<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">John Jannarone | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2019-03-06T11:14:10+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/john-jannarone" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/john-jannarone/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/john-jannarone/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>John Jannarone</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Waiting for Alibaba IPO? Beware This Substitute.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/5/5/11626520/waiting-for-alibaba-ipo-beware-this-substitute" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/5/5/11626520/waiting-for-alibaba-ipo-beware-this-substitute</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T06:14:10-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-05-05T17:49:36-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="China" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[As the wait for Alibaba&#8217;s New York initial public offering drags on, some other high-flying Chinese technology companies are poised to get a U.S. listing first. Investors who consider owning such shares should be sure to read the fine print. Consider JD.com, which has filed a prospectus for its U.S. listing and may make its [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>As the wait for Alibaba&rsquo;s New York initial public offering drags on, some other high-flying Chinese technology companies are poised to get a U.S. listing first. Investors who consider owning such shares should be sure to read the fine print.</p>

<p>Consider JD.com, which has filed a prospectus for its U.S. listing and may make its debut in the coming weeks. JD has a few businesses, including an online marketplace that matches buyers and sellers, similar to Alibaba&rsquo;s main operations.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101643002">Read the rest of this post on the original site &raquo;</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>John Jannarone</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Tiger Cub Coatue to Return $2 Billion to Investors Amid Volatility]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/4/8/11625388/tiger-cub-coatue-to-return-2-billion-to-investors-amid-volatility" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/4/8/11625388/tiger-cub-coatue-to-return-2-billion-to-investors-amid-volatility</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T05:51:13-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-04-08T13:18:58-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Hedge fund Coatue Management plans to return more than $2 billion in capital to investors in its flagship fund on June 30 after extreme volatility in technology stocks led to a nine percent loss in March. &#8220;We are focused on returns and do not want to become asset gatherers,&#8221; Coatue founder Philippe Laffont wrote in [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>Hedge fund Coatue Management plans to return more than $2 billion in capital to investors in its flagship fund on June 30 after extreme volatility in technology stocks led to a nine percent loss in March.</p>

<p>&ldquo;We are focused on returns and do not want to become asset gatherers,&rdquo; Coatue founder Philippe Laffont wrote in an April 4 investor letter reviewed by CNBC. He added that the flagship fund&rsquo;s assets had grown from $1 billion to more than $7 billion in the past six years. &ldquo;We believe the right size for Flagship is $5 billion,&rdquo; he wrote.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101564158">Read the rest of this post on the original site &raquo;</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>John Jannarone</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Less Sirius Is More for John Malone]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/3/14/11624582/less-sirius-is-more-for-john-malone" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/3/14/11624582/less-sirius-is-more-for-john-malone</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T06:11:20-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-03-14T16:50:10-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Business &amp; Finance" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Media" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[As it turns out, Sirius XM Radio and Charter Communications don&#8217;t really belong together. John Malone&#8217;s Liberty Media said Thursday night it had pulled its tender offer to buy the 47 percent of satellite-radio operator Sirius it didn&#8217;t already own. It&#8217;s also creating a new tracking stock called Liberty Broadband to house its 27 percent [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>As it turns out, Sirius XM Radio and Charter Communications don&rsquo;t really belong together.</p>

<p>John Malone&rsquo;s Liberty Media said Thursday night it had pulled its tender offer to buy the 47 percent of satellite-radio operator Sirius it didn&rsquo;t already own. It&rsquo;s also creating a new tracking stock called Liberty Broadband to house its 27 percent stake in Charter, along with a few other assets.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101495394">Read the rest of this post on the original site &raquo;</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>John Jannarone</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Did Investors Miss the Message on the Value of BlackBerry&#8217;s BBM?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/2/20/11623726/did-investors-miss-the-message-on-the-value-of-blackberrys-bbm" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/2/20/11623726/did-investors-miss-the-message-on-the-value-of-blackberrys-bbm</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T05:48:51-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-02-20T11:07:07-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Facebook&#8217;s deal with WhatsApp has everyone talking about how much messages are really worth. So should investors consider picking up their BlackBerrys again? Facebook has agreed to pay up to $19 billion for fast-growing messenger service WhatsApp as part of a bid to command more of consumers&#8217; time on their mobile devices. The price equates [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>Facebook&rsquo;s deal with WhatsApp has everyone talking about how much messages are really worth. So should investors consider picking up their BlackBerrys again?</p>

<p>Facebook has agreed to pay up to $19 billion for fast-growing messenger service WhatsApp as part of a bid to command more of consumers&rsquo; time on their mobile devices. The price equates to an impressive $42 each for WhatsApp&rsquo;s roughly 450 million monthly active users.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101432399">Read the rest of this post on the original site &raquo;</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
