<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Gina Pollack | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2026-03-26T22:13:37+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/gina-pollack" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/gina-pollack/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/gina-pollack/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Gina Pollack</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why some couples are happier living apart]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/videos/483957/why-some-couples-are-happier-living-apart" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?post_type=vm_video_post&#038;p=483957</id>
			<updated>2026-03-26T18:13:37-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-03-26T18:05:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Video" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[For generations, we’ve been taught that if you want to move a relationship forward, you have to follow a specific set of steps: Meet someone, fall in love, and eventually, move in together. Because moving in is a signal that the relationship is serious. But a growing number of couples are opting out of that [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt=" A still from a video showing a man and woman on a split screen, each in front of their own house, with the words Love, Partnership, and Moving In forming a checklist. Moving In is crossed off. " data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/03/Retirement-LAT-03.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">For generations, we’ve been taught that if you want to move a relationship forward, you have to follow a specific set of steps: Meet someone, fall in love, and eventually, move in together. Because moving in is a signal that the relationship is <em>serious.</em></p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But a growing number of couples are opting out of that last step. Mike and Susan have been together for 23 years, but they’ve never lived together…and they don’t plan to.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">This arrangement has a name: “living apart together” (or LAT), and it’s more common than you might think. Between 2000 and 2019, the number of married couples living separately rose by more than 25 percent. And it’s particularly popular with couples later in life, generally people in their 50s or 60s who are retired.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So if sharing a home is the ultimate sign of love and commitment, why are some couples deciding not to do it at all? And is living together actually the best model for every relationship? Or is it just the one we’ve normalized?</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Read more about Living Apart Together:</p>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Vicki Larson’s book goes deeper into her personal story and includes more research on wider trends: <a href="https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/LATitude/Vicki-Larson/9781627783323"><em>LATitude: How You Can Make a Live Apart Together Relationship Work</em></a></li>



<li>Hear about the myths around living apart together: <a href="https://open.spotify.com/episode/6yCEt5n2Jo4Je9iBT9qBzI"><em>The Learn to Love Podcast, </em>“Living Apart Together With Vicki Larson”</a></li>



<li>This New York Times article goes deeper into why this trend is particularly appealing to people later in life: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/16/well/family/older-singles-living-apart-LAT.html">Older singles have found a new way to partner up: Living apart</a></li>



<li>The private “Apartners” facebook group for LAT couples that Mike and Susan mention in the video: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/1593324210932967">Apartners (Living Apart Together) | Facebook</a></li>



<li>A helpful article from AARP on how marriage is changing: <a href="https://www.aarp.org/family-relationships/midlife-marriage-love-it-leave-it-or-reinvent-it/">Midlife marriage: Love it, leave it, or reinvent it</a></li>



<li>A deeper dive published in Time on LAT relationships: <a href="https://time.com/7261972/living-apart-together-relationships-essay/">How living apart together is changing long-term relationships</a></li>
</ul>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>This video is presented by T-Mobile: Broadband. T-Mobile: Broadband doesn&#8217;t have a say in our editorial decisions, but they make videos like this one possible.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Gina Pollack</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Brazil vs. US: Two insurrections, different results]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/videos/480115/brazil-vs-us-two-insurrections-different-results" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/?post_type=vm_video_post&#038;p=480115</id>
			<updated>2026-02-26T15:03:34-05:00</updated>
			<published>2026-02-24T08:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Donald Trump" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Political Violence" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Video" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[On January 8, 2023, thousands of supporters of Brazil’s right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro stormed federal buildings in the country’s capital. Their goal? Overthrow the results of an election they claimed was rigged, despite no credible evidence of fraud.&#160; If that sounds familiar, that’s because it is. Brazil’s January 8 looked a lot like the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/Brazil-Thumbnail-02.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">On January 8, 2023, thousands of supporters of Brazil’s right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro stormed federal buildings in the country’s capital. Their goal? Overthrow the results of an election they claimed was rigged, despite no credible evidence of fraud.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">If that sounds familiar, that’s because it is. Brazil’s January 8 looked a lot like the January 6 attack on the US capital, just two years earlier: mob violence, an insurrection, and a defeated leader who refused to concede.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">But the aftermath could not be more different. Bolsonaro is serving a 27-year prison sentence, while Donald Trump is president, again. </p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">So how did two democracies, facing similar threats, end up with such different outcomes? This video explains how Brazil’s democratic system worked to hold “the Trump of the Tropics” accountable and what the United States could learn from the aftermath.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none">Read more about Brazil’s response:</p>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Vox correspondent Zack Beauchamp’s deep dive into what Brazil got right: <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/479290/brazil-democracy-trump-bolsonaro-multiparty">How one country stopped a Trump-style authoritarian in his tracks</a></li>
</ul>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The Brazilian Report breaks down the details of Bolsonaro’s coup plans: <a href="https://newsletters.brazilian.report/p/bolsonaro-coup-right-pistachio">Anatomy of a coup attempt</a></li>
</ul>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Carnegie Endowment’s podcast, <em>The World Unpacked</em>, breaks down the trial and conviction of former Bolsonaro: <a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/podcasts/the-world-unpacked/did-the-bolsonaro-trial-really-save-brazils-democracy">Did the Bolsonaro Trial Really Save Brazil&#8217;s Democracy?</a></li>
</ul>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The New Yorker’s excellent profile of Alexandre de Moraes includes a lot more detail on how the judge became an enemy of Trump and Elon Musk, in his mission to crack down on election misinformation: <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/04/14/the-brazilian-judge-taking-on-the-digital-far-right">The Brazilian judge Taking on the digital far right</a></li>
</ul>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A New York Times opinion piece, co-written by Filipe Campante, who is featured in the video: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/12/opinion/trump-bolsonaro-conviction-democracy.html">Brazil just succeeded where America failed</a></li>
</ul>

<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The Economist’s take on how countries recover from populism: <a href="https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/08/28/brazil-offers-america-a-lesson-in-democratic-maturity?">Brazil offers America a lesson in democratic maturity</a> </li>
</ul>

<p class="has-text-align-none">If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.</p>

<p class="has-text-align-none"><em>This story was supported by a grant from Protect Democracy. Vox had full discretion over the content of this reporting.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
