<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Tim Ryan Williams | Vox</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters.</subtitle>

	<updated>2022-02-09T16:34:16+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/author/tim-ryan-williams" />
	<id>https://www.vox.com/authors/tim-ryan-williams/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.vox.com/authors/tim-ryan-williams/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/08/vox_logo_rss_light_mode.png?w=150&amp;h=100&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[The best $69.99 I ever spent: A pickleball paddle]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22916261/pickleball-sports-older-adults-best-money-pandemic-hobby" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22916261/pickleball-sports-older-adults-best-money-pandemic-hobby</id>
			<updated>2022-02-09T11:34:16-05:00</updated>
			<published>2022-02-06T09:40:50-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Money" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[In ninth grade, while trying to avoid exposing any part of my body in the locker room after soccer practice, my never-promising career in sports came to an abrupt end. &#8220;Some tough cuts coming up,&#8221; a teammate said to no one in particular, in between half-hearted towel whips. But I knew that casual barb was [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Dana Rodriguez for Vox" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23215909/Paddle.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>In ninth grade, while trying to avoid exposing any part of my body in the locker room after soccer practice, my never-promising career in sports came to an abrupt end.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Some tough cuts coming up,&rdquo; a teammate said to no one in particular, in between half-hearted towel whips. But I knew that casual barb was really aimed at me, the kid who was too old to be this terrible at soccer and still expect to play on the team.</p>

<p>I don&rsquo;t know if I ever really enjoyed the sport; I always hated the running.<strong> </strong>As a kid,<strong> </strong>I took up soccer without much thought; it seemed less boring than T-ball, which reliably put me and the other 5-year-olds to sleep in left field. I liked the Ziplocs of orange slices and the ritual of arming yourself with shin guards, long socks, and cleats. I didn&rsquo;t like when boys would show off their ball juggles, high above their floppy &rsquo;90s haircuts, for the very simple reason that I couldn&rsquo;t do anything like that.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In middle school, others on my team picked up another skill with ease: riffing on a hefty supply of homophobic jokes. So when I was inevitably cut from the lineup, I wish I could say I shrugged it off and gave a hearty, &ldquo;Thanks for nothing, jerks.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Instead, the defeat became a chip on my shoulder, a reason to scorn people who care about sports &mdash; aided by the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/12/sports/concussions-football-helmet.html">many other things</a> <a href="https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/10/21/20921462/nfl-football-woke-colin-kaepernick-take-a-knee">very wrong</a> with the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/03/briefing/nfl-head-coach-brian-flores-racism.html">sports</a> <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/01/everyone-in-new-york-is-betting-on-sports.html">industrial</a> <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/04/sports/ncaafootball/college-football-coaching-changes.html">complex</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p>As I grew older, I occasionally felt pangs of regret. Whatever the &ldquo;working out&rdquo; gene is, I absolutely do not have it. (See also: wanting to hide every part of my body.) But I like being outside, and I like games. I have the privilege of relatively good health, and the time and money for a hobby. What if there were some other sport out there for me?&nbsp;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>What if there were some other sport out there for me? </p></blockquote></figure>
<p>&ldquo;Have you heard of pickle &hellip; ball?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>In the midst of the pandemic, my parents were about to move from their Minnesotan home to a house four miles away. (They were ready to be done with stairs.) To pique my flagging interest in the endeavor over the phone, they mentioned there was a pickleball court in the half-built development they were joining. It was apparently next door to their new house.</p>

<p>My parents weren&rsquo;t too sure what the game was or how to play it &mdash; it sounded like a fever dream combining badminton, ping-pong, and tennis. Plus a whiffle ball? Good, however, for exercise with aging knees.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&ldquo;It seems like it might be kind of noisy, though? Well, we&rsquo;ll give it a go.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>When I finally was able to come visit, they had three paddles ready for action. Now I was intrigued; we are usually a sit-and-read family. I joined them to hit the ball around and found myself immediately chasing after every volley like a happy pup, the perfect sun of a Midwestern summer shining down on my arms, as scrawny and freckled and slathered in sunscreen as they were in my soccer days. This was just fun, unadulterated by adulthood.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Over the course of my stay, I began to fall in love. It&rsquo;s hopeless to try to break down why anyone likes anything, but here are the main points for me: Pickleball looks supremely silly, but feels like a sport. It&rsquo;s slow enough to feel strategic and not make you too winded, but you also get to chase after balls and attempt athletic flailing of the limbs. There is a high skill ceiling, but the floor is low and inviting.<strong> </strong>This is a game about polite introductions: The serves are underhand, and you have to wait for the ball to bounce once on each side of the court before you can start smashing it at each other.</p>

<p>Also: The paddles make a nice thwacking sound, much like, say, a locker room towel fight, but blissfully free of teenage, bro-y bullshit.</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s all <a href="https://usapickleball.org/what-is-pickleball/history-of-the-game/">very Pacific Northwest</a>, I assume; that&rsquo;s where the sport sprang up in the &rsquo;60s after a family was bored in their backyard one day and could only find half a badminton set. Here, confuse yourselves more with a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXD6vuhutHo">video</a>.</p>
<div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Tournament of Champions: Pro Women&#039;s Doubles" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/YXD6vuhutHo?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p>Pickleball has seen a <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/01/connor-pardoe-pickleball.html">surge in interest</a> with the rise of the pandemic hobby; this one has the advantage of being outdoors, social, and relatively easy to pick up for people of all ages. <a href="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/09/24/metro/boomers-have-created-pickleball-phenomenon/">Four million Americans</a> are supposedly playing now.&nbsp;</p>

<p>At my parents&rsquo; place, I started waking up early, eager to practice hitting balls to no one. When I flew back home, I lurked around local tennis courts to see if people like me were really allowed there.</p>

<p>I sometimes go to absurd lengths to avoid spending money on myself. I once moved apartments by lugging four broken suitcases and a trash bag on the New York subway to a Megabus. But I decided I was ready to spend a little &mdash; on a sport! &mdash; and signed up for a single pickleball lesson. I did not even own gym shorts at that point. Or, for that matter, a paddle that could reliably hit the ball more than 6 feet.&nbsp;</p>

<p>If I got a real paddle, I fretted, it would be a statement. It takes up space in your home, and it&rsquo;s a little scary to walk by every day: A person who plays sports lives here? Who am I fooling?&nbsp;</p>

<p>I was determined, however, to keep up the pretense long enough that it would be too embarrassing to suddenly quit. A representative text &ldquo;exchange&rdquo; (read: extremely one-sided conversation) with a friend from this period:</p>

<p>&ldquo;I just paid money for a pickleball lesson&rdquo;<br>&ldquo;like 40 dollars&rdquo;<br>&ldquo;it&rsquo;s at 8 am on a saturday&rdquo;<br>&ldquo;I&rsquo;m very excited&rdquo;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>A person who plays sports lives here? Who am I fooling? </p></blockquote></figure>
<p>On that October morning, I was late, and not quite as excited. I found our instructor on the court already, clad in athletic wear, a visor emblazoned with pickleballs, a slightly worrying leg cast, and a boundless smile.<strong> </strong>She could not have been more enthusiastic about this sport &mdash; perhaps still riding the pandemic hobby high. Or maybe, I hoped, this was the infinite confidence of a person who had found their thing.</p>

<p>I was matched with two much older women who were much better at bending their knees than me, and one ringer with suspiciously pendulum-like serves who eventually admitted to extensive tennis training.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The early going was rough. The &ldquo;just try to bounce the ball on your paddle like a ping-pong ball&rdquo; exercise immediately sent me chasing balls into the rose bushes, as did the &ldquo;just gently bounce the ball and tap it over the net&rdquo; exercise. My serves got only begrudging approval. Still, after whiffing many a <a href="https://www.pickleballmax.com/2015/07/pickleball-dink-shot/">dink</a> and cross-dink, soon my doubles partner and I were playing and winning a real game, grunts and sighs and smashes and all.</p>

<p>Our coach beamed at our modest improvement, and encouraged us to take another class and then maybe check out drop-in play with the local club. We nodded dutifully. But didn&rsquo;t she see me crush those limber-limbed older ladies? I was ready for the big leagues!</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft"><blockquote><p>Maybe, I hoped, this was the infinite confidence of a person who had found their thing</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>A cold night.<strong> </strong>A misty rain. And under the glaring stadium lights, an endless pop pop pop pop on a grid of green courts, full of young, hungry pickleball players here for drop-in play. I scanned the courts from a distance and saw no friendly older ladies. A pastiche of every &rsquo;90s underdog sports movie ran through my head: This was the big leagues, and I was not ready.&nbsp;</p>

<p>If you are wondering what the vibe of a not-quite-professional pickleball player is, it&rsquo;s maybe like someone who bikes a lot. You might see them engaging in very light trash talk while tossing back wayward balls or, in at least one incredible case, stuffing a spare one into tight gym short pockets. They&rsquo;re all angling to play someone who is just a little better than they are, in hopes of making it up a rung on the metaphorical ladder.</p>

<p>I was a wallflower: I walked around to get a closer look; confirmed that, yes, everyone here knew everyone already; walked out; and sat on a park bench, shielding my paddle in my jacket from the rain. Why did the stakes feel so high? Isn&rsquo;t this why I gave up on sports in the first place?&nbsp;</p>

<p>The bench was cold, though, and I came all this way. I bit the bullet and asked a couple people lounging in camp chairs by the court if I could join a game.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Obviously, I got trounced.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But sticking around rewarded me with an invite to gay pickleball, which in my limited experience takes an already pretty relaxed game and truly brings it to the level of friendly competition and affirmation I crave.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I tried to delicately broach the subject of non-gay pickleball and got a lot of reassuring nods. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s too aggro; those guys just smash the ball,&rdquo; one attendee said, although to be clear, smashing the ball is something that person does very well.<strong> </strong>Last time I played, everyone went home with a birthday cookie. Take that, ninth grade jerks.</p>

<p>Is this who I am now? I&rsquo;m not sure. The thrill of facing a tiny fear can only last so long &mdash; I&rsquo;m not dreaming about pickleball anymore. I&rsquo;m not sure I&rsquo;m getting any better at it, either. I try to show up regularly anyway. Every time, I&rsquo;m surprised at how good it feels; I otherwise would only be outside in the winter to shuffle in my parka to the corner store for some seltzer.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I still play in jeans. For months, I resisted spending any more money. &ldquo;How can you even hit with that thing?&rdquo; one of the regulars asked, eyeing my $15 glorified piece of plywood. Finally, I dragged a friend on an inflation-era shopping spree and found the best pickleball paddle a medium amount of money can buy. (I may or may not have also bought rollerblades I have never used.)</p>

<p class="has-end-mark">But it&rsquo;s okay to fool yourself; it&rsquo;s okay to try on a new persona that feels a little ridiculous, no matter your age. I play a sport now, and no one can take that away from me.</p>

<p><em>Tim Ryan Williams&nbsp;is the deputy style and standards editor at&nbsp;Vox.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[One Good Thing: The dreaming, scheming dog lovers of “Central Park”]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/22907985/central-park-apple-tv-bouchard-cole-bitsy-shampagne" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/22907985/central-park-apple-tv-bouchard-cole-bitsy-shampagne</id>
			<updated>2022-02-03T14:23:21-05:00</updated>
			<published>2022-02-03T08:00:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="One Good Thing" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Recommendations" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="TV" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Cole wants a dog, and he can&#8217;t get one. On another sitcom, that would just be a one-off episode. On Central Park &#8212; the animated musical comedy on Apple TV+ &#8212; it&#8217;s half the show.&#160; If, like me, you failed to secure a pandemic furry friend and are looking for some consolation in this, the [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Cole and not-his-dog, reunited. | Screenshot: Central Park" data-portal-copyright="Screenshot: Central Park" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23203987/central_park_sharpened.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Cole and not-his-dog, reunited. | Screenshot: Central Park	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p><br></p>

<p>Cole wants a dog, and he can&rsquo;t get one. On another sitcom, that would just be a one-off episode. On <em>Central Park</em> &mdash; the animated musical comedy on Apple TV+ &mdash; it&rsquo;s half the show.&nbsp;</p>

<p>If, like me, you failed to secure a <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/01/07/covid-dogs-return-to-work/">pandemic furry friend</a> and are looking for some consolation in this, <a href="https://countryroadsmagazine.com/art-and-culture/house-home/is-february-the-cruelest-month/">the cruelest month</a>, here&rsquo;s a tale (only a few spoilers!) to pass the time until we can all go to a real park together.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Cole lives with his park ranger family among the ferns, falcons, and flies (there&rsquo;s a garbage crisis episode) of Central Park, but wants a pet of his own. The object of his affection, Shampagne, is trapped up &ldquo;like a way better Rapunzel&rdquo; by Bitsy, a tycoon whose hotel overlooks the park and whose only love in the world is the Shih Tzu she bathes in perfume.</p>

<p>But Shampagne has escaped, and Bitsy (played by a perfectly grumbly Stanley Tucci) is left uncharacteristically bereft. &ldquo;Your nonallergenic fur, your weirdly hard-to-treat worms. It&rsquo;s like I&rsquo;ve lost 1,000 friends,&rdquo; she laments.</p>

<p>Lest we get too sympathetic, Bitsy turns this into an opportunity to sow total chaos. She calls a press conference and offers &ldquo;50,000 &mdash; no, 60,000! &mdash; no, <em>55</em>,000&rdquo; dollars to anyone who finds Shampagne. A mob descends on the park. Statues are defaced with peanut butter.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Shampagne is not lost. He has found Cole (Tituss Burgess, channeling our collective childhood hopes and anxieties). Playing fetch with a discarded flip-flop, Cole monologues to Shampagne, &ldquo;In this crazy, crazy mixed-up world, I found you. And no one&rsquo;s going to separate us. You hear me? Okay, now you say something. &hellip; I understand completely.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p>But separate they must. Cole&rsquo;s dad, Owen, quickly finds them in hiding, and sings a duet with his son in annoyance (Owen) and mourning (Cole). &ldquo;My heart is broken now that we&rsquo;ve returned that pup / My hopes have dropped like poop that cannot be picked up,&rdquo; Cole sings.</p>

<p>Why do I find this so affecting? I did not lack for dogs growing up. Though <em>Central Park</em> uses a light touch with its dog heartbreak, this little B plot-turned-A plot got me dreaming of my own pup. It feels ripe for a moment when a lot of grown adults want dogs &mdash; or really, anyone to share their lives with.</p>

<p>The flip side of this tragic, half-eaten flip-flop? Bitsy has won, and like any good one-percenter, she is convinced she&rsquo;s the victim. Central Park &hellip; must &hellip; go! &ldquo;I&rsquo;ll put a condo there and a condo there and a TGI Fridays there.&rdquo; It&rsquo;s &ldquo;central to my plot,&rdquo; you see.</p>

<p>This is not really an eat-the-rich satire, though to be honest, I would much rather watch Bitsy and her long-suffering assistant, Helen (Daveed Diggs), affectionately snipe at each other than their <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/22831645/succession-finale-season-3-recap-review-all-the-bells-say-kendall-roman-shiv-tom">big-budget</a> TV <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/tv/2022/01/23/gilded-age-review/">brethren</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Cole and Shampagne do not easily forget their burgeoning love, despite our villains&rsquo; best efforts. Helen dreams of killing off Shampagne to &#8230; somehow &#8230; get Bitsy&rsquo;s inheritance, but she eventually recognizes a chance for a quietly radical arrangement: Cole will walk the dog every so often, for nothing but the thrill of it. Free labor, perhaps, but Helen isn&rsquo;t really working in her own interest: Maybe, just maybe, love is something to be shared, rather than hoarded.</p>

<p>That&rsquo;s all just the opening act in <em>Central Park</em>. Writer-director Loren Bouchard&rsquo;s faux-improvisational charms are not for everyone, but I&rsquo;ve long been a fan.&nbsp;</p>

<p>When I heard about the show, however, my first thought was, &ldquo;What a waste!&rdquo; The world does not need another show about Manhattan, right? And the setup repeats many beats of Bouchard&rsquo;s hit <em>Bob&rsquo;s Burgers</em> &mdash; a weird but wholesome family sitcom that revolves around a dad&rsquo;s insistence that the family needs to literally live in the place he works. It&rsquo;s also fully a musical, which may be a dealbreaker for some.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But out of a park, Bouchard has built a universe. It&rsquo;s a rare thing in TV. Sitcoms in the US are almost always about the three spheres of American life: work, school, and home.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Now the humble park has at least two great TV series to its name. And <em>Central Park</em> has more than the obvious in common with its counterpart, <em>Parks and Recreation</em>. They both feature several oddball romances that are surprisingly moving for a sitcom, but their true love is the public space.</p>

<p>Maybe America is finally ready to view public space as relatable, too. Where the filthy rich and everyone else can take a dog for a stroll, that&rsquo;s a place &mdash; as the song goes &mdash; central in my heart.</p>

<p>Central Park&rsquo;s<em> first two seasons are </em><a href="https://tv.apple.com/us/show/central-park/umc.cmc.4qe3i11erof30x0vz8nwnjkw3"><em>streaming</em></a><em> on Apple TV+. For more recommendations from the world of culture, check out the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.vox.com/one-good-thing"><em><strong>One Good Thing</strong></em></a><em>&nbsp;archives.</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Americans are ready to tax the rich]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2021/10/15/22723457/build-back-better-poll-democrats-bill-infrastructure-taxes" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2021/10/15/22723457/build-back-better-poll-democrats-bill-infrastructure-taxes</id>
			<updated>2021-10-17T15:32:22-04:00</updated>
			<published>2021-10-16T09:40:17-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[As debate over Democrats&#8217; Build Back Better Act has intensified, the $3.5 trillion social spending bill has remained strikingly popular in polls. That may be both a blessing and a curse for lawmakers because it&#8217;s now clear that the bill will need to shrink to pass. And like Congress, Americans don&#8217;t all agree on which [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="A September MoveOn “Hold the Line” rally encourages members of Congress to pass President Joe Biden’s entire Build Back Better recovery package. | Paul Morigi/Getty Images for MoveOn" data-portal-copyright="Paul Morigi/Getty Images for MoveOn" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22928032/GettyImages_1343307477.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A September MoveOn “Hold the Line” rally encourages members of Congress to pass President Joe Biden’s entire Build Back Better recovery package. | Paul Morigi/Getty Images for MoveOn	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>As debate over Democrats&rsquo; <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/budget-reconciliation-bill-build-back-better-act/">Build Back Better Act</a> has intensified, the $3.5 trillion social spending bill has remained strikingly popular in polls. That may be both a blessing and a curse for lawmakers because it&rsquo;s now clear that the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/10/12/pelosi-biden-democrats-spending/">bill will need to shrink to pass</a>. And like Congress, Americans don&rsquo;t all agree on which of its big-ticket items are most important.</p>

<p>But at least one thing seems clear from public surveys: People want to pay for the bill by <a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/democrats-taxes-poll_n_6149eebae4b00171834144d5">taxing the rich</a>.</p>

<p>A <a href="https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2021/10/dfp-vox-bbb-oct12-toplines.pdf">Vox and Data for Progress poll</a>, conducted October 8-12, found that 71 percent of voters support raising taxes on the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans to pay for the bill. Eighty-six percent of Democrats and 50 percent of Republicans backed the idea. Other tax provisions focused on the wealthy that could be included in the bill &mdash; such as tax increases on corporations and capital gains &mdash; found 65 percent or more support overall.</p>

<p>Sixty-three percent of voters in the poll said they supported the $3.5 trillion overall plan that includes spending on health care, long-term care, child care, and clean-energy jobs.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22926396/image__21_.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Chart: “Majorities of likely voters support raising taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to pay for the Build Back Better Plan”" title="Chart: “Majorities of likely voters support raising taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to pay for the Build Back Better Plan”" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Ethan Winter/Data for Progress" />
<p>It&rsquo;s less clear which priorities voters most want to spend that money on.&nbsp;When asked to choose the <a href="https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2021/10/dfp-bbb-maxdiff-priorities-toplines.pdf">most and least important parts of the Build Back Better Act</a>&rsquo;s many policies, taxing the rich was most frequently cited as a top priority, with 13 percent of respondents choosing the measure. (The poll surveyed 1,224 likely voters and had a sampling margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.)</p>

<p>Expanding Medicare benefits to cover dental, vision, and hearing also showed strong support, with 12 percent of respondents ranking it the highest priority, and another 12 percent picked policies to increase access to long-term care for older adults and people with disabilities.<strong> </strong>Republicans were especially supportive of the provisions for health care and long-term care for older adults, compared to Democrats, who most frequently cited the tax increases and clean-energy measures as top priorities.</p>

<p>Democrats <a href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/paulmcleod/build-back-better-reconciliation-cuts-congress">face tough choices</a> in keeping a promise of <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/10/12/pelosi-biden-democrats-spending/">&ldquo;transformative&rdquo;</a> policies in the Build Back Better Act: Do programs <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/democrats-shouldnt-half-ass-joe-bidens-agenda.html">need to be made permanent</a>, increasing their price tag? Should funding <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/13/upshot/of-four-family-policies-in-democrats-bill-which-is-most-important.html">child care or prekindergarten</a> win out over expanding Medicare benefits? How fast must the country move to cut fossil fuels and fight climate change?</p>

<p>This is Democrats&rsquo; first chance in years at crafting major legislation not directly tied to the pandemic &mdash; and given the electoral map&rsquo;s skew toward Republicans, it could be their last for another decade.</p>

<p>The popularity of the Build Back Better Act so far may or may not make it easier for lawmakers to get the bill over the finish line. In the Vox/Data for Progress poll, voters were presented with arguments for and against removing a particular provision to reduce costs, such as Medicare benefits expansion or clean-energy policy. Only about a third of voters or fewer supported the cuts. And respondents showed a diversity of opinion on what&rsquo;s most important in the bill.</p>

<p>That likely reflects the fact that Democrats&rsquo; big bill touches on important issues for people at various stages of life, said Ethan Winter, a senior analyst for Data for Progress.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22928612/Screen_Shot_2021_10_14_at_9.35.46_AM__1___1_.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Chart: “Voters see raising taxes, expanding Medicare, and investing in long-term care as the most important parts of the Build Back Better Plan”" title="Chart: “Voters see raising taxes, expanding Medicare, and investing in long-term care as the most important parts of the Build Back Better Plan”" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Ethan Winter/Data for Progress" />
<p>Winter noted that a policy like free prekindergarten would be especially favored by a young parent, while expanding Medicare benefits appeals more to older adults &mdash; who make up a larger swath of the electorate. The somewhat stronger support for tax increases on the wealthy and spending on care for older adults suggests those ideas are a core appeal of Democratic politics, for both<strong> </strong>the party&rsquo;s base and swing voters.</p>

<p>&ldquo;People elect Democrats because they will raise taxes on the rich to do modest economic redistribution, and [policies] for seniors are always very popular,&rdquo; Winter said.</p>

<p>Polls have shown <a href="https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/voters-want-the-government-to-continue-to-invest-in-job-creation">solid majority support for most pieces of the bill</a> as standalone policies. (The child tax credit expansion has seen <a href="https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2021/10/fighting-chance-ctc-support-oct1-toplines.pdf">majority approval</a> but <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/575491-1-in-3-want-expanded-child-tax-credits-to-be-made-permanent-poll">seems to fare worse in polling</a> when voters are explicitly asked about making the expansion permanent.)</p>

<p>The bill&rsquo;s popularity could shift as Americans learn more about it and are exposed to partisan messaging; an <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-build-back-better-americans-dont-know-opinion-poll/">October CBS News poll</a> found that few Americans say they know much about what&rsquo;s in the bill, and only a third think it will affect them directly, despite many provisions focused on helping middle- and lower-income families.</p>

<p>And there&rsquo;s a potential warning sign for Democrats in a <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/355838/americans-revert-favoring-reduced-government-role.aspx">new Gallup poll</a>: In a September survey, 52 percent of voters said the government is doing too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses &mdash; basically returning to the average level surveyed in the past decade. In 2020, as the pandemic pummeled Americans and the economy, 54 percent of voters said they wanted the government to do more.</p>

<p>On climate issues, 57 percent of voters in the Vox/Data for Progress poll said tax credits for electric cars in the Build Back Better plan would make them more likely to purchase one.</p>

<p>Sixty-three percent of voters expressed support for the <a href="https://www.vox.com/22579218/clean-energy-standard-electricity-infrastructure-democrats">clean electricity program</a>, a key component of the bill&rsquo;s climate crisis strategy that now appears in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/15/climate/biden-clean-energy-manchin.html">danger of being scrapped or significantly cut back</a>. When asked about removing this provision of the bill after hearing arguments for and against government intervention in the energy industry, 53 percent of voters wanted to keep the clean electricity plan, and 36 percent wanted to remove it.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Democrats’ bill is popular. So why are they shrinking it?</h2>
<p>Americans largely seem to like the Build Back Better Act. Most <a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/poll-reconciliation-bill-trillion-dollar-infrastructure_n_611c481ee4b0c696810276c1">don&rsquo;t seem fazed by the $3.5 trillion price tag</a>. The strong support for tax increases on the rich &mdash; after big tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations under President Donald Trump &mdash; suggests <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/10/kyrsten-sinema-arizona-senate-senator-infrastructure-spending-biden-democrats">skeptical centrist Democrats</a> may have <a href="https://observer-reporter.com/opinion/op-eds/op-ed-reconciliation-and-build-back-better/article_09c75618-2855-11ec-93e6-4f55bb523e50.html">other concerns</a> in backing cuts to the bill.</p>

<p>The precariousness of the bill largely comes down to Democrats&rsquo; very thin majorities in the House and Senate. That gives Joe Manchin, a senator from a Trump-voting coal state, the power to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/14/democrats-central-climate-program-is-trouble/">dictate demands on climate provisions</a> as well as the overall size of the bill.</p>

<p>It also means another centrist senator, Kyrsten Sinema, is a key figure in the negotiations, even though it&rsquo;s not totally clear what she wants in the bill &mdash; and she left this week for <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/13/us/politics/kyrsten-sinema-fundraising-europe.html">Europe on a fundraising tour</a>. (While Manchin&rsquo;s approval in his home state of West Virginia has remained fairly steady overall, Sinema&rsquo;s resistance to the legislation has caused her approval rating to <a href="https://morningconsult.com/2021/10/04/sinema-manchin-approval-rating/">plummet among Democrats</a> and prompt stirrings of a <a href="https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2021/10/14/kyrsten-sinema-poised-to-lose-democratic-primary-in-2024">primary challenge</a> in Arizona, a state more evenly split between Republicans and Democrats.)</p>

<p>Manchin, Sinema, and other moderate Democrats have sometimes appeared at odds with each other on tax increases and <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/manchin-sinema-demands-biden-build-back-better-deal.html">how to pay for the bill</a>, making things even more complicated.</p>

<p>At New York magazine, <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/09/why-are-there-so-many-democrats-to-joe-bidens-right.html">Eric Levitz chalks</a> pushback by some House Democrats<strong> </strong>up to America&rsquo;s skewed representation in Congress and the decline of labor as a lobbying force. Plus, perhaps, old-fashioned stubbornness: Many Democrats in Congress came of political age in the era of Bill Clinton, deficit reduction, and welfare reform. &ldquo;I think that&rsquo;s why we can&rsquo;t have ($3.5 trillion worth of) nice things: Labor is weak, Congress is malapportioned, and some old rich Democrats have annoying beliefs,&rdquo; Levitz wrote.</p>

<p>No matter what happens with the Build Back Better Act, it won&rsquo;t end debates around <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/08/opinion/democrats-david-shor-education-polarization.html">what pursuing popular policies really means</a>. Even if the final bill is embraced by the public, it <a href="https://www.vox.com/22711083/biden-reconciliation-build-back-better-polls-infrastructure">might not lead Democrats to electoral victory</a>, either.</p>

<p>But if Democrats are just looking for legislation that most Americans want, taxing the rich to pay for policies that help families, seniors, and the planet seems like a safe bet so far.</p>

<p><strong>Update, October 16, 9:40 am</strong>: This story has been updated to reflect news that the Build Back Better Act&rsquo;s clean electricity program may be cut, and to include a new Gallup poll on the role of government.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Aja Romano</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Mank is the most-nominated film at the Oscars. Should it win Best Picture?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/22363995/mank-best-picture-roundtable-fincher-oldman-citizen-kane-netflix" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/22363995/mank-best-picture-roundtable-fincher-oldman-citizen-kane-netflix</id>
			<updated>2021-04-16T13:58:28-04:00</updated>
			<published>2021-04-14T09:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Awards Shows" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Oscars" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Reviews" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[This year, eight films are in the running for Best Picture, the most prestigious award at the Oscars. That&#8217;s a lot of movies to watch, analyze, and enjoy! So in the days before the ceremony on April 25, Vox staffers are looking at each of the nominees in turn. What makes this film appealing to [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Gary Oldman and Amanda Seyfried in Mank. | Courtesy of Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Courtesy of Netflix" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22441197/mank3.jpeg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Gary Oldman and Amanda Seyfried in Mank. | Courtesy of Netflix	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>This year, <a href="https://www.vox.com/22374044/oscars-2021-best-picture-nominees-reviews-roundtables">eight films are in the running for Best Picture</a>, the most prestigious award at the <a href="https://www.vox.com/oscars">Oscars</a>. That&rsquo;s a lot of movies to watch, analyze, and enjoy! So in the days before the <a href="https://www.vox.com/22213752/oscars-2021-coronavirus-date-streaming">ceremony on April 25</a>, Vox staffers are <a href="https://www.vox.com/22374044/oscars-2021-best-picture-nominees-reviews-roundtables">looking at each of the nominees in turn</a>. What makes this film appealing to Academy voters? What makes it emblematic of the year? And should it win?</p>

<p>Below, Vox film critic Alissa Wilkinson, deputy style and standards editor Tim Williams, and culture writer Aja Romano talk about <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/12/4/22150234/mank-review-netflix-fincher"><em>Mank</em></a>, David Fincher&rsquo;s drama <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/21618200/mank-citizen-kane-netflix-kael-auteur-welles-hearst">about <em>Citizen Kane</em> screenwriter Herman Mankiewicz</a> and the politics of 1930s Hollywood.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ambiguity and ambivalence of watching <em>Mank</em></h2>
<p><strong>Alissa Wilkinson: </strong>It&rsquo;s funny: I think <em>Mank </em>may be the least &ldquo;popular&rdquo; of the Best Picture nominees &mdash; whatever that means in this weird year &mdash; but it&rsquo;s also the most-nominated film by a long shot. I suppose that was inevitable; it is, after all, a movie about Hollywood, and that&rsquo;s historically one of the Oscars&rsquo; favorite categories.</p>

<p>But it&rsquo;s not a <em>loving</em> movie about Hollywood. I watched it multiple times in the course of writing about it, and I kept being startled by how much it criticizes a certain kind of cavalier attitude in the industry about what effect movies actually have on the people who watch them. It&rsquo;s definitely David Fincher&rsquo;s most political film, and it also questions the idea that any movie can be &ldquo;just&rdquo; a movie.</p>

<p>I think it&rsquo;s a film about the &ldquo;power of storytelling,&rdquo; but not in the optimistic way most Oscar ceremonies use that term. <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/12/4/22150234/mank-review-netflix-fincher">To quote myself</a>: It&rsquo;s about how &ldquo;there are big real-world implications to the way the movie business runs, from the lower-paid workers who struggle to make a living to the way the films they produce can distort the truth and benefit the powerful.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Of course, it&rsquo;s about lots of other things. As you watched <em>Mank</em>, what stuck out to you? What worked, and what didn&rsquo;t?</p>

<p><strong>Tim Williams: </strong>I was delighted at the ambition of much of this movie; I was sort of expecting a simple &ldquo;&#8230; And that&rsquo;s how we got <em>Citizen Kane</em>&rdquo; story. In the flashbacks, you get that and a lot more. But the &ldquo;Will he finish the script?&rdquo; frame drops the hints of bigger ideas and doesn&rsquo;t work on its own terms.</p>

<p>There is usually a certain pleasure in a backstage drama (that, as we&rsquo;ve said, Hollywood can&rsquo;t seem to get enough of). I only half-enjoyed the &ldquo;lol alcoholics&rdquo; antics of Herman Mankiewicz, the washed-up screenwriter whom Orson Welles hopes has one last story to tell.</p>

<p>The set-up feels intentionally dated, perhaps as a callback to the one-note movies Mank made for too much of his life. Still, this wizened, literally inert version of Mank just didn&rsquo;t reveal much to me about the character. And it&rsquo;s too hard to care about whether <em>Citizen Kane</em> will be made when there aren&rsquo;t interesting obstacles in the way (besides a late-act appearance by Amanda Seyfried&rsquo;s damsel who&rsquo;s not really in distress).</p>

<p>So it&rsquo;s a bit disappointing for me that the movie doesn&rsquo;t satisfy as a surface-level, behind-the-scenes story, even if that may be the point. I suspect part of the problem was in the rewrites of the film; Fincher retains <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/how-mank-distorts-orson-welles">the disputed theory</a> that the real-life Orson Welles didn&rsquo;t do much writing for <em>Citizen Kane.</em> But he has said <a href="https://www.vulture.com/2020/10/david-fincher-mank.html">he ultimately moved away from that idea</a> being the central conflict of <em>Mank</em>, which seems to have sapped it of some tension.</p>

<p>Luckily, I loved the other half of the movie, even when it was telling me through Mank&rsquo;s asides and Fincher&rsquo;s cold gaze that nothing matters.</p>

<p>It is perhaps a foregone conclusion that Mank, who in his mid-career is already too old for this shit, will turn on his capitalist benefactors. But Gary Oldman and deft dialogue make the particular turns of this arc a joy to watch and listen.</p>

<p>Mank&rsquo;s turn comes too late to aid Upton Sinclair&rsquo;s doomed campaign to bring a little socialism to California (including the movie industry). He does get in a few good monologues and the dubious honor of chewing the scenery of a GOP vote-counting party &mdash; scenery that somehow looks amazing under Fincher&rsquo;s direction.</p>

<p>Every frame of this black-and-white film is styled as an Important Movie, like so many movies after <em>Citizen Kane. </em>It&rsquo;s easy to get swept up in the theatrics, even when little is actually happening. Perhaps the suggestion is that important movies don&rsquo;t amount to much. I don&rsquo;t really think Fincher&rsquo;s movie is telling us that if Mank had made propaganda for Sinclair, the world would be different, but what is the movie saying, if anything?</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22441191/mank1.jpeg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A black and white image of a man’s face, his nose bloodied, surrounded by surrealist clocks." title="A black and white image of a man’s face, his nose bloodied, surrounded by surrealist clocks." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Gary Oldman in &lt;em&gt;Mank&lt;/em&gt;. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p><strong>Aja Romano:</strong> It feels strange to be saying this about a film from David Fincher, who&rsquo;s usually so searing and pointed in his themes and allegories, but I&rsquo;m not really sure <em>Mank</em> knows <em>what</em> it&rsquo;s saying.</p>

<p>Partly that&rsquo;s because performative ambivalence is probably its major theme, if we have to hang our hat on one. It&rsquo;s a consciously ambiguous story about a man whose strong moral compass wars with exhaustion, exasperation, and apathy &mdash; a man who then wrote (or co-wrote) a consciously ambiguous story about another man whose once-clear conscience grew murky with corruption and malaise.</p>

<p>But I think stating that theme so clearly is overdoing it. If <em>Mank</em> is supposed to be a treatise on the indifference of pre-war, <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/8/14/20802379/hunt-canceled-censorship-mpaa-hays-code-trump">Hays Code-era Hollywood</a> to the social and geopolitical unease happening all around it, then Mankiewicz&rsquo;s unerringly clear-sighted ability to read the room comes off less like a scathing commentary (from Fincher&rsquo;s father, journalist and screenwriter Jack Fincher) and more like an attempt to find a knight in shining armor.</p>

<p>The self-loathing irony of Mank&rsquo;s Don Quixote speech can&rsquo;t quite mask the open admiration the film has for him, however muddled and mired in a coterie of flaws his principles might be. There&rsquo;s just something so irresistibly Hollywoodized about a main character who drinks too much and alienates everyone but secretly funds Jewish refugees escaping from Europe. The film keeps Mank on a pedestal, like those famous upward-angle camera shots from <em>Citizen Kane </em>that allow Kane to tower over us.</p>

<p>I found <em>Mank</em>&rsquo;s unmitigated adoration of its title character continually unsettling. I&rsquo;m not sure whether that&rsquo;s because it&rsquo;s asking too much for him to be both the main character <em>and</em> the wry observational court jester of this narrative, or whether it&rsquo;s because, in 2021, straightforwardly framing <em>any</em> straight cis white man as the uneasy moral conscience of his community rubs me the wrong way. And that brings me back to the film&rsquo;s ambiguity and the ultimate ambivalence it left me with.</p>

<p>But maybe I&rsquo;m assuming too much. Do either of you agree that the film is too in love with its own subject? Or am I failing to give it its due for the many ways in which it tries to undermine Mank&rsquo;s clairvoyant view of the world, if not himself?</p>

<p><strong>Alissa:</strong> I never quite had the feeling that the film adored Mank &mdash; or at least not any more than <em>Citizen Kane </em>adores Charles Foster Kane &mdash; but I don&rsquo;t think your conclusion is unfounded, Aja. The text definitely can support it; he&rsquo;s certainly presented as a kind of lovable rogue, and a guy who was perfectly happy to play along with the game as long as it played back. His conscience is questionable, at best; I saw him as more of the unhappy clown who speaks the truth, the miserable court jester, than a knight in shining armor.</p>

<p>But whatever the film does think of him, leaving Mank himself aside, it seems really clear to me that it&rsquo;s in conversation with the politics of the time, from Upton Sinclair&rsquo;s appearances to the union and labor politics at the studio level. Did any of that stick out to you? What do you make of it? Why make that movie now? And is it a little weird or telling that it&rsquo;s on Netflix, which traditional Hollywood studios have tended to see as the harbinger of the death of cinema?</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Do the politics and cultural context of <em>Mank</em> hold up?</h2>
<p><strong>Tim: </strong>In <em>Mank</em>, it never feels like the socialists have a chance at winning over Hollywood, let alone California. Labor unrest is quelled with a single sob speech by MGM tycoon Louis Mayer, who convinces an angry crew to give up their pay for the good of the movies.</p>

<p>Upton Sinclair is given a speech, too, but it serves only to confirm for Mank that he has cast his lot with the bad guys. Mank knows Sinclair isn&rsquo;t going to win, despite the air of suspense as the votes are counted and Hearst clinks glasses as the GOP kingmaker. All Mank can do is lash out in defeat.</p>

<p>So is this all resonant today?</p>

<p>Today&rsquo;s ultrarich are still buying up newspapers and media companies, producing a glut of cultural garbage, and <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2021/3/28/22354604/amazon-twitter-bernie-sanders-jeff-bezos-union-alabama-elizabeth-warren">obsessively policing their image</a>, sure!</p>

<p>But now the gatekeepers have in some ways been overrun, with <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/22351100/congress-peter-welch-facebook-twitter-google-youtube-social-media-agency">no idea how to regain control</a> (well, without essentially taking over the entire internet, as China did).&nbsp;</p>

<p>Monoculture still has some footholds, most visible in all the Marvel-style movies and TV and the endlessly expanding universe of superhuman characters. Occasionally these movies subvert the idea of a superhero, but they don&rsquo;t really push for collective action as an alternative. They generally do spectacularly well in China, because at the end of the day, socialist propaganda is not very exciting and action movies are.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22142458/mank3.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Two men in suits and shades circa the early 1930s sit together." title="Two men in suits and shades circa the early 1930s sit together." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;Mank&lt;/em&gt; is all about old Hollywood. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p>If <em>Mank</em> is about the death of the auteur, then Netflix is both hero and villain, allowing creative freedom here and there but obscuring it all in the churn of content. But is creative freedom the thing Upton Sinclair fought for? His novels were famously didactic and unadorned treatises on the oppression of working people. I can&rsquo;t imagine he cared about the Oscars, Hollywood&rsquo;s chorus that pronounces the final judgment in <em>Mank. </em>(The Academy doles out a single screenplay award to <em>Citizen Kane</em>, bitterly shared by Welles and Mank.)</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s all muddled to me; I&rsquo;m not convinced this film has any answers. It&rsquo;s about Mank&rsquo;s quest to redeem himself and to put his name on the big important movie some powerful people really, really wish did not exist. <em>Citizen Kane</em> does see the light of day and chip away at the mystique of the rich, but doesn&rsquo;t point to anything to replace it with.&nbsp;</p>

<p>So like Aja, I think this movie is a bit too enamored of its antihero to have a coherent political viewpoint. I don&rsquo;t think that&rsquo;s inherently a detriment, but it puts more weight on <em>Mank</em>&rsquo;s thin frame. Mank gets in a good last jab at Orson Welles, who he seems to think is just another phony. It&rsquo;s a very small, individualist triumph, immediately undercut by text before the credits that the writer died of alcoholism.</p>

<p>The movie ends with the sense that Mank got a raw deal in life; someone like Upton Sinclair might say the individual deal-making is the whole problem. So maybe the frame story isn&rsquo;t so removed from politics after all. Still, the lack of fireworks between Mank and Welles makes this less than compelling drama. Needs more lies about history &mdash; I mean, &ldquo;movie magic.&rdquo; (Arguably, <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/how-mank-distorts-orson-welles">there is already a considerable amount</a>.)</p>

<p>Whoops, I was supposed to talk about the parts of this movie other than Mank. Hard to do when it&rsquo;s all about Mank!</p>

<p><strong>Aja:</strong> This is what I mean about the movie keeping Mank on a pedestal &mdash; it doesn&rsquo;t do that purely through subtext, but also through its framing of so many of the other characters as essentially bit players in the <em>You Must Remember This</em> episode of Mank&rsquo;s life. All three of the women who surround Mank, especially his wife Sara, come across as glorified extras whose parts have been built entirely around challenging Mank&rsquo;s narrative of himself. But they fail to function as effective counters, given that they also begrudgingly love him. (What Strong Female Character in a movie that fails the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bechdel_test">Bechdel test</a> doesn&rsquo;t begrudgingly love the Difficult Man they&rsquo;re put into the movie to coddle?)</p>

<p>Sorry, am I making <em>Mank</em> sound superficial? A little &mdash; and that&rsquo;s unfair to the film&rsquo;s sharp shrewdness, its extravagantly witty script, its elaborate production design. It&rsquo;s an excellent viewing experience. But beneath its polish, it treats both its political themes and most of its characters with what ultimately comes off as disinterest.</p>

<p>The film&rsquo;s centerpiece moment, for me, comes at the unwitting hands of Seyfried&rsquo;s Marion Davies (who incidentally is perfect in this role, not a note wrong). When Mank desperately tries to get her to use her influence to stop production on the film that he knows will sink Sinclair&rsquo;s chances, she tells him, &ldquo;I already made my exit.&rdquo; He immediately storms off in defeat, clearly seeing her rationale as a microcosm of everything that is Wrong With Hollywood.</p>

<p>This is supposed to be the film&rsquo;s showstopper irony, the moment when we see the tides of grand political fates turning around the whimsical vicissitudes of Hollywood celebrities. But it feels too easy &mdash; too self-serving as an example of Mank&rsquo;s martyrdom in a land of hypocrites. Instead of painting Marion like a shallow political naif, Mank comes off like a showboat who&rsquo;d rather dramatically race across a set to make an inexplicable demand of a busy starlet, and just as dramatically flounce away again once she&rsquo;s turned him down, than take five minutes to explain to her what he&rsquo;s asking and why. Just tell her why, Mank!</p>

<p>That kind of thing makes it hard for me to know how seriously the movie wants us to take its interest in labor unions et al. &mdash; because the labor movement, too, is ultimately just more expendable backdrop for Mank&rsquo;s own grievances.</p>

<p>I think perhaps it&rsquo;s fitting that a film like this wound up on Netflix. It&rsquo;s demonstrably part of the classic genre of epic silver screen biopics, like <em>Citizen Kane</em> itself &mdash; meant to be seen on a screen 20 feet high and wow you with its masterful cinematography and commitment to spectacle. But it&rsquo;s ultimately too complacent about its own pizazz, I think, to pull off the hat trick of dazzling you into loving it or agreeing with it (not that it knows what it wants you to agree with). It&rsquo;s a film that instead rewards the repeated watching and analysis that a platform like Netflix engenders &mdash; and maybe that distancing effect has robbed it of some of its sheen. At least, in a different era, it would have stayed glossy through awards season. Now I&rsquo;m not so sure.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22430176/mank.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A black and white image of Amanda Seyfried playing Marion Davies, in a circus-inspired costume with a big hat." title="A black and white image of Amanda Seyfried playing Marion Davies, in a circus-inspired costume with a big hat." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Amanda Seyfried in &lt;em&gt;Mank.&lt;/em&gt; | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" /><h2 class="wp-block-heading">What to watch, read, and listen to after <em>Mank</em></h2>
<p><strong>Alissa:</strong> You&rsquo;re both right, of course. There&rsquo;s a lot to chew on here, but ultimately I wish I had gotten to see it on a big screen, while also being glad I got to rewind it and think about bits of it as pieces of filmmaking, not just one story. It&rsquo;s complicated!</p>

<p>So I want to ask you both: If people liked <em>Mank</em> &mdash; or didn&rsquo;t, but wanted to &mdash; are there other movies you would recommend? Or TV shows? <em>Citizen Kane</em>, obviously, but what else?</p>

<p><strong>Aja</strong>: <em>RKO 281</em>, about the making of <em>Citizen Kane</em>,<em> </em>is the obvious choice here. Also try <em>Cradle Will Rock</em>, that lovely weird movie about labor unions, theater, and a radical off-Broadway musical that was too revolutionary to actually be performed. If &ldquo;glossy biopics of eccentric Hollywood pioneers made by auteur directors&rdquo; is the vibe you want, then <em>The Aviator</em> should probably be your first stop. And I&rsquo;ve already mentioned it, but really the whole time I was watching <em>Mank</em>, I just kept thinking &ldquo;This would have been better as a whole season of <a href="http://www.youmustrememberthispodcast.com/"><em>You Must Remember This</em></a>,&rdquo; the glorious podcast dedicated to vintage Hollywood deep-dives, so I&rsquo;ll just toss that out there too. <a href="http://www.youmustrememberthispodcast.com/episodes/2016/06/21/blacklistarchive">Its season on McCarthyism</a> is essential listening, and makes for a great follow-up to <em>Mank</em>.</p>

<p><strong>Tim:</strong> I think the Coen brothers&rsquo; <em>Hail, Caesar!</em> is an interesting companion to <em>Mank</em> &mdash; another muddle of themes and tone about the perverse incentives of the Old Hollywood machine.&nbsp;It&rsquo;s a farce, not a drama, and arguably even messier than <em>Mank</em>, but it definitely has some of the same appeal.</p>

<p>If you&rsquo;re looking for a period backstage drama with an intense focus on a single character, I highly recommend <em>Opening Night</em>, a John Cassavetes film about an actress who refuses to accept her societal role as the aging starlet.</p>

<p>I kind of want to troll people and also recommend <em>This Is Not a Film</em>, Jafar Panahi&rsquo;s goofy, deadly serious, and zero-budget documentary about Iranian censorship. If you hated <em>Mank</em> &hellip; well, you might also not like this, for different reasons? But at least the stakes feel much more immediate.</p>

<p><strong>Alissa</strong>: Oh, man, I love these suggestions. (<em>This Is Not a Film </em>is incredible!)</p>

<p>Since Tim already took <em>Hail, Caesar!</em> and Aja already mentioned <em>You Must Remember This</em>, I&rsquo;ll throw in Robert Altman&rsquo;s <em>The Player</em>, which is set much later than <em>Mank,</em> but in a Hollywood that isn&rsquo;t <em>all </em>that different &mdash; and has the satirical edge and bite that <em>Mank</em> sometimes lacks. It&rsquo;s full of references and Hollywood in-jokes, but it is, for my money, a bit more fun to watch.</p>

<p>And hey, there&rsquo;s always Quentin Tarantino&rsquo;s history-tweaking <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/5/23/18633841/once-upon-time-hollywood-tarantino-review-cannes-pitt-dicaprio-robbie"><em>Once Upon a Time in Hollywood</em></a>, which digs into another Hollywood background story but with a whole different sensibility.</p>

<p>Mank <em>is</em> <a href="https://www.netflix.com/title/81117189"><em>streaming on Netflix</em></a><em>. Find our </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/22374044/oscars-2021-best-picture-nominees-reviews-roundtables"><em>discussions of the other 2021 Best Picture nominees here</em></a><em>. </em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Christina Animashaun</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Benjamin Rosenberg</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[50 million world Covid-19 cases: The biggest outbreaks, explained]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2020/11/8/21550345/50-million-confirmed-cases-covid-19-worldwide" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2020/11/8/21550345/50-million-confirmed-cases-covid-19-worldwide</id>
			<updated>2020-11-09T13:56:50-05:00</updated>
			<published>2020-11-09T13:41:54-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Covid-19" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Health" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Science" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="World Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Last New Year&#8217;s Eve, a hint of what the world might be in for in 2020 arrived in the form of an Associated Press story about 27 people in Wuhan, China, who had fallen ill with a mysterious strain of viral pneumonia. This was the first news of the new illness reported outside of China. [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="A family mourns a deceased relative during a mass burial of coronavirus victims in Parque Taruma cemetery on May 19 in Manaus, Brazil — a city in the Amazon region hit hard by the virus. | Andre Coelho/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Andre Coelho/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22020882/GettyImages_1213995427t.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	A family mourns a deceased relative during a mass burial of coronavirus victims in Parque Taruma cemetery on May 19 in Manaus, Brazil — a city in the Amazon region hit hard by the virus. | Andre Coelho/Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Last New Year&rsquo;s Eve, a hint of what the world might be in for in 2020 arrived in the form of an <a href="https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2019-12-31/china-investigates-respiratory-illness-outbreak-sickening-27">Associated Press story</a> about 27 people in Wuhan, China, who had fallen ill with a mysterious strain of viral pneumonia. This was the first news of the new illness reported outside of China.</p>

<p>Less than 11 months later, <a href="https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html">50 million people worldwide are confirmed</a> to have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes the Covid-19 disease. And more than 1,250,000 Covid-19 deaths have been reported.</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s a grim milestone,&nbsp;one that reflects the coronavirus&rsquo;s contagiousness as well as a global failure to contain its spread.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22021075/map_50M.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Tim Ryan Williams and Christina Animashaun/Vox" />
<p>Ten highly populated countries account for <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&amp;time=2020-03-01..latest&amp;country=USA~ESP~FRA~RUS~IND~BRA~MEX~COL~ARG~OWID_WRL~GBR&amp;region=World&amp;casesMetric=true&amp;interval=total&amp;smoothing=0&amp;pickerMetric=location&amp;pickerSort=asc">about two-thirds of confirmed coronavirus tests</a> since the pandemic began, including the United States, Brazil, and Russia. And the high case counts are <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&amp;time=2020-03-01..latest&amp;country=CHN~USA~IDN~PAK~IND~NGA~JPN~ETH~PHL~VNM~COD~OWID_WRL~TUR~IRN~DEU~THA~GBR~FRA~ITA~ESP~ZAF~TZA~MMR~KEN~KOR~COL~UGA~ARG&amp;region=World&amp;casesMetric=true&amp;interval=smoothed&amp;perCapita=true&amp;smoothing=7&amp;pickerMetric=location&amp;pickerSort=asc">not just because they have more people than the average country</a>, though a lack of testing in some regions makes direct comparisons more difficult.</p>

<p>But the virus is now spreading faster and further than ever detected before, with new case records being set regularly in Europe and North America. <a href="https://www.vox.com/21514530/europe-covid-second-wave-update">As Vox&rsquo;s Julia Belluz reported</a>, European hospitals are <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/10/22/world/europe/europe-hospitals-covid.html">once again filling up</a>.&nbsp;The continent&rsquo;s leaders are <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/05/world/europe/britain-coronavirus-lockdown.html">reimplementing strict social distancing rules</a>, with curfews and other restrictions imposed in Spain, Italy, and other countries. More sweeping lockdowns have been ordered in some places, including France, Greece, the Czech Republic, and parts of the UK.</p>

<p>The spread is more under control in Australia and New Zealand, as well as much of East Asia and Africa. <a href="https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/indias-covid-19-cases-have-declined-rapidly-herd-immunity-still-far-away-scientists-say">India</a> and parts of the Middle East, however, have also seen wide disease spread.</p>

<p>And the US has driven up the world&rsquo;s new case numbers in the past few weeks, due in no small part to a lack of national leadership and a reluctance to implement well-established public health measures like testing, contact tracing, and wearing masks.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the US became the world’s worst failure in containing Covid-19</h2>
<p>The US has the most reported Covid-19 cases and deaths of any country in the world &mdash; more than 10 million confirmed cases and more than 237,000 confirmed deaths as of November 9, according to <a href="https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html">Johns Hopkins University&rsquo;s tracker</a>. Controlling for population, the United States <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?tab=map&amp;zoomToSelection=true&amp;country=~OWID_WRL&amp;region=World&amp;casesMetric=true&amp;interval=total&amp;perCapita=true&amp;smoothing=0&amp;pickerMetric=location&amp;pickerSort=asc">still has one of the worst outbreaks anywhere</a>.</p>

<p>The actual numbers, both globally and in the US, could well be a lot higher, said Eric Toner, a senior scientist at Johns Hopkins&rsquo;s Bloomberg School of Public Health.</p>

<p>&ldquo;The 50 million cases globally, we know is an underestimate, probably by a factor of 10 to 20,&rdquo; Toner said. &ldquo;There are many, many more people who have been infected than those confirmed cases. Same thing is true for deaths. So we don&rsquo;t really know how bad it has been, but it&rsquo;s certainly the worst thing we&rsquo;ve seen in 100 years.&rdquo;</p>

<p>President Donald Trump was briefed on the coronavirus <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/4/28/21239663/coronavirus-presidential-daily-intelligence-briefing">beginning in January</a>, but he has continued to downplay the virus&rsquo;s threat throughout the pandemic.</p>

<p>On February 10, while campaigning in New Hampshire, the president claimed the virus would &ldquo;<a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?468493-1/president-trump-holds-rally-manchester-hampshire&amp;start=1878">miraculously go away</a>.&rdquo; But three days before, he had already <a href="https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/09/politics/coronavirus-trump-woodward-timeline/">privately told journalist Bob Woodward</a> that Covid-19 was more deadly than the flu.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22021109/us_wave_count.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Tim Ryan Williams and Christina Animashaun/Vox" />
<p>&ldquo;What we&rsquo;ve seen is the absolute failure of effective emergency health communication, which has basic principles that are straightforward,&rdquo; says Dr. Tom Frieden, who led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under President Barack Obama. &ldquo;Be first, be right, be credible, give people practical, proven things to do. The US government completely failed on all of those components.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Trump <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-cdc.html">named</a> Vice President Mike Pence to lead the government&rsquo;s coronavirus response on February 27. On <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/an-oral-history-of-the-day-everything-changed-coronavirus/">March 11</a> &mdash; the same day the sports world began to shut down and many schools announced plans for remote learning &mdash; the president announced <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/3/11/21175949/europe-travel-ban-coronavirus-trump">travel restrictions</a> from Europe, after restrictions on travel from China the previous month.</p>

<p>Experts disagree on <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/10/01/debate-early-travel-bans-china/">how effective travel restrictions from Europe and China were</a>, especially because by March the virus was <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-spread.html">already spreading quickly in areas including New York, Washington state, and California</a>. Moreover, Trump did little with the time that travel restrictions may have bought, ignoring the federal government&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/us/testing-coronavirus-pandemic.html">botched development and rollout of coronavirus testing</a>.</p>

<p>It took until March 16 for Trump to <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/16/21182247/trump-coronavirus-covid-19-press-conference">introduce social distancing guidelines</a>, and on March 19, he admitted to Woodward that he was purposely downplaying the virus to avoid &ldquo;creating a panic.&rdquo; He also acknowledged that younger people were susceptible to Covid-19 as well.</p>

<p>Trump has admitted publicly he has pressured officials to &ldquo;slow down&rdquo; testing, not wanting revealed Covid-19 cases to set back reopening of the country.</p>

<p>Equivocation around mask-wearing has been one of his most notable other failures in the pandemic response. In early April, the CDC along with the country&rsquo;s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2020/10/20/is-trump-right-that-fauci-discouraged-wearing-masks/?sh=7de3ccc44969">recommended</a> that Americans wear masks &ldquo;in public settings when around people outside their household, especially when social distancing measures are difficult to maintain.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Trump, however, wore a mask in public for the first time <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53378439">in mid-July</a>, and repeatedly mocked his Democratic opponent in the 2020 election, Joe Biden, for wearing one.</p>

<p>&ldquo;The general measures are wear a mask, watch your distance, and wash your hands, as well as strategic closures,&rdquo; Frieden said. &ldquo;You have to call on people&rsquo;s collective sense of responsibility, that we&rsquo;re all in this together. The lack of recognition that we&rsquo;re all connected, and the lack of acting on that recognition, has been very problematic.&rdquo;</p>

<p>States that were <a href="https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/21546014/mask-mandates-coronavirus-covid-19">reluctant to issue mask mandates</a> or <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/7/6/21308351/california-coronavirus-pandemic-covid-outbreak">close down nonessential businesses again</a> when cases rose did not help matters, although a <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/4/22/21228229/coronavirus-bailout-money-state-austerity-budget-shortfall">lack of federal aid</a> may have played a role in those decisions.</p>

<p>Now, the US is in its third &mdash; and worst &mdash; wave of surging infections, this time across nearly every region. On November 5, the country set a new single-day record with more than 120,000 new cases reported.</p>

<p>As <a href="https://www.vox.com/21523039/covid-coronavirus-third-wave-fall-winter-surge">Vox&rsquo;s German Lopez explained</a>, those rising numbers are &ldquo;partly due to&nbsp;<a href="https://covidtracking.com/data/charts/us-daily-tests">more testing</a>&nbsp;exposing more cases. But that can&rsquo;t be the full explanation, because <a href="https://covidtracking.com/data/charts/us-currently-hospitalized">hospitalizations</a> and the&nbsp;<a href="https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/individual-states">overall rate of positive tests</a>&nbsp;are trending up.&rdquo; It doesn&rsquo;t have to stay this way &mdash; but it probably will:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Cities, counties, states, and the federal government &mdash; or, short of all that, the public &mdash; could take social distancing seriously again. Governments could mandate masks, and the public could opt to wear them without a mandate. Bars and restaurants could close, voluntarily or not. Places that do open, such as schools, could try to adopt aggressive testing-and-tracing regimes to try to keep the coronavirus under some control.</p>

<p>Without that, America&rsquo;s coronavirus epidemic will keep getting worse.</p>
</blockquote><h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the rest of the world has handled the virus</h2>
<p>Other than the US, Europe and Latin America have struggled the most to contain Covid-19. Italy and Spain had the biggest outbreaks to be initially detected in Europe. Italy had just 566 new daily confirmed cases on March 1, but that number rose to more than 6,000 by March 26. A strict lockdown successfully contained the disease, but it came back with a vengeance in the fall.</p>

<p>This time, it was Spain that first showed the alarming resurgence on the continent. The country had followed a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/world/europe/spain-coronavirus-cases.html">similar trajectory</a>, with an initial spike in March and a lockdown that almost totally suppressed the virus.</p>

<p>As Spain reopened, however, social distancing rules and enforcement were lax in some areas, and the disease burden shifted more toward younger people with generally less severe cases. At the same time, the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(20)30239-5/fulltext">keys to controlling epidemic spread &mdash; test, trace, and isolate</a> &mdash; were underutilized by a public health system that had deteriorated with a decade of fiscal austerity. Cases began to spike again in July, and some more drastic restrictions such as closing restaurants and bars in Catalonia did not come until October.</p>

<p>Spain now has more than 20,000 confirmed cases per day, and continues to <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&amp;time=2020-03-01..latest&amp;country=EuropeanUnion~ESP~ITA~GBR~DEU~CZE&amp;region=World&amp;casesMetric=true&amp;interval=smoothed&amp;perCapita=true&amp;smoothing=7&amp;pickerMetric=location&amp;pickerSort=asc">record some of the highest numbers</a> of new cases per million people on the continent.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, some European countries were <a href="https://www.vox.com/21435868/coronavirus-france-italy-spain-uk-europe">slow to react to Spain&rsquo;s case surge</a> and impose measures of their own.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22022222/spain_wave_count.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Tim Ryan Williams and Christina Animashaun/Vox" />
<p>As <a href="https://www.vox.com/21435868/coronavirus-france-italy-spain-uk-europe">Julia Belluz explained in September</a>, France soon went down the same path as Spain:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>In July, cases started increasing in a way that couldn&rsquo;t be explained by testing alone &mdash; albeit slowly, doubling&nbsp;<a href="https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/are-we-really-seeing-a-second-european-spike-">every two weeks instead of every 3.5 days, like in March</a>. A rise in hospitalizations didn&rsquo;t follow immediately.</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s become clear that was because younger people were catching the virus. By mid-August, &ldquo;the virus started to affect older people, and then a few weeks later, hospitalizations have started to increase,&rdquo; said [Edouard Mathieu, the Paris-based data manager of Oxford University&rsquo;s&nbsp;<a href="http://ourworldindata.org/"><strong>Our World in Data</strong></a>&nbsp;project]. By September 10, the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/maladies-et-infections-respiratoires/infection-a-coronavirus/documents/bulletin-national/covid-19-point-epidemiologique-du-10-septembre-2020">French public health ministry</a>&nbsp;reported that new Covid-19 hospitalizations were growing in all but one region of the country.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As outbreaks have spread across the continent again, <a href="https://www.vox.com/21514530/europe-covid-second-wave-update">several countries</a> have returned to full or partial lockdowns to combat the new surge, including the United Kingdom, France, <a href="https://www.vox.com/21495327/covid-19-germany-coronavirus-cases-deaths">Germany</a>, Ireland, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic.</p>

<p>Before Europe&rsquo;s coronavirus resurgence, South America&rsquo;s outbreaks had begun to spiral out of control, and the hardest-hit has been Brazil. President Jair Bolsonaro, the country&rsquo;s far-right populist and a Trump ally, has waved off the virus in much the same way as Trump. He ignored a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/30/brazil-manaus-coronavirus-mass-graves">growing outbreak in the Amazon region</a> in the spring, and touted hydroxychloroquine as an effective treatment for Covid-19 despite a lack of evidence that it helps at all. His government <a href="https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/another-piece-populist-propaganda-critics-slam-brazilian-government-s-new-covid-19-drug">continues to endorse questionable treatments</a> for the virus.</p>

<p>Bolsonaro himself <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/7/7/21315953/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-coronavirus-positive">tested positive</a> for the virus in July. He has opposed mask mandates and social distancing measures, and sought to reopen the economy almost as soon as regional restrictions were imposed in March.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22021119/brazil_wave_count.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Tim Ryan Williams and Christina Animashaun/Vox" />
<p>Brazil has had by far the most confirmed cases in Latin America, with nearly 5.6 million, though new cases are on a <a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/29/brazils-first-wave-not-over-yet-coronavirus-pandemic-manaus-bolsonaro/">downward trend</a>. Other countries in the region have been hit hard, too: Argentina and Colombia each have more than a million cases, and Peru will likely join them soon. Central America has seen wide disease spread in some countries as well, and Mexico in particular <a href="https://apnews.com/article/religion-virus-outbreak-india-united-states-bfa57a99aaf45c5a4032c9226fd5cf08">has been criticized</a> for insufficient testing to accurately determine the scope of community transmission.</p>

<p>Other regions have so far done a better job containing the spread, including Africa, despite <a href="https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/89246">dire predictions</a> early on about potential spread on the continent. <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30708-8/fulltext">Africa</a> is home to 17 percent of the world&rsquo;s population but <a href="https://theconversation.com/covid-19-examining-theories-for-africas-low-death-rates-147393?utm_source=Maliasili+Reader&amp;utm_campaign=091b4480bc-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_01_21_07_38_COPY_01&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_63a597acd5-091b4480bc-202604513">accounted for just 3.5 percent of reported Covid-19 deaths</a>, as of early October. Africa has a younger population compared to other continents, and Covid-19 is most severe in older people.</p>

<p>But that&rsquo;s likely <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-54418613">not the only reason</a> behind the relatively fewer confirmed deaths and <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&amp;country=OWID_WRL~ZAF~KEN~UGA~MAR~Africa~COD&amp;region=World&amp;casesMetric=true&amp;interval=smoothed&amp;perCapita=true&amp;smoothing=7&amp;pickerMetric=location&amp;pickerSort=asc">cases</a>: Many African countries, including Kenya and Lesotho, acted quickly in issuing health guidance and social distancing measures. And the experience of countries on the continent with previous epidemics may have helped officials and the public prepare better for this one.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter alignnone"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-dnt="true"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Around the world, the places that have struggled most in controlling the virus are those with the least social cohesion. Fighting Covid requires a common understanding that we’re all in this together.</p>&mdash; Dr. Tom Frieden (@DrTomFrieden) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrTomFrieden/status/1324828064342310913?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2020</a></blockquote>
</div></figure>
<p>Parts of Asia have also fared well. China, where the virus originated, <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/3/26/21184238/coronavirus-china-authoritarian-system-democracy">initially sought to hide information about the virus</a>. But officials soon changed course, locking down cities and ordering widespread testing. The country &mdash; of more than 1.4 billion people &mdash; still has fewer than 100,000 confirmed cases, according to Johns Hopkins data.</p>

<p>South Korea <a href="https://www.vox.com/videos/2020/8/6/21356265/south-korea-coronavirus-response-testing">quickly contained an early outbreak</a>. And Australia and New Zealand &mdash; it helps being islands &mdash; have been among the best in the world at suppressing the virus.</p>

<p>The reasons behind disease spread are complicated, and not every country&rsquo;s situation can be easily compared.</p>

<p>But these seem to be key factors in stemming the tide of an outbreak: Quick action, clear health guidance, public trust, robust testing and surveillance systems, and thorough contact tracing. Many countries in the Pacific have managed all of these.</p>

<p>&ldquo;Certainly, we can point to Taiwan, to Singapore, to South Korea, to Japan,&rdquo; Toner said. &ldquo;But also places like Vietnam have done a very good job. Certainly, Australia and New Zealand have been great examples. They&rsquo;ve done a really good job with messaging and containment.&rdquo;</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Sean Collins</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Benjamin Rosenberg</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Everyone in the White House cluster who has reportedly tested positive for the coronavirus]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/2020/10/2/21498870/white-house-cluster-tested-positive-covid-19-coronavirus" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/2020/10/2/21498870/white-house-cluster-tested-positive-covid-19-coronavirus</id>
			<updated>2021-06-09T15:10:57-04:00</updated>
			<published>2020-10-15T10:16:33-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="2020 Presidential Election" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Covid-19" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Health" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Politics" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[More than 20 people in and around the White House have tested positive for the coronavirus in recent weeks &#8212; including President Donald Trump, first lady Melania Trump, and their son, Barron Trump. The president announced on October 2 that he and Melania Trump had tested positive for the coronavirus that causes Covid-19, joining several [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="President Trump introduced Judge Amy Coney Barrett as his nominee to the Supreme Court at the Rose Garden on Saturday, September 26. Many attendees did not wear masks. | Alex Brandon/AP" data-portal-copyright="Alex Brandon/AP" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/21934015/AP_20276678196557.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	President Trump introduced Judge Amy Coney Barrett as his nominee to the Supreme Court at the Rose Garden on Saturday, September 26. Many attendees did not wear masks. | Alex Brandon/AP	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>More than 20 people in and around the White House have tested positive for the coronavirus in recent weeks &mdash; including<strong> </strong><a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/10/2/21498281/trump-covid-19-coronavirus-positive">President<strong> </strong>Donald Trump</a>, first lady Melania Trump, and their son, Barron Trump.</p>

<p>The president <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1311892190680014849">announced</a> on October 2 that he and Melania Trump had tested positive for the coronavirus that causes Covid-19, joining several other high-ranking US government officials who have contracted SARS-CoV-2. Trump was given an experimental antibody treatment and oxygen at the White House, before being moved to <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/10/2/21499423/trump-coronavirus-walter-reed-hospital">Walter Reed National Military Medical Center</a> in Bethesda, Maryland for three days.</p>

<p>Melania Trump recuperated at home. Barron Trump, <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/first-lady-melania-trump-personal-experience-covid-19/">his mother announced</a> on October 14, tested positive after his parents; the first lady said he was asymptomatic and has since tested negative.</p>

<p>Some prominent officials in the Trump administration have recently tested positive as well, including presidential adviser <a href="https://twitter.com/HallieJackson/status/1313611970655006721">Stephen Miller,</a> as well as press secretary <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/05/politics/kayleigh-mcenany-coronavirus-white-house/index.html">Kayleigh McEnany</a> and at least <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1313582378091241473?s=20">four members of her staff</a>. McEnany &mdash; like&nbsp;<a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/house/519569-barr-reverses-will-quarantine-for-several-days-after-potential-coronavirus"><strong>others in the White House cluster</strong></a>&nbsp;&mdash; failed to immediately quarantine after Trump&rsquo;s diagnosis, and she appeared in front of reporters without a mask in the following days.</p>

<p>While the administration has refused to conduct contact tracing, many Covid-19 cases in the cluster are believed to have originated around the time of a White House event &mdash; which took place <a href="https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/8/19/21364031/coronavirus-air-purifiers-filter-hepa-merv-ventilation">indoors</a> and outdoors &mdash; on September 26 honoring the nomination of <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21453067/amy-coney-barrett-potential-nominee-supreme-court">Judge Amy Coney Barrett</a> to the Supreme Court.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.axios.com/fauci-we-had-a-superspreader-event-at-the-white-house-ff56bb49-b61f-4039-8829-aa136cd4e164.html">Dr. Anthony Fauci</a> of the federal coronavirus task force has called the gathering a &ldquo;superspreader event,&rdquo; criticizing it for being a &ldquo;situation where people were crowded together and were not wearing masks.&rdquo;</p>

<p>A number of attendees tested positive for the coronavirus in the days following the event, including GOP Sens. Mike Lee of Utah and <a href="https://twitter.com/BresPolitico/status/1312184938398056448?s=20">Thom Tillis of North Carolina</a>; former senior White House counselor Kellyanne Conway; and Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien.</p>

<p>Former New Jersey <a href="https://twitter.com/GovChristie/status/1312416381758050305">Gov. Chris Christie</a>, another attendee, also tested positive and was <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/10/10/21510579/chris-christie-leaves-hospital-covid-19-treatment">hospitalized for a week</a>.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/21934049/AP_20270781211633.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Kellyanne Conway announced her positive result in a Twitter post late Friday night. | Alex Brandon/AP" data-portal-copyright="Alex Brandon/AP" /><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/21934050/GettyImages_1228859887.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Many top Republicans attended the White House event without masks or social distancing. Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is seen greeting guests after the news conference. He announced his positive result on Saturday, October 3. | Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Getty Images" /><img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/21934047/GettyImages_1276846547.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Sens. Thom Tillis and Mike Lee are among several people who have tested positive since attending the event. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images" />
<p>Barrett, for her part, was <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/barrett-coronavirus-court-trump/2020/10/02/ecf7c7ce-04cf-11eb-8879-7663b816bfa5_story.html">diagnosed with Covid-19 over the summer</a> but has recovered. It is unknown whether she now carries immunity.</p>

<p>But it&rsquo;s not just the one event. On October 3, <a href="https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1312379172640239617?s=20">Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI)</a> announced he had tested positive. Johnson was not at the Barrett event, but he did attend a lunch with other Republican senators last week. <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/house/521032-michigan-republican-isolating-after-positive-coronavirus-test">Rep. Bill Huizenga&nbsp;(R-MI)</a> said on October 14 he was isolating after a positive test. There was <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-barrett-coronavirus/coronavirus-risks-shadow-barretts-supreme-court-confirmation-hearings-idUSKBN26X235">some concern</a> Barrett&rsquo;s confirmation hearing could contribute to spread given many senators &mdash; <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/520588-gop-senator-attends-barrett-hearings-in-person-after-covid-19-diagnosis">including Lee</a>, who said he is &ldquo;no longer contagious&rdquo; &mdash; are attending in person.</p>

<p>There have been more cases of political figures in recent days, which do not immediately appear linked to the cluster: Joe Biden&rsquo;s campaign announced on October 15 that Kamala Harris&rsquo;s communications director and a flight crew member tested positive for coronavirus. The campaign said that others, including Harris and Biden, have repeatedly tested negative in recent days, and that it is conducting contact tracing.</p>

<p>Beyond the relatively well-known senators, members of the press, and White House officials who have tested positive, less well-known government staff members and security officers have been infected with the coronavirus as well. A number of such cases have been confirmed, including McEnany&rsquo;s deputies, Trump aide Nicholas Luna, and military officials assigned to the White House.<strong> </strong>Vice Commandant Charles Ray of the Coast Guard tested positive, leading <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/10/6/21504499/coronavirus-joint-chiefs-staff-coast-guard-test-positive">other military leaders to enter quarantine</a>.</p>

<p>The White House, in other words, became a Covid-19 hot spot.</p>

<p>Over the summer, Republican Sens. Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy were diagnosed with Covid-19 but have successfully recovered. The virus has also infected more than 15 House members since March. But this is the first time the virus, which has <a href="https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html">killed more than 215,000 Americans</a>, has spread in such a concentrated manner among White House officials, staffers, and members of the press corps.</p>

<p>While it&rsquo;s not clear how the president was exposed, Trump was in regular contact last week with<strong> </strong>senior counselor Hope Hicks, whose positive coronavirus test was <a href="https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1311820562587619333">revealed on Thursday</a>, October 1. Hicks had traveled with Trump multiple times ahead of his diagnosis, including to the September 29 <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/9/29/21493926/first-presidential-debate-winners-losers-biden-trump">presidential debate</a> in Cleveland, Ohio.</p>

<p>Vice President Mike Pence and his wife Karen have both repeatedly tested negative, as have Democratic nominee Joe Biden and his wife Jill. Some other Trump administration officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, have tested negative as well.</p>

<p>Following his recovery, Trump has resumed campaigning, promising to hold a rally nearly every day between now and November 3. He kicked these off with events in <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/10/14/21515705/trump-johnstown-pennsylvania-rally-coronavirus-kissing">Florida and Pennsylvania</a>, and spent part of each event incorrectly stating that those who have had the coronavirus are immune to reinfection.</p>

<p>While the rallies are all expected to be held outdoors, they have, thus far, not featured social distancing or universal mask wearing, <a href="https://www.vox.com/21512819/trump-pandemic-rally-sanford-florida">fueling concerns</a> that they will create new coronavirus clusters, both in the locales in which they are held, and among Trump&rsquo;s staff. And the speculation is not unfounded; <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/09/trump-minnesota-rally-coronavirus-cases-428425">local officials believe</a> a rally the president held on September 18 in Bemidji, Minnesota, caused at least nine cases.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/21959639/1229056889.jpg.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Trump in a black overcoat, white shirt, and red tie, claps; in stands behind him and in a mass in front of the stage are close-packed crowds. Many have red Make America Great Again signs and hats; about one-third have on masks." title="Trump in a black overcoat, white shirt, and red tie, claps; in stands behind him and in a mass in front of the stage are close-packed crowds. Many have red Make America Great Again signs and hats; about one-third have on masks." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="President Donald Trump among supporters at an October 13 rally in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. | Jeff Swensen/Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Jeff Swensen/Getty Images" />
<p>Here&rsquo;s what we know about some key figures who have tested positive &mdash; and negative &mdash; for SARS-CoV-2 so far.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">People in the White House cluster who have reportedly tested positive for the coronavirus</h2>
<p>This list includes people who attended the September 26 Barrett event and/or have had close recent contact with the White House.</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1311892190680014849">President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump</a></li><li><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/first-lady-melania-trump-personal-experience-covid-19/">Barron Trump</a>, the president and the first lady’s son</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1311859538279239686">Hope Hicks</a>, senior adviser to President Trump</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/HallieJackson/status/1313611970655006721">Stephen Miller</a>, senior White House adviser</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/1313138387994509313">Kayleigh McEnany</a>, White House press secretary</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/ShimonPro/status/1313159224583696391">Karoline Leavitt</a>, McEnany aide</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/Santucci/status/1313153083447402498">Chad Gilmartin</a>, McEnany aide</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1313575076772667392?s=20">Jalen Drummond</a>, McEnany aide  </li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1313582378091241473?s=20">A fourth, unnamed, McEnany aide</a></li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/SenMikeLee/status/1312055257992753152">Sen. Mike Lee</a> (R-UT)</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/BresPolitico/status/1312184938398056448?s=20">Sen. Thom Tillis</a> (R-NC)</li><li><a href="https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/10/06/california-congressman-says-he-got-coronavirus-after-sen-mike-lee-interaction-1321724">Rep. Salud Carbajal</a> (D-CA)</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/kellyannepolls/status/1312214949658152960?s=21">Kellyanne Conway</a>, former senior White House counselor </li><li><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/02/trump-campaign-manager-tests-positive-for-covid-19-425722">Bill Stepien</a>, Trump’s campaign manager</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/GovChristie/status/1312416381758050305?s=20">Chris Christie</a>, former New Jersey governor</li><li><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/04/politics/nicholas-luna-body-man-trump-positive-test/index.html">Nicholas Luna</a>, an assistant to President Trump</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/NDSMCObserver/status/1312068039475634176">John Jenkins</a>, president of the University of Notre Dame</li><li><a href="https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/10/05/riverside-megachurch-pastor-who-attended-white-house-event-contracts-covid-19-1321259">Greg Laurie</a>, a pastor at Harvest Christian Fellowship in Riverside, California</li><li>Three journalists from the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/media/three-white-house-journalists-test-positive-for-coronavirus-after-closely-covering-trump/2020/10/02/c907f1c4-04f5-11eb-b7ed-141dd88560ea_story.html">White House press corps</a>, including Michael Shear of the New York Times and <a href="https://twitter.com/Al_Drago/status/1313567437271556096?s=20">photojournalist Al Drago</a></li><li>A White House press staffer, <a href="https://deadline.com/2020/10/white-house-coronavirus-donald-trump-white-house-press-corps-1234590403/">according to the White House Correspondents’ Association</a></li><li>A military aide, according to <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/05/politics/trump-white-house-coronavirus-diagnosis/index.html">CNN</a></li><li>A presidential valet, according to <a href="https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1313507289161236480?s=20">Bloomberg</a></li></ul>
<p>Crede Bailey, the head of the White House security office, was <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-07/white-house-security-official-contracted-covid-19-in-september?sref=yYYRek8e">hospitalized with Covid-19</a> in September, according to Bloomberg. He reportedly became sick before the Amy Coney Barrett event.</p>

<p>Two housekeeping staff members at the White House tested positive in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/04/world/trump-covid-live-updates#two-white-house-residence-employees-who-do-not-have-contact-with-the-president-tested-positive-weeks-ago">early September</a>, according to the New York Times.</p>

<p>Vice Commandant Ray, Sen. Johnson, and Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel have also recently tested positive. Johnson and McDaniel were not at the Barrett event, but <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/02/politics/ronna-mcdaniel-coronavirus/index.html">McDaniel had contact with Trump</a> in the days before it.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A brief list of key politicians and officials who have tested negative</h2>
<p>Vox has compiled a list of key administration figures who help run the country, key lawmakers who have been in contact with the president, and key Democrats in the 2020 election cycle who have recently gotten negative test results for the virus.</p>

<p>While it could take several days for an individual who has contracted the virus to test positive, some recent negative tests have been made public. Here&rsquo;s a partial list so far:</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/10/2/21498487/joe-biden-tests-negative-for-covid-19-trump">Democratic nominee<strong> </strong>Joe Biden and Jill Biden</a></li><li><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/02/politics/pence-coronavirus/index.html">Vice President<strong> </strong>Mike Pence and second lady Karen Pence</a></li><li><a href="https://www.wdsu.com/article/kamala-harris-tests-negative-for-coronavirus/34250763#">Sen.<strong> </strong>Kamala Harris and her husband<strong> </strong>Doug Emhoff</a></li><li><a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/519290-pompeo-says-he-has-tested-negative-for-coronavirus">Secretary of State Mike Pompeo</a></li><li><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/03/us/trump-vs-biden#attorney-general-barr-will-not-self-quarantine-despite-possible-exposure-to-the-coronavirus">Attorney General Bill Barr</a></li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/jseldin/status/1312103005810913280">Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe</a></li><li><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/10/02/us/politics/trump-contact-tracing-covid.html">White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows</a></li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/TreasurySpox/status/1312004725122969601">Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin</a></li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/Drew_Hammill/status/1312120496821923841">House Speaker Nancy Pelosi</a></li><li>Republican Reps. <a href="https://twitter.com/gabemschneider/status/1312134593961586689">Pete Stauber</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/gabemschneider/status/1312134931754090496">Tom Emmer</a> of Minnesota, who traveled with Trump ahead of his positive test </li><li>Republican Sens. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Kelly Loeffler of Georgia, who had been in contact with Trump ahead of his positive test, <a href="https://twitter.com/HayleyMasonTV/status/1312076059614105600">according to a CBS reporter in Atlanta</a></li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/jim_newell/status/1312471010956828672?s=21">Sen. Ted Cruz</a> (R-TX)</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/SenatorLankford/status/1312409354902138881?s=20">Sen. James Lankford</a> (R-OK)</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1312159951238750208?s=20">Sen. Lindsey Graham</a> (R-SC)</li><li><a href="https://www.1011now.com/2020/10/03/sen-sasse-negative-for-covid-19-after-being-around-several-people-whove-now-tested-positive/">Sen. Ben Sasse</a> (R-NE)</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1312532588313997312?s=20">Sen. Josh Hawley</a> (R-MO)</li></ul>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Susannah Locke</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Elizabeth Crane</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Li Zhou</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alex Abad-Santos</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Emily St. James</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Constance Grady</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Aja Romano</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Laura Bult</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Rajaa Elidrissi</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Nisha Chittal</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Jessica Machado</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Allegra Frank</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Hannah Brown</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Meredith Haggerty</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[We read all 25 National Book Award finalists for 2019. Here’s what we thought.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/11/18/20955380/2019-national-book-awards-review" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/11/18/20955380/2019-national-book-awards-review</id>
			<updated>2020-10-15T10:10:53-04:00</updated>
			<published>2019-11-20T23:46:21-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Books" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Every year, the National Book Foundation nominates 25 books &#8212; five fiction, five nonfiction, five poetry, five translated, five young adult &#8212; for the National Book Award, which celebrates the best of American literature. And every year (well,&#160;every year&#160;since&#160;2014), we here at Vox read them all to help smart, busy people like you figure out [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Amanda Northrop/Vox" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19386306/natbookawards2019_final.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Every year, the National Book Foundation nominates 25 books &mdash; five fiction, five nonfiction, five poetry, five translated, five young adult &mdash; for the National Book Award, which celebrates the best of American literature. And every year (<a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/11/12/18068468/2018-national-book-award-finalists-winners">well</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/11/8/16552828/2017-national-book-award-nominees-reviews">every</a> <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2016/11/15/13362580/2016-national-book-award-nominees">year</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.vox.com/2015/11/18/9753832/national-book-award-2015-nominee-reviews">since</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.vox.com/2014/11/19/7246149/national-book-award-nominee-reviews">2014</a>), we here at Vox read them all to help smart, busy people like you figure out which ones you&rsquo;re interested in. Here are our thoughts on the class of 2019. The winners, which were announced November 20, are marked at the top of each category.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fiction</h2><h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Trust-Exercise-Novel-Susan-Choi/dp/1250309883"><em>Trust Exercise</em></a> by Susan Choi — WINNER</h3>
<p><em>Trust Exercise</em> is a viciously elegant novel with a structure so sharp it cuts. It concerns a group of young teenagers at a performing arts high school, a bunch of high-achieving theater kids always trembling on the edge of hormonal overload. Two of them, David and Sarah, are enmeshed in a torrid will-they-won&rsquo;t-they affair; their charismatic acting teacher, Mr. Kingsley, forces them to mine that relationship for stage material repeatedly in front of their classmates.</p>

<p>That&rsquo;s the first section of <em>Trust Exercise</em>, and as compelling as it is &mdash; Choi renders the insular world of a theater kid&rsquo;s high school with claustrophobic intensity &mdash;&nbsp;it&rsquo;s mostly setup. The real story comes in the second two acts, in a twist I won&rsquo;t reveal here. But what ensues is an extended meditation on trust: trust between lovers, between student and teacher, between actor and director &mdash;&nbsp;and the trust that is implicit and unspoken in novels themselves, that lies between the author who writes the novel, the characters who enact the novel, and the readers who read the novel.</p>

<p>Choi plays with our trust, dancing right up on the edge of betraying it, again and again throughout <em>Trust Exercise</em>. But she does it so skillfully, with such intelligence, that all you can feel as you read is delight at having been fooled so well.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Constance Grady</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Sabrina-Corina-Stories-Kali-Fajardo-Anstine/dp/0525511296/"><em>Sabrina &amp; Corina: Stories</em></a> by Kali Fajardo-Anstine</h3>
<p><em>Sabrina &amp; Corina</em> is a world inhabited as much by personal and political history, and the dead, as it is by Kali Fajardo-Anstine&rsquo;s stunningly realistic protagonists.</p>

<p>The 11 stories in her literary debut are, first and foremost, a beautiful testament to Denver, Colorado&rsquo;s indigenous Latina women. Whether it&rsquo;s Corina reckoning with the murder of her strangled cousin Sabrina, who in the titular story becomes &ldquo;another face in a line of tragedies that stretched back generations,&rdquo; or children loving addict parents too &ldquo;caught in [their] own undercurrent&rdquo; to be present, the notion of legacies is of utmost importance. And those legacies concern familial blood, yes, but the long history of racism, poverty, and violence, too.</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s not so much that Fajardo-Anstine&rsquo;s female leads are haunted by this. It&rsquo;s more that navigating the events of the past is a central part of their stories. These are women persisting, and doing so with poise and power. They are figuring out what it means to be a woman <strong>&mdash;</strong> to have ties to Denver that run so much deeper than the white transplants who &ldquo;came with the tech jobs and legalization of weed;&rdquo; to reckon with mortality; and to try to love family, partners, and one&rsquo;s self, even when that love is imperfect.</p>

<p>It&rsquo;s a terrific debut, varied enough to be consumed all at once, but worth savoring.</p>

<p><em> &mdash;Caroline Houck</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Black-Leopard-Wolf-Dark-Trilogy/dp/0735220174"><em>Black Leopard, Red Wolf</em></a> by Marlon James</h3>
<p><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/6/18212431/black-leopard-red-wolf-marlon-james-review"><em>Black Leopard, Red Wolf</em></a> is stunningly ambitious and epic. It&rsquo;s also deliberately, and at times frustratingly, opaque.</p>

<p>The first in a planned trilogy, <em>Black Leopard, Red Wolf</em> takes place in a fantasy land rooted in pan-continental African folklore. There, a boy has gone missing, and a scrappy team of adventurers has assembled to find him.</p>

<p>The plan is that each volume of this trilogy will retell the story of the quest for the boy from a different point of view, <em>Rashomon</em>-style. In this first volume, we see it from the perspective of Tracker, who is basically a magical medieval African Philip Marlowe. Pointedly, Tracker has no emotional attachment at all to the missing boy; also pointedly, he tells us in the very first line that the boy is now dead.</p>

<p>This book is deliberately structured to thwart the reader&rsquo;s desire for a traditional narrative arc. It&rsquo;s also structured to thwart their<strong> </strong>desire for clarity. James withholds proper nouns from his sentences until the last possible moment, which means that as you read, you generally can&rsquo;t tell who&rsquo;s doing what at any given moment: you just get an impression of anonymous limbs tangled together in sex or battle. And that opacity seems to be key to James&rsquo;s ambitions for this trilogy &mdash;&nbsp;but it also means that <em>Black Wolf, Red Leopard</em> can be a bit of a slog, because it is not interested in giving its readers anything solid to hold onto.</p>

<p>Still, James&rsquo;s imagined landscape is lush with bloody and magical details, and the queer romances at the heart of the novel are immensely tender. If nothing else, this book is worth checking out for the sheer scale of the thing.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Constance Grady</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Other-Americans-Novel-Laila-Lalami/dp/1524747149"><em>The Other Americans</em></a> by Laila Lalami</h3>
<p>Laila Lalami&rsquo;s <em>The Other Americans</em> opens up with the protagonist, Nora, receiving the news that her father was killed in a hit and run. As she and her family grapple with this sudden loss, Nora finds herself on a mission<strong> </strong>to discover what actually happened to her father.<strong> </strong>But what she learns about her father&rsquo;s life<strong> </strong>ends up disappointing her.</p>

<p>Even though Nora is the main character, each player has a chance to tell how her father&rsquo;s death changed their life. And as their perspectives push up against Nora&rsquo;s, Lalami begins to delve into the struggles of immigrant families. The chapters from Nora&rsquo;s perspective juxtaposed with the ones from her mother&rsquo;s show how both struggle with what it means to be Moroccan and American. Other chapters show readers how even an event as intimate as death can be inflected by your race, your ethnicity, and how safe you feel in the US.</p>

<p>And as Nora searches for answers, Lalami slowly reveals how the environment for Muslims, immigrants, and people of color in a post 9/11 US contributed to the chaos around the death of Nora&rsquo;s father.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Rajaa Elidrissi</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Disappearing-Earth-novel-Julia-Phillips/dp/0525520414"><em>Disappearing Earth</em></a> by Julia Phillips</h3>
<p>Julia Phillips&rsquo;s riveting <em>Disappearing Earth</em> is technically a novel, but it reads more like a collection of short stories. The book is set in Kamchatka, a remote peninsula in Russia&rsquo;s Far East that is inaccessible by land from the rest of the country, and starts with the disappearance of two young sisters, which nearly everyone across the small peninsula hears about. Each subsequent chapter, however, tells a new story from a new character&rsquo;s perspective rather than following the missing girls&rsquo; story in a linear way.</p>

<p>Through these women&rsquo;s stories, we get a glimpse of how the girls&rsquo; disappearance has rippled through the broader Kamchatka community, but we also hear more about how each of them struggle with the limitations they come up against in their everyday lives in Kamchatka. Some of the women are bored and trapped in unhappy relationships; others are frustrated by the lack of economic resources keeping them stuck in Kamchatka when they long to leave the peninsula and live in Europe; others grapple with the dynamics between white Russians and the indigenous Even people. The peninsula of Kamchatka is almost a character in and of itself, shaping how each of these women view the world and their opportunities within it. The stories seem disconnected at first, but the characters&rsquo; paths start to overlap toward the end of the book for a surprising ending that you won&rsquo;t want to miss. It&rsquo;s a breathtaking page-turner of a novel that covers some very 2019 themes, all while set against the beautiful backdrop of Kamchatka.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Nisha Chittal</em></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Nonfiction</h2><h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Yellow-House-Sarah-M-Broom/dp/0802125085"><em>The Yellow House</em></a> by Sarah M. Broom — WINNER</h3>
<p>I still haven&rsquo;t been to New Orleans. And everything I know about New Orleans comes from friends&rsquo; stories (&ldquo;it&rsquo;s very humid, you&rsquo;d hate it&rdquo;), travel shows spotlighting the food (shrimp etouffee, beignets, gumbo with a roux dark as cocoa powder), and articles about how Katrina and its annihilative waters drowned the city; stories of how, to this day, the trauma of Katrina fundamentally changed the soul of New Orleans.</p>

<p>What this knowledge amounts to is superficial stuff that would pass at a cocktail hour. Sarah Broom&rsquo;s revelatory memoir, <em>The Yellow House</em>, is not that.</p>

<p>Broom&rsquo;s story is about Katrina, but it isn&rsquo;t just about the life-shattering chaos of the storm. <em>The Yellow House</em> is about her family, the non-French Quarter pockets of New Orleans that America forgot about or chose to forget, and the myths of prosperity perched atop the rot of corruption. Ultimately, <em>The Yellow House </em>is about the price the city&rsquo;s black men and women have paid for it.</p>

<p>Broom grafts these narratives onto the bones of her family&rsquo;s yellow house, purchased by Broom&rsquo;s mother&nbsp;Ivory Mae in 1961. Its appearance on the outside was a facade for its structural disorder the inside. The house witnessed what Broom&rsquo;s family &mdash; Broom has seven siblings &mdash; did not show to their friends, the interior anarchy that never slipped beyond the home&rsquo;s raw walls and broken doors.</p>

<p>Katrina&rsquo;s cataclysmic fury destroyed the house, like it did New Orleans. But that&rsquo;s just the beginning of Broom&rsquo;s powerful story.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Alex Abad-Santos</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Thick-Essays-Tressie-McMillan-Cottom/dp/1620974363"><em>Thick: And Other Essays</em></a> by Tressie McMillan Cottom</h3>
<p><em>Thick: And Other Essays</em> isn&rsquo;t a conventional personal essay collection. But Dr. Tressie McMillan Cottom, who holds a PhD in and teaches sociology, makes it a point to bill it as an eight-piece &ldquo;portrait of her own life.&rdquo; She affirms that by focusing on contemporary black womanhood, digging into challenging concepts like the societal difference between &ldquo;black blacks&rdquo; and &ldquo;black ethnics.&rdquo; And with the title essay &mdash; about the size of her body in relation to white beauty standards &mdash; serving as table setting, Cottom&rsquo;s intent becomes clear: She is defining the truth of her own existence, and deconstructing white Americans&rsquo; reactions to her doing so.</p>

<p>For the well-read black woman, <em>Thick</em> won&rsquo;t be a consistently revelatory read. As Cottom herself notes in one of the later essays, there is a growing, if small, cohort of writers online and in print who do a great job covering the intersecting political and personal elements of black feminism. But <em>Thick</em> is nonetheless a significant &mdash; and very readable &mdash; academic exploration of topics like black girlhood, black intellectualism, and black aesthetics.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Allegra Frank</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/What-You-Have-Heard-True/dp/0525560378"><em>What You Have Heard Is True: A Memoir of Witness and Resistance</em></a> by Carolyn Forché</h3>
<p>Poets write the best memoirs, and Carolyn Forch&eacute;&rsquo;s <em>What You Have Heard is True</em> is no exception. It&rsquo;s Forch&eacute;&rsquo;s chronicle of a life-altering encounter with Leonel G&oacute;mez Vides, an activist who opened her eyes to what was going on in his native El Salvador: poverty, unrest, injustice, and much unease.</p>

<p>It was the late 1970s, and Forch&eacute;, who had just published her first book of poetry, was teaching. But at G&oacute;mez&rsquo;s invitation, she traveled from her home in California to El Salvador and then embarked on a tour around the country with G&oacute;mez. The book is a lyrical and pristinely disturbing recounting of that time, and how it awoke within her a calling.</p>

<p>The subtitle of <em>What You Have Heard Is True</em> is &ldquo;A Memoir of Witness and Resistance&rdquo; &mdash; two things, it seems, that Forch&eacute; learned from G&oacute;mez are closely intertwined. He is constantly asking her to not just see what is going on around her as she travels with him, but <em>witness</em> it, to understand it and then gather the courage to speak and write of it.</p>

<p>The decades since are evidence that Forch&eacute; took that charge seriously; since that time, she&rsquo;s called herself a &ldquo;poet of witness.&rdquo; But though it&rsquo;s prose, <em>What You Have Heard is True</em> is no less stunning than her poetry &mdash; sharp, unsparing, and never looking away.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Alissa Wilkinson</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Heartbeat-Wounded-Knee-America-Present/dp/1594633150"><em>The Heartbeat of Wounded Knee: Native America from 1890 to the Present</em></a> by David Treuer</h3>
<p>Five hundred years after Columbus &ldquo;sailed the ocean blue,&rdquo; it&rsquo;s impossible to buy into the white colonialist lore of America, land of the free. We are well aware of the slavery, slaughter, and rape of American Indians and the stripping away of their land and resources, which are the tenets of their spirituality. In <em>The Heartbeat at Wounded Knee</em>, however, David Treuer pushes the reader beyond this narrative of sadness, defeat, and cultures ruined. After the brutal massacre of 150 Lakota Sioux at Wounded Knee Creek in 1890, there was not simply &ldquo;an Indian past&rdquo; and &ldquo;only an American future.&rdquo; The story of American Indians is a testament of insistent, persistent survival.</p>

<p>Treuer weaves in written history, reportage, and personal stories to complete this record of who Indians are post-1890 and who they always have been; he is not content to let <em>Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee</em> by Dee Brown, a white man, be the last, defining word on the Indian. While some of the historical passages on legislative bills and treaties come across a little stiff compared to the intimate portraits &mdash; like a cousin learning to channel his rage through MMA fighting or the young Indian who is finding community online &mdash; these legal and congressional battles remain vital to understanding how Indians have endured.</p>

<p>To be clear, Treuer is not interested in happy, shiny anecdotes of Indians returning to old ways on the reservation or making successes away from it; he portrays the nuance: what it is like to carry your peoples&rsquo; history of fighting literal wars, anger, the bottle. The everyday living of raising kids, making mistakes, working rodeos, foraging for pinecones, selling weed. Being downright, utterly scrappy. The reality of the American Indian is very much the reality of America.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Jessica Machado</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.in/Solitary-Unbroken-Decades-Confinement-Transformation/dp/0802129080"><em>Solitary: Unbroken by Four Decades in Solitary Confinement, My Story of Transformation and Hope</em></a> by Albert Woodfox with Leslie George</h3>
<p>Robert King, Herman Wallace, and Albert Woodfox were the <a href="https://angola3.org/">Angola Three</a> &mdash; three inmates of the notoriously harsh&nbsp;Louisiana State Penitentiary who each spent decades in solitary confinement. Woodfox, the last of the three to be freed, spent 42 years in solitary before his conviction was <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/20/us/albert-woodfox-angola-3-prisoner-louisiana.html">overturned</a> in 2016. <em>Solitary</em>, his memoir of surviving the longest sustained period of solitary confinement in US history, is a vital first-hand account of carceral brutality, told with astonishing aplomb.</p>

<p>Woodfox and his cowriter Leslie George always use the same measured, even tone, whether they&rsquo;re describing Woodfox&rsquo;s childhood in the Treme, New Orleans brutal Sixth Ward, or long-ago crimes &mdash; knocking a girl out with a chair or borrowing buggy horses to ride them, desperate for any release he can get. That understatement becomes a strategy when Woodfox is sentenced to Angola &mdash; a prison erected on a former slave plantation &mdash; for robbery and abruptly enters a nightmare; it&rsquo;s a scene that, like many others, makes use of the N-word to underline its generally unsparing view of violent racism.</p>

<p>Woodfox rattles off detail after detail of the hellscape he&rsquo;s thrust into &mdash; a bogglingly complex ecosystem of violence and corruption. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s painful to remember how violent Angola was in those days,&rdquo; he says at one point. &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t like to go into it.&rdquo; But he does, with prose that shocks because it is so readable, plainspoken, and awful; by the time he&rsquo;s recounting his experience of a claustrophobic panic attack while doing his first stretch in the 6-by-9 solitary confinement cell, a reader might feel claustrophobic, too.</p>

<p>It seems unthinkable that anything can be uplifting in such a place, but the collective spirit and sense of brotherhood among the Angola Three sustains and animates their long, grueling fight for freedom, even through the agony of Woodfox having his conviction finally overturned only for the state to retry and re-convict him. The laborious nature of court proceedings in this context is mainly a reminder that the system can dehumanize its victims in even the most trivial ways; Woodfox is never more passionate than when he&rsquo;s tearing apart the unsourced and fabricated claims made about him in legal affidavits.</p>

<p>Such callous details, juxtaposed against the larger-than-life horrors of Angola, make <em>Solitary</em> a must-read look at the justice system, and of humanity struggling to endure in the most abject and frustrating conditions. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t turn away from what happens in American prisons,&rdquo; he writes, simply, in the end. After reading <em>Solitary</em>, you never will again.</p>

<p>&mdash;<em>Aja Romano</em></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Poetry</h2><h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Sight-Lines-Arthur-Sze/dp/155659559X"><em>Sight Lines</em></a> by Arthur Sze — WINNER</h3>
<p>Sze&rsquo;s tenth volume of poetry is a kaleidoscope of juxtaposition, layered stacks of images from across time and space, presenting a deeply interconnected feel of the universe. Let me give you a taste:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>&ldquo;in the desert, a crater of radioactive glass&mdash;<br>assembling shards, he starts to repair a gray bowl with gold lacquer&mdash;<br>they ate psilocybin mushrooms, gazed at the pond, undressed&mdash;<br>hunting a turkey in the brush, he stops&mdash;&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Awash in nature and unafraid of science, Sze&rsquo;s poems use languages&rsquo; sounds in a lovely way, while addressing the world&rsquo;s horrors.</p>

<p>In some poems, he writes from the perspective of a voiceless, lowly natural thing &mdash; lichens, or in this example salt:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>&ldquo;&#8230; in Egypt I scrubbed the bodies of kings and<br>queens &nbsp; in Pakistan I zigzag upward through twenty-six miles<br>of tunnels before drawing my first breath in sunlight &nbsp; if you<br>heat a kiln to 2380 degrees and scatter me inside &nbsp; I vaporize<br>and bond with clay &nbsp; in this unseen moment a potter prays<br>because my pattern is out of his hands &#8230;&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>&mdash;Susannah Locke</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Tradition-Jericho-Brown/dp/1556594860"><em>The Tradition</em></a> by Jericho Brown</h3>
<p>It&rsquo;s always tricky for me, picking up a new book of poetry. I wonder, will it speak to me? Will it reward whatever work I have to put in to understand it? Fortunately, Jericho Brown&rsquo;s <em>The Tradition</em> pays off on the first page (which opens with &ldquo;Ganymede,&rdquo; in which he reimagines the Greek myth: &ldquo;I mean, don&rsquo;t you want God/ to want you?&rdquo;) and just keeps on giving.</p>

<p>The writing is clear and precise throughout; the topics are modern and rooted in the writer&rsquo;s culture, but they&rsquo;re still universal enough to speak to a reader outside that culture. It can be considered slander to call poems &ldquo;accessible&rdquo; &mdash; as though the only way poems can mean is through the hard work of unlocking all the doors and opening all the windows of a poem&rsquo;s secret house. Brown&rsquo;s poems are accessible the way your friends are accessible: They invite you in, sit you down, talk to you about things that matter in words that revel in their beauty. Please, let&rsquo;s celebrate the radical accessibility of these poems.</p>

<p>Also, I am a sucker for form. Sonnets? Villanelles? Yes, please. When I read the first Duplex in the book<strong> </strong>(a form invented by Brown), I thought, &ldquo;Ooh, nice trick, well executed.&rdquo; But there were four more in the collection, each cleverer than the last, and as I read,<strong> </strong>I became a Jericho Brown fan for life. Writing is good words in good order; poetry is the best words in the best order. Brown&rsquo;s words are in the best order possible.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Elizabeth Crane</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/New-Selected-Poems-Pitt-Poetry/dp/0822945665"><em>“I”: New and Selected Poems</em></a> by Toi Derricotte</h3>
<p>In this 298-page book, containing selections from 40 years of work plus more than 30 new poems, Toi Derricotte invites the reader into an intimate portrayal of trauma, struggle, and triumph. Many of the poems take the shape of stories, feeling like autobiography, a mix of musing and memories.</p>

<p>Derricote&rsquo;s writing can be beautiful, horrific, and sometimes laugh-out-loud funny, as she explores identity, race, gender, and everyday delights. In one section, harrowing first-person accounts of child abuse live next to touching odes to a pet fish (&ldquo;Joy is an act of resistance,&rdquo; she writes). Another provides an unflinching perspective of giving birth without drugs.</p>

<p>Some of Derricotte&rsquo;s most moving work addresses personal and collective trauma, like this section from the new poem &ldquo;Pantoum for the Broken&rdquo;:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Some forget but their bodies do inexplicable things.<br>We don&rsquo;t know when or why or who broke in.<br>Sleepwalking, we go back to where it happens.<br>Not wanting to go back, we make it happen.<br>If we escaped, will we escape again?<br>I leapt from my body like a burning thing.<br>Not wanting to go back, I make it happen<br>until I hold the broken one, hold her and sing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In another new poem, she writes, &ldquo;I see what a great gift it is if a writer just truthfully records the way her mind moves.&rdquo; Derricotte gives us that gift, too.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Susannah Locke</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Deaf-Republic-Poems-Ilya-Kaminsky/dp/1555978312"><em>Deaf Republic</em></a> by Ilya Kaminsky</h3>
<p>For protest art, you can look to the novelists and essayists, but the ones who leave you feeling socked in the gut are the poets, and Ilya Kaminsky is aiming his blows straight at our churning stomach. His first full-length collection, <em>Dancing in Odessa</em>, was released in 2004, which means expectations were at a fever pitch for <em>Deaf Republic. </em>And by my lights, it doesn&rsquo;t disappoint.</p>

<p><em>Deaf Republic</em> is the story of a town, told in a series of poems, in which a young deaf boy named Petya is killed by soldiers as they seek to break up a protest. In response, the townspeople begin to feign deafness in the face of the soldiers, fomenting a revolution of a kind. But Kaminsky, who lives with hearing impairment and whose family fled his native Odessa when he was 16, seeking political asylum in the US, knows deafness firsthand and how to make it into a metaphor. It&rsquo;s a double-edged sword, this deafness: On the one hand, it&rsquo;s a silent but powerful protest; on the other, it suggests that we can shut ourselves off from one another&rsquo;s suffering.</p>

<p>The opening poem, &ldquo;<a href="https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/91413/we-lived-happily-during-the-war">We Lived Happily During the War</a>,&rdquo; positions the story that follows as partly, but explicitly, the American story:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>And when they bombed other people&rsquo;s houses, we&nbsp;</p>

<p>protested<br>but not enough, we opposed them but not</p>

<p>enough. I was<br>in my bed, around my bed America</p>

<p>was falling: invisible house by invisible house by invisible house.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And the final poem, ironically titled &ldquo;In a Time of Peace,&rdquo; begins by reminding Americans that this story, of Petya and the deaf town, is ours:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Ours is a country in which a boy shot by police lies on the pavement<br>for hours.<br>We see in his open mouth<br>the nakedness<br>of the whole nation.<br>We watch. Watch<br>others watch.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Deaf Republic</em> is harrowing and damning, if we dare to listen.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Alissa Wilkinson</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Be-Recorder-Carmen-Gim%C3%A9nez-Smith/dp/1555978487"><em>Be Recorder</em></a> by Carmen Giménez Smith</h3>
<p>At first, it might seem like <em>Be Recorder</em> is looking for an argument. Some early poems almost take the form of tiny essays. They lay bare the oppression and dismissal of marginalized people, even in supposed safe spaces.</p>

<p>After being mistaken for another woman with &ldquo;what you might call a brown name,&rdquo; the narrator in &ldquo;Origins&rdquo; boldly asserts her selfhood through her poetry: &ldquo;here I am with a name that&rsquo;s at the front of this object, a name I&rsquo;ve made singular, that I spent my whole life making.&rdquo;</p>

<p>But <em>Be Recorder</em> is more than one origin story, and Carmen Gim&eacute;nez Smith shows resistance and resilience are not always rewarded. (One line of startling clarity in &ldquo;Self as Deep as Coma&rdquo;: &ldquo;To end a conversation, tell a story of suicide with a girl in it.&rdquo;)</p>

<p>Identity and argumentation soon break down. The titular poem is long and fragmented: &ldquo;Poetry v prose&rdquo; is the first in a long list of dichotomies that collapse onto each other, and the arbitrary hierarchy of the animal kingdom stands in for the arbitrary hierarchy of nations. Gim&eacute;nez Smith asks if the immigrant is doomed to be seen as an albatross, a mere symbol: &ldquo;am I the mariner / and whose bird was it&rdquo;</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>will I be reincarnated as elephant<br>as king as flea as barnacle<br>why am I the locus of your discontent<br>and not your president<br>your intimate the landlord<br>an aesthetic landlord<br>how do I hang from your neck<br>with such ease and when<br>will I be graced with immunity</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>&mdash;Tim Williams</em></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Translated Literature</h2><h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Baron-Wenckheims-Homecoming-L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3-Krasznahorkai/dp/0811226646"><em>Baron Wenckheim’s Homecoming</em></a> by László Krasznahorkai, translated by Ottilie Mulzet — WINNER</h3>
<p>With <em>Baron Wenckheim&rsquo;s Homecoming</em>, L&aacute;szl&oacute; Krasznahorkai closes out his gargantuan four-part literary quartet, begun with his first novel <em>S&aacute;t&aacute;ntang&oacute;</em> in 1985, and continued in The <em>Melancholy of Resistance</em> (1989), <em>War and War</em> (1999), and finally <em>Baron Wenckheim</em>. (The first two books were turned into cinematic masterpieces by Hungarian filmmaker B&eacute;la Tarr.) You thankfully don&rsquo;t have to have read the earlier novels to get through this one, but when characters have cosmic visions of Satan dancing into eternity, it helps to understand that Krasznahorkai has woven certain motifs throughout his tapestry of vanishing Hungarian pastoral life. In Krasznahorkai&rsquo;s writing, the banal and the quotidian are constant gateways to mystical revelations and Kafkaesque insights about our absurd postmodern world &mdash; or at least, they <em>could</em> be, if his characters, and we as ride-alongs, could only manage to catch them before they vanish into ephemera.</p>

<p><em>Baron Wenckheim </em>concerns a retiring man who returns home to his tiny Hungarian village, only to be met with scheming and manipulation from many of its desperate and desolate inhabitants. Anyone focusing too much on the plot, though, will miss the trees for the woods, because the real draw of this shamelessly performative experimental fiction is the endless metaphysical abyss of Krasznahorkai&rsquo;s prose: uninterrupted stream-of-consciousness passages that last for chapters with no breaks of any kind, ruminate simultaneously on the cosmic and the mundane, and fold endlessly onto themselves in a hopeless existential ouroboros, perpetually advancing and retreating before the impossibility of grasping the self and the universe. For example:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote has-text-align-none is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>&#8230; because in reality the fear that existence will cease, and that always in a given case it will cease, is the most elemental force that we know &mdash; and if we can&rsquo;t really enclose this fact in a nice, little box, if we were nonetheless to place all our most significant knowledge in a capsule and shoot it off to Mars &mdash; if we could finally make up our minds and leave behind this earth, which in general we don&rsquo;t deserve (although who knows who&rsquo;s in charge here?), well &mdash; and so here we are again, back with fear &#8230; because just think about what that means: fear, if we regard it as a creationary force, a general power center, from which the gods evaporate, and finally God emerges &#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This approach predictably doesn&rsquo;t add up to tidy narrative conclusions. But if such whirling philosophical exercises rejuvenate and invigorate you, then Krasznahorkai&rsquo;s works are calling your name.</p>

<p>&mdash;<em>Aja Romano</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Death-Hard-Work-Khaled-Khalifa/dp/0374135738"><em>Death Is Hard Work</em></a> by Khaled Khalifa, translated by Leri Price</h3>
<p>In Khaled Khalifa&rsquo;s version of<strong> </strong>Syria, death is the easy part. Living and finding meaning in a country wracked by civil war and mass atrocities proves much more difficult.</p>

<p>Three siblings, Bolbol, Hussein, and Fatima, navigate their broken worlds as they attempt to take the body of their father Abdel Latif for burial back in the hometown he fled many years before. <em>Death Is Hard Work</em><strong> </strong>captures their frustration and dissociation with violence as they physically and metaphorically traverse the divides of their country. They are forced to face their own issues with each other, problems that lead them back to the frustrations with the dead man wrapped up in the back seat. War in this novel is messy in a way that goes beyond airstrikes and refugee flows.</p>

<p>At 180 pages divided into three parts, Khalifa oscillates between complexity and simplicity. We&rsquo;ve all felt like<strong> </strong>Hussein, struggling to feel important, or like Bolbol, swinging back and forth between thinking of himself as a brave hero and thinking of himself as a cowardly outcast. But the numbness, the blas&eacute; nature of tragedy, grant this novel both its undercurrent of dark humor and the fog that lies over its happiness and places the reader deep in the throes of the conflict in Syria. Revolutionaries or rebels, like Abdel Latif, find vigor and life in the hope of breaking the chains of the regime, but those left behind by their seemingly inevitable deaths feel the weight of fear and suffering.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The beautiful translation comes<strong> </strong>courtesy of Leri Price and<strong> </strong>holds on to the integrity of Khalifa&rsquo;s purpose and compelling prose. Normally banal encounters of checkpoints and falling asleep depict the real cost of war. One<strong> </strong>recurring metaphor imagines<strong> </strong>the opportunity for love as a bouquet of flowers floating down a river. And the ignored, rotting corpse of the siblings&rsquo; father becomes a potent symbol of all that the siblings can&rsquo;t bear to face, all of the greater tragedies they ignore so that they can focus on the surface-level injustices against them. After they bury their father, the siblings leave each other with little more than a wave goodbye, relishing their return to the hard work of waiting to die.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Hannah Brown</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Barefoot-Woman-Scholastique-Mukasonga/dp/1939810043"><em>The Barefoot Woman</em></a> by Scholastique Mukasonga, translated by Jordan Stump</h3>
<p><em>The Barefoot Woman</em> is an elegiac tribute by Scholastique Mukasonga both to her mother, Stefania &mdash; the focal point of the book &mdash; and to what life was like for Tutsi residents in Rwanda before the devastating 1994 genocide, when many members of her own family were killed.</p>

<p>Even as it captures the ever-present anxiety in a community racked by violence, <em>The Barefoot Woman</em> also centers heavily on the routine, day-to-day acts that families engage in as they try to build a home together. The book, which is translated from French to English, is as much about commemorating and remembering the sorghum harvest rituals Mukasonga participated in and her mother&rsquo;s matchmaking prowess as it is about capturing the fear and anguish that her family experiences.</p>

<p>Ultimately, <em>The Barefoot Woman</em> is meant to serve as its own marker, not only of the atrocities that have been committed but also of the people these acts attempted to erase. Mukasonga writes to her mother, &ldquo;I&rsquo;m all alone with my feeble words, and on the pages of my notebook, over and over, my sentences weave a shroud for your missing body.&rdquo;</p>

<p>The book is a testament to her memory and her life.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Li Zhou</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Memory-Police-Novel-Yoko-Ogawa/dp/1101870605"><em>The Memory Police</em></a> by Yoko Ogawa, translated by Stephen Snyder</h3>
<p>Yoko Ogawa focuses on the materiality of life on a small, unnamed island in <em>The Memory Police</em>. That&rsquo;s because the premise of her dystopian novel is that the objects that enrich life &mdash; books, perfume, roses, birds &mdash; are systematically disappeared along with the characters&rsquo; memories of them, enforced by a fascist regime.<strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p>The horror of forgetting is baked deeply into this novel. The narrator is an unnamed novelist whose mother was murdered by this regime because she had the power that few on the island have: to remember. The novelist&rsquo;s editor, named simply &ldquo;R,&rdquo; also has this power,<strong> </strong>so the narrator hides him in a bunker in her home. The novel they are writing appears in occasional passages as a mise en scene; it&rsquo;s about a woman who loses her voice, an image that mirrors the novelist&rsquo;s own fears of how she&rsquo;ll continue to write while losing words.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The narrator&rsquo;s only other relationship is with an elderly man she colludes with to hide &ldquo;R&rdquo;; he was once the island&rsquo;s ferry captain before ferries vanished. Whenever another beloved object disappears, the old man responds with empty maxims &mdash; &ldquo;time is a great healer&rdquo; &mdash; or reassurances &mdash; &ldquo;maybe some other flower will grow in its place,&rdquo; after roses disappear. His character represents the most haunting aspect of Ogawa&rsquo;s book: the adaptation and quiet resignation that enables an oppressive regime.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Laura Bult</em></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Young People’s Literature</h2><h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/1919-Year-That-Changed-America/dp/1681198010"><em>1919: The Year That Changed America</em></a> by Martin W. Sandler — WINNER</h3>
<p>Yes, this book exists mostly because 1919 was exactly a century ago. But <em>1919: The Year That Changed America</em> makes a compelling case for both itself and its title.</p>

<p>This is a children&rsquo;s history book that has the wit to open with a giant flood of molasses. But it doesn&rsquo;t shy away from the more solemn tales of a revolutionary moment in US history: <em>1919</em> thoughtfully covers the women&rsquo;s suffrage movement (and the racism it did not expel), the violent suppression of labor and African American civil rights movements, and the Red Scare that helped fuel these crackdowns.</p>

<p>I&rsquo;m very sorry to note, then, that <a href="https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/5/18518005/prohibition-alcohol-public-health-crime-benefits">this very website has debunked the myths around Prohibition</a> &mdash; the other big event of 1919 &mdash; and Martin W. Sandler&rsquo;s history seems to miss the mark here.<strong> </strong>Despite careful inclusion of revisionist sources elsewhere in the book, the author does not cite any in this section.</p>

<p>The conventional story the book imparts is captured by the pull quotes (eye-catching with smart use of color, thoughtfully designed like the rest of the book). One from historical aphorism repository H.L. Mencken is so sweeping, it approaches parody: &ldquo;There is not less drunkenness in the republic, but more. There is not less crime, but more. There is not less insanity, but more.&rdquo; But substantial evidence suggests Prohibition really did reduce problem drinking and didn&rsquo;t increase crime overall, even if organized crime benefited<strong> </strong>from the legislation.</p>

<p><em>1919</em> does invite readers to weigh the costs and rewards of other public health interventions &mdash; including gun control. But, say, a debate over a higher alcohol tax? Maybe that will make it in in 3019.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Tim Williams</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Pet-Akwaeke-Emezi/dp/0525647074/ref=sr_1_9?keywords=pet&#038;qid=1573154318&#038;sr=8-9"><em>Pet</em></a> by Akwaeke Emezi</h3>
<p>Jam thinks she lives in a utopia in Akwaeke Emezi&rsquo;s bittersweet and unsettling YA novel <em>Pet</em>. The largely unspecified revolution happened before she was born, and she now lives in a world free of police violence, of domestic abuse, of injustices big and small. A trans girl, Jam received care that let her socially transition at 3 and physically transition in her teens. The point is: The monsters are gone and the world is better.</p>

<p>Or is it? A strange, lumbering beast crawls out of one of Jam&rsquo;s mother&rsquo;s paintings and makes itself known to Jam, who dubs it Pet. Pet says it is hunting a monster, right there in Jam&rsquo;s supposed utopia, and the thrust of <em>Pet</em> involves Jam learning that monsters are not confined to history books.</p>

<p>This is a fable, more or less, but it&rsquo;s a lovely and loving one, with genuine affection for every character who is even briefly introduced. The relationship between Pet and Jam has real heft, even if this is yet another tale of a normal girl and a magical creature. But the really thoughtful idea here is Emezi&rsquo;s dissection of what justice means, even in a supposed utopia. It&rsquo;s fleeting, and you have to fight for it &mdash; over and over and over again.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Emily VanDerWerff</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Untitled-Jason-Reynolds-w-t/dp/148143828X"><em>Look Both Ways: A Tale Told in Ten Blocks</em></a> by Jason Reynolds</h3>
<p>This is YA author Jason Reynolds&rsquo; second National Book Award nomination. Like his previously nominated work, <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2016/11/15/13362580/2016-national-book-award-nominees">2016&rsquo;s <em>Ghost</em></a>, <em>Look Both Ways</em> channels his vivid voice and his deadpan but tender portraiture of kids growing up in the city, with all its excitement and complexity and cacophony.</p>

<p>In <em>Look Both Ways</em>, Reynolds turns that noise into a polyphonic character study of the city<em>.</em> Billed as a story told in 10 blocks, <em>Look Both Ways </em>channels Armistead Maupin&rsquo;s <em>Tales From the City, </em>unfolding through the varied viewpoints of a class full of children as they walk home from school every day, navigating their respective city streets. Their lives bypass and occasionally intersect with each other, and as the book unfolds, the reader discovers the physical and human geography of the city.</p>

<p>These kids&rsquo; adventures are granular. They are formed moment by moment, block by block: from the ragtag gang who pools their resources to turn 90 cents into an unforgettable memory, to the boy fighting a panic attack when his daily route home is upended, to the kid who expresses a wealth of inarticulable emotions by grabbing a fistful of roses. It&rsquo;s less a novel than a protracted tone poem, with striking imagery (&ldquo;He watched his classmates tap-dance with tongues&rdquo; &#8230; &ldquo;For him, the hallway was a minefield, and there were hundreds of active mines dressed in T-shirts and jeans&rdquo;) accented with subtle commentary on a host of social issues, from health care and poverty to homophobia and bullying. The prevailing takeaway, though, is a sense of indomitable wonder, girded by Reynolds&rsquo; underlying confidence in his city kids. They&rsquo;re doing just fine.</p>

<p>&mdash;<em>Aja Romano</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Patron-Saints-Nothing-Randy-Ribay-ebook/dp/B07HLXDN1J"><em>Patron Saints of Nothing</em></a> by Randy Ribay</h3>
<p>Randy Ribay has packed a lot into this YA novel. It&rsquo;s got the requisite<strong> </strong>messed-up family dynamics, the teen unsure of his path forward, and the love interest, but the real focus is a murder mystery pursued by a total amateur in a faraway country, a place where he doesn&rsquo;t speak the language and doesn&rsquo;t always know who to trust. Throw in more than a splash of misdirection and some pretty pointed opinions on the political situation in the Philippines, and you&rsquo;ve got an out-of-the-ordinary story.</p>

<p>Jay, a Filipino American high school senior with no enthusiasm for college, travels to the country his parents left when he was a baby to solve the mystery behind his cousin Jun&rsquo;s death. Jun is set up as a saint, an impossibly empathetic paragon who is wildly misunderstood by his authoritarian parent (who is an actual cop, as if we needed the emphasis). Jay rides to the rescue of his younger girl cousins and his whole sad family, but he gets so many things wrong and has to learn real truths instead of relying on his idealized version of events. It&rsquo;s just like in life.</p>

<p>Some of the &ldquo;kumbaya&rdquo; family healing at the end feels forced, but Ribay deals well with the emotions and compromises tragedy forces on people. And the plot never gets lost in its march toward understanding, despite the silent family members, the college plans gone awry, and the crush who may or may not be actually interested. I found myself caring more for the flawed, dead Jun than for the Jay who still has his life ahead of him, but I couldn&rsquo;t help rooting for Jay to figure himself out.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Elizabeth Crane</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Thirteen-Doorways-Wolves-Behind-Them/dp/0062317644"><em>Thirteen Doorways, Wolves Behind Them All</em></a> by Laura Ruby</h3>
<p><em>Thirteen Doorways </em>is a ghost story, told by the ghost.</p>

<p>Teenage Frankie, getting by in a World War II-era orphanage with her bratty sister Toni, is mostly unaware that<strong> </strong>she&rsquo;s being haunted by the long-dead narrator Pearl. But she&rsquo;s plenty conscious of the other spectral presences in her life: the missing humanity of cruel head nun Sister George; the absence of her very-much-alive father, who abandoned his children; the lack of joy or light or meatball sandwiches at the orphanage. And now, the list includes her brother Vito &mdash; her father reappears only to take Vito to Colorado with their new stepmother and step-siblings, leaving Toni and Frankie behind.</p>

<p><em>Thirteen Doorways, Wolves Behind Them All</em> is a story of female anger and pain<strong> </strong>&mdash;<strong> </strong>about how terrible it was to be a girl in the past, and the past before that, and the past before that. It&rsquo;s a story<strong> </strong>about the fear and shame and determination that an unfair life instills in the women those girls become, or never get to become.</p>

<p>There are some familiar beats (orphans bond; teens have crushes; ghosts can&rsquo;t quite comprehend their own deaths; women with spirit find that spirit violently quashed), but the language is moody and engaging (at one point, phantom Pearl describes herself as &ldquo;ghostful&rdquo;), and the truth of the central theme &mdash; that danger lurks around every corner &mdash; resonates. It&rsquo;s a story about very real helplessness that manages a glimmer of hope.</p>

<p><em>&mdash;Meredith Haggerty</em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Constance Grady</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Libby Nelson</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Nisha Chittal</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Will Reid</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Decoding the book of the summer, Fleishman Is in Trouble]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/7/10/20680910/fleishman-is-in-trouble-taffy-brodesser-akner-roundtable" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/7/10/20680910/fleishman-is-in-trouble-taffy-brodesser-akner-roundtable</id>
			<updated>2019-07-10T16:46:36-04:00</updated>
			<published>2019-07-10T14:30:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Books" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Critics have anointed Taffy Brodesser-Akner&#8217;s debut novel, Fleishman Is in Trouble, the book of the summer. Fleishman Is in Trouble is a New York Times best-seller. It&#8217;s received raves from reviewers at the New York Times, the Washington Post, NPR, and the New Yorker, among others (including Vox!). The book review aggregator Bookmarks can&#8217;t find [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Random House" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/18278927/9780525510871.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Critics have anointed Taffy Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s debut novel, <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/7/3/20679997/fleishman-is-in-trouble-review-taffy-brodesser-akner"><em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em></a>, the book of the summer.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fleishman-Trouble-Novel-Taffy-Brodesser-Akner/dp/0525510877"><em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em></a> is a New York Times best-seller. It&rsquo;s received raves from reviewers at <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/11/books/review/fleishman-is-in-trouble-taffy-brodesser-akner.html">the New York Times</a>, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/fleishman-is-in-trouble--and-so-is-modern-marriage/2019/06/12/0f63eef0-8d17-11e9-8f69-a2795fca3343_story.html?utm_term=.4356ca6268a6">the Washington Post</a>, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2019/06/18/733430304/fleishman-is-in-trouble-flips-expectations-upside-down">NPR</a>, and <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/fleishman-is-in-trouble-turns-the-marriage-novel-inside-out">the New Yorker</a>, among others (<a href="http://vox.com/culture/2019/7/3/20679997/fleishman-is-in-trouble-review-taffy-brodesser-akner">including Vox!</a>). The <a href="https://bookmarks.reviews/reviews/fleishman-is-in-trouble/">book review aggregator Bookmarks</a> can&rsquo;t find a single negative review of it, and only one that&rsquo;s so much as mixed. <em>Fleishman</em> seems to be one of those books that everyone agrees has universal things to say about the human condition, and is warm and funny to boot.</p>

<p>It deals with Toby Fleishman, 41, newly separated from his wife and entranced by the dating apps that now populate his phone. But as Toby revels in his new freedom, he slowly realizes that his soon-to-be-ex-wife, Rachel, isn&rsquo;t just absent from his life. She seems to have fully disappeared.</p>

<p>Here at Vox, we decided to take a closer look at what all the fuss was about. Vox book critic Constance Grady sat down with deputy policy editor Libby Nelson, engagement editor Nisha Chittal, copy editor Tim Williams, and <em>Today, Explained</em> intern Will Reid for a roundtable discussion. Together, we talked <em>Fleishman</em>, the state of the marriage novel, and that ambiguous ending. If you haven&rsquo;t read the book yet yourself, beware of spoilers below.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Fleishman</em> is a smash hit. But is it fun to read?</h2>
<p><strong>Constance Grady:</strong> <em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em> clearly wants to be a big, ambitious novel that has things to say about gender and marriage and class and living in America today, and we&rsquo;ll get into how it handles most of those in a little bit. But just to start off, let&rsquo;s hit the most important question of all: Is it enjoyable to read?</p>

<p>For me: Yes, very much so! If you&rsquo;ve read one of the profiles that Taffy Brodesser-Akner has written <a href="http://www.taffyakner.com/work">in her other life as a magazine writer</a>, you know that she can really write a sentence, so it&rsquo;s not a surprise that her prose is sparkling and twisty and witty all the way through the novel. But what really impressed me about this book is actually the same thing that I think elevates Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s profiles above basically every other writer&rsquo;s in the game: She always goes out of her way to find the humanity in her subjects, even the ones that she knows her readers are looking forward to mocking.</p>

<p>In another writer&rsquo;s hands, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/magazine/big-business-gwyneth-paltrow-wellness.html">that Gwyneth Paltrow profile</a> just becomes a collection of wacky things Gwyneth says that can get aggregated into a snarky listicle, right? And in another writer&rsquo;s hands, Toby really is the aggrieved and wronged party that he believes himself to be and Rachel really is the bitter shrew that he presents her to us as.</p>

<p>But with Brodesser-Akner at the helm, it&rsquo;s impossible not to empathize with everyone, even when we can very clearly see their failings and their foibles. For me, that&rsquo;s what makes this book so absorbing to read.</p>

<p>But that&rsquo;s just me! Did it work for you? Or are you a <em>Fleishman</em> skeptic?</p>

<p><strong>Libby Nelson: </strong>I am a gulper-down of novels in general, and I read the last half of <em>Fleishman </em>in a propulsive sprint, finishing it on my couch at 2 am on a workday. But this speed-read astonished even me, because it should have been <em>so</em> not my thing: I can appreciate good contemporary literature with a well-turned sentence, but the books I love and read late into the night are usually plot-driven novels, often set in the past or with murders or both, with women as their primary protagonists. If I weren&rsquo;t a Taffy Brodesser-Akner completist who viewed preordering her first novel as something akin to an obligation, I likely never would have picked it up at all.</p>

<p>I&rsquo;m so glad I did, because if I hadn&rsquo;t, I would have missed out on <em>Presidentrix, </em>a running bit through Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s book. One of the characters is an agent who represents the creator of <em>Presidentrix,</em> essentially a through-the-looking-glass, gender-flipped version of <em>Hamilton: </em>an unlikely biography-as-musical by a Hispanic artist about Edith Wilson, Woodrow Wilson&rsquo;s wife. I volunteered for this discussion mostly so I could yell about <em>Presidentrix, </em>because it deserves more credit for being both one of the funniest things I&rsquo;ve encountered in a book in ages and a neat encapsulation of some of the broader points <em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em> wants to make about gender and narrative.</p>

<p>So yes, I enjoyed it &mdash; somewhat to my surprise. Not all of it worked perfectly for me, for reasons I&rsquo;m sure we&rsquo;ll explore, but Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s voice and wit were more than enough to carry me through.</p>

<p><strong>Nisha Chittal:</strong> This book is extremely my cup of tea &mdash; I love contemporary novels about adults navigating the messiness of modern life &mdash; and it did not disappoint. Many reviews have described this as a book about marriage or a book about a divorce, but I also saw it as about something broader: middle-age malaise. Everyone in <em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em>, whether it&rsquo;s the Fleishmans or their friends or the narrator, appears to be having a midlife crisis of some sort. (After finishing the book, I immediately started worrying about whether this is just what being in your 40s looks like.)</p>

<p>What I found most surprising<strong> </strong>about the book is how Brodesser-Akner tricks readers into sympathizing with Toby Fleishman. The story is told from his perspective for the vast majority of the novel, and Rachel is unquestionably the villain in the marriage &mdash; she&rsquo;s a cold, careerist social climber who&rsquo;s never home from work early enough for dinner with the kids, while Toby is a martyr who singularly does all the child care.</p>

<p>There are, of course, two sides to every story, and a savvy reader will probably pick up quickly that something is missing in Toby&rsquo;s story. When you finally hear Rachel&rsquo;s side of things at the end of the book, it delivers an immense payoff for the reader, and I think it will particularly resonate with a lot of female readers. I loved that the ending really underscored the invisible work that women often do, the immense amount of pressure they face, and how little the men in their lives understand both of those things.</p>

<p><strong>Will Reid: </strong>Nisha, I love what you said about feeling sympathy for Toby. How could we not when we feel we understand his perspective so well? But I&rsquo;m sure I wasn&rsquo;t alone in the dread of feeling we weren&rsquo;t getting the whole story. At times, the book honestly felt like a horror movie: I found myself constantly trying to anticipate when a jump cut would reveal the monster Toby really was.</p>

<p>That&rsquo;s not, in the end, entirely how things turned out. (Rachel treats Toby with far more empathy than he extends to her, and so I found him less monstrous than pathetic.) But the suspense kept me reading well past my bedtime. I was happy to give up the sleep.</p>

<p>Another thing I enjoyed: Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s narrator. Elizabeth Slater, n&eacute;e Epstein &mdash; who goes by Libby &mdash; is an old friend of Toby&rsquo;s from college. They&rsquo;ve fallen out of touch until the divorce drives Toby to call her for support. (We eventually learn that she&rsquo;s spending hours and hours on the phone with him, her own escape from middle-age malaise.)</p>

<p>Biographically, Libby&rsquo;s too much like the author <em>not</em> to notice: Like Brodesser-Akner, she&rsquo;s a writer who lives in New Jersey and who used to work for a men&rsquo;s magazine writing celebrity profiles. (Brodesser-Akner wrote for GQ.) So what you pointed out, Constance, about bringing the same sensitivity to contradiction and humanity to bear on her fictional characters as she does her profile subjects doesn&rsquo;t feel like an accident. It&rsquo;s baked into the character.</p>

<p>What I really like about Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s nonfiction is the way she plays with pulling back the curtain. Her <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/27/movies/bradley-cooper-a-star-is-born.html">profile of Bradley Cooper</a>, for instance, is as much about the actor as it is an argument in favor of the celebrity profile itself. So it didn&rsquo;t surprise me when, in a magnificently meta moment, Libby proposes to write the book we now hold in our hands and tells Toby (and us) how it ends. To use a sports metaphor Toby would abhor, Brodesser-Akner tees up the ending for herself and drives it to a satisfying finish.</p>

<p><strong>Libby: </strong>When it comes to the broader arguments the book wants to make about gender, narrative, and whose stories get listened to, planting the way that Libby weaved her own life experience into the profiles she wrote of famous men is brilliant. (This brings me back to <em>Presidentrix</em> again: It&rsquo;s a very funny joke, but the humor works in part because society views women&rsquo;s stories as worth less than men&rsquo;s. A buzzy modern musical about a forgotten Founding Father is improbable &mdash; try to remember how bizarre &ldquo;hip-hop musical about Alexander Hamilton&rdquo; sounded when you first heard it &mdash; but the suggestion of a similar show about a woman, no matter how fascinating her forgotten story is, cranks up that unlikeliness to pure satire.)</p>

<p>From a narrative and character perspective, the same tricks that make <em>Fleishman</em> such a compelling and vital book occasionally made the story not quite land for me. Are we supposed to assume that Libby&rsquo;s narration is reliable, or read Toby&rsquo;s experiences as a blend of his own and his narrator&rsquo;s?  What, in the end, are we supposed to make of Rachel, and Toby, and their marriage? The final pages depicting Rachel&rsquo;s insomnia and breakdown are harrowing &mdash; I&rsquo;m not sure I&rsquo;ll ever look at Chinese takeout the same way again &mdash; but I couldn&rsquo;t help but wish that we&rsquo;d had a bit more of her, that her narrative had been given a few minutes to breathe.</p>

<p><strong>Tim Williams:</strong> I found this book engrossing, but I did have some nitpicks: I don&rsquo;t think all the characters get the full empathetic profile treatment Brodesser-Akner is known for. The main ones, certainly! It&rsquo;s an inspired choice to make Toby the self-proclaimed &ldquo;good parent&rdquo; who actually does seem like a good parent in many ways. Rachel is a never-satisfied multimillionaire, but we come to understand why, and root for her too.</p>

<p>But the characterization and dialogue of others (for me, this includes finance bro Seth and some people in T-shirts with embarrassing slogans) occasionally feels over-the-top or too neat. Brodesser-Akner deploys the repeated use of &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t know&rdquo; in one memorable line from young resident Joanie: &ldquo;I thought I don&rsquo;t know. I know you just got divorced and I know it&rsquo;s not the same thing but I&rsquo;m sad and you&rsquo;re sad and I don&rsquo;t know.&rdquo; I liked it, but it might arguably take away from the poignancy beneath her words.</p>

<p>Many of the stylistic choices I really liked, though. The dating app hellscape is a huge part of the book; it could easily come off as immediately dated, but it just works. That recurring waking nightmare about Chinese takeout food is a standout in the impeccable section where we finally get to meet<strong> </strong>Rachel and the horror brought upon her.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The marriage at the center of <em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em> is toxic to the core</h2>
<p><strong>Constance:</strong> Another big question: Is this book&rsquo;s treatment of marriage and the way marriage and gender interact convincing?</p>

<p>I am not married, but what impressed me about the treatment of marriage here was that no one person&rsquo;s understanding of it is completely allowed to dominate the book. Toby has all these righteous idealistic ideas about marriage that are curdled by his own resentment, but you also have Seth, who feels empty without marriage, and Libby, who is very clear-eyed about how much she likes being married, even when she feels trapped by it.</p>

<p>Libby has that great line toward the end: &ldquo;What were you going to do? Were you not going to get married when your husband was the person who understood you and loved you and rooted for you forever, no matter what?&rdquo; There&rsquo;s this sense in her narration that being married will involve long periods of discontent and frustration but that it&rsquo;s still worthwhile, which is actually pretty optimistic for a divorce novel.</p>

<p>But the central marriage in this book revolves around one major concern: Is it possible in our culture, given its gender norms, for a woman to outstrip her husband in ambition and wealth and career and for everyone involved to be okay with it? Or is that woman always going to be trapped under the weight of everyone else&rsquo;s expectations?</p>

<p>The Fleishman marriage would seem to argue that maybe she can&rsquo;t. And Libby&rsquo;s marriage isn&rsquo;t necessarily a very optimistic answer to that question either, because Libby leaves her job as a journalist in part because she can&rsquo;t deal with the pressure of having to be a mom while also working a full-time job. But there&rsquo;s also a suggestion that she maybe writes <em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em>, in which case I guess she&rsquo;s a celebrated New York Times best-selling author now, so maybe it works out for her.</p>

<p>For me, the conclusions Brodesser-Akner seems to come to on these questions &mdash;&nbsp;that a marriage in which the woman is the primary breadwinner can maybe work, but not without a struggle, or without both partners trying &mdash; feel convincing. But does it work for you?</p>

<p><strong>Nisha: </strong>The book really emphasizes the idea that gender roles are reversed in the Fleishman marriage; a lawyer even<strong> </strong>once tells Toby that he&rsquo;s &ldquo;the wife.&rdquo; Rachel is the workaholic and the breadwinner, while Toby cooks and takes care of the kids (he&rsquo;s no slouch, as a doctor, but he doesn&rsquo;t aspire to climb the ladder much higher). And Brodesser-Akner masterfully illustrates how tough it is for women to pull off this arrangement, even in the supposedly woke era of 2019.</p>

<p>Although Rachel started her own business and makes a seven-figure income that supports the entire family, Toby still resents her for not spending as much time with the kids as he does, and for extending her business trips by an extra day. These are things that would be pretty common for a male partner in a heterosexual marriage &mdash; but when a woman does it, she&rsquo;s viewed by those around her as too ambitious, too careerist, not family-oriented enough. And in the end, Rachel does break down because of the pressures<strong> </strong>to be and do everything and to fulfill the expectations of the men around her, pressures that she manages well for years but eventually can no longer cope with.</p>

<p>On the book&rsquo;s portrayal of marriage: I think the Fleishman marriage is a particularly acrimonious one. They both harbor contempt and resentment toward each other. They both bottle up their feelings instead of talking about them. They have communication issues and seem to be on different pages about what kind of life they want. And Toby has a lot of insecurities that often manifest in resentment toward Rachel for being more ambitious than he is &mdash; both in her career and in the type of life that she wants. So it&rsquo;s a portrait of a pretty toxic marriage, for sure, but I don&rsquo;t take it as an indictment of marriage or even of whether an unconventional female-breadwinner marriage can survive. I just think that Toby and Rachel were phenomenally mismatched for each other, and that Toby perhaps has a lot to learn about all of the invisible work that women do.</p>

<p>I think Libby&rsquo;s marriage to Adam is probably a more realistic portrayal of a happier marriage, even though Libby often chafes at the dullness of suburban New Jersey, and even though she eventually quit her men&rsquo;s magazine job after feeling marginalized for years. To me, the overall message is that marriage is complicated, it takes work, and it isn&rsquo;t what the rom-coms and Disney fairy tales lead you to believe. But that&rsquo;s what I love so much about this type of book &mdash; it really captures the complexities of the human experience, and in that sense, it felt very convincing to me.</p>

<p>That said, I don&rsquo;t think &ldquo;complicated&rdquo; and &ldquo;it takes work&rdquo; are bad things &mdash; they&rsquo;re just accurately reflecting real life. Of course merging two lives legally and financially and logistically for life is complicated! That doesn&rsquo;t mean it&rsquo;s not worth doing. I think Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s overall message is a positive one: A<strong> </strong>healthy marriage where the partners both try, and are both the right fit for each other, can be a wonderful thing. All marriages have ups and downs, but the point is to have the ups far outnumber the downs.</p>

<p><strong>Tim:</strong> I also thought the marriage crises &mdash; and one of the potential solutions &mdash; were specific and convincing. They build over time and a million tiny slights that each person can&rsquo;t help but indulge in. Which is not to say the warfare is symmetrical; Rachel and Libby spend a lot of time anticipating how they will be misunderstood. Rachel finds it hard just to admit she hates long walks, let alone that she may have been sexually assaulted by a doctor.</p>

<p>In Libby&rsquo;s magazine profiles, she can&rsquo;t escape telling women&rsquo;s stories as &ldquo;the struggle to be the kind of woman who gets interviewed.&rdquo; But even this kind of narrative confuses Toby, who doesn&rsquo;t<strong> </strong>see Rachel&rsquo;s boss hitting on her or retaliation for her becoming pregnant as systemic abuses of women in the workplace. Toby is only interested in his own narrative &mdash; and so he&rsquo;s just mad that someone went after &ldquo;his&rdquo; wife.</p>

<p>So can these marriages work? Yes, but only if the people in them are willing to hear each other, and push back against the power imbalances that shape their stories. That&rsquo;s really hard to do.</p>

<p>Brodesser-Akner finds this insight despite her book involving a small set of rich people, mostly on the Upper East Side of New York. The limits of this vantage point are carefully acknowledged: Toby is shown to despise any display of wealth besides his own, and Rachel&rsquo;s struggles against workplace sexism are complicated by her occasionally exploitative treatment of the women below her. Still, I often found myself nodding along at the Fleishmans&rsquo; conflicts over tiny differences of class: what house in the Hamptons to buy and what cookware you are allowed to put in it. This bubble was both totally foreign and understandable.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The characters&rsquo; heterosexual bubble in the city was less convincing. I almost forgot that we do see a glimpse outside it. Rachel goes to the apartment of <em>Presidentrix</em> creator Alejandra Lopez in desperation, walking in unannounced for the first time in their long business relationship, and encounters Lopez&rsquo;s wife, Sofia, a WASP stay-at-home mom.</p>

<p>The implications there are interesting. Did Sofia really want to quit her job? Are these two people replicating the power imbalances of other well-to-do couples, or are they totally at peace? But I wish we had heard a little more from voices like these; the discussions of marriage would feel more complete. Seth sort of serves as the marriage gadfly, but even with his cartoonish levels of privilege, he feels acute pressure to be included in respectable coupledom. (Which, same.)</p>

<p><strong>Will: </strong>Tim, I hear your point. The novel concerns a rarified group with fairly narrow ideas about marriage. I&rsquo;m someone for whom marriage is still a long way off, so I feel a bit out of place answering this question. But if the main takeaway here is that relationships take work, I sort of feel like &#8230; duh? That feels enough like common knowledge among my own group of 20-somethings that it&rsquo;s become clich&eacute;. (That having an SO is like taking an extra class was frequently memeified in our university-wide Facebook group.)</p>

<p>Where Brodesser-Akner&rsquo;s novel feels new, and even a little radical, is that it asks whether happiness in marriage is possible at all. We don&rsquo;t get a neat resolution here. Vanessa and Seth ominously get into an argument at their engagement party. Libby has to resign a lot about herself to feel happy in her marriage. (That she supposedly goes on to write the novel in an auspicious return to the writing life doesn&rsquo;t feel like a convincing out, if only because we don&rsquo;t know how that endeavor influences their marriage. Who knows? Maybe she and Adam don&rsquo;t last.) And Rachel&rsquo;s return might lead her and Toby to get back together and figure out how not to hate each other. Or it might not.</p>

<p>The characters do realize they need to accept themselves and their marriages, or lack thereof. Toby recognizes he might &ldquo;figure out a way to extract himself from the idea that he lived in contrast to [Rachel.]&rdquo; Libby thinks, &ldquo;What would be so wrong with finally mellowing out?&rdquo; We could call these realizations solutions to the problem. But the novel doesn&rsquo;t put these solutions to the test. Instead, we&rsquo;re left with a lot of ambiguity.</p>

<p><strong>Libby:</strong> It&rsquo;s hard to finish the last section and not want to immediately turn back to the beginning and see the whole story with new eyes. <em>Fleishman Is in Trouble</em> is a book that&rsquo;s unquestionably of our moment &mdash; but also one that is seemingly built to reward rereading.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ending is purposely ambiguous, but that doesn’t mean we can’t fight about it anyway</h2>
<p><strong>Constance:</strong> I agree that this is a novel we&rsquo;re going to see people reread a lot, and I think one of the big pleasures of rereading will be getting the chance to change your mind about that ambiguous ending and then fighting about it.</p>

<p>So! Lightning round-style: In the ending, do you think Rachel is going back to Toby for good, and if so, is that a good thing?</p>

<p>My answer is that yes, she is going back to him, and no, that&rsquo;s not a good thing. Rachel and Toby will be exactly as miserable as they always have been, because Toby is never going to put in the work to empathize with her &mdash;&nbsp;while Rachel is too trapped by her beliefs about what happiness should look like for her to break away from their marriage for good.</p>

<p>What do you think?</p>

<p><strong>Tim:</strong> I agree that<strong> </strong>they get back together, despite Toby being the worst. Maybe one of them eventually pulls the plug; I don&rsquo;t see Toby giving up his apps. But as we&rsquo;ve already seen with the kids involved (a whole other discussion to be had!), their parental guilt will make it doubly hard to end things. And the impossible choices will continue regardless.</p>

<p><strong>Will: </strong>They might get back together, but it&rsquo;s hard to imagine Toby getting over Rachel&rsquo;s disappearance (or her sleeping with Sam Rothberg, for that matter.) His moment of epiphany at the end seems conditioned on forgetting that Rachel ever existed: &ldquo;If he could imagine &#8230; she&rsquo;d just sort of ascended into the heavens and would remain a ghost that some people sometimes saw, he could proceed.&rdquo; That&rsquo;s hardly a model for marital bliss. Don&rsquo;t do it, Rachel!</p>

<p><strong>Nisha: </strong>Yes, I think Rachel showing up on Toby&rsquo;s doorstep means they&rsquo;ll get back together, but I agree with Constance that I don&rsquo;t think that&rsquo;s a good thing. I think Rachel and Toby are ultimately not the right partners for each other, and they might have a brief honeymoon phase because they&rsquo;re happy to be reunited, but ultimately I think their relationship will be just as unhappy and as unhealthy as it was before. Also after everything Rachel went through in dealing with the expectations of men &mdash; Toby and Sam &mdash; maybe she would be better off taking some time to herself!</p>

<p><strong>Libby: </strong>I&rsquo;m going to be the outlier here; I&rsquo;m not sure that they&rsquo;re getting back together or if Rachel&rsquo;s just reentering Toby&rsquo;s life after her absence. But maybe that&rsquo;s wishful thinking, because what we&rsquo;ve seen over the entire book prior to that moment really suggests that their marriage is likely beyond repair. If she is coming back, then I agree with the rest of you: It&rsquo;s a very bad idea.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why we need to get to know the “bad gays” of history]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/6/26/18715040/bad-gays-podcast-roy-cohn-lawrence-of-arabia-andrew-sullivan-lgbtq-pride" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/6/26/18715040/bad-gays-podcast-roy-cohn-lawrence-of-arabia-andrew-sullivan-lgbtq-pride</id>
			<updated>2022-02-06T10:53:11-05:00</updated>
			<published>2019-06-26T16:00:00-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[LGBTQ Pride Month is a time to celebrate the queer people in history who have fought for equal rights. But how should we talk about influential queer figures who don&#8217;t fit that narrative? That&#8217;s the idea behind the new podcast Bad Gays from writers Ben Miller and Huw Lemmey. LGBTQ history is often ignored or [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="Lawrence of Arabia in 1927, dressed in the clothing of the Arabs he fought for — and against — during the colonial independence movement. | Bettmann Archive" data-portal-copyright="Bettmann Archive" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/16679688/GettyImages_514705466.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Lawrence of Arabia in 1927, dressed in the clothing of the Arabs he fought for — and against — during the colonial independence movement. | Bettmann Archive	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p><a href="https://www.vox.com/2014/6/8/5786368/lgbt-gay-pride-month-2019">LGBTQ Pride Month</a> is a time to celebrate the queer people in history who have fought for equal rights.</p>

<p>But how should we talk about influential<strong> </strong>queer figures<strong> </strong>who don&rsquo;t fit that narrative?</p>

<p>That&rsquo;s the idea behind the <a href="https://badgayspod.podbean.com/">new podcast <em>Bad Gays</em></a> from writers Ben Miller and Huw Lemmey. LGBTQ history is often ignored or <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/16/18071460/bohemian-rhapsody-queerphobia-celluloid-closet-aids">misrepresented</a> in pop culture. Even among historians, the focus at times has been on finding and recognizing the queer heroes. <em>Bad Gays</em>, focusing on the &ldquo;evil and complicated gay men in history,&rdquo; tries to tell some of the stories that get left out.</p>

<p>Each installment of<strong> </strong>the podcast&rsquo;s 10-episode first season centers on a particular historical figure. Some are famous, like Lawrence of Arabia, but questions about their sexual identity have often been considered more as scandals or footnotes than as important details of their story.</p>

<p>And &ldquo;bad&rdquo; can be as slippery a term as &ldquo;gay&rdquo; for <em>Bad Gays</em>&rsquo; subjects. (The title is a clever misdirect; it&rsquo;s not just about villains, and definitely not about <a href="https://twitter.com/spenc2110/status/1141535411363340288">performative enthusiasm for brunch</a>.) &ldquo;Some of them are bad because they went along with the prevailing spirit of their time,&rdquo; Miller says. &ldquo;Some of them might have been considered bad at the time or might be considered bad in popular conversation, but actually we end up coming to a more sympathetic understanding of them.&rdquo;</p>

<p><em>Bad Gays</em>&rsquo; first episode concerns a less well-known figure: Nazi leader Ernst R&ouml;hm, &ldquo;the world&rsquo;s first openly gay politician.&rdquo; The show later turns to perhaps <a href="http://outhistory.org/blog/in-the-archives-friedrich-radszuweit-and-the-false-security-of-collaboration/">the first publisher of gay, lesbian, and transgender magazines</a> &mdash; who tried to appease the Nazis. Lawrence of Arabia makes his appearance, along with <a href="http://rictornorton.co.uk/lawrence.htm">BDSM fiction</a> he writes that is tied to his deeply problematic work in the colonial Middle East.</p>

<p>Listeners also hear about a very different side of Andrew Sullivan, the contemporary writer who helped popularize the conservative case for gay marriage and <a href="http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/andrew-sullivan-what-democrats-can-learn-from-steve-bannon.html">continues</a> to argue against perceived radicalism in the LGBTQ community. An actual spy struggles with layers of concealed identity, and the season ends with a<strong> </strong>fixture of the McCarthy era and Donald Trump mentor, Roy Cohn, who aids a witch hunt against imagined gay spies in the US government. (<em>Bad Gays</em> labels him the &ldquo;Polestar of Human Evil.&rdquo;)</p>

<p>Each of these subjects becomes totally fascinating through <em>Bad Gays</em>&rsquo;<em> </em>lens; the rigorous research and eye for telling details evoke the feeling of unraveling a mystery. It&rsquo;s also pretty funny &mdash; each episode ends with reality TV-style snap judgments of &ldquo;bad gay or not bad gay?&rdquo;</p>

<p>I reached out to Miller and Lemmey to find out how they managed to make a podcast on a really difficult and sensitive topic accessible and a joy to listen to.</p>

<p>&ldquo;We did want to make a show that people could sort of laugh along to. We wanted to make a show that was kind of juicy,&rdquo; Miller told me, adding, &ldquo;But there&rsquo;s something more than just fun to be had.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Lemmey and Miller <a href="https://badgayspod.podbean.com/e/special-episode-andy-warhol-with-sholem-krishtalka/">just released a bonus episode on Andy Warhol</a> with artist and writer Sholem Krishtalka, and plan to release season two in the next few months. In the meantime, our conversation about how they choose their subjects, debates over gay identity in history, &ldquo;evil twink energy,&rdquo; and how we might learn from the mistakes of the bad gays, is below.</p>

<p><em>The following interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.</em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>I admit I probably wouldn&rsquo;t listen as raptly to a <em>Good Gays</em> podcast. So how do you critique the badness in gay history versus sort of reveling in it?</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Huw Lemmey</h3>
<p>For us, the interest is not to perpetuate the idea of these good and bad role models, but to use the idea of the &ldquo;bad gay&rdquo; to talk about things that just focusing on activist heroes or authors or artists might not allow you access to. For example, Lawrence of Arabia or, actually, most of our subjects.</p>

<p>So, yeah, I think that the title is slightly tongue in cheek and sort of eye-catching.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>The show is, so far, about the bad gay <em>men </em>of history because, as you repeatedly note, &ldquo;men are definitionally the most bad.&rdquo; Define definitionally. Why are these specific men the ones chosen?<em> </em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ben Miller</h3>
<p>I suppose it&rsquo;s my word. I mean, I suppose that phrase began as a bit of a joke really. But like all jokes, it has its roots somewhere real.</p>

<p>Some of [the subjects] are bad because they went along with the prevailing spirit of their time, a spirit which in some cases has changed; in some cases unfortunately it hasn&rsquo;t. Some of them are bad because they do specifically evil things. Some of them might have been considered bad at the time or might be considered bad in popular conversation, but actually we end up coming to a more sympathetic understanding of them. <em> </em></p>

<p>In terms of why men are bad, I suppose it has to do with cultural and social construction of patriarchy in which men have more power and power leads to abuse. So I don&rsquo;t think it&rsquo;s some sort of radical feminist conviction that men are biologically evil, but instead kind of an understanding about power and how it is abused &mdash; which is also a theme, of course, that keeps coming up in the show itself.</p>

<p>I think on the question of your stereotypical &ldquo;good gay&rdquo; &mdash; I mean, one of the people that we profile, Andrew Sullivan, is someone whose entire kind of public career has been about embodying and promoting the good gay as a lifestyle. So the ones who go around screaming how good they are often are the most kind of problematic and chewy and interesting. <em> </em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Huw Lemmey</h3>
<p>We&rsquo;ve tried to stay away from too many serial killers. There were a lot of serial killers, and some of them have very interesting stories. But these stories reflect something more interesting about gay identity.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>I think that comes through very clear in the one true crime episode, about two rich nihilist lovers, <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/leopold-and-loebs-criminal-minds-996498/">Richard Loeb and Nathan Leopold</a>, who planned the &ldquo;perfect&rdquo; murder together in Chicago during the<strong> </strong>Jazz Age. There are really interesting ideas in the episode about the death penalty and the birth of psychology. The &ldquo;insanity&rdquo; defense was sort of brought out of this case.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ben Miller</h3>
<p>In that particular case, the kind of &ldquo;born this way&rdquo; line about gay people is first used in a big splashy public setting not as an activist plea but as a kind of excuse for murder, in the context of this very strange trial. And I think we both found that really fascinating.</p>

<p>[Loeb and Leopold&rsquo;s lawyer took on the case to attack the death penalty. He brought in supposed psychological experts to try to prove that these two men, who were famous for their lack of remorse for anything, were incapable of acting differently. And the lawyer linked their nihilism to their gayness, without quite naming it.]</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>There are these revealing moments in the show found in private letters. The two Chicago lovers have a falling out at one point, and Leopold writes a &ldquo;Can We Still Be Friends?&rdquo; letter. Which is just brutal in how it tries to be businesslike and cordial about the dangers they face from public scrutiny as gay men while still making clear his true feelings.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Huw Lemmey</h3>
<p>Well, I think part of that is the way that history [works] and what we retained from the archives, especially in the 19th and 20th century, the spaces where people could be open about their emotions which now survive.<em> </em></p>

<p>So the private letters is one of the few aspects of that archive that probably still survive. And obviously in lots of cases don&rsquo;t survive. &#8230; There&rsquo;s lots of cases especially from those of the middle of the 20th century of men burning all their archives of letters &mdash; some really important &mdash; because they were terrified of being exposed. <em> </em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>There&rsquo;s a running joke on the show about &ldquo;evil twink energy&rdquo; being the downfall of everyone you profile. I&rsquo;m going to attempt a partial defense of one of these guys, Lord Alfred Bruce Douglas, or Bosie. He&rsquo;s kind of a rich layabout who becomes involved with the writer Oscar Wilde and then abandons him again and again. Bosie&rsquo;s indiscretion <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/gay-rights/oscar-wilde-trial">arguably helps land Wilde in jail</a> on charges of gross indecency for his same-sex relationships. But Bosie is also a younger, less successful writer looking up to this older man.</p>

<p>And this question kind of gets to the fraught relationships between older, more powerful men and their younger lovers, sometimes teenagers. Is it possible to read the Wilde situation differently?</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Huw Lemmey</h3>
<p><em>[Laughs]</em> Yeah, I think the evil twink thing is a bit of an in-joke which emerged quite organically, but I think it&rsquo;s a stand-in for this idea of men making bad decisions based on their own desire. Wilde definitely being one. There&rsquo;s plenty of people warning him that he was engaging in a bad relationship.</p>

<p>Like you said, [Bosie] was a young guy who could easily be influenced. But his real crime is not his sort of evil twink energy surrounding Oscar Wilde. I mean, his behavior is really appalling toward Oscar Wilde, especially after [Wilde&rsquo;s] been convicted and prosecuted and jailed. But it&rsquo;s also what happened after Wilde&rsquo;s death and Bosie&rsquo;s engagement in far-right politics and his unrepentant anti-Semitism. &#8230;</p>

<p>I think <a href="http://rictornorton.co.uk/jamesi.htm">King James I and VI</a> is [another] really good example. He allows his desire for Buckingham [his confidant and likely his lover] to overcome what might be a sensible political decision or to ignore the advice of his friends and counselors. He just kept promoting this completely unqualified young guy higher and higher in British nobility and aristocracy. So this really threatens James&rsquo;s project of absolutism because the merchants upon whom power rested at the time were becoming more and more angry.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>There seems to be some debate among historians about how we should treat the language used in these private letters and other correspondence from the era, about how we might perceive &ldquo;correctly&rdquo; or &ldquo;incorrectly&rdquo; gay identity in historical documents.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Huw Lemmey</h3>
<p>Well, you know, I&rsquo;m not a historian, so I think Ben should cover that for me. Mine is an impulsive response, which is that if a guy wrote me a letter saying [like Buckingham said to James I and VI] that <a href="http://rictornorton.co.uk/kingjame.htm">he was my dog and he loves sleeping in my bed</a> etc., etc. &mdash; I know what I&rsquo;d think of it. <em> </em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ben Miller<em> </em></h3>
<p>In history there&rsquo;s this truism that the past is a foreign country and they do things differently there. And I do believe that in a sense the past is full of totally unrecognizable practices and is basically unrecoverable.<em> </em></p>

<p>So for us, when we talk about a figure like James I and VI, to use the term &ldquo;gay&rdquo; is on the one hand totally absurd because it makes absolutely no sense given the historical context in which he lived. On the other hand, what do we learn by including him in a series of shows about different kinds of bad or evil gay men in history?</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>There&rsquo;s the literal Nazi on the show, but another interesting figure is Frederich Radszuweit. He was one of the first publishers of LGBTQ magazines, who at one point seems so enthusiastic in his appeasement of the Nazis that he inspired the newspaper headline &ldquo;Third Gender Welcomes the Third Reich.&rdquo; Why does he go to such lengths to defend Nazism?<em> </em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ben Miller</h3>
<p>Well, maybe that&rsquo;s a question that&rsquo;s better asked of the Nazis. The headline is from a straight newspaper of the time. You can imagine exactly how that headline gets written if you think like a newspaper editor. Because you see <a href="http://outhistory.org/blog/in-the-archives-friedrich-radszuweit-and-the-false-security-of-collaboration/">an article in a gay magazine praising a Nazi</a>, and you know the writing of that headline becomes irresistible.</p>

<p>I think the way that Radszuweit survives [the Nazi regime until his death from tuberculosis] was in the idea of collaborating.</p>

<p>He sees where the winds are blowing; he thinks, well, maybe we can convince them or maybe we can kind of bring them around on the facts. And I think it&rsquo;s not too difficult to find some evidence of similar thinking today.<em> </em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>One of the most interesting arguments I think you make on the show is that Andrew Sullivan sort of invented gay marriage and that the conservative case he made for it was actually a devastating setback for LGBTQ rights. [Miller and Lemmey see in Sullivan&rsquo;s work the idea that gay marriage &mdash; and making queer people&rsquo;s lives look more like those of rich white straight people &mdash; is the end goal of the LGBTQ rights movement.]</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ben Miller</h3>
<p>I mean, &ldquo;devastating setback&rdquo; is maybe somewhat overstating the case. And terms like gay marriage and ideas of relationship recognition have been a part of a lot of different kinds of activism, about which people might have a lot of different kinds of feelings since well before Sullivan. <em> </em></p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Huw Lemmey</h3>
<p>What I think is interesting is the gay marriage that we got, at least in the English-speaking world. In the US, the decision is written by Anthony Kennedy, who&rsquo;s a right-wing Catholic conservative, and in the UK the gay marriage bill is brought forward by David Cameron, who is a quite right-wing Conservative Party prime minister. The conservative case for gay marriage is the case that we ended up getting. That&rsquo;s the version of it that won, and the story that that case tells, which is a story about gay people existing throughout time.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ben Miller</h3>
<p>This sort of move toward tolerance, and then the final move of tolerance is to provide legal and social acceptance &mdash; so long as the relationship and the social model looks exactly the same as everything else does. And the achievement of that sameness gets labeled as &ldquo;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/there-was-one-unifying-theme-of-anthony-kennedys-jurisprudence/2018/06/28/650aa740-7adf-11e8-80be-6d32e182a3bc_story.html?utm_term=.e777e06016a8">dignity,</a>&rdquo; and that&rsquo;s the word that keeps coming up in Kennedy&rsquo;s decision.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tim Williams</h3>
<p>Does learning about the bad gays of history offer any defense against repeating these mistakes in the future?</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ben Miller</h3>
<p>I think it just might. The question that Huw and I end the first season with is: What route out of heterosexuality do we take? What kind of a life do we make for ourselves? And I think those questions are always informed by knowing the decisions that people have made in the past.</p>

<p>We did want to make a show that people could sort of laugh along to. We wanted to make a show that was kind of juicy. But also I think it&rsquo;s of profound importance, this question. Can we take this route that is all about solidifying our own personal power &#8230; or try to make a world that everyone can live in?</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Alissa Wilkinson</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Nisha Chittal</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Eliza Barclay</name>
			</author>
			
			<author>
				<name>Tim Ryan Williams</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Roma would be an unusual Best Picture winner. Here’s why it deserves the honor.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/19/18225326/roma-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose" />
			<id>https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/19/18225326/roma-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose</id>
			<updated>2019-02-22T13:35:12-05:00</updated>
			<published>2019-02-19T15:30:00-05:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Awards Shows" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Culture" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Movies" /><category scheme="https://www.vox.com" term="Oscars" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Each year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominates between five and 10 movies to compete for the&#160;Oscars&#8217; Best Picture trophy &#8212; its most prestigious award, and the one given out at the very end of the ceremony. There&#8217;s no strict definition for what makes a &#8220;best&#8221; picture; it&#8217;s easiest to think about [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="" data-caption="The movie Roma has been nominated for an Oscar in the Best Picture category. | Carlos Somonte/Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Carlos Somonte/Netflix" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13457248/ROMA_23491_001R.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	The movie Roma has been nominated for an Oscar in the Best Picture category. | Carlos Somonte/Netflix	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Each year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominates between five and 10 movies to compete for the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/12/12/18127861/oscars-2019-news-updates">Oscars</a>&rsquo; Best Picture trophy &mdash; its most prestigious award, and the one given out at the very end of the ceremony. There&rsquo;s no strict definition for what makes a &ldquo;best&rdquo; picture; it&rsquo;s easiest to think about it as an honor given to the film that Hollywood thinks best represents the year in movies.</p>

<p>So whatever film wins Best Picture essentially represents the American movie industry&rsquo;s view of its role in driving culture, as well as its capabilities and aspirations, at a specific point in time.</p>

<p>Every year&rsquo;s nominee slate, then, is a rough approximation of the options from which the industry will choose as it attempts to characterize its past 12 months. And one thing that&rsquo;s definitely true about&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/1/22/18188209/oscars-2019-best-picture-nominees-streaming-favourite-roma-star-is-born-vice-black-panther">the eight Best Picture nominees</a>&nbsp;from 2018 is that they exhibit a <em>lot</em> of variety.</p>

<p>There&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/2/15/17008196/black-panther-review">a superhero film</a>, two political satires (one set in <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/21/18069758/favourite-review-stone-colman-weisz">an 18th-century royal court</a> and one set <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/12/21/18144605/vice-review-dick-cheney-adam-mckay-christian-bale-sam-rockwell-bush-steve-carell-rumsfeld">in the White House</a>), a movie <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/5/15/17355432/blackkklansman-review-spike-lee-david-duke-charlottesville">about infiltrating the KKK</a>, a <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/9/14/17835796/star-is-born-review-lady-gaga-bradley-cooper">classic Hollywood remake</a>, a <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/16/18069756/green-book-review-racism-schomburg-segregation-golden-globes">classic Hollywood feel-good buddy comedy</a>, a <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/11/2/18048688/bohemian-rhapsody-review-freddie-mercury-rami-malek-bryan-singer">rocker biopic</a>, and a <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/20/18102734/roma-review-netflix-cuaron">sweeping domestic drama</a>. And thinking about what the Academy voters &mdash; as well as audiences and critics &mdash; found enticing about them can help us better understand both the state of Hollywood and, broadly speaking, what we were looking for at the movies this year.</p>

<p>In the runup to the Oscars on February 24, Vox&rsquo;s staff is looking at each of the eight Best Picture nominees in turn. What makes this film appealing to Academy voters? What makes it emblematic of the year? And should it win?</p>

<p>Here, we talk about <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/20/18102734/roma-review-netflix-cuaron"><em>Roma</em></a>, the highly lauded black-and-white drama from Mexican director (and previous Oscar winner) Alfonso Cuar&oacute;n. Joining the conversation are Alissa Wilkinson, Vox&rsquo;s film critic; Eliza Barclay, senior editor for health and science at Vox; Nisha Chittal, Vox&rsquo;s audience engagement editor; and Tim Williams, copy editor.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why <em>Roma</em> captivated us</h2>
<p><strong>Alissa Wilkinson: </strong>More than any of the other films nominated for Best Picture this year, <em>Roma</em> is the critical darling. It won awards from major critics&rsquo; groups and nearly universal plaudits, which have helped with its status as a frontrunner for the Best Picture trophy. It&rsquo;s also <a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/1/22/18188134/oscars-2019-nominees-full-list">tied with <em>The Favourite</em> for the most Oscar nominations in 2019</a>; its 10 nominations include nods for directing and cinematography for its director, Alfonso Cuar&oacute;n, who won the latter category for his direction of <em>Gravity</em> in 2014.</p>

<p>Yet, it&rsquo;s honestly a bit of an oddball, as Best Picture contenders go. It&rsquo;s in black and white. It&rsquo;s in Spanish and the indigenous language Mixtec, with English subtitles (at least if you&rsquo;re watching it in the US). It doesn&rsquo;t have any recognizable movie stars to most audiences (its star <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/21/18103486/yalitza-aparicio-interview-roma-cuaron">Yalitza Aparicio</a>, who&rsquo;s up for Best Actress, had never acted before the movie). Set in 1970, it&rsquo;s the story of a young woman who works for a middle-class family in Mexico City during a time of political unrest. It&rsquo;s the kind of slow, contemplative film that typically has a small release in specialty theaters.</p>

<p>But <em>Roma</em> differs from other films of its sort in one huge way: It was distributed by streaming giant Netflix, which means that although it was ultimately released theatrically, it was also available to people all over the world to watch on their TVs and computers and even their phones (a level of access and convenience that Netflix chief content officer Ted Sarandos <a href="https://variety.com/2018/film/news/ted-sarandos-netflix-dealmakers-1203082743/">suggested people would love</a>). It&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/1/22/18187333/roma-oscars-nomination-best-picture-alfonso-cuaron">Netflix&rsquo;s first Best Picture nominee</a>. And if it wins, it will be a huge deal not just for Netflix, but for the film industry.</p>

<p>So I&rsquo;m wondering: How did you first see <em>Roma</em>? What did you think of the movie? And what about it do you think makes it a Best Picture contender?</p>

<p><strong>Tim Williams:</strong> America is doing movie theaters totally wrong. This is my obnoxious opinion after seeing <em>Roma</em> in Mexico City (where it was filmed) in an alarmingly beautiful cinema plaza. <a href="https://www.google.com/maps/uv?hl=en&amp;pb=!1s0x85d1ffc0bdd5331d%3A0x96e188ebb2ad7d82!2m22!2m2!1i80!2i80!3m1!2i20!16m16!1b1!2m2!1m1!1e1!2m2!1m1!1e3!2m2!1m1!1e5!2m2!1m1!1e4!2m2!1m1!1e6!3m1!7e115!4shttps%3A%2F%2Felviajero.elpais.com%2Felviajero%2F2013%2F04%2F09%2Factualidad%2F1365539420_076660.html!5scineteca%20nacional%20-%20Google%20Search&amp;imagekey=!1e10!2sAF1QipPzphbJig1iIZJWvv_HCMS2m0yNEgZAMYDZ9q0b&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiHwZ6s16zgAhXRjVkKHfivCbkQoiowDHoECAMQBg">Look at these pictures</a>!</p>

<p>Movie theaters can certainly survive by <a href="https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/9/20/17870760/movie-theater-concessions-dinner-movie-alamo-regal-amc-metrograph">selling ever-more-expensive fancy food</a> ferried to you by bent-over servers in the dark. But wouldn&rsquo;t it be great to make them communal spaces again instead?</p>

<p>The pageantry of going to the movies is obviously a big part of <em>Roma</em> (and we all know the Oscars love a movie about movies), with several key scenes &mdash; including the one where Cleo tells her boyfriend Fermin about her pregnancy &mdash; occurring in or just outside of movie theaters. But it&rsquo;s a lot more than that, obviously.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13618535/roma3.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A scene from Roma" title="A scene from Roma" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="A scene from &lt;em&gt;Roma&lt;/em&gt;. | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p>Which was somewhat lost on me because I saw it the first time without subtitles, despite speaking almost no Spanish.</p>

<p>I was sort of hoping a handsome stranger would whisper translations in my ear, but it was still a magical way to experience the movie. Another reason I think <em>Roma</em> has had such success at the Oscars is the immediacy of its images &mdash; <a href="https://the.hitchcock.zone/wiki/Monitor_(BBC,_05/Jul/1964)">what Alfred Hitchcock called &ldquo;pure cinema.&rdquo;</a>  (To describe his own movies!) It&rsquo;s a foreign film, but the dialogue is often added color, not the thrust of the storytelling.</p>

<p>I was astounded, watching the opening credits, to see that there is a full minute of the camera fixed on gray tile &mdash; before the tide of the morning suds washes over the screen. It&rsquo;s stunning, like so many images in the movie, but it also tells so much about the place and characters, without dialogue.</p>

<p><strong>Nisha Chittal: </strong>I watched it on Netflix! Honestly that was part of the appeal, that it was so much more easily accessible. Seeing movies in theaters is so expensive &mdash; it&rsquo;s like $17 a ticket in New York City, which means it costs more to see one movie in a theater than an entire month of Netflix.</p>

<p>I loved it. The story was so moving, the cinematography and directing were so well done &mdash;the way Cuar&oacute;n filmed the scenes around the house where Cleo worked was just fascinating to watch. So much of the film focuses on&nbsp;the sort of small, mundane things that make up everyday household/family life, yet it was still so interesting and compelling to watch. Yalitza Aparicio was so wonderful!</p>

<p><strong>Eliza Barclay: </strong>I saw <em>Roma</em> in the theater (having <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/12/11/18135050/roma-netflix-theater-netflix-streaming-better">read Alissa&rsquo;s recommendation to see it there</a>). The film was a very poignant experience on a few levels.</p>

<p>First, I lived in the Roma neighborhood of Mexico City (a.k.a. Distrito Federal, or DF) for three years, from 2004 to 2007, working there as a freelance foreign correspondent, and there were so many atmospheric details about street vendors in Roma in the film that mapped perfectly on my memory.</p>

<p>For instance, the camote (sweet potato) vendor who rattles along the streets pushing his small cart and advertising his presence with a sorrowful high-pitched whistle. This is one of those distinctive DF&nbsp;sounds still present today that you come to know, and it was a tradition I found bizarre until I just accepted it. And it delighted me to see it in the film.</p>

<p>Another scene that was just so spot-on was when Cleo emerges from the movie theater looking for her date who has abandoned her, and is confronted with a bunch of garish vendors selling whimsies. To be a pedestrian in DF is to be regularly overwhelmed by street vendors hawking all manner of things you don&rsquo;t need in that moment. It also means, though, that the street life there is unparalleled in its activity and its entrepreneurial creativity.</p>

<p>I could name so many other scenes that were so deeply, authentically DF, and that captured a distinct strain of fearlessness running through the people there &mdash; the scene at the country retreat with the fires, with kids and adults pitching in to put out flames, creating no doubt significant anxiety for risk-averse American viewers &#8230;</p>

<p>But on another level of poignancy, I just found the tenderness, intimacy, and gentleness of the relationship between Cleo and the kids to be absolutely extraordinary. I&rsquo;ve never seen anything quite like it in a film before. The love, the kindness, and the best of human nature were captured and conveyed in the way that she cared for them, and the way that they loved her back.</p>

<p>That authentic emotion to me is the core of what makes <em>Roma</em> a Best Picture contender.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How <em>Roma’s</em> backdrop of political unrest works with its story</h2>
<p><strong>Alissa: </strong>I think what you&rsquo;re all getting at well is that this is a really emotional film to watch for a lot of people. Which is startling, when you think about it &mdash; it&rsquo;s slow, and set in a different time and place, and the black and white in particular really sets it apart from &ldquo;reality,&rdquo; in a way. Something you all pointed out is how the small details of the setting, the household, the sounds, the street vendors all build the world that Cleo lives in, without having to do a lot of over-explaining for those who are less familiar.</p>

<p>I&rsquo;m wondering how the details of domestic life work for you against the backdrop of what&rsquo;s happening in the film. <em>Roma</em> is about Cleo&rsquo;s life with the family she works for, but while that&rsquo;s happening there is serious political and social unrest occurring as well. The film is purposefully set in 1970 and 1971, when land grabs and revolts were <a href="http://time.com/5478382/roma-movie-mexican-history/">happening in Mexico</a>. The film&rsquo;s pivotal scene, when Cleo&rsquo;s water breaks in a furniture store, happens in the midst of the <a href="https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/xwpmmw/the-1971-student-massacre-that-mexico-would-rather-forget">Corpus Christi massacre</a>, in which student demonstrators were attacked by a shock group trained by the government.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13618533/roma1.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Where should you see Roma?" title="Where should you see Roma?" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="A scene from &lt;em&gt;Roma.&lt;/em&gt; | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p>When I <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/21/18103486/yalitza-aparicio-interview-roma-cuaron">talked to Yalitza Aparicio</a>, who plays Cleo, she noted that all of this history is very present for her and her indigenous community, especially when it&rsquo;s been echoed more recently in incidents like the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Iguala_mass_kidnapping">2014 &ldquo;disappearance&rdquo; of activist students from the Ayotzinapa Rural Teachers&rsquo; College</a>. And the Domestic Workers&rsquo; Union has been out promoting the film as a vital look into domestic workers&rsquo; lives, not just in the past but today.</p>

<p>Were you thinking about any of this watching the film? How do you think the small domestic drama works against <em>Roma</em>&rsquo;s bigger backdrop? And is there anything about the film that adds to this larger story?</p>

<p><strong>Tim: </strong>The workers&rsquo; union has rightly seized on the movie to amplify its message. But I wonder if this film is really the best possible vehicle. Cuar&oacute;n&rsquo;s film is a sort of love letter to his childhood housekeeper, and the love shows clearly, especially in the relationship between one of her charges, the precocious dreamer Paco, and Cleo. Her work is given dignity, and she has a rich inner life outside it.</p>

<p>And this relationship is not uncomplicated. Cleo briefly joins a family gathering around the TV and is even invited to curl up next to one of the boys. But then she is quickly sent to fetch tea, and this separation repeats throughout the film. Still, Cleo is a member of the family &mdash; its backbone, really. In the film&rsquo;s wide panning shots, she&rsquo;s often kept at the center as the family enacts their drama about the house on the outskirts.</p>

<p>But it&rsquo;s clear that Cleo&rsquo;s situation is not quite typical. It&rsquo;s unlikely that another home would instantly show support when a maid reveals a pregnancy. <em>Roma</em> is a film in which political forces intercede on the domestic, but class war at home is repressed.</p>

<p>What would a less rosy picture of domestic workers&rsquo; lives look like? I think the answer is in <em>Guie&rsquo;dani&rsquo;s Navel</em>, another 2018 film about an Oaxacan maid that otherwise couldn&rsquo;t be less aligned with Cuar&oacute;n&rsquo;s vision.</p>

<p>In that film, Zapotec Guie&rsquo;dani, a modern-day teenager, joins her mother to work for a wealthy Mexico City family. It&rsquo;s clear from the moment she steps into the home of their employer (which like in <em>Roma</em> has a grand entrance but functions to keep people out) that she will never become &ldquo;one of them.&rdquo; And she never wants to, refusing their clumsy gifts and offer to tutor her (to feel less guilty about using child labor).</p>

<p>The family is clearly uncomfortable with ordering Zapotec around but chooses to simply separate themselves as much as possible. In <em>Roma</em>, Cleo smoothly weaves her native dialect together with Spanish; in <em>Guie&rsquo;dani&rsquo;s Navel</em>, Zapotec is mocked for daring to speak her own language. We see little of Cleo&rsquo;s room in <em>Roma</em>, but <em>Guie&rsquo;dani&rsquo;s Navel</em> doesn&rsquo;t let us forget Zapotec&rsquo;s bare closet. The airy, modern home has none of the wide panning shots of Cuar&oacute;n&rsquo;s film: This place is Zapotec&rsquo;s prison, and the confinement leads to a violent climax.</p>

<p><em>Guie&rsquo;dani&rsquo;s Navel</em> is carefully directed, and the amateur Oaxacan actors are every bit as riveting in their performances as Aparicio is in hers. It doesn&rsquo;t have the scope or stunning images of <em>Roma</em>, but I think it&rsquo;s a perfect counterpart to it.</p>

<p>But to get back to the actual film we&rsquo;re discussing, I was interested in what people saw in the recurring images in the film. The water, the planes that pass over the film&rsquo;s opening and ending (and drown out a very bizarre scene involving a muscle man/hippie guru). It seems like there&rsquo;s something there with the international forces working on the city, but I&rsquo;m not really sure what. This is the &ldquo;problem&rdquo; with a film as beautiful as <em>Roma</em>: Everything seems full of meaning.</p>

<p>Maybe it&rsquo;s just a nod, like the camote men, to the quirks of the city.</p>

<p><strong>Nisha: </strong>I&rsquo;ll admit that I did not know a lot about the Corpus Christi Massacre before watching <em>Roma</em>, so I spent some time reading about it after watching the film. (<a href="https://slate.com/culture/2018/11/roma-corpus-christi-student-massacre-el-halconazo.html">This explainer was helpful</a>.)</p>

<p>I think the political backdrop that the film&rsquo;s story was set against was incredibly important to the story &mdash; it further highlighted the class divisions and tensions that were already bubbling in the city at the time.</p>

<p>Fermin, the man who briefly dates Cleo and gets her pregnant only to abandon her, is seen training to be part of &ldquo;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Christi_massacre#Los_Halcones">Los Halcones</a>,&rdquo; the secret paramilitary force that the Mexican government trained to fight against student activists. The scene where Cleo and her employer watch the massacre/protests at a distance from inside the furniture store while Cleo is going into labor &mdash; only to then be confronted by some of the Halcones, including Fermin himself &mdash; is haunting. We don&rsquo;t learn too much about Fermin&rsquo;s life and what got him into martial arts, and eventually into Los Halcones. And by all accounts, he&rsquo;s not a good guy: He abandons his pregnant girlfriend, and he&rsquo;s last seen brandishing a gun in front of innocent student activists.</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13618540/roma5.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A scene from Roma." title="A scene from Roma." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="A village scene from &lt;em&gt;Roma.&lt;/em&gt; | Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Netflix" />
<p>But we do see in some earlier scenes that he lives in relative poverty in a rural area outside the city, and I had to wonder whether those circumstances &mdash; desperation and poverty &mdash; are what drove him to get involved in Los Halcones.</p>

<p><strong>Tim: </strong>Fermin is bad news from the moment he enters the picture: Why is he snatching one of the girls&rsquo; Coke? He&rsquo;s also uninterested in following through on plans to go the movies; he has Cleo to impress with his much less frivolous martial arts (which at first Cuar&oacute;n seems to lavish attention on, but in the later scenes are shown to be a farce).</p>

<p>He&rsquo;s clearly a kid wrapped up in a twisted ideology; he tries to say the right things to Cleo when she breaks the news of her pregnancy, then wanders off because the lies he&rsquo;s been told about self-sufficiency are much more comforting. Antonio &mdash; <em>Roma</em>&rsquo;s other male figure &mdash; also gets away with such thinking, though less extreme. The women don&rsquo;t have that luxury; the children occupy all their time.</p>

<p><strong>Eliza: </strong>During the scene where Cleo&rsquo;s water broke, I was definitely thinking about the general pattern of violent repression of student groups happening in many countries around the time of Corpus Christi.&nbsp;I thought the chaos of that scene &mdash; and the chaos of the following scene in the hospital &mdash; was so powerful, with the way the camera lingered and encompassed&nbsp;these very uncomfortable moments of suffering. There are wide, wide images, giving us no escape from the pain of a woman whose boyfriend is shot, the pain of Cleo losing her baby with the doctors trying furiously to save her.</p>

<p>The scene where Fermin rejects Cleo to her face also brought out the theme of intense racism and economic subjugation &mdash; especially of indigenous groups like the Mixtec &mdash; in Mexico that persists today.</p>

<p>And yet somehow there&rsquo;s also some mystery in Cleo&rsquo;s sense of self; we never quite know how personally she takes the rejection, how much she feels shame about being a domestic worker or not. And of course <em>Roma</em>&rsquo;s ending offers some equalizing healing, in what she is able to do for the children and the mother.&nbsp;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What could <em>Roma’s</em> success mean for Netflix, and for filmmakers?</h2>
<p><strong>Alissa: </strong>The film itself ran into a few snags related to the social context of our time, too. <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/roma-actor-finally-gets-u-s-visa-time-oscars-n971096">The news recently broke</a> that Jorge Antonio Guerrero, the Mexican actor who plays Fermin in the film, <em>will</em> be able to attend the Oscars ceremony after all, after being shut out of the US during most of the Oscar campaign period due to repeated denials of his visa.</p>

<p>And, even more strikingly, Yalitza Aparicio, who is an indigenous woman and nominated for playing Cleo, was the subject of apparently <a href="https://www.latinorebels.com/2019/02/12/aparicioamcc/">racially motivated rumblings among some Mexican actresses</a> to keep her out of contention for various awards and <a href="http://remezcla.com/film/yalitza-aparicio-roma-vogue-mexico/">racist attacks online after landing on the cover of Vogue Mexico</a>.</p>

<p>But I think the film has a fighting chance at winning a lot of Oscars this year, even if it doesn&rsquo;t land Best Picture, and that&rsquo;s a coup for everyone involved, including Netflix. If it does win, it will mean a lot for films like <em>Roma</em>, and might even prompt Netflix to invest in similar projects in the future.</p>

<p>So my question to you all is: What one place or historical setting would you love to see Netflix invest its film production dollars in?</p>
<img src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13893834/1071624272.jpg.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Best Supporting Actress-nominated Marina De Tavira having her picture taken by cordoned-off photographers in front of a wall decorated with the words “Roma” and “Netflix.” " title="Best Supporting Actress-nominated Marina De Tavira having her picture taken by cordoned-off photographers in front of a wall decorated with the words “Roma” and “Netflix.” " data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Best Supporting Actress-nominated Marina De Tavira attends the Netflix &lt;em&gt;Roma&lt;/em&gt; Premiere at the Egyptian Theatre on December 10, 2018, in Hollywood, California. | Charley Gallay/Getty Images for Netflix" data-portal-copyright="Charley Gallay/Getty Images for Netflix" />
<p><strong>Tim: </strong>Ads for <em>Roma</em> (and other Spanish-language Netflix-produced shows) were everywhere when I was in Mexico City. Netflix clearly sees these projects as a way to take over every screen on Earth. Hopefully the company will continue to support interesting films in Mexico and not just charge into the next market, colonial-style.</p>

<p>But if for some reason Bulgaria is next, Netflix should throw some money at Tonislav Hristov. His 2016 documentary <em>The Good Postman</em> localizes the Syrian refugee crisis in a tiny Bulgarian town. It&rsquo;s surreal, captivating, and I&rsquo;d love to see what he tackles next.</p>

<p><strong>Eliza: </strong>Gosh, this is a hard question. But I&rsquo;d love to see more films set in Tibet!</p>

<p>More specifically, films about the spread of Buddhism out of India, into countries like Tibet and China.</p>

<p><strong>Nisha: </strong>This is a tough question! I loved Netflix&rsquo;s <em>Sacred Games</em> (not a film, but a TV series) which was filmed in India and starred Indian actors and was just incredibly well done. I&rsquo;d love to see Netflix do more perhaps in Southeast Asia &mdash; a region of the world that I think deserves more coverage.</p>

<p>When <a href="https://www.vox.com/summer-movies/2018/8/14/17688338/crazy-rich-asians-review-constance-wu-henry-golding-gemma-chan-romantic-comedy"><em>Crazy Rich Asians</em></a><em> </em>came out last summer, many people pointed out that the film <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/aug/21/where-are-the-brown-people-crazy-rich-asians-draws-tepid-response-in-singapore">focused on Singapore&rsquo;s Chinese population</a>; other ethnic groups that live in Singapore &mdash; Malaysians, Indians, and others &mdash; were not represented onscreen. I&rsquo;d love to see Netflix invest in more stories from Southeast Asian countries that have historically been underrepresented, like Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Malaysia, or Indonesia.</p>

<p><strong>Alissa: </strong>Netflix has the ability (and maybe the interest) to invest in filmmakers who hail from those countries, too, which would be in stark contrast to most Hollywood studios&rsquo; practices. There&rsquo;s more than one way to be a disruptor, and <em>Roma</em> &mdash; and the attention paid to it by the Oscars &mdash; proves that, whether or not it wins Best Picture. Maybe change really is afoot.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<p>Check out what our roundtable participants had to say about all eight Best Picture nominees:</p>

<p><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/19/18222080/black-panther-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose"><em>Black Panther</em></a><em> | </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/20/18222082/blackkklansman-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose"><em>BlacKkKlansman</em></a><em> | </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/2/21/18222084/bohemian-rhapsody-best-picture-oscars-2019-win-lose"><em>Bohemian Rhapsody</em></a><em> | </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/20/18222092/favourite-best-picture-oscars-2019-win-lose"><em>The Favourite</em></a><em> | </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/19/18222085/green-book-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose-controversy"><em>Green Book</em></a><em> | </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/19/18225326/roma-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose"><em>Roma</em></a><em> | </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/22/18222090/star-is-born-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose"><em>A Star Is Born</em></a><em> | </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/2/20/18222089/vice-oscars-2019-best-picture-win-lose"><em>Vice</em></a><em> </em></p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
