Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Employers added 142,000 jobs in August

The newest figures from the Labor Department show that non-farm employers added 142,000 jobs last month, well below consensus estimates of 225,000 to 230,000. The unemployment rate ticked downward slightly from 6.2 to 6.1 percent.

August jobs day fixed

The Labor Department also found there were 28,000 fewer new jobs in June and July than previously estimated. It revised June’s count from 298,000 to 267,000 and July’s count up slightly, from 209,000 to 212,000.

The labor force participation rate also fell slightly, from 62.9 to 62.8 percent. That is the share of working-age Americans who are actively looking for work or who have it, and it has been watched closely during the recovery because it has been stuck at low levels — pre-recession, it was in the 66 percent range. A shrinking labor force participation rate could be a sign that the unemployment rate is too low, as people who are unemployed and actively looking for work may have given up the search and therefore are not counted as “unemployed” in the Labor Department numbers. However, it may also simply be a sign that the labor force is shrinking as Boomers age out of it.

The monthly jobs report is a big deal, of course, being both media event and also a market-mover, so news will abound today that this is a mediocre report. That’s true, but it’s also important to remember that this month’s payrolls figure will also be revised twice in coming months and that it has a confidence interval of 90,000 jobs either way.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff