Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The best evidence yet Obamacare competition lowers premiums

Andrew Burton

The White House has long argued that, under Obamacare, competition in the exchanges will lower health premiums. When insurers have to compete side-by-side, the thinking goes, they’ll have a new incentive to compete with other health plans on price.

A new paper is arguably the best evidence yet that this might be true.

A trio of health economists shows that a major health insurer’s decision to sit out healthcare.gov, only competing in the state-run marketplaces, led to 5.4 percent higher premiums on the federal site.

It’s easy to show that exchanges with more competitors have lower premiums, as economists Leemore Dafny, Jonathan Gruber and Christopher Oby chart in this new working paper.

This tells us that markets with more insurers tend to have lower premiums, but doesn’t suggest a causal relationship. There are dozens of the things at play when insurers set prices like how sick the local population is, and how much local hospitals charge for visits.

So Dafny, Gruber and Oby looked at one particular factor that could measure the effect of competition. They homed in on UnitedHealthcare’s decision not to sell any plans on healthcare.gov this year, deciding instead to only sell products on the state-marketplaces.

United dropped lots of hints about this approach in late 2013 and early 2014, giving its competitors a pretty decent heads up on where it would, and would not, be selling. This gives a window to compare how insurers priced in the markets where United decided to compete, and where it didn’t.

The new working paper estimates that premiums for the benchmark plan* on healthcare.gov would have been 5.4 percent lower if United had sold on that federal marketplace. And if all major insurers had jumped into the pool, premiums would have cost 11.1 percent less.

This matters a lot for shoppers, and the federal government. Obamacare commits the feds to paying a certain percent of low and middle income shoppers’ health insurance premiums. If the overall tap is lower, that puts the government on the hook for a smaller share.

United has already indicated plans to expand into other markets next year, which could be good news for insurance premiums in 2015.

More in Health Care

The End of HIV
The 45-year fight against HIV is one of humanity’s greatest victories. It’s also in danger.The 45-year fight against HIV is one of humanity’s greatest victories. It’s also in danger.
The End of HIV

We have the tools to end the virus. The question is whether we’ll abandon them.

By Bryan Walsh
The Highlight
The elder care solution that everyone with aging parents should know aboutThe elder care solution that everyone with aging parents should know about
The Highlight

As baby boomers age, caregivers are often squeezed caring for parents and children at the same time. They need help.

By Courtney E. Martin
Good Medicine
The cocaine comeback, explainedThe cocaine comeback, explained
Good Medicine

The next phase of America’s drug crisis is here.

By Dylan Scott
Future Perfect
The world’s deadliest infectious disease is on the rise in the USThe world’s deadliest infectious disease is on the rise in the US
Future Perfect

We discovered its cause 144 years ago. It’s still a massive problem.

By Shayna Korol
Good Medicine
How to talk to your doctor about moneyHow to talk to your doctor about money
Good Medicine

Health care in America is too expensive. But you can make your physician your ally.

By Dylan Scott
Good Medicine
Nurse practitioners are rushing in to fill the gaps in US health careNurse practitioners are rushing in to fill the gaps in US health care
Good Medicine

You need a primary care appointment. Should you see an MD — or NP?

By Dylan Scott