Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Everything the internet wrote about that Brookings study on student debt today

Libby Nelson
Libby Nelson was Vox’s editorial director, politics and policy, leading coverage of how government action and inaction shape American life. Libby has more than a decade of policy journalism experience, including at Inside Higher Ed and Politico. She joined Vox in 2014.

The number of words written on Tuesday about the Brookings Institution study on student loan debtors might surpass the number of dollars that the median student loan borrower still owes: about 13,000. It may have been a stealth full-employment plan for business/policy journalists/opinionators.

Here is everything the internet wrote on June 24 about whether student debt is as bad as you think it is:

  1. The Brookings study on student loan debtors finds that the burden of student loan repayment (for some households, at least) is no worse than it was in the past.
  2. David Leonhardt writes up the study at The Upshot, part of The New York Times. (The story also appeared on A3 of the print edition.)
  3. Max Ehrenfreund at the Washington Post's Wonkblog also gives the study a fairly straightforward writeup, as did The Boston Globe, as did Marketplace.
  4. Choire Sicha at The Awl argued that the study is terrible, in part because its methodology oversamples the wealthy and that the households are not representative.
  5. Quartz's Matt Phillips explains why readers of The Awl don't want to hear that student debt isn't a problem.
  6. Peter Coy at Businessweek compares and contrasts Leonhardt's piece with Adam Davidson's New York Times magazine cover last weekend.
  7. Slate's Jordan Weissmann looks at the study's two main points and how they relate to Sicha's critique.
  8. At The New Republic, Mike Konczal argues that the real consequences of debt show up in the long run, not in monthly payments.
  9. Demos's Mark Huelsman argues that anecdotes can be overblown without invalidating the huge issue of student debt.
  10. Frederik deBoer critiques Sicha's critique with more information on research methodology. (The post is more interesting than my summary makes it sound.)
  11. The Atlantic's Derek Thompson zigs where others zag and writes about the return on investment in a college degree.
  12. As always, The Toast's Mallory Ortberg has a fantastic take.

Full disclosure, since this is clearly a contentious topic: Matthew Chingos, a co-author of the Brookings study, lent me a turkey pan at Thanksgiving despite mostly knowing me from higher ed policy Twitter. Unfortunately, I keep forgetting to return it, so if anything, he is beholden to me and not the other way around.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff