Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

One type of business is growing fast, and it may not be good news

Working for yourself is comfy, but that doesn’t mean everyone wants to do it.
Working for yourself is comfy, but that doesn’t mean everyone wants to do it.
Working for yourself is comfy, but that doesn’t mean everyone wants to do it.
Flickr user Brett Selvitelle

Is entrepreneurship really fading fast in the US? Some have said so (and Vox has reported on it), but one type of entrepreneurship is on the rise. While the rate of new firm creation is on the decline, the number of nonemployer businesses is on the rise, as the Urban Institute’s Austin Nichols points out in an analysis of Census data. There are now around 180 per thousand workers, compared to 140 in 2000.

Screen_shot_2014-05-28_at_9.55.20_am

Nonemployer businesses — businesses that do not have paid employees — make up a majority of American businesses and continue to climb. As of 2012, there were 22.7 million nonemployer businesses. Roughly 86 to 88 percent of those are sole proprietorships — a class that includes, for example, someone operating their own store themselves, as well as a contract worker or freelancer.

Nichols shows that this is happening even while the number of new firms is declining.

Screen_shot_2014-05-28_at_9.49.52_am

First, a disclaimer that this data pits total nonemployer businesses — existing and new — versus new firms. And there are also a few caveats on this nonemployer business data — this doesn’t necessarily mean there are 22.7 million self-employed people. For example, a person might freelance on the side while they maintain a steady job.

But either way, the trend is clear: nonemployer businesses are on their way up — a measure that is often used as a proxy for the size of the "freelance economy."

So while that may sound like great news that lots of new businesses are being created, it’s much more complicated than that. This growth may signal that Americans are feeling like taking risks and striking out on their own, but it may also simply mean that employers are hesitant to take workers on full-time.

“This adds to a longstanding trend of more workers with nonstandard or alternative work arrangements like contract workers getting 1099s instead of W-4s at the end of the year,” writes Nichols. “With fewer employment protections and benefits, these workers are on the losing end of a large-scale shift of risk from large institutions (employers and governments) to workers, which has so far been good for American business but bad for the American worker.”

So while it’s possible many of these new nonemployer businesses are people who have happily hung their own shingle and are living the self-employed dream, many also could be unable to find work or are simply contracting until they are offered full-time work — this is the phenomenon some have called the “freelance economy.”

“A lot of the people who become self-employed are entrepreneurs not by choice. and they’re trying to recreate that job,” says Nichols.

It’s possible that Obamacare will fuel this trend even more, as people get out of “job lock” and are able to get insurance without an employer. That’s one of the policy’s key selling points, according to its supporters.

But it remains to be seen whether a wave of self-employed workers would be better off. As Nichols also points out, self-employed workers tend to have less upward mobility than regular wage and salary workers.

Correction: This post was corrected to fix a number typo in the first paragraph.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff