Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Prosecutor in Ferguson grand jury says he knew some witnesses were lying

Pool/Getty Images

  1. The prosecutor who led the grand jury investigation into the August 9 police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, said he was aware that some eyewitnesses were lying.
  2. The admission could mean the prosecutor, St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch, knowingly violated ethical and legal requirements to not knowingly present false evidence.
  3. Several news reports in the past week have uncovered false or contradictory statements from witnesses in the Ferguson grand jury, which on November 24 decided not to press criminal charges against Darren Wilson for the Brown shooting.

McCulloch repeatedly acknowledged some witnesses were lying

St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch told radio station KTRS that he let some witnesses testify “even though their statements were not accurate.”

“I knew that no matter how I handled this, there would be criticism of it,” McCulloch said. “So if I didn’t put those witnesses on, then we’d be discussing now why I didn’t put those witnesses on even though their statements were not accurate.”

He later added, “I thought it was much more important to present anybody and everybody and some that, yes, clearly were not telling the truth. No question about it.”

McCulloch said he won’t charge the witnesses involved with perjury. But he acknowledged, “There were people who came in and, yes, absolutely lied under oath.”

McCulloch suggested he knew Witness 40 was being dishonest
One witness McCulloch believed was lying matches several news outlets’ description of Witness 40, who told the grand jury that Brown charged at Wilson before the officer fired the final shots that killed him.

“[T]his lady clearly wasn’t present when this occurred,” McCulloch said. “She recounted a statement that was right out of the newspaper about Wilson’s actions, and right down the line with Wilson’s actions. Even though I’m sure she was nowhere near the place.”

Earlier this week, the Smoking Gun’s William Bastone, Andrew Goldberg, and Joseph Jesselli reported that Witness 40 had a history of racism and likely wasn’t at the scene of the shooting:

The grand jury witness who testified that she saw Michael Brown pummel a cop before charging at him “like a football player, head down,” is a troubled, bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a “complete fabrication,” The Smoking Gun has learned.

In interviews with police, FBI agents, and federal and state prosecutors — as well as during two separate appearances before the grand jury that ultimately declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson — the purported eyewitness delivered a preposterous and perjurious account of the fatal encounter in Ferguson.

McCulloch’s actions raise ethical and legal questions about the grand jury proceedings

McCulloch’s admission could put him at odds with ethical and even legal requirements to not knowingly present false evidence.

“A lawyer should not present testimony that he believes to be false,” Steven Lubet, a law professor at Northwestern University, told BuzzFeed. “That is especially true in a proceeding that lacks all of the usual safeguards, such as opposing counsel and a judge.”

It’s considered a federal offense to persuade another person to commit perjury. Those found guilty of subornation of perjury can be fined, imprisoned for up to five years, or both.

Read more: A Ferguson witness who testified in favor of Darren Wilson may not have seen the shooting.

Culture
The US’s biggest tennis stars don’t really want to get political. They might not have a choice.The US’s biggest tennis stars don’t really want to get political. They might not have a choice.
Culture

The biggest storyline at the 2026 Australian Open is Americans being asked about Trump.

By Alex Abad-Santos
Politics
How long can ICE keep ignoring federal courts?How long can ICE keep ignoring federal courts?
Politics

A federal judge just threatened to hold the agency’s leader in contempt.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
How Democrats — and even a few Republicans — in Congress are moving to rein in ICEHow Democrats — and even a few Republicans — in Congress are moving to rein in ICE
Podcast
Podcasts

Alex Pretti’s death has pushed more and more lawmakers into saying something must be done.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Can the ICE shooter be prosecuted?Can the ICE shooter be prosecuted?
Podcast
Podcasts

The answer could hinge on a Supreme Court ruling from 1890 — and another from 2025.

By Ariana Aspuru and Noel King
Podcasts
The Minnesotans trying to stop ICEThe Minnesotans trying to stop ICE
Podcast
Podcasts

Since Renee Good’s killing, more residents are trying to protect their neighbors themselves.

By Danielle Hewitt and Noel King
Podcasts
“There’s a fight to be had here”: A local reporter on the pain and resolve in Minneapolis“There’s a fight to be had here”: A local reporter on the pain and resolve in Minneapolis
Podcast
Podcasts

The Twin Cities were already on edge. Now they’re full of anguish.

By Hady Mawajdeh and Noel King