<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Mark Berniker | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2019-03-06T11:11:43+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/mark-berniker" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/mark-berniker/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/mark-berniker/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Mark Berniker</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[We Never Said We Wouldn&#8217;t Poach From Google, Says Facebook&#8217;s Sandberg]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/3/24/11624876/we-never-said-we-wouldnt-poach-from-google-says-facebooks-sandberg" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/3/24/11624876/we-never-said-we-wouldnt-poach-from-google-says-facebooks-sandberg</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T06:11:43-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-03-24T13:22:27-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Big Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Facebook" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Google" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Social Media" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[It all started with Apple&#8217;s Steve Jobs and Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt allegedly entering a secret agreement promising not to poach each other&#8217;s employees. Now, the size and scope of this legal controversy over fixing tech-worker wages in Silicon Valley is expanding. And one major player in the Valley is getting out in front of the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>It all started with Apple&rsquo;s Steve Jobs and Google&rsquo;s Eric Schmidt allegedly entering a secret agreement promising not to poach each other&rsquo;s employees.</p>

<p>Now, the size and scope of this legal controversy over fixing tech-worker wages in Silicon Valley is expanding. And one major player in the Valley is getting out in front of the allegations that a hiring conspiracy took place.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101520188">Read the rest of this post on the original site &raquo;</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Mark Berniker</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Robocoin Rolling Out First Bitcoin ATM in the U.S.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/2/20/11623718/robocoin-rolling-out-first-bitcoin-atm-in-the-u-s" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/2/20/11623718/robocoin-rolling-out-first-bitcoin-atm-in-the-u-s</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T06:10:09-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-02-20T09:14:44-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Bitcoin" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Business &amp; Finance" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Commerce" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Call it the dawn of the bitcoin ATM. In Austin, Texas, on Thursday, Robocoin is unveiling the first of what it intends to be many bitcoin ATMs around the world, including at least seven in the United States by May. Read the rest of this post on the original site &#187; This article originally appeared [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>Call it the dawn of the bitcoin ATM.</p>

<p>In Austin, Texas, on Thursday, Robocoin is unveiling the first of what it intends to be many bitcoin ATMs around the world, including at least seven in the United States by May.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101429218">Read the rest of this post on the original site &raquo;</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Mark Berniker</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Google Makes Huge Investment in Clean Energy]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/2/17/11623576/google-makes-huge-investment-in-clean-energy" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/2/17/11623576/google-makes-huge-investment-in-clean-energy</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T05:48:39-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-02-17T08:30:32-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Big Data" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Big Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Google" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Influence" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Privacy &amp; Security" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Venture Capital" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[When you conduct a search on Google, your query goes across the Internet, hits a server, gets processed and is sent back to you in microseconds. You would be surprised how much energy is consumed in that process. In its latest quarter, Google spent $2.25 billion on data center and infrastructure spending, a huge area [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>When you conduct a search on Google, your query goes across the Internet, hits a server, gets processed and is sent back to you in microseconds. You would be surprised how much energy is consumed in that process.</p>

<p>In its latest quarter, Google spent $2.25 billion on data center and infrastructure spending, a huge area of costs for the company. That&rsquo;s one of the reasons the company is aggressively moving to solar, wind and other alternative energies to power its data centers and banks of servers scattered around the world.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101417698">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Mark Berniker</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Slow Down, Carl: Not All Apple Shareholders Want a Big Share Buyback]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2014/1/31/11622954/slow-down-carl-not-all-apple-shareholders-want-a-big-share-buyback" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2014/1/31/11622954/slow-down-carl-not-all-apple-shareholders-want-a-big-share-buyback</id>
			<updated>2019-03-06T05:41:21-05:00</updated>
			<published>2014-01-31T10:33:20-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Big Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Technology" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[For months, Carl Icahn has been pushing Apple CEO Tim Cook to use the company&#8217;s $158 billion war chest to buy back company shares, and hopefully substantially boost its stock price. But not every Apple shareholder agrees with that strategy, and at least one big one doesn&#8217;t appreciate Icahn&#8217;s activism. Read the rest of this [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						<p>For months, Carl Icahn has been pushing Apple CEO Tim Cook to use the company&rsquo;s $158 billion war chest to buy back company shares, and hopefully substantially boost its stock price.</p>

<p>But not every Apple shareholder agrees with that strategy, and at least one big one doesn&rsquo;t appreciate Icahn&rsquo;s activism.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101377530">Read the rest of this post on the original site &raquo;</a></p>

<p><small><em>This article originally appeared on Recode.net.</em></small></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
