<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Marc Gunther | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2021-12-20T22:00:00+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/marc-gunther" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/marc-gunther/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/marc-gunther/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Marc Gunther</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why the future of animal welfare lies beyond the West]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2021/11/26/22772693/animal-rights-welfare-movement-global-factory-farming" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2021/11/26/22772693/animal-rights-welfare-movement-global-factory-farming</id>
			<updated>2021-12-20T17:00:00-05:00</updated>
			<published>2021-11-26T08:30:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Future Perfect" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="The Future of Meat" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The fight to end factory farming has long been vexed by a disconnect: While experts estimate that 6 percent of the world&#8217;s farm animals are located in the US and Europe, advocacy groups in those regions collect the lion&#8217;s share of funding. Last year, about $200 million went into the farmed animal advocacy movement, according [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="A woman holds a sign that reads in Spanish “Ecocide” as animal rights activists march against a proposed deal with China to build large pork farms in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on August 31, 2020. | Natacha Pisarenko/AP" data-portal-copyright="Natacha Pisarenko/AP" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23006037/AP20244827327571.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A woman holds a sign that reads in Spanish “Ecocide” as animal rights activists march against a proposed deal with China to build large pork farms in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on August 31, 2020. | Natacha Pisarenko/AP	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The fight to end factory farming has long been vexed by a disconnect: While experts estimate that 6 percent of the world&rsquo;s farm animals are located in the US and Europe, advocacy groups in those regions collect the lion&rsquo;s share of funding.</p>

<p>Last year, about $200 million went into the farmed animal advocacy movement, according to a survey of several hundred nonprofits conducted by Farmed Animal Funders. Only about one-fifth of that reached activists in countries outside the US and EU, where the vast majority of animals are farmed.&nbsp;</p>

<p>This misallocation of resources comes against a backdrop of worrisome trends. Meat consumption is <a href="https://faunalytics.org/global-animal-slaughter-statistics-and-charts-2020-update/">rising in the developing world</a>, particularly in Asia.&nbsp;Intensive farming practices are becoming the norm in Latin America and Asia, and they are getting a foothold in Africa as well. According to <a href="https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/global-animal-farming-estimates">one estimate</a>, nine out of 10 animals raised for food globally are confined&nbsp;in factory farms.</p>
<div class="wp-block-vox-media-highlight vox-media-highlight"><h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="http://vox.com/meatless-newsletter"><strong>Sign up for the Meat/Less newsletter course</strong></a></h2>
<p>Want to eat less meat but don&rsquo;t know where to start? <a href="http://vox.com/meatless-newsletter">Sign up</a> for Vox&rsquo;s Meat/Less newsletter course. We&rsquo;ll send you five emails &mdash; one per week &mdash; full of practical tips and food for thought to incorporate more plant-based food into your diet.</p>
</div>
<p>The animal rights movement is responding &mdash; and not a moment too soon. From S&atilde;o Paulo to Shanghai, local organizations focused on animal protection are growing fast. Meanwhile, nonprofits that once worked only in the US, including <a href="https://mercyforanimals.org/">Mercy For Animals</a> and <a href="https://thehumaneleague.org/">the Humane League</a>, now have staff in Brazil, Mexico, India, and Japan.</p>

<p>Institutional funders are supporting advocacy and public awareness campaigns across Latin America and Asia. &ldquo;We&rsquo;ve shifted funding to the Global South,&rdquo; says Amanda Hungerford, a program officer at Open Philanthropy, the world&rsquo;s biggest funder of farm animal advocacy. She expects that trend to continue. Kieran Greig, a manager of the <a href="https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/animal-welfare">EA Animal Welfare Fund</a>, says by email: &ldquo;Our grantmaking to the global south has increased significantly in these past five or so years. I am optimistic that the percentage of giving to the global south will continue to increase steadily.&rdquo;</p>

<p>These early efforts have led to some gains. For instance, the <a href="https://openwingalliance.org/">Open Wing Alliance</a>, a global but decentralized network that was incubated by the Humane League, has brought together 79 organizations from 63 countries, most in the Global South, to campaign against <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22331708/eggs-cages-chickens-hens-meat-poultry">battery cages for egg-laying hens</a>, considered one of the cruelest factory farming practices. It <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wF_5T9u-rBA79ehMtrt3PUFPF6P920wy/view">reported</a> earlier this year that more than 2,000 companies around the world have adopted cage-free egg policies, and that 85 percent of companies that pledged to use cage-free eggs by 2020 or earlier have done so.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;We can put pressure on the company at the global headquarters and rally our partners to pressure regional branches and outlets,&rdquo; says Alexandria Beck, the alliance&rsquo;s director.</p>

<p>Carolina Galvani founded <a href="https://www.sinergiaanimalinternational.org/">Sinergia Animal</a> in 2017 to focus on farm animal welfare issues in Brazil, after spending a decade working for US- and UK-based advocacy groups. &ldquo;Parts of the Global South were being ignored,&rdquo; she explains.</p>

<p>At first, she was its only paid employee. Today, Sinergia Animal has more than 30 full-time staff members, an annual budget of $850,000, and operations in six South American countries, as well as in Thailand and Indonesia. &ldquo;If we want to see a truly global movement, we need to have strong organizations originating and working in the south,&rdquo; Galvani says.&nbsp;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23005954/GettyImages_1157638888.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Animal activists organized by Sinergia Animal protest the use of cages for chickens in the egg production industry in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in July 2019. | Carol Smiljan/NurPhoto via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Carol Smiljan/NurPhoto via Getty Images" />
<p>But the scale of the challenge facing animal welfare advocates is daunting, and the movement faces new obstacles as it expands around the world. It&rsquo;s difficult to identify startup organizations or leaders to fund, donors say. Meat consumption remains a marker of economic well-being in many places. Western donors and activists can&rsquo;t assume that tactics that worked in the West &mdash; investigations of factory farms, say, or street-level protests &mdash; can simply be exported everywhere else, and have to be mindful to defer to locals on strategy, so as not to violate cultural norms and laws.</p>

<p>By far the steepest challenges are in China. China farms more animals than any other country. Altogether, China consumes <a href="https://eu.boell.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/MeatAtlas2021_final_web.pdf?dimension1=ecology">almost one-third</a> of the world&rsquo;s meat, although its per capita consumption is still less than half that of the US. Yet the animal advocacy community there is small, and groups in China play by strict rules set by the government.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Second to China in terms of its farmed animal population is India. There, strong laws prohibiting animal cruelty are rarely enforced. Despite the country being home to more vegetarians than any other country, <a href="https://www.fao.org/3/Y4252E/y4252e05c.htm">meat and dairy consumption</a> are on the rise.</p>

<p>The question now is whether the animal advocacy movement can build on its progress in rich countries, even as it seeks to expand to the Global South. It has won meaningful victories, including an EU ban on battery cages for egg-laying hens and a slew of corporate animal welfare commitments in the US, and it has helped power the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/5/28/18626859/meatless-meat-explained-vegan-impossible-burger">growth of plant-based alternatives</a> to milk and meat.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Even so, huge problems remain in the West, notably the misery suffered by the billions of <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21437054/chickens-factory-farming-animal-cruelty-welfare">chickens raised for meat</a> every year. Funding is not just limited but meager: The estimated $200 million a year spent on farm animal welfare is a fraction of the amount devoted to more popular causes, like climate change. Donors and activists will have to decide where to allocate their money, their time, and especially their creativity. New thinking will be required to build a robust animal welfare movement in countries where hundreds of millions of people live without electricity or suffer from malnutrition.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the animal protection movement went global</h2>
<p>In January 2021, Mercy For Animals launched the <a href="https://data.mercyforanimals.org/">Farmed Animal Opportunity Index</a> (FAOI), a tool designed to guide the organization&rsquo;s international expansion. US- and EU-based nonprofits have been expanding their operations in the Global South in recent years, but they had sometimes done so in an ad hoc manner.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The FAOI brings rigor to the process. Using publicly available data, Mercy For Animals&rsquo; index ranks what it has identified as the 60 countries that are most important to farm animal welfare. (China tops the list, with the US close behind. Latvia is No. 60.)&nbsp;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23040562/FAOI_CARDS_slab_3.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Christina Animashaun/Vox" />
<p>Like many nonprofits and donors that work on behalf of farm animals, the FAOI is shaped by the principles of <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/15/17924288/future-perfect-explained">effective altruism</a>, a philosophy and social movement that uses reason and evidence to do the most possible good. To allocate resources to solve problems, many effective altruists rely on a framework that looks at a problem&rsquo;s scale, tractability, and neglectedness.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The FAOI ranks countries based on scale (how many farmed land animals and fish are raised there) and tractability<em> </em>(the likelihood of success).&nbsp;It leaves out neglectedness, the third pillar, because it is too hard to quantify. Instead, the index seeks to measure global influence, meaning the degree to which one country affects others.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;Global influence plays an important role,&rdquo; says Lucas Alvarenga, Mercy For Animals&rsquo; senior vice president for strategy, which is why the dollars do not simply match up with the number of animals in each country. The US, Germany, and the Netherlands top the rankings of influencers because progress in those countries has consequences beyond their borders, through trade agreements, corporate animal welfare commitments, and global media. (In case you&rsquo;re wondering, the Netherlands is by some <a href="https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/animal-products/reporter/nld">metrics</a> the world&rsquo;s second-largest exporter of agricultural products.) Alvarenga is careful to say that the index, which has been shared widely in the movement, is designed as a starting point for analysis and not as a decision-making tool.</p>

<p>Europe, <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22698265/europe-cage-ban-animal-welfare-eggs-pork-united-states">by most accounts,</a> has been a pioneer in <a href="https://us14.campaign-archive.com/?u=66df320da8400b581cbc1b539&amp;id=cba67f210d">animal welfare reforms</a>. The EU&rsquo;s directive to eliminate conventional battery cages, for example, which was enacted in 1999, laid the groundwork for the global movement to free egg-laying hens from cages. California voters enacted a ballot measure to phase out battery cages in 2008, after which dozens of big food companies <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22576044/prop-12-california-eggs-pork-bacon-veal-animal-welfare-law-gestation-crates-battery-cages">made commitments to source cage-free eggs</a>. David Coman-Hidy, president of the Humane League, says, &ldquo;What happened on cage-free in the US probably would not have happened had the EU not acted years earlier.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>Looking to take the cage-free momentum everywhere, the Humane League started the Open Wing Alliance in 2016, around the same time other organizations and funders began to take a more global approach.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Open Wing&rsquo;s focus is cage-free campaigns, both because of the number of animals affected and because the demand to liberate hens from cages is easy to explain, even in countries where animal protection issues are new.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;You can get people to empathize,&rdquo; the alliance&rsquo;s Alexandria Beck says. &ldquo;They wouldn&rsquo;t want to be fenced into a small space. They don&rsquo;t want chickens confined in a small cage either.&rdquo;</p>

<p>This fall, Yum Brands, the world&rsquo;s largest fast food company, which owns KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell, pledged to <a href="https://thehumaneleague.org/article/yum-cage-free">eliminate battery cages</a> in its entire global supply chain after Open Wing members staged street protests in Eastern Europe, Russia, Indonesia, and Nigeria (along with the usual petitions and social media campaigns).&nbsp;</p>

<p>One country that has drawn a lot of attention from US- and EU-based animal rights advocates &mdash; and where some notable progress has been made &mdash; is Brazil, one of the world&rsquo;s largest producers and exporters of livestock.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Animal Equality, the Good Food Institute, Humane Society International, Mercy For Animals, and World Animal Protection all have operations in Brazil, engaging in a broad range of activities &mdash; public awareness work, vegan advocacy, celebrity engagement, undercover investigations, corporate campaigns, and support for developing plant-based and <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/12/2/22125518/lab-grown-chicken-meat-singapore-bioreactor-approve">cell-based meat</a>.</p>

<p>Brazil&rsquo;s food industry has responded. S&atilde;o Paulo-based JBS, which is by far the <a href="https://eu.boell.org/en/2021/09/07/companies-dominating-market-farm-display-case?dimension1=ecology">world&rsquo;s largest meat company</a>, <a href="https://www.meatpoultry.com/articles/17013-jbs-commits-to-cage-free-eggs-in-brazil">pledged</a> in 2017 to source exclusively cage-free eggs by 2020; it missed that target date but has made meaningful progress, activists say. Meanwhile, BRF, Brazil&rsquo;s largest producer and exporter of chickens, has <a href="https://www.poultryworld.net/Eggs/Articles/2020/9/BRF-switches-to-cage-free-eggs-636292E/">fulfilled a pledge</a> to source cage-free eggs for its processed foods.&nbsp;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23038215/PSX_20190922_134720_1020x680.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Members of Mercy For Animals in Brazil protest deforestation for cattle grazing in the Amazon rainforest. | Courtesy of Mercy For Animals" data-portal-copyright="Courtesy of Mercy For Animals" />
<p>Humane Society International (HSI) works with school districts in Brazil to shift from meat to plant-based food in 20 percent of their meals. &ldquo;I was surprised at the number of schools that were interested,&rdquo; says Julie Janovsky, vice president for farm animal welfare at HSI.</p>

<p>Sinergia Animal has moved beyond cage-free campaigns to push <a href="https://www.change.org/p/brf-tire-os-animais-desse-sofrimento-e-preserve-a-sa%C3%BAde-das-pessoas?use_react=false&amp;v2=false&amp;redirect_reason=can_edit">BRF</a> to improve its welfare practices for pigs and <a href="https://www.change.org/p/nestl%C3%A9-diga-n%C3%A3o-%C3%A0-crueldade-animal-e-n%C3%A3o-coloque-as-pessoas-em-risco?use_react=false&amp;v2=false&amp;redirect_reason=can_edit">Nestl&eacute;</a> to improve the treatment of dairy cows in its supply chain. Other groups working on farm animals include <a href="https://alianima.org/en/">Alianima</a> and <a href="https://forumanimal.org/">Forum Animal</a>, which were started in Brazil and get funding from Western donors.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The challenges ahead</h2>
<p>But the corporate pressure campaigns that have proven effective in the US, EU, and Brazil don&rsquo;t work everywhere. Different tactics are required in cultures that frown on confrontation, particularly in Asia, activists say, so local groups typically approach industry in a spirit of cooperation.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The <a href="https://www.east.org.tw/en">Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan</a>, for example, works with retailers and egg producers to create a cage-free supply chain. The group recently made progress on the issue when the Taiwanese government <a href="https://www.poultryworld.net/Eggs/Articles/2021/10/Taiwan-mandates-labelling-of-cage-systems-on-eggs-809320E/">announced</a> it will mandate that eggs from caged hens be labeled as such.</p>

<p>In Singapore, where there&rsquo;s little local agriculture but an eagerness to innovate, activists focus on developing plant- and cell-based alternatives to meat. Last year, Singapore became the first country in the world to <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/12/2/22125518/lab-grown-chicken-meat-singapore-bioreactor-approve">approve the sale of cell-based meat</a> when regulators approved a chicken product made by Eat Just.</p>

<p>In Africa, where the vast majority of land animals are still raised and slaughtered by small-scale farmers, the animal rights movement is just getting started. The <a href="https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/animal-welfare">EA Animal Welfare Fund</a> and Open Wing Alliance have made grants to the <a href="https://www.anaw.org/">Africa Network for Animal Welfare</a>, a group based in Kenya, to research the prevalence of battery cages in Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania. Other groups are engaging with regulators who are setting fish welfare standards in South Africa and cage-free campaigns in Nigeria.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But the biggest opportunities outside of the US and EU to curb global animal suffering, per FAOI, are in China and India.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Unlike the meat industry in Brazil, where markets are dominated by some of the world&rsquo;s biggest food companies and large-scale farmers, India&rsquo;s vast meat and dairy industry is decentralized, consisting of millions of rural, small-scale operations.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Reliable data is hard to come by, but it&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.fao.org/3/i1522e/i1522e02.pdf">estimated</a> there are some 75 million dairy farms in India. India is the world&rsquo;s largest producer and consumer of milk, with about half coming from cows and half from buffalo.&nbsp;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23005965/GettyImages_909465780.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="A worker cleans up cow dung in a cattle shed at a dairy farm in the village of Zurkheda, Maharashtra, India, in October 2017. | Dhiraj Singh/Bloomberg via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Dhiraj Singh/Bloomberg via Getty Images" />
<p>The industry structure is a barrier to animal advocacy, explains Vasanthi Vadi, a founder of several Indian animal rights groups. &ldquo;You will find small dairies in every village,&rdquo; she says, and livestock can be well treated, relatively speaking. &ldquo;If a farmer has six buffaloes, they all have names.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Another obstacle is poverty, which remains widespread. Government policy, for example, seeks to increase the production of eggs, a cheap source of protein, to reduce malnutrition and lift the income of farmers. The government goes so far as to supply chicks to poor farmers. People are unlikely to jump from being food-insecure to being vegan.</p>

<p>Despite all that, there are reasons to be optimistic about India&rsquo;s growing animal protection movement. India has more vegetarians than any other country &mdash; as high as 37 percent of the populace, according to government surveys, although <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-43581122">some estimates</a> put the number at more like 20 percent.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Importantly, India&rsquo;s 1960 constitution makes it the &ldquo;duty of every citizen &#8230; to have compassion for all living creatures,&rdquo; and a strong animal welfare law prohibits &ldquo;causing unnecessary pain to any animal&rdquo; and &ldquo;keeping any animal in a cage where it doesn&rsquo;t have reasonable opportunity of movement.&rdquo; The Dalai Lama welcomed the Humane Society International to India when it <a href="https://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/11/prweb10181034.htm">opened an office</a> in Hyderabad in 2012.</p>

<p>Given this legal precedent, animal advocates focus on enforcing or strengthening current laws rather than lobbying for new ones. <a href="https://www.peopleforanimalsindia.org/">People for Animals</a>, which calls itself India&rsquo;s largest animal welfare group, provides training to police on the effective enforcement of welfare laws. FIAPO, a federation of animal welfare groups, has pushed for state-by-state guidelines on the treatment of dairy animals.</p>

<p>The national government has issued directives to ban battery cages, as have the courts, but with little effect on farming practices. &ldquo;Implementation is always a challenge,&rdquo; says Shreya Paropkari, a senior campaign manager at Humane Society International in India.</p>

<p>Though efforts to improve animal welfare on farms are gaining steam, India&rsquo;s animal protection movement is largely devoted to companion animals, as the US movement was during its early years. &ldquo;Most NGOs focus on rescue and rehab,&rdquo; Vadi says.&nbsp;&ldquo;Advocacy work is a little more challenging.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Meanwhile, China poses a unique challenge for animal welfare &mdash; and an opportunity. A <a href="https://faunalytics.org/growing-a-community-farmed-animal-protection-in-china/">recent analysis</a> by the nonprofit Faunalytics concluded: &ldquo;Supporting the animal protection community in China should be a key goal of globally oriented animal advocates.&rdquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>But what, exactly, can advocates do when the government won&rsquo;t tolerate dissent? Chinese&nbsp; authorities promote factory farms because of their productivity and efficiency.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;The expansion of China&rsquo;s animal agriculture is not an accident,&rdquo; says Peter J. Li, an adviser to Humane Society International and author of the book <a href="https://smile.amazon.com/Animal-Welfare-China-Peter-Li/dp/1743324707"><em>Animal Welfare in China</em></a>. &ldquo;It is deliberate government policy. The government is obsessed with food security.&rdquo;</p>

<p>What&rsquo;s more, much of the population is neither aware of nor interested in animal welfare issues, according to Li. Older people remember what&rsquo;s been called the Great Chinese Famine, a period of mass starvation between 1959 and 1961. They don&rsquo;t want to be told to eat less meat.</p>

<p>&ldquo;I&rsquo;ve given up on older people. They&rsquo;re hopeless,&rdquo; Li says.</p>

<p>The situation, fortunately, is far from hopeless. Young people in China&rsquo;s cities who aspire to middle-class lives do not want to see animals treated cruelly, activists say. (There&rsquo;s no polling data to support that claim, but pet ownership &mdash; which can lead to awareness of animal welfare issues &mdash;&nbsp;is <a href="https://www.chinabusinessreview.com/the-extraordinary-rise-of-chinas-pet-industry/">rising rapidly</a>.)&nbsp;Young people are <a href="https://www.goodfoodchina.net/updates/152">showing interest in vegetarian diets</a>, in part because of worries about climate change and food safety; an African swine fever epidemic in 2018 and 2019 is thought to have killed more than half of China&rsquo;s hogs.</p>

<p>Animal welfare groups are free to raise awareness about the benefits of consuming less meat, so long as they don&rsquo;t criticize the government. Considering tofu originated in China 2,000 years ago and meatless meats are commonplace in grocery stores and on restaurant menus, vegetarianism could be an easier sell there than in some countries.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23005977/GettyImages_954080452.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Workers dry tofu before making fermented bean curd in May 2018 in Qinhuangdao, China. | Visual China Group via Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Visual China Group via Getty Images" />
<p>Paradoxically, China&rsquo;s authoritarian system could become a boon to animal welfare should the state choose to get behind plant-based alternatives to meat. In 2016, China&rsquo;s health ministry issued new dietary guidelines urging citizens to reduce their meat consumption by half out of concern for public health; it&rsquo;s unclear whether that has made a difference, but there&rsquo;s no doubt the state has the ability to drive the growth of plant-based meats by offering low-cost capital or state contracts. Government records <a href="https://gfi.org/blog/china-is-making-moves-on-cultivated-meat/">recently reviewed</a> by the Good Food Institute indicate that significant funds are being allocated to help the plant-based sector scale up.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Other activists say corporate animal welfare pledges and global trade create opportunities to influence welfare practices in China. After leading Humane Society International&rsquo;s work in India, Jayasimha Nuggehalli moved to Singapore to start <a href="https://globalfoodpartners.com/">Global Food Partners</a>, a consulting firm that helps businesses throughout Asia source higher-welfare eggs and meat.</p>

<p>Global firms including Accor Hotels, Hilton, Marriott, Nestl&eacute;, Unilever, and Yum Brands have all made global pledges to go cage-free, but they need help developing supply chains in China, Nuggehalli says. Global Food Partners helped one of the largest egg producers in China develop a pilot cage-free farm with about 60,000 birds.</p>

<p>&ldquo;What really has led to change in Asia are corporate commitments,&rdquo; he says. Building awareness of animal welfare issues and influencing government policy in China could take decades.</p>

<p>Mercy For Animals&rsquo; Leah Garc&eacute;s worked in China earlier in her career, seeking to persuade the government to pursue more humane slaughter practices for pigs in order to comply with EU rules regulating imports.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;I think we have to keep throwing spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks,&rdquo; Garc&eacute;s says. &ldquo;We have not cracked the code. Nobody has.&rdquo;</p>

<p><em>Marc Gunther is a veteran reporter who writes about the animal welfare movement, among other issues.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Marc Gunther</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Rich countries have pledged billions in climate aid. Why has progress been so slow?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/5/8/11600940/green-climate-fund" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2016/5/8/11600940/green-climate-fund</id>
			<updated>2016-05-05T15:07:45-04:00</updated>
			<published>2016-05-08T09:00:03-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Climate" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Originally published on Ensia. When the world&#8217;s poor countries demanded action during the failing United Nations&#8211;led climate negotiations in Copenhagen in 2009, the US government responded with a promise: It would help raise $100 billion a year by 2020 to assist efforts to cope with climate change in the global south. Out of that commitment [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shutterstock.com&quot;&gt;Shutterstock&lt;/a&gt;" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6088107/shutterstock_78627838.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p><em>Originally published on </em><a href="http://ensia.com/features/what-the-green-climate-fund-really-means-for-international-development/"><em>Ensia</em></a><em>.</em></p>

<p>When the world&rsquo;s poor countries demanded action during the failing United Nations&ndash;led climate negotiations in Copenhagen in 2009, the US government responded with a promise: It would help raise $100 billion a year by 2020 to assist efforts to cope with climate change in the global south.</p>

<p>Out of that commitment has slowly grown a peculiar but potentially important institution known as the <a href="http://www.greenclimate.fund/">Green Climate Fund</a>. The fund has nowhere near $100 billion to spend, but, if all goes according to plan, it will deliver significant aid to impoverished nations that are threatened by a warming planet.</p>

<p>The idea behind the fund is simple: The world&rsquo;s rich nations, led by the US and Europe, are responsible for most of the greenhouse gases that cause climate change, but the burdens of a warming planet fall most heavily on poor countries. Consequently, the fund takes from the rich and gives to the poor &mdash; like Robin Hood, but with the legal and political backing of the UN.</p>

<p>The GCF intends to support clean energy, low-carbon cities, low-emission agriculture, forestry, and climate adaptation. Tunisian economist H&eacute;la Cheikhrouhou, the fund&rsquo;s first executive director, <a href="http://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/44502/From_the_SDGs_to_the_Paris_Agreement___GCF_is_a_Facilitator_of_Change.pdf/0de96ba6-4a25-41ce-879e-fa6ba60f094a">has said</a> that its goal is nothing less than to help poor countries overcome &#8220;the twin threats of climate change and poverty.&#8221;</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6445219/green-climate-fund.0.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenclimate.fund/&quot;&gt;Green Climate Fund&lt;/a&gt;" />
<p>What is by no means clear is whether the GCF can achieve those goals &mdash; or even how the fund, with its unwieldy governance structure, will answer a series of fundamental questions about how it intends to do business. That&rsquo;s where things get complicated &mdash; and contentious. Should the fund make grants, low-interest loans, market-rate loans, or equity investments? Should the money go to governments, businesses, or nonprofits? Should the fund support efforts to clean up fossil fuels, in particular, capture and sequester carbon dioxide from coal plants?</p>

<p>&#8220;The Green Climate Fund is struggling with an identity crisis,&#8221; says Athena Ballesteros, director of the finance center with the World Resources Institute, who has followed the GCF closely.</p>

<p>Because the GCF is the world&rsquo;s only financial institution devoted solely to climate finance in the developing world, its actions are being closely watched. Environmental activists say the fund needs to do more to devolve power to those it is designed to help; <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/green-climate-fund-faces-slew-of-criticism-1.18815">they worry</a> that local communities aren&rsquo;t being sufficiently involved in decision-making, and <a href="http://webiva-downton.s3.amazonaws.com/877/be/8/7536/3-1-16_no-hsbc-ca-gcf.pdf">they are wary</a> of big companies that want to profit from the fund. By contrast, corporate observers say the fund must do more to welcome private sector partners.</p>

<p>All agree that the fund has the potential to drive what, <a href="https://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/56440/Governing_Instrument.pdf/caa6ce45-cd54-4ab0-9e37-fb637a9c6235">in its governing document,</a> it calls &#8220;a paradigm shift towards low-emission and climate-resilient development pathways&#8221; &mdash; even if no one is quite certain about what that means.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Slow to gain traction</h2><div data-chorus-asset-id="6444839"> <img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6444839/GettyImages-166002601.jpg"><div class="caption">A shopper exits the bus stop next to the Northeast Asia Trade Tower, a commercial skyscraper in 2013 in Songdo, Incheon, South Korea.</div> </div>
<p>Based in the Songdo district of Incheon, South Korea, the GCF for now is just a blip on the global landscape of climate finance. Some 42 countries have <a href="http://www.greenclimate.fund/contributions/pledge-tracker">pledged $10.3 billion</a> to the fund between now and 2018. Donor governments have formally approved about $7 billion. The US has promised $3 billion and <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/07/obama-administration-pays-out-500m-to-climate-change-project">sent the bank $500 million earlier this year</a>.</p>

<p>So far, the fund has <a href="http://www.greenclimate.fund/-/green-climate-fund-approves-first-8-investmen-1">approved just $168 million for eight projects</a>, including a venture fund to support off-the-grid energy in Africa, energy-efficiency bonds for Latin America, an adaptation effort in Bangladesh, and protection for the clean water supply on the Pacific Island nation of Fiji. The fund says it aims to approve $2.6 billion of projects by the end of 2016.</p>

<p>In comparison, about $391 billion was invested in low-carbon and climate-resilient growth in 2014, <a href="http://www.climatefinancelandscape.org/">according to the Climate Policy Initiative</a>, which tracks both public and private climate finance. That sounds like a lot &mdash; and it is &mdash; but experts have estimated that as much as $1 trillion a year is needed to meet the national climate pledges countries made leading up to the Paris climate talks.</p>

<p>The GCF has been slow to gain traction because, like many UN institutions, it aims to balance an array of competing interests. Policies and projects must be approved by a 24-member board equally drawn from developed and developing countries that also must strive for gender balance (for now, three of the 24 are women). Decisions must be made by consensus.</p>
<div data-chorus-asset-id="6444945"><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6444945/shutterstock_91290512.jpg"></div>
<p>Cheikhrouhou, the executive director, plans to step down in September, just as the fund is trying to grow. It has about 60 people on staff, and has been authorized to hire 80 more by the end of next year. (By comparison, the Inter-American Development Bank, which provides aid to Latin America and the Caribbean, has about 2,000 employees, while the World Bank has around 10,000.)</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s been hard to attract staff, particularly those with working spouses, to Songdo, a district built from scratch on reclaimed wetlands with limited employment and cultural opportunities. The Koreans provided financial assistance to help attract the fund; insiders say other potential locales, including Geneva and Bonn, were opposed by the US officials (because they didn&rsquo;t want the fund too closely identified with the UN) and by developing countries (who wanted it headquartered in a developing country, as South Korea is deemed to be by the UN&rsquo;s climate agency).</p>

<p>To deploy its resources, the fund relies on institutions known as <a href="http://www.greenclimate.fund/ventures/accreditation">accredited entities</a> to develop and manage projects. This, too, is controversial. Some <a href="http://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/114261/20160406_-_GCF_List_of_Accredited_Entities.pdf/e09bb9b3-9730-4adc-bca9-ff32739ecae8">33 entities</a> have been accredited, mostly development banks and government agencies. But a board decision to accredit private sector banks, including HSBC and Deutsche Bank, has been opposed by dozens of nongovernmental organizations that say HSBC is tainted by investigations of money laundering and Deutsche Bank has invested heavily in coal.</p>

<p>&#8220;Creating new business for big banks with large fossil fuel portfolios and poor records on human rights and financial scandal would undermine the very purpose of the fund,&#8221; says Karen Orenstein, a senior international policy analyst at Friends of the Earth US.</p>

<p>But Abyd Karmali, a longtime climate finance expert at Bank of America Merrill Lynch and until recently <a href="http://www.greenclimate.fund/boardroom/observers">an accredited private sector observer</a> of the GCF board, says the best way for the fund to drive its desired &#8220;paradigm shift&#8221; is to use its resources to leverage lots of private sector money. &#8220;Climate finance will scale via financial intermediaries that access mainstream investors,&#8221; he says.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Important work to do</h2><div data-chorus-asset-id="3691532"><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3691532/smokestack.0.jpg"></div>
<p>While they may disagree about how the fund should operate, NGOs and corporate observers agree that the fund has important work to do.</p>

<p>The GCF &#8220;isn&rsquo;t perfect, but it&rsquo;s one of the best chances we&rsquo;ve got to really think about how to change the model of development,&#8221; says Janet Redman, director of the climate policy program at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC.</p>

<p>The opportunity, the NGOs contend, is to give power as well as money to poor countries to shape their own low-carbon future. Other development banks have been donor-driven. Liane Schalatek of the Heinrich B&ouml;ll Siftung, a green political foundation, says, &#8220;Rather than bringing in some fancy technical experts from the outside, you think about how you can execute projects using local knowledge, local groups, local materials.&#8221;</p>

<p>The WRI&rsquo;s Ballesteros would like to see the fund support a handful of large-scale projects &mdash; such as mass transit in cities like Mumbai, Dhaka, or Manila &mdash; that could be models for greener cities everywhere. But achieving consensus is a big challenge, she says: &#8220;It&rsquo;s all about building a transformational pipeline of programs, and they can only do that if they bring the countries together.&#8221;</p>

<p>If the bank doesn&rsquo;t show signs of tangible progress before long, donor countries could grow impatient. A group of 22 US senators led by John Barrasso of Wyoming has asked the US Senate to block any appropriations for the GCF in fiscal year 2017, when the administration is seeking $750 million.</p>

<p>&#8220;Giving billions of dollars to an international climate fund is a significant waste of American resources,&#8221; <a href="http://www.barrasso.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2016/3/senators-to-appropriators-no-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-for-u-n-green-climate-fund">the senators wrote</a>.</p>

<p>But Orenstein says the US and other wealthy countries should not abandon the victims of climate change. &#8220;You can&rsquo;t expect a developing country that didn&rsquo;t cause the crisis and bears little responsibility for it to spend its own money,&#8221; she says. &#8220;We have a &#8216;polluter pays&#8217; principle in this country: You break something in a store, you pay for it.&#8221;</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
