Sikes, the dog-beating criminal from <em>Oliver Twist</em> who ends up murdering his girlfriend.</p>

<p>He&#8217;s also, as English professor <a href="https://www.opendemocracy.net/lee-erickson/primitive-keynesianism-of-dickenss-christmas-carol">Lee Erickson</a> writes, quite similar to others of his day, who &#8220;feared not just the Sprit of Christmas Yet to Come but the financial future, which seemed likely in the deflationary moment of December 1843 to be very bleak.&#8221; That is, Scrooge, like many other mid-19th-century businessmen, was concerned about the future of the economy, and was therefore &#8220;tight-fisted,&#8221; in case things took a turn for the worse.</p>

<p>As Erickson notes, by the time Dickens published <em>A Christmas Carol</em>:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>the prices of goods in England had been falling for the past four years and had fallen during that time a total of 22.72 percent. During this period, the rate of deflation had thus been 5.68 percent a year; and, in particular, retrospective price indexes show that prices had fallen and the purchasing power of a pound had risen by five-and-a-half percent from the end of 1842 to the end of 1843. As a consequence, those with income in excess of their needs were spending no more at present than they had to spend &hellip;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In the opening scene when we meet Scrooge, two men show up to his office to ask for charity. Scrooge, of course, offers no money, since, he argues, there are prisons and union workhouses, not to mention poverty laws, to provide for the lower classes. Scrooge didn&#8217;t protest these government programs &mdash; he just thought they were sufficient for those in need.</p>

<p>But as Dickens powerfully argues, those programs are not sufficient. Charity is still necessary.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The economics of <em>A Christmas Carol</em></h2>
<p>Some have read <em>A Christmas Carol</em> as espousing <a href="https://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/2009/12/25/merry-christmas-2/">socialism</a>, but the book doesn&#8217;t decry capitalism. To be sure, Dickens condemns greed, but that is just one negative effect of a free market, not its defining feature.</p>

<p>In Dickens, the remedy to greed is not socialism &mdash; it&#8217;s charity.</p>

<p>After being convinced by three spirits to mend his ways, Scrooge does in fact improve himself, and becomes something of a philanthropist. He provides dinner for the Cratchits and medical care for Tiny Tim, none of which would have been possible for Scrooge if he hadn&#8217;t been a successful, shrewd businessman. In other words, capitalism was the very condition that made Scrooge&#8217;s philanthropy possible. Scrooge&#8217;s wealth, Dickens argues, is actually a very good thing, when generously distributed.</p>

<p>And Dickens practiced what he preached. He earned a comfortable living as a writer, and he used his wealth and influence to help those less fortunate. One of Dickens&#8217;s main projects was helping to establish <a href="http://html">Urania Cottage</a>, a 19th-century safe house where women who led lives of crime and prostitution were given shelter, an education, and a chance to start over.</p>

<p>Though Dickens&#8217;s classic story is set at Christmastime, the principles at its heart are meant to be read &mdash; and practiced! &mdash; year round. This is all the more apparent once you understand the author&#8217;s noble reasons for publishing the work. It was Dickens&#8217;s hope that all of his readers would come to the same conclusion as his repentant Scrooge:</p>

<p>&#8220;I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year. I will live in the Past, the Present, and the Future. The Spirits of all Three shall strive within me. I will not shut out the lessons that they teach!&#8221;</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Krampus: the demonic Santa Claus you haven&#8217;t heard about]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/12/6/7341617/krampus-demonic-santa" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/12/6/7341617/krampus-demonic-santa</id>
			<updated>2019-03-03T00:44:35-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-12-04T13:05:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Almanac" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Video" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The night of December 5 is the darkest of the whole year. If you can make it through that darkness, St. Nicholas Day awaits you on the other side. But if you cannot, beware, for you might have been taken by Krampus. December 5 is his night &#8212; Krampusnacht. But what does all of this [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="A member of the Haiminger Krampusgruppe dressed as the Krampus creature hits a fire to release sparks on the town square during their annual Krampus night in Tyrol on December 1, 2013, in Haiming, Austria. | (Sean Gallup/Getty)" data-portal-copyright="(Sean Gallup/Getty)" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15092310/bonfire_Krampus.0.0.1539835600.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A member of the Haiminger Krampusgruppe dressed as the Krampus creature hits a fire to release sparks on the town square during their annual Krampus night in Tyrol on December 1, 2013, in Haiming, Austria. | (Sean Gallup/Getty)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The night of December 5 is the darkest of the whole year. If you can make it through that darkness, St. Nicholas Day awaits you on the other side. But if you cannot, beware, for you might have been taken by Krampus. December 5 is his night &mdash; Krampusnacht.</p>

<p>But what does all of this even mean? Allow us to introduce you to a bizarre Christmas tradition from Europe that&#8217;s been gaining in popularity in the States, to the degree that Krampus is even starring in his <a href="http://www.krampusthefilm.com/?gclid=CKuD-7vkwskCFUaCfgodjCwJag">own film</a>.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1) What is a Krampus?</h2>
<p>Krampus is basically the anti-St. Nicholas, the opposite of Santa Claus. He&#8217;s a fugly mythical creature usually depicted with similar features as the devil. He has body hair, horns, hooves, and fangs. He carries with him chains and birch rods, which he uses to beat misbehaving children and whisk them off to hell.</p>

<p>Krampus is considered the son of the Norse god Hel, the ruler of Helheim, or the Underworld. As such, he&#8217;s a reminder of some of the <a href="http://www.livescience.com/25779-christmas-traditions-history-paganism.html">pagan roots</a> of Christmas celebrations. As early Christianity began spreading throughout Europe, its adherents started to interact with &#8220;pagans,&#8221; and eventually borrowed some of their festivals, repackaging them in ways that resonated with their own religious narratives.</p>

<p>Krampus is known by many names, as the folks at <a href="http://www.krampus.com/">Krampus.com</a> point out. Those names include Knecht Ruprecht, Certa, Perchten, Black Peter, Schmutzli, Pelznickel, and Klaubauf. (Klaubauf would <em>also</em> be a great name for your prog-rock band.)</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2) Why are we talking about Krampus now? Christmas is still a ways off.</h2>
<p>Sure. But December 6 is known as <em>Nikolaustag</em>, or St. Nicholas Day, in many parts of Europe.</p>

<p>And just like All Saints&#8217; Day, St. Nicholas Day has its darker half, which takes place the night before, known as <em>Krampusnacht </em>or Krampus Night. It is traditionally viewed as the night when the demon carries out his tricks on all the wicked children of the world.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3) What do people do on Krampusnacht?</h2>
<p>Traditionally, children leave their shoes out for Krampus to fill with treats (if they&#8217;ve been nice) or a birch rod (if they&#8217;ve been naughty). Presumably, Krampus no longer drags kids off to hell, but you never know. (In the new movie, the whole &#8220;dragging you off to the underworld&#8221; thing is still his modus operandi.)</p>

<p>As <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/12/131217-krampus-christmas-santa-devil/">National Geographic</a> points out, the festivities have become much more modernized in recent years: &#8220;A more modern take on the tradition &#8230; involves drunken men dressed as devils, who take over the streets for a <em>Krampuslauf &mdash;</em> a Krampus Run of sorts, when people are chased through the streets by the devils.&#8221;</p>

<p>This is actually pretty close to the roots of Christmas in the United States, as Stephen Nissenbaum details in his book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Battle-Christmas-Stephen-Nissenbaum/dp/0679740384"><em>The Battle for Christmas</em></a>. Because of its association with the pagan winter solstice, and the public drunkenness and licentiousness that went with it, the Puritans originally banned Christmas celebrations in Massachusetts Bay Colony.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4) Did I hear something about spanking being involved?</h2>
<p>Yes. <a href="http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20141204/bridgeport/chicago-krampus-fest-celebrates-demonic-christmas-devil">Some celebrations</a> include &#8220;switching stations&#8221; where, in the spirit of the lore surrounding the holiday, participants can go to get spanked by people dressed as Krampuses.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5) Where is Krampusnacht a thing?</h2>
<p>Krampus is traditionally associated with European Alpine folklore, but, like most lore, it has circulated steadily around the globe. Modern-day Krampus celebrations are held in Germany, Poland, Italy, and Austria. Several major cities across the US also hold Krampus celebrations each year.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6) Why am I hearing so much about Krampus now?</h2>
<p>It&#8217;s not just the movie. Krampus sure seems like he&#8217;s making a comeback.</p>

<p>Each year in the US, there are <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/12/10/143485735/naughty-or-nice-krampus-horror-for-the-holidays">more</a> and more celebrations of Krampusnacht. Pop culture is taking notice as well. In addition to the movie, the animated comedy <a href="http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/minstrel-krampus-106512"><em>American Dad</em></a> produced an episode titled &#8220;Minstrel Krampus&#8221; in 2013, and <em>The Office</em>&#8216;s Dwight once dressed up as a variation on the character.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/12/131217-krampus-christmas-santa-devil/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">According to National Geographic</a>, celebrating Krampusnacht is a way for people &#8220;to celebrate the Yuletide in non-traditional ways.&#8221; This, it argues, is one way for hip audiences to ironically deck their halls with a snarky, &#8220;Bah, humbug!&#8221; And also probably have a good time drinking.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also possible that the heightened interest in Krampus, at least in the US, is part of the larger trend of an increase in an interest in all things demonic, a trend that has been <a href="http://www.vox.com/2014/7/3/5864861/belief-in-god-is-declining-but-belief-in-satan-is-on-the-rise">steadily growing</a> over the past several decades.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">7) Can you show me some creepy Krampus pictures?</h2>
<p>Yup! Check it.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2524736/Krampus_click.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Krampus" title="Krampus" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Karnival Krampus. (Philipp Guelland/Getty)</p></div><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2524738/krampus_pig.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Krampus pig" title="Krampus pig" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Oinky Krampus. (Philipp Guelland/Getty)</p></div><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2524740/Krampus_white.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Sean Gallup" title="Sean Gallup" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Abominable Krampus. (Sean Gallup)</p></div><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2524746/fugly_krampus.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Fugly Krampus" title="Fugly Krampus" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Horny Krampus. (Sean Callup)</p></div><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2524750/adorable_Krampus.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Adorable Krampus" title="Adorable Krampus" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Adorable Krampus. (Philipp Guelland)</p></div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">8) How can I celebrate Krampusnacht?</h2>
<p>You could go to <a href="http://www.krampus.com/">one of these parties</a>. Or if you want to throw your own, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5865333/six-tools-to-help-terrorize-children-during-krampusnacht/">Gizmodo</a> put together a nice list of six things you can do to get the party going.</p>

<p>Make sure to search for DIY devil costumes on Pinterest, and show up to your Christmas party in one.</p>

<p>You could also go see the film <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3850590/"><em>Krampus</em></a>. It&#8217;s basically fine, but has a lot of issues.</p>
<p><iframe frameborder="0" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/h6cVyoMH4QE" height="315" width="560"></iframe></p>
<p>If that doesn&#8217;t appeal, you could check out this other film. We haven&#8217;t seen it, but it looks absolutely terrible/the best.</p>
<iframe frameborder="0" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/0qaJMgNQBos" height="315" width="560"></iframe><h2 class="wp-block-heading">9) December 6 is St. Nicholas Day. What can I do to celebrate that?</h2>
<p>St. Nicholas Day is the Christian feast day for St. Nicholas, the early Christian saint who, according to legend, left coins in children&#8217;s shoes as they slept. Nicholas&#8217; habit of leaving kids gifts in secret evolved into the story of Santa Claus.</p>

<p>St. Nicholas Day is celebrated differently throughout the world. In Italy, a celebration called <em>Rito delle nubili </em>is held, where young brides are given gifts to help their future marriages. Dutch children leave carrots and hay in their shoes hoping St. Nick will exchange them for toys. In Poland, young boys dress as bishops and collect money for the poor.</p>

<p>Here in the US, these celebrations aren&#8217;t generally observed. However, if you&#8217;re the church-going type, you could always attend a St. Nicholas mass. Here&#8217;s one of the prayers you&#8217;d say there: <br>&#8220;O God, who did adorn, by the working of countless miracles, the holy bishop Nicholas; grant we beg You, that by his merits and prayers, we may be delivered from the pains of hell.&#8221;</p>

<p>&hellip;and Krampus!</p>

<p><strong>Update: </strong>Question 5 has been updated to reflect that Krampus is popularly celebrated in the places we named.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Is Easter about Jesus or bunnies? Both, actually.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/4/17/5624316/is-easter-about-jesus-or-bunnies-both-actually" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/4/17/5624316/is-easter-about-jesus-or-bunnies-both-actually</id>
			<updated>2019-02-27T02:37:55-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-04-02T11:52:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Almanac" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Video" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Walk past any store&#8217;s Easter display and you&#8217;re guaranteed to see bunnies, eggs, and candy. What you probably won&#8217;t see is much evidence of the Easter story itself, as told in the Bible&#8217;s four Gospels: that Jesus was arrested, beaten, and hung on a cross to die. And that his resurrection a few days later, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="A rabbit is pictured on March 28, 2014 in Berlin&#039;s Tiergarten park. | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot;&gt;JOHANNES EISELE/Getty &lt;/a&gt;" data-portal-copyright="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot;&gt;JOHANNES EISELE/Getty &lt;/a&gt;" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/14689334/481076871.0.1539835600.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A rabbit is pictured on March 28, 2014 in Berlin's Tiergarten park. | <a href="http://www.gettyimages.com">JOHANNES EISELE/Getty </a>	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Walk past any store&#8217;s Easter display and you&#8217;re guaranteed to see bunnies, eggs, and candy. What you probably won&#8217;t see is much evidence of the Easter story itself, as told in the Bible&#8217;s four Gospels: that Jesus was arrested, beaten, and hung on a cross to die. And that his resurrection a few days later, according to the Christian faith, means that God has made good on his promise to restore a broken world. Easter is arguably the most important day of the Church year because, <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+15%3A14-19&amp;version=ESV">as the apostle Paul says</a>, without Jesus&#8217; death and resurrection, the entire Christian faith is &#8220;in vain.&#8221;</p>

<p>So how did Easter go from the day Jesus rose again to the day giant bunnies leave pastel-colored eggs all over your house?</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The origins of the Easter Bunny</h2>
<p>In case you&#8217;re unsure &mdash; no, there are no Easter Bunny cameos in the Gospels. The first historical references we have to an Easter Bunny date to the 16th-century German tale of Oschter Haws. According to this legend, a mysterious creature named Oschter Haws, or Easter Hare, visited children while they slept and rewarded them for their good behavior (similar to Santa). The children made nests for these hares, who would then lay colored eggs in them.</p>

<p>The tale was then brought to America when Germans emigrated here in the 1700s. The legend of the Easter Hare continued to grow in America, especially as books like <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14838/14838-h/14838-h.htm"><em>The Tale of Peter Rabbit</em></a> (1902) and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Easter-Bunny-That-Overslept/dp/0060296453"><em>The Easter Bunny That Overslept</em></a> (1957) were published. In 1971, ABC aired a television special called<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2_ZdknLMIo"> <em>Here Comes Peter Cottontail</em></a>, which was based on the 1957 book.</p>
<p><span>But where did Germans get the idea to associate a hare with Easter? The history here is murky. Some people suggest that in antiquity, hares were associated with new life, due to their high fertility rate. </span><a href="http://www.history.com/topics/holidays/history-of-easter/videos/bet-you-didnt-know-easter-traditions">Some have</a><span> theorized that there is a connection between hares and the Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre &mdash; the goddess from whose name &#8220;Easter&#8221; may be derived, </span><a href="http://www.questia.com/read/118140318/the-reckoning-of-time">according to one source</a><span>.</span></p><h2 class="wp-block-heading">The origins of the Easter egg</h2><p><span>The history here is largely speculative. One </span><a href="https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/activities/view.cfm?id=778">theory</a><span> is that early Christians came to associate an egg with the Easter story: just like a hard shell contained new life, so the tomb of Jesus contained his resurrection body. According to </span><a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/bytopic/holidays/fastlenteastereggs.html">another legend</a><span>, an egg merchant named Simon of Cyrene was forced to put down his egg basket in order to help Jesus carry his cross to where he would be crucified. When Simon returned to his basket, he found that his eggs had been miraculously decorated.</span></p><p dir="ltr">One thing that is certain, though, is that by the <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3147.htm#article1">13th century</a>, it was customary for Christians to abstain from eating eggs during Lent, the 40 days leading to Easter. Of course, hens didn&#8217;t abstain from laying eggs during Lent, and so by the time Easter rolled around, there might have been a surplus of eggs to sell or give away by the basketfull.</p><p><span>Decorating eggs predates Christianity, as evidenced by </span><a href="http://www.globalegyptianmuseum.org/detail.aspx?id=339">decorated ostrich eggs</a><span> dating to ancient Egypt. The Easter tradition of egg dying, though, probably originated in ancient Christian communities in Mesopotamia who colored chicken eggs red to symbolize the blood of Jesus. (To this day, </span><a href="http://greece.greekreporter.com/2014/04/16/why-do-greeks-dye-eggs-red-for-easter/">Orthodox</a><span> congregations continue this practice.)</span></p><p><span>The most famous example of a decorative Easter egg is the Faberge egg. In 1885, Tsar Alexander III commissioned a Russian jeweler named Peter Faberge to design a gold-encrusted egg as an Easter present for his wife. Over the next 30 years, Faberge&#8217;s company made </span><a href="http://www.professionaljeweller.com/article-10291-faberge-a-regal-renaissance/">52 more eggs</a><span>, 43 of which have survived. (Some eggs were lost or destroyed during the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.)</span></p>
<p>Christians also may have picked up the egg symbol from Passover &mdash; the hard-boiled egg is one of the seven symbols set out on the Seder plate. Easter and Passover, after all, are strongly connected to each other. According to the Gospel accounts, Jesus celebrated a Passover meal with his disciples just before the crucifixion. After the disciples began proclaiming Jesus&#8217; resurrection, they continued to celebrate a yearly Passover in the way Jesus had instructed them to, remembering his death and, more importantly, what his death and resurrection meant for the world.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">And now Americans spend $2.2 billion on Easter candy</h2>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.candyusa.com/FunStuff/content.cfm?ItemNumber=9963">National Confectioners Association</a>, the first edible Easter eggs date to 19th-century Europe. Germans made the sweets out of sugar and pastries, and slipped into the hats and bonnets that children laid out overnight. (These bonnets were the precursors to baskets.) Easter candy continued to be popular, but it wasn&#8217;t until the 20th century that innovations in candy-making production allowed it to become the <a href="http://www.saveur.com/article/Kitchen/The-History-of-Easter-Candy">Easter staple</a> that it now is. In the 1930s, <a href="http://www.candyfavorites.com/shop/jelly-bean-history.php">people began to associate</a> the oval shape of jelly beans with miniature eggs, thus eternally associating them with Easter.</p>

<p>This year, the National Retail Federation <a href="http://www.mrketplace.com/64057/easter-spending-apparel-drop-year/">estimates</a> Americans will spend almost $16 billion on Easter, including $2.2 billion on candy and over $1 billion on flowers.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What does all of this have to do with the Easter story?</h2>
<p>On the surface, not much.</p>
<p><span>In fact, this is one of the reasons </span><a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/women/2010/april/caught-between-easter-bunny-and-empty-grave.html?start=1">some Christians</a><span> approach the modern trappings of the holiday with caution.</span><span> Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, told </span><a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2008/march/sin-at-easter-not-peep-from-pulpit.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Christianity Today</a><span> a few years ago: &#8220;All the Easter eggs and the Easter bunny are even more extraneous to the purpose of Easter than Santa is to Christmas. &hellip; I wonder whether even some Christian churches are making the connection between Christ&#8217;s death and resurrection and victory over sin &mdash; the linchpin doctrine of Christianity.&#8221;</span></p><p><span> </span><span>Mohler&#8217;s concern may be misplaced, though. According to a </span><a href="http://cms2.americanbible.org/about/press-news/new-survey-shows-7-out-10-americans-celebrate-easter-religious-holiday">2012 poll</a><span>, seven out of 10 American adults celebrate Easter as a religious holiday.</span></p>
<p>The evolution of Easter celebrations demonstrates that, while the stories of Christianity are timeless, they have an adaptability that opens them up to the many cultures they come in contact with.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[&#8220;Everybody is looking for something&#8221;: Looking&#8217;s Murray Bartlett on his series&#8217; universal appeal]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2015/3/22/8220045/murray-bartlett-hbo-looking" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2015/3/22/8220045/murray-bartlett-hbo-looking</id>
			<updated>2019-03-04T14:48:12-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-03-22T12:00:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Celebrity Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Marriage Equality" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[HBO&#8217;s Looking has matured in its second season. The show has upped its storytelling and character development, earning higher marks from critics. Brian Moylan, though not without his criticisms of the show, said Looking&#8216;s second season is &#8220;groaning toward greatness.&#8221; Part of this is thanks to the show&#8217;s great characters, one of whom is Dom [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Murray Bartlett in Looking. | (HBO)" data-portal-copyright="(HBO)" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15297639/dom-1024.0.0.1504100564.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Murray Bartlett in Looking. | (HBO)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>HBO&#8217;s <em>Looking</em> has matured in its second season. The show has upped its storytelling and character development, earning higher marks from critics. <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/jan/12/looking-review-tvs-only-gay-show-is-growing-towards-greatness">Brian Moylan</a>, though not without his criticisms of the show, said <em>Looking</em>&#8216;s second season is &#8220;groaning toward greatness.&#8221;</p>

<p>Part of this is thanks to the show&#8217;s great characters, one of whom is Dom Basaluzzo, a career waiter, played by Australian Murray Bartlett. Right off the bat, what jumps out about Dom is his age. In the first season, he turns 40 &mdash; and, as the show makes clear, milestone birthdays can sometimes be a swift kick in the gut for the aging. Dom is not where he wants to be, professionally and at times personally, and he, like his friends in the series, is <em>looking</em> for more &mdash; for what&#8217;s next, for who&#8217;s next.</p>

<p>Bartlett&#8217;s big break came in 2002, almost accidentally, when he landed a memorable spot on one of TV&#8217;s most successful shows: <em>Sex and the City </em>as Carrie&#8217;s <a href="http://www.accesshollywood.com/lookings-murray-bartlett-recalls-sex-and-the-city-past-jonathan-groff-previews-new-hbo-show_article_89103">gay Australian best friend</a>. After that, he went on to soap fame (Cyrus Foley on <em>Guiding Light</em>) and toured Australia opposite Hugh Jackman in <em>The Boy From Oz</em>.</p>

<p>Bartlett says that <em>Looking</em> is a reflection of where gay culture currently is headed. The characters aren&#8217;t stereotypes, as gay characters have often been on television (think <em>Will &amp; Grace</em>&#8216;s Jack McFarland), and the dialogue and plots seem very aware of what life is like for many gay men in 2015.</p>

<p>I recently caught up with Bartlett to discuss <em>Looking</em> with him, and to find out whether he and Dom share similar thoughts about aging.</p>

<p>The interview has been edited for length and clarity.</p>

<p><strong>Brandon Ambrosino:</strong> <strong>So how does an Australian wind up on <em>Looking</em>? </strong></p>

<p><strong>Murray Bartlett: </strong>Gosh. [laughs] Well, I studied and worked as an actor for years in Sydney, and then I basically came to New York because I was restless. I fell in love with the city, so I stayed longer. And I booked a job &mdash; <em>Sex and the City</em>. It was kind of amazing to have that as my first job! Out of that, I got an agent, and then it took a number of years to get a visa. For the first couple of years, I went back and forth [between the US and Australia]. <em>Guiding Light</em> was helpful in getting my green card.</p>

<p>I met Michael Lannan socially, very briefly, a few years before [<em>Looking</em>] came up. I also met Andrew [Haigh] at a couple of festivals. I liked them both. I was a huge fan of [Haigh&#8217;s critically acclaimed film] <em>Weekend</em>. So when <em>Looking</em> came up, I was incredibly excited. It&#8217;s such a dream job working with these great people and great scripts. I really like the show, and I like being in the company of people committed to the show.</p>
<p><q class="left" aria-hidden="true">&#8220;It&#8217;s one of those times you go, &#8216;whoa, i&#8217;m 40! am i the person i wanna be?'&#8221;</q></p>
<p><strong>BA: What drew you to your character? </strong></p>

<p><strong>MB:</strong> I knew Michael and Andrew would be taking this show into a certain tone &mdash; one of the ideas was to bring some of the tone and sensibility that Andrew had in <em>Weekend</em>. So: a very real, naturalistic, unfiltered style. I love that. I knew I was taking on a character with clear connections that I could understand at this time of life. The way the character is written &#8230; it&#8217;s very interesting to see a gay man in his forties on TV. I didn&#8217;t feel like I&#8217;d seen [a character like Dominic] written in this way, on TV.</p>

<p><strong>BA:</strong> <strong>Dom&#8217;s age is sometimes a big deal in the series. How was it turning 40 for you? Do you and Dom share similar thoughts about it? </strong></p>

<p><strong>MB:</strong> I like to think I don&#8217;t think about it much. I just feel like myself. Fortunately, I&#8217;m in good health. But turning 40 is a big deal! And I wasn&#8217;t expecting it to be one of those &#8230; benchmarks? Maybe that&#8217;s not the right word. It&#8217;s one of those times of your life when you go, &#8220;Whoa, I&#8217;m 40! Am I the person I wanna be?&#8221; You measure yourself up against people, against expectations. You&#8217;re faced with all the associations you have with &#8220;your forties&#8221; &mdash; whatever that means. It&#8217;s a time of reflection. For me, it was a really great thing because it made me think, &#8220;I wanna make sure I&#8217;m doing what I want to be doing.&#8221; It was a good sort of refocusing for me. I&#8217;m halfway through my life &mdash; so I better be doing what I want to be doing.</p>

<p>Dom is going through a similar sort of reflection, realizing he&#8217;s not where he wants to be. You know, I thought I could have done this, or I could be better at this, but in general I&#8217;ve had a great life. I&#8217;m happy for the things that have happened. Dom is sort of toward the other end of the spectrum: Fuck, what am I doing? On one level, I totally relate to where he&#8217;s at, but we have had different experiences.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3507010/sex_dom.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Dom sex" title="Dom sex" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Murray Bartlett and Andrew Keenan-Bolger. (HBO)</p></div>
<p><strong>BA: So sex is dealt with in a really nice way in this series. What is it like filming those scenes? </strong></p>

<p><strong>MB: </strong>Obviously, when you&#8217;re doing an intimate scene, you have some kind of, &#8220;Oh my god, I&#8217;ve got to get naked&#8221; about it. I try and approach it like any other scene. Fortunately in our scripts, sex has a function in terms of forwarding the story. It doesn&#8217;t feel gratuitous. And we have an amazing crew. Everybody&#8217;s very close, so you feel safe, and you can focus on what you&#8217;re doing. It&#8217;s like any other scene: you look at what the scene is about, and try to do that.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s hard at times &mdash; it is an odd situation to be in. Oftentimes you&#8217;re doing these scenes with someone you&#8217;ve just met, or have never met. There&#8217;s a closed set when we do these scenes, which means there&#8217;s a very small group of people. You can be nervous in the beginning, but once you start, once the first take is done &mdash; well, here we are in our cock socks, it&#8217;s a relief, and you get on with it.</p>

<p><strong>BA: I imagine it&#8217;s weird having the makeup applied, like the bruise they gave you on your butt this season.</strong></p>

<p><strong>MB: </strong>It is bizarre. You&#8217;re standing in a van naked with one of the makeup people, talking about what you&#8217;re doing on the weekend. I think they sprayed something on the bruise so it wouldn&#8217;t come off in the shower.</p>

<p><strong>BA: How long does it take to film a typical sex scene?</strong></p>

<p><strong>MB:</strong> The actual filming [of Dom&#8217;s sex scene with Alex] &mdash; I guess we must have done about three or four takes? Well, maybe four or five. So, I guess that was 40 minutes, or something like that. You do one take, then sit around naked for a while [as the crew prepares for the next take].</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3507024/scott-bakula-murray-bartlett-dom-lynn-looking-in-the-mirror.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Dom in jacket" title="Dom in jacket" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Murray Bartlett. (HBO)</p></div>
<p><strong>BA: How is this show different from other gay shows? </strong></p>

<p><strong>MB:</strong> <em>Looking</em> is a reflection of where we are now, in terms of, not the entire gay community, but these characters in the gay community. Hopefully, it&#8217;s a real reflection of what&#8217;s happening to these types of characters. I feel like the show is also a reflection of something more unfiltered, more real. For the most part, shows come along and reflect where we&#8217;re at in terms of a community as a whole, and what we&#8217;re ready for, and hopefully it pushes boundaries a bit. I think <em>Looking</em> does that. I feel like, hopefully, film and TV with gay content are going more and more toward the real, and away from stereotypes. That&#8217;s one of our hopes with this show.</p>

<p><strong>BA: What do you think about the title &#8220;Looking?&#8221; Every episode is something about looking. &#8220;Looking for Uncut,&#8221; &#8220;Looking for Now,&#8221; &#8220;Looking for the Promised Land.&#8221; What&#8217;s the significance of that word in gay male communities? </strong></p>

<p><strong>MB:</strong> A few things. First, it refers to hookup sites: looking for now &mdash; so it&#8217;s a specifically gay reference. I think what I like about it, though, is that it refers to what everybody does. Looking is a universal thing: everybody is looking for something. We&#8217;re all going through life constantly looking for something: habit, relationships, peace of mind, meaning. It&#8217;s an umbrella term for all human beings.</p>

<p><strong>BA: OK, musical-theater-nerd question. You played Peter Allen&#8217;s boyfriend, Greg Connell, in <em>The Boy From Oz</em>. Where can I find footage of you performing &#8220;I Honestly Love You&#8221;?</strong></p>

<p><strong>MB: </strong>[laughs] I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any video of the show. But believe me, if there&#8217;s anyone you should ask about it, it&#8217;s [fellow musical theater nerd and <em>Looking</em> cast member] Jonathan Groff! I think he&#8217;s actually spent some time trying to find it.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[&#8220;What the hell did I do?&#8221; 6 shocking moments from HBO&#8217;s The Jinx]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2015/3/16/8223707/hbo-jinx-shocking-moments-robert-durst" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2015/3/16/8223707/hbo-jinx-shocking-moments-robert-durst</id>
			<updated>2019-03-04T14:51:42-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-03-16T12:00:03-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Criminal Justice" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[When I spoke with director Andrew Jarecki last week, I asked him if his latest project, the HBO true-crime documentary miniseries The Jinx, would have a satisfying conclusion. &#8220;When we get to end of The Jinx,&#8221; he told me, &#8220;the audience won&#8217;t be scratching their heads. They&#8217;ll know what happens.&#8221; The six-episode series, which ended [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Robert Durst. | (HBO)" data-portal-copyright="(HBO)" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15298338/The_Jinx.0.0.1539835600.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Robert Durst. | (HBO)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>When I spoke with director Andrew Jarecki last week, I asked him if his latest project, the HBO true-crime documentary miniseries <em>The Jinx, </em>would have a satisfying conclusion. &#8220;When we get to end of <em>The Jinx</em>,&#8221; he told me, &#8220;the audience won&#8217;t be scratching their heads. They&#8217;ll know what happens.&#8221;</p>

<p>The six-episode series, which ended Sunday night,  tells the story of Robert Durst, a wealthy man from a family of New York City real estate developers with a connection to three deaths: the killing of his Galveston, Texas, neighbor, the shooting of his best friend, and the decades-old disappearance &mdash; and presumed murder &mdash; of his wife.</p>

<p>Well, Jarecki was right about the finale. The sixth and final episode ended with the smokingest gun of all time. Durst must have forgotten he was wearing a live microphone, and seemingly confessed to the three killings he&#8217;d long been suspected of. This moment was jaw-dropping, as Time&#8217;s <a href="http://time.com/3745422/the-jinx-robert-durst-hbo-finale/">James Poniewozik</a> pointed out: &#8220;My gob is numb from being repeatedly smacked,&#8221; he wrote.</p>

<p>But Durst&#8217;s whispered confession wasn&#8217;t the series&#8217; only giant surprise. Here are the six biggest WTF moments from <em>The Jinx</em>.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Episode 1: The eyes</h2>
<p>If the eyes are the window to the soul, then surely the two dark specks in Durst&#8217;s face tell us something about him. Durst&#8217;s eyes are unlike any others. They aren&#8217;t so much eyes as they are vacant black pools. When you stare at them &mdash; and it&#8217;s impossible not to, accentuated as they are by his many erratic blinks &mdash; they seem to grow, to overtake his entire body.</p>

<p>Jarecki plays this up. Indeed, he first introduces viewers to Durst as he&#8217;s leaving an <em>eye</em> clinic in Galveston.</p>

<p>The climax of the first episode is a long, slow-motion capture of the jumpsuit-clad accused making his way to stand trial. He stares into the camera, his black, darting eyes daring us not to believe him. What is it that we see there? Confidence? Arrogance? Fear?</p>

<p>One thing is for sure: Durst&#8217;s eyes have seen many things. Yes, they saw their owner dismember a man, and they may have seen him murder two others. But they also saw his mother&#8217;s suicide. His father&#8217;s death. His brother&#8217;s betrayal. And they stared into Jarecki&#8217;s own eyes, and those eyes have their own hidden motivations.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Episode 2: The suicide</h2>
<p>You can&#8217;t help but feel sorry for Durst when you learn that his father made him wave to his mother as she readied herself to jump to her death. In those few moments of sympathy, you might forget what he&#8217;s accused of and remember he&#8217;s human. As Jarecki told me, you can learn a lot about someone &#8220;when you start with the premise that you&#8217;re both human beings who come at life in different ways.&#8221;</p>

<p>Complicating the villainy of a villain, even and especially when he seems so obviously irredeemable, is a powerful challenge in a media environment often bereft of empathy. It&#8217;s also a challenge to viewers, who might prefer our villains simple and our anger pure.</p>

<p>Humanizing a bad guy doesn&#8217;t mean you have to see him as a good guy &mdash; it just means you have to see him as a human. And humans, as we all know, are capable of doing really evil things.</p>

<p>This is why Durst&#8217;s mother&#8217;s suicide matters. It, no doubt, had incredibly negative effects on his childhood, and might have even affected his relationship with his brother.</p>

<p>As many point out, the enmity between the two Durst sons is so great that it smacks of biblical family feuds. Robert, the firstborn, was the rightful heir to his father&#8217;s real estate business. But his younger brother, Doug, ended up inheriting the company.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s understandable, then, given his own tragic family life, that Robert wouldn&#8217;t want to father children. &#8220;I knew I wasn&#8217;t gonna be a good father,&#8221; he told Jarecki. &#8220;I thought I might be a jinx.&#8221;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3481788/jarecki.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Jarecki" title="Jarecki" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Andrew Jarecki. (Jeff Kravitz/Getty)</p></div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Episode 3: The hoagie</h2>
<p>No matter how compelling Jarecki&#8217;s storytelling is, there are things about this case that just don&#8217;t add up.</p>

<p>Like the fact that Durst, who had more than $500 in his pocket and $37,000 in his car, would shoplift a chicken salad hoagie from a Wegman&#8217;s grocery store in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, in November 2001. (All three alleged murders had happened at this point.)</p>

<p>Even stranger is that Durst would have cooperated with the store&#8217;s security when they tried to detain him. After all, in his vehicle were two guns and Morris Black&#8217;s driver&#8217;s license &mdash; certainly enough evidence to connect him to the dismembered Texan.</p>

<p>Why would Durst shoplift something he could have easily bought? For the thrill of it? Durst certainly seems to live as if he&#8217;s above the law, as if no one can ever catch him. Or maybe Durst <em>wanted</em> someone to catch him? But, if so, then why? Was the guilt too much for him to bear? Did he want the authorities to search his car and tie him to Black?</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not a psychologist, and I&#8217;m certainly not qualified to comment on Durst&#8217;s state of mind &mdash; but it does seem as if there&#8217;s more than one &#8220;Durst&#8221; in there. Is it possible that the frightened, small boy watching his mom jump to her death is trying to overcome the calloused, sociopath with whom he shares a body?</p>

<p>During his interviews, Durst sits very emotionless and still, except, of course, for his furious facial ticks. No matter how confidently he answers questions that cast him in a negative light, you can&#8217;t forget that he admitted to dismembering Black&#8217;s body.</p>

<p>Berman&#8217;s stepson, Sareb Kaufman, understandably has strong feelings toward Durst, with whom he&#8217;d become close after his mother&#8217;s murder. Durst financially supported Kaufman through college. When Kaufman agreed to an interview with Jarecki, he said he had one request: &#8220;that we keep the best in mind.&#8221;</p>

<p>Durst seemed to try this strategy a lot with Jarecki. &#8220;I don&#8217;t know that she&#8217;s dead,&#8221; he said of Kathie, his onetime love. &#8220;You&#8217;re saying she&#8217;s alive?&#8221; asked Jarecki. &#8220;It&#8217;s not likely. It&#8217;s not what I think. I think she&#8217;s almost definitely dead. But I don&#8217;t know that she&#8217;s dead.&#8221;</p>

<p>Maybe Durst is the one who taught Kaufman how to hope for the best.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Episode 4: The defense</h2>
<p>When I first learned of Durst&#8217;s self-defense plea in the 2001 killing of Texas neighbor Morris Black, I couldn&#8217;t believe anyone would buy it. Durst hacked Black&#8217;s body into several pieces, severing the head and limbs from the torso. How are those actions consistent with self-defense? Yet Durst wasn&#8217;t convicted of Black&#8217;s murder.</p>

<p>How did Durst&#8217;s legal team deal with the dismembered body? Simple: they ignored it. Time and again, Chip Lewis and Dick DeGuerin, Durst&#8217;s counsel, reminded the jury that Durst was not charged with chopping up a body &mdash; but with killing someone. And the killing, they maintained, was accidental and in self-defense: Black was going to kill him, so Durst had to shoot first. What Durst did <em>after</em> Black was dead was not the jury&#8217;s problem. They were simply there to deliberate whether Durst acted out of self-defense.</p>

<p>This was a pretty smart move, admits Cody Cazalas, a Galveston police detective who investigated the case. If there were only two people in the room and one of them is dead, then how do you disprove self-defense? In fact, it was the prosecution&#8217;s job to disprove self-defense &mdash; and it failed. So Durst walked.</p>

<p>The moment we learn Durst was acquitted of Black&#8217;s murder is pivotal in terms of how the series plays on the audience&#8217;s sympathies. Up until that moment, Jarecki had done a good job complicating Durst just enough that believing he might not be guilty of what he&#8217;s accused of doesn&#8217;t seem entirely impossible.</p>

<p>But then you hear Cazalas say this:</p>

<p>&#8220;As a homicide investigator, you work for God. Because the victim is not there to tell his story. You&#8217;re there to represent the victim, you&#8217;re there to tell his story. You&#8217;re doing that for God. There&#8217;s a lot of truth in that. To this day, I feel like I &#8230; &#8220;</p>

<p>And then Cazalas&#8217; voice trails off, overtaken with emotion. &#8220;Can we stop?&#8221; he asks Jarecki. &#8220;Thanks.&#8221;</p>

<p>By the episode&#8217;s end, sympathies shift again. We catch Durst talking to himself &mdash; foreshadowing his later undoing. &#8220;I did not knowingly, purposefully, intentionally lie,&#8221; he recites to himself, methodically, as if he&#8217;s trying to convince himself.</p>

<p>&#8220;I did not tell the whole truth,&#8221; he later says. &#8220;Nobody tells the whole truth.&#8221;</p>

<p>Not villains, and certainly not the victims.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Episode five: The letter</h2>
<p>&#8220;CADAVER.&#8221;</p>

<p>One of the strangest details of Berman&#8217;s murder is that police were tipped off to her body&#8217;s location. In a handwritten note, neatly adorned with block lettering, were Berman&#8217;s address and the word &#8220;cadaver.&#8221; (One of Kathie&#8217;s friends suggested Durst would have heard Kathie use the word often during her medical studies.) The tell of the note is its misspelled &#8220;BEVERLEY,&#8221; as in Beverly Hills.</p>

<p>At the end of the penultimate episode, Kaufman contacts producers to talk with them about new information he discovered that might possibly have something to do with his stepmother&#8217;s murder. While going through Berman&#8217;s belongings, Kaufman found a handwritten letter Bob had sent her in the year before her death. The address on the envelope is written eerily similar to the address on the cadaver note. And like the latter, it contains the same misspelling: &#8220;BEVERLEY.&#8221;</p>

<p>That discovery was enough to convince Kaufman he was wrong about Durst. And it notably affected Jarecki&#8217;s opinion of him, too. Jarecki and Durst had become close throughout the interview process. No doubt, the thought that Durst might have been lying to him the entire time weighed on the filmmaker. This tension is heightened during episode six, when Jarecki can&#8217;t manage to get Durst to make good on his promise of a second interview.</p>

<p>While I realized the similarities between the two letters were compelling, I wondered if and when Jarecki went to the authorities with this information. That was always the risk with making this film: Jarecki obviously couldn&#8217;t withhold evidence from the state, which would have been illegal, but at the same time, could he just hand over every single <em>Jinx</em> spoiler as soon as he&#8217;d discovered it?</p>

<p>This is where things get murky. According to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/16/nyregion/robert-durst-subject-of-hbo-documentary-on-unsolved-killings-is-arrested.html">New York Times</a>, producers of <em>The Jinx </em>discovered the audio of Durst&#8217;s confession &#8220;more than two years&#8221; after it was recorded. A <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/the-jinx-finale-review-robert-durst/?_r=0">different article</a> in the Times confirms this, adding that the producers accidentally stumbled upon the recording in the summer of 2014. But as Buzzfeed&#8217;s Kate Aurthur was quick to <a href="https://twitter.com/KateAurthur/status/577296315362619392">point out</a>, two years haven&#8217;t even passed since the audio was allegedly made in fall 2013.</p>

<p>Regardless of how long Jarecki waited to give authorities the evidence he found, the fact remains that <em>The Jinx</em> has &#8220;played a crucial role in Durst&#8217;s arrest,&#8221; as <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/the-jinx-finale-review-robert-durst/?_r=0">Mike Hale</a> writes in the Times.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3508684/jarecki_smerling.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="SMerling" title="SMerling" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><div><p class="caption">Producers Marc Smerling and Andrew Jarecki attend <em>The Jinx</em> premiere at the 2015 Sundance Film Festival. (Araya Diaz/Getty)</p></div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Episode six: The confession</h2>
<p>&#8220;What the hell did I do?&#8221;</p>

<p>When these words flash onto the screen early in the finale, it&#8217;s easy to wonder who the &#8220;I&#8221; is. Obviously, it&#8217;s Durst, who&#8217;s overheard whispering those words to himself when he thinks he&#8217;s out of earshot. (Or did he know he was being recorded? Is this another example of self-sabotage, like the hoagie?)</p>

<p>But you might see the &#8220;I&#8221; as Jarecki. <em>What the hell am I doing</em>? That thought had to cross the filmmaker&#8217;s mind many times during the course of making this documentary.</p>

<p>What kinds of ethical calls did Jarecki have to make? In the last episode, he says his first priority is making sure justice is done. But, with respect to Jarecki, that isn&#8217;t quite right, is it? He&#8217;s a filmmaker &mdash; his first priority was to make a film.</p>

<p>Whatever evidence Jarecki unearthed while making this series, it was subsumed by the fact that it was presented during a televised special. The evidence, in other words, is entertainment. Informative? Yes. Investigative? Absolutely. But also undeniably entertaining. Just take a look at that hauntingly beautiful opening credits sequence. Or the teasers. Or the music, which would make a pretty good playlist for working out.</p>

<p>We have a cultural soft spot for true-crime programming right now. <a href="http://www.vox.com/2014/11/7/7169555/serial-podcast-listen-online-adnan-syed">Serial</a>, the uber-successful podcast that many compare to <em>The Jinx</em>, was one of the most downloaded podcasts of the past year. Week after week, we tune in to whodunits because figuring out who done it is <em>fun</em>.</p>

<p>That brings us to another possible &#8220;I&#8221; &mdash; the audience.</p>

<p>&#8220;What the hell did I do?&#8221; I asked myself, chastising myself for ever giving Durst the benefit of the doubt, but also feeling slightly embarrassed for taking such gleeful delight in a show about a real filmmaker who caught a real man who killed at least one real person. (Yes, seeing Jarecki as the star of the show is one way of looking at it.)</p>

<p>There&#8217;s something just a bit unsettling about the new age of the whodunit. Sure, it&#8217;s important that we revisit closed cases to determine if the prosecuted were unjustly convicted. And if a documentary&#8217;s filmmaking process unearths evidence that can help investigators solve a decades-old mystery, then that is undoubtedly a good thing. But we need to remember that before these shows are anything else &mdash; they are <em>shows</em>. They are <em>enjoyable</em>. And they are bringing in a nice chunk of money for their producers.</p>

<p>The cut-to-black ending of <em>The Jinx </em>was one of the most mesmerizing finales of any television series. As Durst went into the bathroom, Jarecki and his crew turned off the lights in the main room and filed out. Here is Durst&#8217;s complete monologue:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>There it is. You&#8217;re caught. You&#8217;re right, of course. But you can&#8217;t imagine. Arrest him. I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s in the house. Oh, I want this. What a disaster. He was right. I was wrong. And the burping. I&#8217;m having difficulty with the question. What the hell did I do?</p>

<p>Killed them all, of course.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As I sat, drop-jawed, listening to Durst hang himself, I couldn&#8217;t look away from one image lingering in the corner of my screen: a boom mic.</p>

<p>I wasn&#8217;t accidentally happening to overhear Durst talk about killing people. That experience was doctored for me. Just like any Hollywood explosion or car chase or space journey, <em>The Jinx</em> was painstakingly constructed to offer me an experience that was at once compelling and enjoyable.</p>

<p><em>What the hell did I do? </em></p>

<p>Durst&#8217;s words continued to echo in my head after he&#8217;d said them, after the screen went black. It didn&#8217;t come to life again until what seemed like an eternity later, when the names of three people flashed onto the television:</p>

<p>Supervising Editor. Co-Editor. Additional Editor.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Robert Durst, subject of HBO’s The Jinx, arrested for decades-old murder]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2015/3/15/8220407/robert-durst-jinx-arrested-murder-letter" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2015/3/15/8220407/robert-durst-jinx-arrested-murder-letter</id>
			<updated>2019-03-04T14:49:05-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-03-15T21:26:34-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Criminal Justice" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Who is Robert Durst? Though he has laid low for the past few years, Robert Durst, 71, of the wealthy New York&#8211;area real estate family, has been thrust back into the public spotlight. That&#8217;s because Durst &#8212; who has been notoriously tight-lipped about granting interviews ever since he was acquitted of the 2001 murder of [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="The Jinx. | (HBO)" data-portal-copyright="(HBO)" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15297809/the_jinx.0.0.1539835600.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	The Jinx. | (HBO)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Robert Durst, subject of <a href="http://www.vox.com/2015/2/8/8001579/the-jinx-HBO">HBO&#039;s six-part documentary miniseries <em>The Jinx</em></a>, which concludes tonight, has been arrested in New Orleans for the unsolved murder of Susan Berman, reports the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/16/nyregion/robert-durst-subject-of-hbo-documentary-on-unsolved-killings-is-arrested.html">New York Times</a>.</li><li>Although no one has yet been able to charge Durst with the murder of his friend Berman, new evidence, brought to light in last week&#039;s episode of <em>The Jinx</em>, might have been enough to convince authorities to pursue the connection.</li><li>According to ABC, Durst&#039;s attorney, Chip Lewis, maintains Durst&#039;s innocence.</li></ol><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Who is Robert Durst?</h2>
<p>Though he has laid low for the past few years, Robert Durst, 71, of the wealthy New York&ndash;area real estate family, has been thrust back into the public spotlight. That&#8217;s because Durst &mdash; who has been notoriously tight-lipped about granting interviews ever since he was acquitted of the 2001 murder of his Texas neighbor Morris Black &mdash; granted filmmaker Andrew Jarecki about 25 hours of sit-down interviews for <em>The Jinx. </em></p>

<p>The six-part series explores Durst&#8217;s possible connections to Berman&#8217;s 2000 murder, as well as the 1982 disappearance of his then-wife, Kathie. Though many have continued to believe Durst was behind both crimes, he had yet to be charged in either case.</p>

<p>That is, until Saturday, when, just before 4:30 pm, he was arrested at the JW Marriott Hotel in New Orleans. According to Los Angeles channel <a href="http://abc7.com/558780/">ABC 7</a>, authorities believed Durst was planning to flee to Cuba.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What new evidence was uncovered?</h2>
<p>According to the New York Times, while making <em>The Jinx</em>, Jarecki uncovered new evidence linking Durst to Berman&#8217;s death. The producers turned this information over to the Los Angeles district attorney more than a year ago, reports the Times.</p>

<p>The evidence director Andrew Jarecki discovered was a letter believed to be sent from Durst to Berman in the year before her murder. The address contained the word &#8220;BEVERLEY,&#8221; misspelled and written in block lettering.</p>

<p>The writing, according to Jarecki, and Berman&#8217;s stepson, Sareb Kaufman, who discovered the letter, bears a striking resemblance to what authorities call &#8220;the cadaver note&#8221; &mdash; a letter sent to authorities alerting them to Berman&#8217;s dead body.</p>

<p>And in the finale of the miniseries, Jarecki caught Durst saying he &#8220;killed them all&#8221; on a hot microphone when Durst didn&#8217;t think he was being interviewed.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Brandon Ambrosino</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Jinx director Andrew Jarecki tells us why he wants viewers to rethink an alleged murderer]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2015/3/8/8172293/andrew-jarecki-jinx-interview" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2015/3/8/8172293/andrew-jarecki-jinx-interview</id>
			<updated>2019-03-04T14:03:14-05:00</updated>
			<published>2015-03-08T21:00:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Celebrity Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Criminal Justice" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Science" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Space" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[In HBO&#8217;s The Jinx, director Andrew Jarecki isn&#8217;t looking to tell the story of Robert Durst so much as untell it. The six-part miniseries focuses on Robert Durst, the mysterious man with a connection to three crimes: two murders and one disappearance (which many assume to be a third murder). The only one, though, for [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Andrew Jarecki. | (Jeff Kravitz/Getty)" data-portal-copyright="(Jeff Kravitz/Getty)" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/15288197/jarecki.0.0.1505283652.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Andrew Jarecki. | (Jeff Kravitz/Getty)	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-1">In HBO&#8217;s <em>The Jinx</em>, director Andrew Jarecki isn&#8217;t looking to tell the story of Robert Durst so much as <em>untell</em> it.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-17">The six-part miniseries focuses on Robert Durst, the mysterious man with a connection to three crimes: two murders and one disappearance (which many assume to be a third murder). The only one, though, for which Durst was charged was the 2001 murder of Morris Black, in Galveston, Texas. Durst has never been convicted of murder.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-19">What&#8217;s also interesting about Durst is his deep pockets. His father is Seymour Durst, the New York City real estate mogul whose organization owns nine properties in New York. So when it comes to power, influence, and the ability to purchase the best defense attorney in town, Durst has it made.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-21">Durst&#8217;s Texas legal team was able to successfully argue that despite Durst&#8217;s own admission that he dismembered Morris Black after he shot him, the initial killing was actually self-defense.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-23">Reading this story in a tabloid paper, the self-defense plea might sound fishy. But hearing it narrated in <em>The Jinx</em> &mdash; well, you might be tempted to agree with the jury. That&#8217;s because the way Jarecki has pieced together this series is masterful. There&#8217;s a certain whodunit sensibility to <em>The Jinx</em>, no doubt, but for the most part, this is a show about complicating narratives to their snapping point.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-39">What&#8217;s interesting to Jarecki, who also directed the critically acclaimed, similarly themed documentary <em>Capturing the Friedmans</em>, is not that Durst did these things but <em>why</em> he did them. Every single detail that makes him look bad, every fact that casts him in a criminal light &mdash; Durst can explain all of them. Granted, you might not believe what he says. But he clearly has something to tell you.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-55">Jarecki&#8217;s series simultaneously revisits and shores up the narratives we think we know about his subject before turning on those same narratives and watching them wither away from the inside out.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-57">I recently caught up with Jarecki to talk with him about <em>The Jinx</em> and what it was like to portray a hated man in such a complicated, nuanced, even empathetic way.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-64">The interview has been lightly edited for length or clarity.</p><p class="ql-line"><q class="left" aria-hidden="true">jarecki isn&#8217;t looking to tell the story of robert durst as much as untell it</q></p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-66"><strong>Brandon Ambrosino:</strong> This documentary started out as Durst&rsquo;s idea, right?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-70"><strong>Andrew Jarecki:</strong> We had made this narrative feature film about Durst called <em>All Good Things</em>, and reached out to him during the making of it. We&rsquo;d spoken to his lawyer, and said, &#8220;We&#8217;re making this film about your client, and maybe it would be appropriate for him to talk with us at some point, to have his perspective represented.&#8221; He was polite, but he declined. A week before the movie came out in theaters, I got a phone call out of the blue from Durst. He wanted to see the film &mdash; he&rsquo;d heard good things about it.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-81">That is sort of how we connected to begin with. And after we showed it to him, he liked it. So he reached back out, and said he was interested in talking more, giving us his perspective on the story, which had been covered lots and lots of times by tabloid shows. I think he felt very frustrated that his version of the story was irrelevant to all the ways it had been told before.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-83"><strong>BA:</strong> Because Durst approached you, some people, especially his family, have <a href="http://nypost.com/2015/02/05/lawyer-blasts-filmmaker-over-documentary-on-robert-durst/">accused</a> you of sort of being in Bob&#8217;s pocket.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-94"><strong>AJ: </strong>You know, it&rsquo;s hard to say why his family took that position. That&rsquo;s an idiotic position to take, for anybody. Because that&rsquo;s not the kind of work that we do. A for-hire piece? We have no interest in doing anything like that. I just don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a thoughtful analysis of anything we were doing. My sense was that his brother was anxious about the piece for other reasons, and just wanted to denigrate the movie to prevent people from seeing it by saying this was going to be &#8220;An Evening With Bob Durst.&#8221;</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-98"><strong>BA:</strong> What was it like meeting Robert for the first time?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-102"><strong>AJ:</strong> We&#8217;d spoken on the phone quite a lot by the time we met in person. He was very charming on the telephone. He&rsquo;s got a very recognizable voice. When you&#8217;re talking to him, you know who you&rsquo;re talking to &mdash; he doesn&rsquo;t sound like anyone else. By the time we met in person, I already had a sense of what he was like and what our interaction would be like. I thought he was very straightforward. That isn&rsquo;t to say I thought of him as being consistently truthful &mdash; I didn&rsquo;t. But I did know he was going to be truthful about a lot of surprising things. Things most people would keep to themselves are things Bob speaks about freely, and then other things that you would speak about freely are more mysterious when it comes to Bob. So he sort of has a &hellip; different rhythm when you compare him to a regular person.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-106">We first met in person at the Peninsula Hotel. We had breakfast on the day we arranged to show him the film <em>All Good Things</em>. He was very gracious. He showed up on time; he was polite to everybody. But you can&rsquo;t shake that feeling when you shake his hand: this is the hand of a person who&#8217;s been well taken care of during his life; he doesn&rsquo;t have the hands of a day laborer. But at the same time, you can&rsquo;t ignore the fact that you&rsquo;re shaking the hand of somebody who&rsquo;s dismembered someone. There&rsquo;s something about that &mdash; electricity &mdash; you can&rsquo;t shake.<span> </span></p><p class="ql-line"><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3389944/The_Jinx.0.jpg" alt="The Jinx" data-chorus-asset-id="3389944"></p><div><p class="caption">Robert Durst. (HBO)</p></div><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-113"><strong>BA:</strong> When you began this filmmaking process, was your mind already made up about Durst?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-117"><strong>AJ:</strong> I try to never have my mind made up for a few reasons. One, there are so many nuances to what somebody may or may not have done. I try to see situations individually and put myself in the position of the audience. I think there are a lot of filmmakers who assume they know who their audience is, and that the audience is gonna be really wound up on one side or another. And they think it makes sense to join that. But I don&#8217;t agree with that.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-121">I think the main thing you can do for the audience is to represent them: you&rsquo;re their proxy. People that watch <em>The Jinx</em> are not gonna get the opportunity to sit down with Bob and ask the questions they want to ask, so it&#8217;s my obligation to do that for them.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-128">Some people might say they would have asked it differently. But the only thing you can do to satisfy that experience for people is to ask <em>everything</em>. Sometimes you ask it in more pointed ways, sometimes in less pointed ways. But you&#8217;re always trying to create a safe place for the subject to express himself. That&rsquo;s really what the audience is there for. They don&rsquo;t care what I&rsquo;m saying &mdash; they just want to make sure what I&rsquo;m saying is gonna galvanize the expression of the subject.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-135"><strong>BA: </strong>So at the end of episode six, will there be a definite conclusion? Or will we be left hanging, wanting more?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-139"><strong>AJ:</strong> It&rsquo;s sort of a mystery. There are lots of real people involved, so lots of people are paying attention to the series because Bob had such an impact on the world around him. I&#8217;ve said before that when we get to end of <em>The Jinx</em>, the audience won&rsquo;t be scratching their heads. They&#8217;ll know what happens.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-150"><strong>BA:</strong> And whatever that ending is, did it blindside you the first time you learned it?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-154"><strong>AJ:</strong> I think &hellip; I think the truth comes in strange ways. The truth is elusive, and it arrives in lots of strange little packages, and then things get put together. That always surprises me. I always find it surprising when you get a hint of the truth. And when you get multiple hints of the truth, it&rsquo;s even more surprising and valuable.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-158"><strong>BA: </strong>The narrative structure of <em>The Jinx</em> is really masterful. How did you decide on telling the story in this particular way?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-169"><strong>AJ:</strong> I wish I could say we had it all figured out, but the truth is we didn&#8217;t. Usually we try it the wrong way 100 times first, and that&#8217;s sort of what happened here. It was really trial and error. We had a version of this that was in a sense movie length, but that version didn&rsquo;t work. Every time we&#8217;d hint at something &mdash; oh, by the way, Bob has a current wife, so we&#8217;d put in a little moment with Deborah, and someone would say, &#8220;Wait a minute, you&rsquo;re telling me that Durst, who&rsquo;s been accused of <em>murdering his first wife</em>, has a new wife? I need to know more about that first story. You can&rsquo;t just gloss over that.&#8221;</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-180">When we started, we thought about it chronologically. There&#8217;s a version that starts with Bob&rsquo;s childhood and moves through to his health food store, and meeting his wife and falling in love, and then we see how that relationship deteriorates. That&#8217;s one viable way of going about it. But that didn&rsquo;t infuse the story with the kind of urgency it needed to carry the narrative.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-182">It became very clear I wouldn&rsquo;t care nearly as much about Bob if I didn&rsquo;t see him in the context of how he ended up. If you look at the trajectory of his story, here&#8217;s a young man born into a world of privilege and opportunity, in a fancy house in Scarsdale, New York. Then you follow it through 60 years later, and he&rsquo;s living in a $300-a-month house disguised as a woman. You see what an unusual trajectory that is? When you know that, you have to ask yourself what kind of story structure will make that most absorbable to the audience. How will every part of that story have impact? You want the audience to engage at every level; you want them feel that every moment of this is important.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-184">So [producers] Mark [Smerling] and Zack [Stuart-Pontier] and I are all grinding through this in the editing room. And we were also simultaneously all watching <em>Breaking Bad</em>. And we just thought, &#8220;Why, just because it&#8217;s a documentary, can&#8217;t we tell this story in episodic format?&#8221; We realized we might have to tell it that way. So we developed the story as a series, then we let each episode have its own beginning, middle, and end.</p><p class="ql-line"><q class="center" aria-hidden="true">&#8220;You can&#8217;t ignore the fact that you&#8217;re shaking the hand of somebody who&#8217;s dismembered someone&#8221;</q></p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-200"><strong>BA:</strong> What do you think about him unwittingly whispering &#8220;I did not intentionally lie&#8221; in episode four?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-204"><strong>AJ:</strong> A lot of the stuff that Bob says off camera turns out to be important, but it&rsquo;s not all stuff we were thinking about at the time. He talks to himself, there&rsquo;s no question about that. I thought that was interesting. Certainly for the audience, it gives them the feeling of narration going on in his head. Bob&#8217;s very casual: he speaks off the cuff, and he obviously speaks very confidently. He certainly has a clear memory of his life in some ways. I think [that moment you referenced] was one of first times the audience could see a little bit behind the curtain. It let you see that Bob is careful about what he says; he thinks about it in advance, and in some ways he rehearses it.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-208"><strong>BA:</strong> What do you think your series can teach us about jumping to conclusions?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-212"><strong>AJ:</strong> I&rsquo;ve always felt like whenever you think about somebody &mdash; whether it&rsquo;s Bob or the family in <em>Capturing the Friedmans</em> or the mom in <em>Catfish</em>, who&rsquo;s also kind of a mystery &mdash; I think we tend to demonize these people based on the first few things we hear about them. That&#8217;s wrong for a lot of reasons. First, it&#8217;s wrong because if someone doesn&rsquo;t happen to be guilty, then you&#8217;re doing the wrong thing, and you could be damaging their lives.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-234">But even beyond that, from the standpoint of what we&rsquo;re doing to ourselves, that kind of narrative isn&#8217;t very interesting. When you make Durst into a burlesque figure, and you say, &#8220;Well, he&#8217;s a cross-dresser and a body-chopper&#8221; &mdash; both, you could argue, are technically true. Yet if you ask him, you&#8217;ll find there&rsquo;s an explanation for it. Now, that explanation may not satisfy you or justify anything. But there&#8217;s an explanation.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-236">Bob&#8217;s explanation for why he was dressed as a woman is more interesting than someone saying he&rsquo;s a transvestite. The truth is, I don&rsquo;t think Bob&#8217;s a transvestite. Do I think he dressed as a woman? Yes. That, by itself, is far more fascinating to understand as a specific choice he made. I&#8217;m sure a hundred amateur psychologists are gonna go, &#8220;Yeah, if it&#8217;s true he dressed as a woman, then it&#8217;s because he&#8217;s sexually interested in feeling what it would be like to be a woman.&#8221; Or maybe they think he dressed as a woman because he was trying to reclaim the identity of women in his life: he lost his mother, his wife, his best friend, so he wanted to recreate them. OK, I&#8217;m really interested in that complicated situation. I&#8217;d much rather be in that dialogue, thinking about that, trying to understand that, than reading a headline in the New York Post that says &#8220;CROSS-DRESSING FREAK.&#8221;</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-238"><strong>BA: </strong>Some people might not be interested in humanizing someone like Durst.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-242"><strong>AJ:</strong> These stories are deeply complicated. What do we take away from these things if all we&rsquo;re learning about is the caricature?</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-246">You learn a lot more when you start with the premise that you&rsquo;re both human beings who come at life in different ways, and approach challenges in different ways, and you have different kinds of dysfunctions. You come away with a lot more knowledge about the world, and come away with a lot more knowledge about yourself if you don&rsquo;t point the finger at people &mdash; even if it&rsquo;s a person you think is bad. Even if you get to the end of the series and think Bob killed all these people, and you reach own conclusion, you really haven&rsquo;t learned anything by saying, &#8220;I don&rsquo;t need to know anything more than X.&#8221;</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-248">The truth is: you do need to know more than X.</p><p class="ql-line" id="ql-line-252">The Jinx <em>airs Sundays on HBO at 8 pm Eastern. It&#8217;s also available on HBO Go.</em></p><p class="ql-line"><em>Correction:</em> This post has been updated to reflect that Robert Durst was not charged with dismembering Morris Black. He was charged, though not convicted, of murdering Black but the defense repeatedly reminded the jury that he was not charged with dismemberment.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
