Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Mitch McConnell: Repeal Obamacare, except maybe keep everything it does in Kentucky

Tom Williams, CQ-Roll Call Group/Getty
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

Mitch McConnell really doesn’t like Obamacare — and since the health law polls badly in Kentucky, many observers thought this put him in a good position for his reelection. But what is Obamacare, anyway? At its core, the law expands health insurance coverage in two main ways. It creates a regulated framework intended to make private insurance more affordable, and it expands Medicaid.

In Kentucky, both of these are being implemented by the state's exchange, which is called the Kynect. According to the state, over 400,000 people have signed up for insurance on Kynect so far — 80 percent of them signing up for Medicaid, and 20 percent purchasing private insurance. And according to a recent poll, Kentuckians rather like it, as Sarah Kliff described here.

Put simply, the Kynect is Obamacare in Kentucky. Which is why these recent comments by McConnell, reported by Joe Sonka of LEO Weekly, are so absurd:

McConnell: “[Obamacare] was a big mistake, we ought to pull it out root and branch and start over.” ...

Q: ...“Should Kynect be dismantled?”

McConnell: “I think that’s unconnected to my comments about the overall question here.”

McConnell's position is ludicrous because the Kynect was only created, and can only continue to exist in anything close to its current form, because of the federal health law's spending and regulations. MIT economics professor Jonathan Gruber told the Post that McConnell's position "makes no sense," because "exchanges don't work without mandates and subsidies — without those, there isn't enough demand and too much adverse selection." Without the billions in federal subsidies the law provides, and the requirements that insurance companies offer affordable coverage to people with preexisting conditions, a great many low-income Kentuckians wouldn't be able to afford to purchase private insurance. The Lexington Herald-Leader editorialized, "Kynect could not survive without the ACA's insurance reforms."

Follow-up statements from McConnell's campaign make it clear he's trying to have it both ways — arguing that a repeal of Obamacare wouldn't necessarily mean the end of Kynect. "If Obamacare is repealed, Kentucky should decide for itself whether to keep Kynect or set up a different marketplace," said McConnell campaign spokesperson Allison Moore. "When Obamacare is repealed, Kentucky can choose to continue Kynect or alter it in a way that makes the best sense for Kentuckians," his campaign manager Jesse Benton said. McConnell has also emphasized that he'd prefer to let people buy insurance across state lines — but as the Post's Glenn Kessler points out, "This is the exact opposite of preserving a Kentucky exchange that appears to be working for the state."

Regardless of these attempts to obfuscate, the challenge McConnell faces is quite clear. Now that hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians are actually seeing the benefits of Obamacare, and liking them, McConnell is afraid to actually stick to his past positions, and say he’d prefer to take those benefits away.

Further reading

  • Greg Sargent of the Washington Post has been extensively covering this issue — here are his latest two posts on it.
  • Joe Sonka of LEO Weekly first reported McConnell's comments, and you can read his coverage here.
  • Also check out these posts from Brian Beutler at TNR, Michael Tomasky at the Daily Beast, and Aliyah Frumin and Zachary Roth of MSNBC.
  • McConnell's Democratic opponent Alison Lundergan Grimes has her own political difficulties with Obamacare, as WFPL wrote about here.
See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff