Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why China is making it harder for Chinese Muslims to celebrate Ramadan

Peter Parks/AFP/Getty Images
Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy, The Reactionary Spirit, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here.

Ramadan, the Muslim holy month, has just begun — but a number of China’s 23 million Muslims won’t be allowed to participate in the daily fast that is so central to the holiday, and in some cases are even barred from entering mosques. Authorities in Xinjiang, a largely Muslim semi-autonomous region in China’s northwest, have sharply limited Ramadan observance for Muslim students, teachers, and civil servants, who are now prohibited from “fasting and other religious activities.”

Beijing has imposed similar Ramadan restrictions in the past. But the situation in Xinjiang is unusually tense this year, where there is growing resistance to Chinese rule, including an isolated but worsening trend of violent attacks that some observers worry could spiral out of control.

The plurality of Xinjiang residents, about 45 percent, are Uighurs. The Uighurs are ethnically Turkic and overwhelmingly Muslim, doubly setting them apart from the Han Chinese nationwide majority. Uighurs, by in large, want more self-determination, and some even would like to become an independent nation, often under the name East Turkestan.

The Beijing government has long viewed these attitudes as threats to Chinese control over Xinjiang. A 2005 Human Rights Watch report, citing internal Communist Party documents, found that the Chinese government sees Uighurs “as an ethno-nationalist threat to the Chinese state.” Because “Islam is perceived as underpinning Uighur ethnic identity, China has taken draconian steps to smother Islam as a means of subordinating Uighur nationalist sentiment.” That, according to Human Rights Watch, has included:

  • Torturing and killing peaceful Muslim activists
  • Shipping Uighurs to “reeducation” camps
  • Sending over a million Han Chinese to live in Xinjiang to change the ethnic balance of the population
  • Arresting and detaining thousands of Uighurs on “terrorism” chargs

171837822

Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images

So the long-running Ramadan restrictions are part-and-parcel of China’s broader approach to Xinjiang. Chinese state media’s claims that fasting is bad for children, for instance, are part of China’s broader campaign to alienate Uighurs from their religion. Suppress Islam, the theory goes, and you suppress the basic motivation for Uighur separatism.

But this isn’t an ordinary Ramadan. In 2013, fighting between the Chinese government and Uighur separatists claimed the largest number of lives since 2009, when mass riots swept the regional capital, Urumqi.

Many of the over 100 people killed in the 2013 violence were “the result of military-style assaults on [Uighur] groups preparing violent attacks,” Human Rights Watch reports. And there have been attacks by separatists outside of Xinjiang. The Turkestan Islamic Party, a Uighur separatist group, killed five people in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square — well outside of Xinjiang — in an October 2013 terrorist attack.

It’s only gotten worse in 2014. In May, Urumqi saw its first suicide bombing. Later that month, a sophisticated car bomb attack killed 31 people.

“There is a level of organization and sophistication” to Uighur separatist attacks now that hasn’t previously been seen, Michael Leiter, a former director of the US National Counterterrorism Center, told NBC News.

Some experts think the Xinjiang conflict could become a full-blown insurgency, or may already be there.

"In Xinjiang, we see evidence of a wider insurgency in recent attacks on police stations and security checkpoints, symbols of the 'occupying power,'" Jay Ulfelder, a political scientist who studies conflict and mass atrocities, wrote recently. "The tactical variation and increased pace and intensity of the clashes leads me to believe that this conflict should now be described as a separatist rebellion."

171859735

Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images

It’s difficult to say where the conflict will go from here. On the one hand, Beijing certainly seems to believe that enough suppression and counterterrorism will quiet Xinjiang, and it’s worth noting that China has successfully kept various regional tensions from boiling over for years, for example in Inner Mongolia.

It’s also possible that, the more Beijing represses the Uighurs through measures like the Ramadan fasting ban, the more incentives Uighurs have to support separatism or even join a separatist movement. Maybe that’s a conflict Beijing can win, and maybe it’s one that could spiral out of control. But there’s no happy outcome in sight for Xinjiang’s Uighurs.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff