Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

We’ve only regressed since the NYPD banned chokeholds in 1993

Kena Betancur/Getty Images

On November 24, 1993 a reporter named Ian Fisher wrote a story for the New York Times headlined “Kelly Bans Choke Holds By Officers.“

The story says that Raymond Kelly (who was police commissioner before Rudy Giuliani replaced him with William Bratton, and then was commissioner again under Michael Bloomberg before Bill de Blasio replaced him with William Bratton again) had issued a new order “banning the use of choke holds, the restraining maneuvers that cut off the flow of blood and oxygen to the brain.” The reason given was that it turns out that when you cut off the flow of blood and oxygen to a person’s brain, he sometimes dies.

The order came in the wake of the now-forgotten death of a man named Federico Pereira who died of asphyxiation after “one officer had choked the 21-year-old man in Queens on Feb. 5 as he lay face down with his hands cuffed behind his back.” Pereira was apprehended after having stolen a car. Four other officers involved in the arrest were also deemed complicit in Pereira’s death by the Queens District Attorney, John Santucci. But Santucci retired before the cases ever went to trial. His successor dropped charges against the other four officers and reduced the main complaint to manslaughter. Nonetheless, the officer was acquitted.

Nonetheless, the chokehold ban served as a kind of testament to Pereira’s life and death.

The 1993 ban was described at the time as a clarification and enhancement of an earlier, 1985 rule against choke holds. As Fisher explained, however, that rule had “an exception when an officer’s life was in danger and the choke hold was the ‘least dangerous alternative method of restraint’” while “the new policy allows no exceptions.” The NYPD’s union opposed the chokehold ban at the time, and Fisher rather presciently cast some doubt on the question of whether it would even be followed.

“It’s not a good regulation,” said the officer, who like the others spoke on the condition of anonymity. “We need all the means necessary to defend ourselves. I was trained to use it and based on my training it would be difficult for me not to use it. Then again, we’ll try not to use it.“A bit less than 21 years later, a police officer choked Eric Garner to death in broad daylight — on video no less — on the streets of Staten Island. This time, there will be no indictment. No trial. Despite the video. Despite the ban on chokeholds. It’s easy to see this as a frustrating lack of progress. But the frightening reality is that it’s more like regress.

Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
These reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothingThese reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothing
Future Perfect

Crime is falling to historic lows. This economist knows how to make it plunge even faster.

By Bryan Walsh
Podcasts
The influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s homeThe influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s home
Podcast
Podcasts

Are they harming the investigation — or just doing the same thing as CNN?

By Kelli Wessinger and Sean Rameswaram
Policy
The Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own gunsThe Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own guns
Policy

Gun lovers may soon have the right to bear bongs.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
The Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning gunsThe Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning guns
Policy

Do stoners have a right to bear arms?

By Ian Millhiser