<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Josh Rosenblat | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2016-05-26T16:29:33+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/josh-rosenblat" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/josh-rosenblat/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/josh-rosenblat/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Josh Rosenblat</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Javier Zarracina</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The complex physics of that viral water bottle trick, explained]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/5/26/11785562/water-bottle-flip-physics" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/5/26/11785562/water-bottle-flip-physics</id>
			<updated>2016-05-26T12:29:33-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-05-26T14:40:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The viral video of a high school student flipping a water bottle so that it lands straight upright on a table has set the internet ablaze. With the pressure of his peers looking on, Michael Senatore, a senior at Ardrey Kell High School in Charlotte, North Carolina, flipped a third-full Deer Park water bottle through [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>The viral video of a high school student flipping a water bottle so that it lands straight upright on a table has set the internet ablaze.</p>

<p>With the pressure of his peers looking on, Michael Senatore, a senior at Ardrey Kell High School in Charlotte, North Carolina, flipped a third-full Deer Park water bottle through the air, landing it perfectly vertical on a table.</p>

<p>The theatrics, the focus, the precision, and the reaction of the audience help make this seemingly pedestrian feat extraordinary. But what really makes it special is the physics behind the now-famed flip &mdash; which are actually pretty complex.</p>

<p>&#8220;This is not your average undergraduate physics problem,&#8221; Nathaniel Stern, an assistant professor of physics and astronomy at Northwestern University, said. &#8220;It&#8217;s much more complicated.&#8221;</p>

<p>Stern and I spoke by phone this morning about Senatore&#8217;s feat. He explained to me that what separates a typical bottle toss from a perfect landing is just the right amount of water combined with a practiced and thought-through technique.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6553569/water-bottle4.0.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" /><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Angular momentum + fluid dynamics = AMAZING</h2>
<p>&#8220;The flip,&#8221; as it will henceforth be known, all begins with a flick of the wrist, generating a specific force called angular momentum, Stern said.</p>

<p>Angular momentum is very similar to the classical sense of momentum, where an object moving will not change its motion unless acted upon by another force. With angular momentum, the same concept is applied to rotation.</p>

<p>&#8220;If you just lob it, that&#8217;s not good enough,&#8221; Stern said. (At this point, I could hear a water bottle crashing against a table over the phone.) &#8220;He releases it from the cap, so that as he tosses it out of his hand the bottle already naturally wants to be spinning. If you toss it from the body, then you&#8217;re not imparting that same force that causes it to spin.&#8221;</p>

<p>Once Senatore gets the bottle spinning through the air, en route to its final destination, the water inside the bottle then needs to react to that angular momentum.</p>

<p>Liquids are unlike solids in that their molecules are able to move freely and independently from one another. That characteristic leads into another important concept, fluid dynamics &mdash; how the water moves inside the bottle.</p>
<p><q aria-hidden="true" class="right"><span class="q__inner"><span>&#8220;This is not your average undergraduate physics problem. It&#8217;s much more complicated.&#8221;</span></span></q></p>
<p>When the bottle is released, it pushes on the water and starts trying to transfer its angular momentum to the liquid, according to Stern. But the water has more mass than the bottle &mdash; and it doesn&#8217;t want to rotate because, as a fluid, it can slosh around unevenly the inside of the bottle. So as this angular momentum is transferred to the water, the rate of rotation slows down.</p>

<p>The water bottle will land squarely on the table when the angular rotation slows enough that the water is at the bottom of the bottle and the bottle itself is straight upright. Having that instance play out just before it hits the table takes careful timing and perhaps a little practice.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to execute &quot;the flip&quot;</h2>
<p>According to the Charlotte Observer, Senatore <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/weird/article79848532.html">has put a lot of work into perfecting his craft</a>. The 18-year-old said he practices when he gets bored at both school and work.</p>

<p>&#8220;All I wanted to do was flip a bottle,&#8221; Senatore said humbly.</p>

<p>But little did he know he would inspire many to recreate &#8220;the flip.&#8221;</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6551581"><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6551581/internet-famous-teen-michael-senatore-water-bottle.gif"></div>
<p>Here are some tips to make it happen, according to Stern:</p>

<p><strong>1) &#8220;I would find a water bottle and fill it to about a third.&#8221;</strong></p>

<p>This is vitally important. Stern says there is a &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; when it comes to filling up the water bottle. If there is too much water, spinning the bottle will be like spinning any solid object, because there is no room for the water to move around. Too little water means there will not be enough mass to slow down the angular momentum and make the bottle land consistently. Spinning the bottle just a third full allows it to spin easier and allows the water to adjust easier to the angular momentum because it can move around.</p>

<p><strong>2) &#8220;Make sure every time you throw, you throw it the same way, so you understand that if you want to change it a little bit, you know what you need to change.&#8221;</strong></p>

<p>&#8220;Consistency is key,&#8221; Stern said. This is a human trick after all, so while a machine may be able to accomplish &#8220;the flip&#8221; time after time, variations in how humans toss the bottle will greatly impact the result. Tossing the bottle too fast or slightly off axis could result in a fallen water bottle. Staying consistent allows tossers to pinpoint small, specific adjustments.</p>

<p><strong>3) &#8220;You have to impart spin.&#8221;</strong></p>

<p>Without the spin, the trick is nothing. The spin is essential for landing the bottle upright.</p>

<p>With those keys in mind, give &#8220;the flip&#8221; a shot. Just remember to make sure the cap is closed tightly.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Watch Vox try &quot;the flip&quot;, live on Facebook</h2><div data-show-text="false" data-width="1000" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/Vox/videos/vb.223649167822693/523562847831322/?type=3" class="fb-video"><div class="fb-xfbml-parse-ignore"><blockquote> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Vox/videos/523562847831322/">Flipping a water bottle, with physics.</a><p>Gravity, angular momentum and fluid dynamics all play a critical role in flipping a bottle of water to land upright.</p>Posted by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Vox/">Vox</a> on Thursday, May 26, 2016</blockquote></div></div>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Josh Rosenblat</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[These musicians stayed popular longest, according to 6 decades of Billboard chart data]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/5/24/11668386/adele-prince-taylor-swift-billboard" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/5/24/11668386/adele-prince-taylor-swift-billboard</id>
			<updated>2016-05-24T13:20:11-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-05-24T13:50:03-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Adele, the 28-year-old British pop star, overtook some of the top names in pop music this weekend &#8212; Drake, Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber, the Weeknd &#8212; taking the Top Artist award at Sunday&#8217;s Billboard Music Awards. Unlike other awards, the Billboard Awards are determined strictly by chart performance, rather than a vote from a guild, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Adele won Billboard&#039;s Top Artist award at Sunday night&#039;s awards show. | Photo by Pedro Gomes/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Photo by Pedro Gomes/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6539021/533286894.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Adele won Billboard's Top Artist award at Sunday night's awards show. | Photo by Pedro Gomes/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Adele, the 28-year-old British pop star, overtook some of the top names in pop music this weekend &mdash; Drake, Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber, the Weeknd &mdash; taking the Top Artist award at Sunday&#8217;s Billboard Music Awards.</p>

<p>Unlike other awards, the Billboard Awards are determined strictly by chart performance, rather than a vote from a guild, for example. And since she made her US chart debut in early 2009 with &#8220;Chasing Pavements,&#8221; Adele has stayed at or near the top of the music world.</p>

<p>But how long can it last?</p>

<p>To get a better idea of which musicians have had the most staying power, I analyzed the weeks between the top 50 Billboard artists&#8217; first and last &#8220;peak&#8221; in the Hot 100, with peaks referring to the date a song reached its highest point in the Hot 100.</p>

<p>I found that top artists can survive for upward of two decades &mdash; but that staying power varies significantly by genre and time period.</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6539729"><img data-chorus-asset-id="6540331" alt="musical lifespan final edit" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6540331/musical_lifespan-02.0.png"></div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Longevity in the music industry is fleeting, an aspect that impacts artists from different eras and genres differently</h2>
<p>The Hot 100 charts are a general measure of a song&#8217;s popularity. Starting in 1958, Billboard has published the charts each week, ranking singles on a shifting list of criteria. Right now the list is derived from radio airplay, sales, and streaming data. While not perfect, the Hot 100 gives an adequate picture of the most popular songs at any given moment and has adjusted its criteria over time to account for changes in how Americans listen to music.</p>

<p>So I took the top 50 artists from Billboard&#8217;s &#8220;Greatest of All Time&#8221; list and measured the length of time between their first peaks and most recent peaks to get a rough view of how long they stayed popular.</p>

<p>One thing that became immediately clear combing through the data is how greatly musical lifespans vary by genre. Rappers have the lowest average musical lifespan &mdash; 12.24 years &mdash; whereas those in R&amp;B and rock tend to stick around much longer.</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6539733"><img data-chorus-asset-id="6540351" alt="musical lifespan genre final edit" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6540351/lifespan_by_genre_500PX-500PX.0.png"></div>
<p>&#8220;In hip-hop, anything that&rsquo;s more than a couple years old starts to be kind of corny,&#8221; says Steven Hyden, author of <em>Your Favorite Band Is Killing Me</em>, a book on the history of pop music rivalries. &#8220;There&rsquo;s an expectation in that genre where you have to do something different all the time. That makes it really exciting, but also makes a lot of artists disposable.&#8221;</p>

<p>What that generates is a variety of artists making fewer hits over a shorter length of time.</p>

<p>But with R&amp;B and rock, for example, artists and bands such as Stevie Wonder, Prince, the Rolling Stones, and the Beatles have years of making hits for a large, consistent audience.</p>

<p>Stars from those genres, then, have become more and more entrenched in the ears of the music-listening public, to the point where almost anything they put out is classified as a &#8220;hit.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Producing hits isn’t the only standard of a long, successful music career</h2>
<p>Taylor Swift already has more weeks with singles in the Hot 100 than any other artist besides Madonna and Elton John. But a lot of that stems from her ability to release entire albums on streaming services that people use constantly, allowing more of her songs to reach the Hot 100 chart.</p>

<p>Streaming services make it easier for listeners to cycle through entire albums, Hyden said. For instance, Drake, who put out his album <em>Views</em> a matter of weeks ago, has 17 songs in <a href="http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100">this week&#8217;s Hot 100</a>. The album has 20 songs. The same phenomenon applies to Swift whenever she puts out a full-length album.</p>

<p>For Madonna and Elton John, though, the non-hit singles on their albums didn&#8217;t receive that streaming boost.</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6539735"><img data-chorus-asset-id="6540175" alt="musical lifespan by hits" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6540175/musician_length_vs_quantity_500PX-500PX.0.png"></div>
<p>&#8220;When people use the word relevant, they mean this person is hip or has some cachet with youth culture,&#8221; Hyden said. &#8220;If we&rsquo;re just talking success or popularity, there are lots of bands who do really well on the road that haven&rsquo;t had hits in decades.&#8221;</p>

<p>Specifically, Hyden mentioned the Grateful Dead, a band that produced songs totaling just 43 weeks on Hot 100 charts, yet toured and sold out huge shows from 1965 through 2015.</p>

<p>Even so, producing hits is often the only way bands and artists can stay relevant from a cultural and economic perspective.</p>

<p>Take Billy Joel, who hasn&rsquo;t produced a Hot 100 single since 1997. Yet he&rsquo;s touring throughout 2016.</p>

<p>Oftentimes, it&rsquo;s the hits that keep musicians relevant in the minds of popular culture, even if they were released decades prior.</p>

<p>&#8220;The power of a hit song, even if it&rsquo;s 20 years old, it&rsquo;s pretty powerful,&#8221; Hyden said. &#8220;It&rsquo;s amazing how people hang on to that shit for so long.&#8221;</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" /><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Watch: 11 songs you didn&#039;t know were Prince songs</h2><div class="video-container"><iframe src="https://volume.vox-cdn.com/embed/10c277db1?player_type=youtube&#038;loop=1&#038;placement=article&#038;tracking=article:rss" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" allow=""></iframe></div>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Josh Rosenblat</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The wealthier you get, the less social you are. Here’s why it matters.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/5/5/11578994/income-friends-family" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/5/5/11578994/income-friends-family</id>
			<updated>2016-05-05T14:59:11-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-05-05T15:30:03-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Social Policy" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Rich Americans aren&#8217;t only getting richer. They&#8217;re becoming more isolated from the rest of America, too. A recent analysis of survey data from more than 100,000 Americans finds that the rich spend significantly less time socializing than low-income Americans. On average, they spend 6.4 fewer evenings per year in social situations. Rich Americans spend less [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shutterstock.com/index-in.mhtml&quot;&gt;Shutterstock&lt;/a&gt;" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6444955/shutterstock_86214664.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Rich Americans aren&#8217;t only getting richer. They&#8217;re becoming more isolated from the rest of America, too.</p>

<p>A recent <a href="http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/04/06/1948550616641472.full">analysis</a> of survey data from more than 100,000 Americans finds that the rich spend significantly less time socializing than low-income Americans. On average, they spend 6.4 fewer evenings per year in social situations.</p>

<p>Rich Americans spend less time socializing with their family and neighbors &mdash; although they do spend more time socializing with friends.</p>

<p>The study is part of a growing body of research that suggests a yawning gap between what it means to be rich and poor in the United States.</p>

<p>For years, American society has become both more affluent and more stratified. Now this empirical evidence shows that for the rich it is becoming more exclusive, reflecting the phenomenon of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/business/economy/velvet-rope-economy.html?_r=1">&#8220;velvet rope economy&#8221;</a> and increasing <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/wonk/housing/charlotte/">economic segregation</a>.</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6444829"><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6444829/income%20and%20social%20worlds1.png"></div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Richer Americans aren&#039;t that into talking with you</h2>
<p>The paper&#8217;s co-authors &mdash; Emory University&#8217;s Emily Bianchi and the University of Minnesota&#8217;s Kathleen Vohs &mdash; analyzed results from the General Social Survey and American Time Use Survey. The studies controlled for a variety of variables in order to generate estimations of the specific impact household income has on people&#8217;s social connections. For example, the study controlled for differences in gender, race, marital status, geographic location, living arrangements, city size, and more.</p>

<p>In addition to looking at evenings spent socializing, the authors also examined how a typical day plays out for Americans at different income levels. They found that people with higher incomes spent an estimated 10 minutes more alone in a day, 22 minutes more with friends, and 26 minutes fewer with family than people with lower incomes.</p>

<p>To estimate the minutes per day, the authors counted low income as earning $12,340 and high income as $105,086. For their work on nights socializing in a year, they used $5,427 for low and $131,203 for high.</p>

<p>The paper reflects psychological findings about the social behavior of people with access to different levels of money, and demonstrates how they play out in the real world. For example, previous studies have shown <a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/20/1/99.short">wealthier people to be less interested in social interactions </a>and <a href="http://www.krauslab.com/Stellaretal.Emotion.2012.pdf">less compassionate than people with lower incomes</a>. These characteristics, the authors of the paper theorize, manifest themselves in people&#8217;s social tendencies.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rich Americans pay people to do the things neighbors and families used to</h2>
<p>A social network can be more crucial to the less affluent &mdash; whereas in the gig economy, richer Americans can pay for the work that friends and families used to provide.</p>

<p>Relatives and neighbors are more likely than friends to <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2781064.pdf?_=1462385744450">provide financial help, child care needs, or home repairs</a>, which &#8220;are likely to be crucial for managing existing and impending challenges.&#8221;</p>

<p>As an example, Bianchi mentioned home alarm systems. Before the technology became cheap enough for millions of Americans to afford them, it was more common to have neighbors look after your house when you left town.</p>

<p>Not anymore. As Bianchi points out, &#8220;That&#8217;s something you can pay for and never interact with your neighbor about that. But, again, only on certain economic levels.&#8221;</p>

<p>An Uber ride can replace a friend or family&#8217;s car for getting to the airport &mdash; and instead of borrowing a cup of sugar from a neighbor, TaskRabbit can now procure that same service at the tap of a screen.</p>

<p>&#8220;Now we can kind of, through money, pay for things that we used to rely on other people for,&#8221; Bianchi said. &#8220;As we become more affluent as a nation &mdash; as we have, and certainly not equally by any stretch &mdash; we do tend to pay for some of these things that we used to give and receive support on.&#8221;</p>

<p>Unlike friends, family and neighbors are driven less by choice and more by biology and geography. Friendships are based more on shared interests and values.</p>

<p>People in wealthier households relying less on family and neighbors for help in times of need may point to why more of their free time is spent with their chosen social circles. These relationships with friends, Bianchi said, could be more &#8220;satisfying.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why an isolated upper class matters for America</h2>
<p>Rising affluence, Bianchi suggested, has pushed forward &#8220;individualization&#8221; &mdash; an idea that political scientist Robert Putnam wrote about in his seminal work <em>Bowling Alone</em>, which began as a 1995 essay and turned into a book in 2000.</p>

<p>Putnam argues there that the individualization of leisure time is in part responsible for a decline in civic participation.</p>

<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve always been struck by the idea that we&#8217;ve become wealthier as a country and by many metrics less happy, less involved in our communities, and certainly interacting less,&#8221; she said. &#8220;That&#8217;s been a puzzle to many scholars and something that&#8217;s always captured my attention and interest. I see this as a small piece of understanding that.&#8221;</p>

<p>This increasing isolation is shown a number of ways. For instance, <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/30038995?seq=6#page_scan_tab_contents">Americans are talking less and with fewer people about &#8220;important matters.&#8221;</a> From 1985 to 2004, the percentage of Americans who said they had no one with whom to talk about &#8220;important matters&#8221; rose from 10 percent to 24.6 percent.</p>

<p>Further, voter turnout in the 2014 midterm elections (35.9 percent) was the <a href="http://www.electproject.org/national-1789-present">lowest of any midterm since 1940</a>.</p>

<p>But that&#8217;s not to say all of this is &#8220;bad.&#8221; And it&#8217;s not &#8220;good,&#8221; either. Rather, it&#8217;s different. This phenomenon, which doesn&#8217;t seem to be stopping anytime soon, will force Americans to interact in new, <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/04/25/civic-engagement-in-the-digital-age/">nontraditional</a> ways.</p>

<p>Sure, you may not lean over your white picket fence anymore to ask your neighbor what he or she thinks of Donald Trump. Today, your &#8220;friend&#8221; is more likely to rant about him online.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" /><h2 class="wp-block-heading">How wealth inequality is dangerous for America</h2><div class="video-container"><iframe src="https://volume.vox-cdn.com/embed/35dab5502?player_type=youtube&#038;loop=1&#038;placement=article&#038;tracking=article:rss" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" allow=""></iframe></div>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Josh Rosenblat</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[America doesn&#8217;t have a food problem. It has a hunger problem.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/4/29/11521610/hunger-food-insecurity-food-stamps" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/4/29/11521610/hunger-food-insecurity-food-stamps</id>
			<updated>2016-04-28T11:24:03-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-04-29T08:30:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Science" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[An estimated one in seven Americans faced inadequate or inconsistent access to food at some point in 2014. That figure has held pretty constant since the 2008 financial crisis, according to a Feeding America report released Thursday. &#8220;There&#8217;s plenty of food in America,&#8221; Feeding America CEO Diana Aviv said. &#8220;This is more about a transportation [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Food banks are struggling to curb America&#039;s food-insecurity problem. | Andrew Burton/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Andrew Burton/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6401473/498479356.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Food banks are struggling to curb America's food-insecurity problem. | Andrew Burton/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>An estimated one in seven Americans faced inadequate or inconsistent access to food at some point in 2014. That figure has held pretty constant since the 2008 financial crisis, according to a Feeding America report released Thursday.</p>

<p>&#8220;There&rsquo;s plenty of food in America,&#8221; Feeding America CEO Diana Aviv said. &#8220;This is more about a transportation problem, a distribution problem, a political will problem. It&rsquo;s not about lack of availability.&#8221;</p>

<p>Food insecurity &mdash; a household-level socioeconomic condition in which access to food can be limited or uncertain &mdash; did lower slightly to 15.4 percent nationally in 2014, though it is far from reaching its pre-2008 level of around 11 percent.</p>

<p>Feeding America, the nation&#8217;s largest hunger-related nonprofit, measured food insecurity at state, county, and congressional-district levels, providing a localized picture of the challenges facing millions of Americans.</p>

<p>For example, in the county with the lowest food-insecurity rate, Virginia&#8217;s Loudon County, just 4.3 percent of individuals are considered food-insecure. To contrast, 37.5 percent of people in Jefferson County, Mississippi, face food-security issues, the highest rate in the nation.</p>

<p>You can view information for your county via Feed America&#8217;s <a href="http://map.feedingamerica.org/county/2014/overall">interactive map</a>.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Food insecurity is everywhere — but on the rise in big cities</h2>
<p>Geographically, food insecurity is present everywhere in the US, but states and counties in the South tend to have the highest rates of food insecurity, the report indicates. Of the counties in the top 10 percent of food insecurity, 90 percent of them are located in the South.</p>
<p><!-- (function() { var l = function() { new pym.Parent( 'vox-food-insecurity-by-state__graphic', '//apps.voxmedia.com/at/vox-food-insecurity-by-state/'); }; if(typeof(pym) === 'undefined') { var h = document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0], s = document.createElement('script'); s.type = 'text/javascript'; s.src = 'https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pym/0.4.5/pym.js'; s.onload = l; h.appendChild(s); } else { l(); } })();// --></p><div id="vox-food-insecurity-by-state__graphic" data-analytics-label="vox-food-insecurity-by-state:2167" data-analytics-viewport="autotune"></div>
<p>Food-insecurity rates in large urban areas, meanwhile, have increased. In 2013, the food-insecurity rate across metropolitan counties was at 22 percent. In 2014, it climbed to 26 percent.</p>

<p>One of the reasons for this increase could be due to food prices. Metropolitan counties account for 37 percent of all US counties, but make up 54 percent of the 331 highest priced counties for food.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6409359/food_insecure_counties2_500PX-500PX.0.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="foodinsecurity" title="foodinsecurity" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Josh Rosenblat and Javier Zarracina / Vox" />
<p>Counties with a high food-insecurity rate have higher unemployment and poverty rates and lower homeownership rates and incomes than the average of all US counties.</p>

<p>People and households struggling with food insecurity face a multitude of unique problems, Aviv said, and food purchases are often the &#8220;first thing that goes.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Food banks are struggling to curb the problem</h2>
<p>There&#8217;s no silver bullet to fix America&#8217;s food-insecurity problem. Feeding America runs more than 200 food banks nationwide, and in her visits to these banks over the last few months, Aviv has seen firsthand the issues that food banks face.</p>

<p>Food banks serve as hubs and storage facilities, portioning out food and distributing it to local communities. These banks and pantries are often only open during work hours and lack proper accessibility for the people who need their services most.</p>

<p>&#8220;Our lines [for food] are getting longer and longer. It pushes us not only to provide more food but to ask fundamental questions about how we shorten this line,&#8221; Aviv said.</p>

<p>Feeding America is trying to streamline all the functions of food banks and pantries &mdash; donation, collection, stocking, access, and distribution &mdash; into an organized system so that individuals are better able to receive the food they need, when they need it.</p>

<p>For example, some food banks and pantries have set up offices for people to sign up for government assistance programs while they&#8217;re picking up food.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Government assistance programs aren&#039;t helping as many people as they could</h2>
<p>Many food-insecure Americans aren&#8217;t using &mdash; or aren&#8217;t eligible for &mdash; government programs meant to combat hunger.</p>

<p>About a quarter of food-insecure Americans are ineligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), better known as <a href="http://www.vox.com/2015/6/26/8845881/food-stamps">food stamps</a>.</p>

<p>Even among those who qualify, participation rates tend to be low. A <a href="http://www.hamiltonproject.org/papers/twelve_facts_about_food_insecurity_and_snap">recent Hamilton Project</a> report finds that about 56 percent<strong> </strong>of those eligible for food stamps don&#8217;t receive the benefits.</p>

<p>In recent years, Congress has also <a href="http://www.vox.com/2014/9/3/6102765/last-year-millions-of-americans-were-hungry-then-congress-cut-food">made cuts</a> to these programs.</p>

<p>In March, the House of Representatives&#8217;s 2017 budget <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/house-2017-budget-plan-would-slash-snap-by-more-than-150-billion-over-ten">proposed</a> cutting funding for food stamps by more than 20 percent by 2026.</p>

<p>&#8220;It&rsquo;s not an ephemeral question. It&rsquo;s not an academic question. It&rsquo;s a question of people and hungry children who, instead of being hungry for learning, are hungry for food,&#8221; Aviv said. &#8220;The pressure and urgency makes me feel like we have no time to lose.&#8221;</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Josh Rosenblat</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cleveland is spending $20 million in federal money on riot and security gear for the Republican convention]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/4/13/11387910/cleveland-republican-convention-security" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/4/13/11387910/cleveland-republican-convention-security</id>
			<updated>2016-04-13T10:44:00-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-04-13T11:10:04-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Criminal Justice" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[As Cleveland prepares to host the Republican National Convention this summer, it&#8217;s bidding on millions of dollars of security equipment and tactical gear for its police. Cleveland and Philadelphia, which will host the Democratic convention, each received $50 million in federal money to cover the security costs associated with the conventions. Cleveland projects to spend [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Scenes like this one at a rally for Donald Trump have become more and more commonplace during the presidential primaries. | Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6322015/514965604.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Scenes like this one at a rally for Donald Trump have become more and more commonplace during the presidential primaries. | Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>As Cleveland prepares to host the Republican National Convention this summer, it&#8217;s bidding on millions of dollars of security equipment and tactical gear for its police.</p>

<p>Cleveland and Philadelphia, which will host the Democratic convention, each received $50 million in federal money to cover the security costs associated with the conventions. Cleveland <a href="https://www.scribd.com/doc/299085823/Cleveland-City-Council-Retreat-2016-Est-City-Budget-02-12-2016">projects to spend $20 million</a> of that on security equipment and supplies and $30 million on &#8220;personnel-related expenditures.&#8221; Philadelphia has not yet announced how it will use the money.</p>

<p>In March, Cleveland opened its bids for various security supplies. And the sheer quantity of equipment is staggering.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cleveland will buy thousands of sets of crowd control equipment</h2><div data-chorus-asset-id="6330603"><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6330603/police%20square2-01.png"></div>
<p>Based on public <a href="http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/node/7338">documents</a>, Cleveland is asking for a wide range of things from hay for police horses to riot gear, both of which aren&rsquo;t out of the norm for a city hosting a political convention.</p>

<p>For example, Tampa spent about $13 million on security-related equipment and supplies for the 2012 Republican convention, according to a Department of Justice <a href="https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/g4014003.pdf">audit</a>.</p>

<p>While there were <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/undercover-officers-infiltrated-took-over-tampa-protest-groups-before-2012/2239836">protests</a> in Tampa, they were relatively <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/08/27/minimal-protests-at-republican-national-convention">small</a>. The city focused its spending more on improving the police department&rsquo;s infrastructure than on police gear. It spent the bulk of the money on surveillance cameras and communications equipment.</p>

<p>Cleveland, though, has taken a different approach.</p>

<p>The city estimates it will spend about 40 percent of its federal grant, or about $7 million more than Tampa, on equipment and supplies.</p>

<p>This includes plans to buy 2,000 sets of full-body riot suits for police. (The city currently employs 1,500 police and will look to add about 3,500 from units based in other places.)</p>

<p>Cleveland has also put out bids for, among other things, 24 sets of ballistic body armor, 300 patrol bikes, and more than 3.7 miles of interlocking steel barriers, all of which can be used to curtail protestors.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Republican convention might have an especially contentious atmosphere</h2>
<p>Groups protesting the Republican Party are expected to show up, much as they have at every RNC. However, this year&#8217;s inflammatory campaign rhetoric and a potentially rare contested convention could make for bigger and more violent protests than in recent years.</p>

<p>Already during primaries this year, <a href="http://www.vox.com/2016/3/11/11208228/trump-rally-violence">violent protests</a> have broken out at campaign stops across the country, most notably at <a href="http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11219256/trump-violent">rallies</a> for Republican frontrunner Donald Trump.</p>
<div class="video-container"><iframe src="https://volume.vox-cdn.com/embed/808203a1b?player_type=youtube&#038;loop=1&#038;placement=article&#038;tracking=article:rss" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" allow=""></iframe></div>
<p>Trump&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/3/12/11211898/donald-trumps-ideology-of-violence">repeated allusions to violence</a> during his speeches and controversial platform have spurred protests and physical confrontation between his supporters, his critics, and law enforcement.</p>

<p>Trump currently maintains a delegate lead but may come up short of the necessary 1,237 delegates to win the GOP nod outright. If that happens, it would<strong> </strong>lead to a rare contested or brokered convention.</p>

<p>In this <a href="http://www.vox.com/2016/3/23/11280032/brokered-convention-explained">scenario</a>, most convention delegates would be free to vote for whomever they want, voting in successive rounds until one candidate earns an outright majority.</p>

<p>That could mean that even if Trump goes into July with a commanding delegate lead, he may not get the party&#8217;s nomination in Cleveland.</p>

<p>And that startling discrepancy between who people voted for in primaries and what the Republican Party ends up doing could lead to some serious unrest.</p>

<p>&#8220;I think you&#8217;d have riots,&#8221; Trump <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/16/politics/donald-trump-ted-cruz-brokered-convention/">said</a> on CNN in March about what would happen if he were denied the nomination despite a lead in delegates.</p>

<p>Fellow Republican candidate Ted Cruz has echoed Trump&rsquo;s sentiment about a brokered convention, telling CNN he thinks it &#8220;would be an absolute disaster. I think the people would quite rightly revolt.&#8221;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Can Cleveland handle convention protests?</h2><div data-chorus-asset-id="6324743"> <img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6324743/451875448.jpg"><div class="caption">Cleveland will host the Republican convention at Quicken Loans Arena.</div> </div>
<p>While Cleveland public safety officials <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/rnc-2016/index.ssf/2016/04/cleveland_is_catching_flak_ove.html">say they&#8217;re confident</a> the city and police will keep the events secure, others aren&rsquo;t so sure.</p>

<p>For instance, the president of Cleveland&rsquo;s police union, Steve Loomis, told <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/rnc-2016/index.ssf/2016/04/cleveland_is_catching_flak_ove.html">Cleveland.com</a> that officers have begun crowd control training but do not have the riot gear they need to train properly. He also said he has concerns about whether the suits &mdash; which may take 90 days to prepare and send to Cleveland &mdash; will be ready in time. The convention is just 96 days away.</p>

<p>Training is essential because it &#8220;does a lot more than just tell people how to safely use the equipment. It teaches them when and how to responsibly bring that gear into tense situations,&#8221; Vox&#8217;s Amanda Taub wrote in 2014 about <a href="http://www.vox.com/2014/8/14/6003239/police-militarization-in-ferguson">police use of military equipment</a>.</p>

<p>While the riot suits are not officially classified as military gear, they will still be new to most of the cops wearing them.</p>

<p>In part because of that, many lack confidence in the city&rsquo;s ability to carry out the convention without controversy.</p>

<p>The Cleveland Police Department is <a href="http://www.vox.com/2014/12/4/7335777/justice-department-cleveland-police">currently under Justice Department oversight</a> after a 2013 <a href="https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2014/12/04/cleveland_division_of_police_findings_letter.pdf">DOJ probe</a> revealed numerous problems, including unnecessary and violent confrontations with citizens.</p>

<p>&#8220;They will be facing one of the most complex incidents that they will ever face,&#8221; Jonathan Smith, a former Justice Department lawyer who supervised the investigation into Cleveland, <a href="https://www.themarshallproject.org/2016/04/05/can-the-troubled-cleveland-police-handle-a-volatile-republican-convention#.q8oGEc3AT">told</a> the Marshall Project in reference to the convention. &#8220;You would want a department that has systems that are in place where there is better accountability and better supervision.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;I&rsquo;m really concerned all hell is going to break loose,&#8221; James L. Hardiman, a vice president of the Cleveland NAACP, <a href="http://www.apple.com/">told</a> the Los Angeles Times. &#8220;The big concern is injury to people, damage to property, indiscriminate arrest. The people who actually live here &mdash; what are we going to be left with at the end of the day?&#8221;</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" /><h2 class="wp-block-heading">How much do conservatives hate Trump?</h2><div class="video-container"><iframe src="https://volume.vox-cdn.com/embed/808203a1b?player_type=youtube&#038;loop=1&#038;placement=article&#038;tracking=article:rss" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" allow=""></iframe><p>Cleveland will host the Republican convention at Quicken Loans Arena.</p></div>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Josh Rosenblat</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How a public trust fund helps Texas cities host the NCAA Final Four]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/4/2/11347208/ncaa-final-four-houston-2016-march-madness" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/4/2/11347208/ncaa-final-four-houston-2016-march-madness</id>
			<updated>2016-04-01T15:32:57-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-04-02T06:00:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Cities &amp; Urbanism" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Sports" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Everything is bigger in Texas &#8212; even the sporting events. It&#8217;s no coincidence that this year&#8217;s Final Four tournament is held in Houston; the state has, since the passage of a 2003 statute, aggressively courted major events using public funds. It even set up a trust fund that cities can tap into when they want [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6276699/518566484.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Everything is bigger in Texas &mdash; even the sporting events.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s no coincidence that this year&#8217;s Final Four tournament is held in Houston; the state has, since the passage of a 2003 statute, aggressively courted major events using public funds. It even set up a trust fund that cities can tap into when they want to host a large event. Houston has put <a href="http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/texas/article/Texas-pays-2-7M-for-WWE-s-WrestleMania-32-6691717.php">$8.4 million</a> from it toward this weekend&#8217;s NCAA men&#8217;s basketball national semifinals and championship.</p>

<p>What Texas does is an anomaly, as many <a href="http://www.indystar.com/story/news/2015/04/01/much-cost-final-four-indy/70806958/">cities opt for tax hikes</a> to raise their own funds for large events. And spending this public money is controversial among economists, who see it as an unwise use of taxpayer dollars. But it does mean that a disproportionate number of NCAA men&#8217;s basketball championships now happen in the Lone Star State.</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6275393"> <img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6277037/final_four_locations_map2_FINAL.0.jpg" alt="Final Four locations from 2004 to 2021" data-chorus-asset-id="6277037"><p class="caption">Texas will host a third of the NCAA Men&#8217;s Final Fours between 2004 and 2021, in large part because of a public trust fund cities can use to help finance the events.</p> </div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Texas has hosted more recent Final Fours than anywhere else</h2>
<p>Texas cities hosted just two NCAA Final Fours between 1985 and 2004.</p>

<p>But in 2003, the state <a href="https://fmx.cpa.state.tx.us/fm/statewise/archive/rules_attraction_10.php">tried out a novel financial strategy</a> for cities to use public funds to attract and finance sporting events. It became <a href="http://www.sao.texas.gov/reports/report.aspx?reportnumber=16-001">the only state</a> to set up public trust funds for its cities to use to attract major events.</p>

<p>Using public money to pay for sports stadiums and major events like the Olympics isn&rsquo;t new. But Texas does something different: It lets cities apply to use a pot of money that the state maintains, in order to host a big event.</p>

<p>The Major Events Trust Fund, as it&#8217;s called, is different from other programs because it sets aside a portion of state money for the cities to use to cover the costs of hosting huge events. Other cities might have to raise taxes or find other ways to pay for the events, while cities in Texas can receive enormous sums of money without having to do so.</p>

<p>Texas maintains a list of events that these funds can be put toward, which includes everything from the NCAA Tournament to a World Cup soccer game, Elite Rodeo Association world championship, or the X Games.</p>

<p>In essence, when San Antonio hosted the Final Four in 2004, it was able to commit millions in automatic public support simply by submitting an application to the state. Between 2004 and 2018, Texas will host one in three NCAA Final Four tournaments, along with numerous other major events including Super Bowls, NBA All-Star games, and other competitions.</p>

<p>A handful of other states have followed in Texas&#8217;s footsteps. Louisiana, Florida, Indiana, and Missouri <a href="http://www.sao.texas.gov/reports/report.aspx?reportnumber=16-001">all have grant and other smaller funding programs available</a> to cities and organizing committees for attracting major sports events, according to a 2015 report by the Texas State Auditor&rsquo;s Office. Only three of the Final Four&#8217;s host cities since 2004 have not been located in these states.</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6276725"> <img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6276725/518440084.jpg"><div class="caption">Villanova, Oklahoma, North Carolina, and Syracuse will play in the national semifinals Saturday night, with the winners meeting in Monday evening&#8217;s championship game.</div> </div><h2 class="wp-block-heading">Is spending all that public money worth it?</h2>
<p>One reason Texas invests so much money into attracting these events &mdash; and why other states have followed in its footsteps &mdash; is that Texas thinks it will end up earning back significantly more than it spends.</p>

<p>Houston <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/morning_call/2016/02/heres-the-one-trick-to-becoming-a-final-four-host.html">has projected</a> an estimated $300 million in overall economic impact from about 70,000 out-of-town visitors spending time in Houston over the course of the week.</p>

<p>Economists tend to be skeptical of those types of numbers. Craig Depken, an economist based at the University of North Carolina in Charlotte who has studied the economic impact of numerous sporting events, including Final Fours and those located in Texas, <a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/news/special-reports/more-public-money-used-to-attract-big-events-to--1/nRtt2/">told</a> the Austin Statesman in 2012 that the forecasts often promise 10 times the actual net economic benefit.</p>

<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve read hundreds of these things,&#8221; Depken <a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/news/special-reports/more-public-money-used-to-attract-big-events-to--1/nRtt2/">said</a>. &#8220;And I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen one that wouldn&#8217;t be panned by economists. They are all very rosy projections.&#8221;</p>

<p>The two big reasons for the overestimation: The projections often assume all the generated revenue will stay in the city, according to economists Victor A. Matheson and Robert A. Baade. Their <a href="http://www.nku.edu/~lipping/PHE385/ncaa.pdf">study</a> tracked the economic gains and losses for host cities of both the NCAA men&rsquo;s and women&rsquo;s Final Fours. Over the course of their research (1970 through 1999 for the men and 1982 through 1999 for the women) the economists found no substantial gains in economic growth for the host cities.</p>

<p>Big sporting events definitely do drive up the cost of hotel rooms and increase demand at restaurants and bars. But it&#8217;s not clear that the revenue stays in the city. If a hotel in Houston, for example, has huge profits from this weekend, it might just send that money right back to its corporate parent organization. Economists are skeptical that the money gets recycled back into the economy.</p>

<p>What&#8217;s more, sporting events can drive out local consumers for the weekend. It would presumably be a mess to try to go out in a bar near the NCAA tournament this weekend.</p>

<p>But Houston doesn&#8217;t actually have to worry too much about this, since the state gives it millions to pay for the events. That probably helps explain why the city is already planning for another big sporting event: In February, it will host Super Bowl LI.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
