Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s attorney also defended the Unabomber and Jared Loughner

A TV near the site of the Boston Marathon bombing displays Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s picture.
A TV near the site of the Boston Marathon bombing displays Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s picture.
A TV near the site of the Boston Marathon bombing displays Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s picture.
Mario Tama / Getty Images News

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who’s accused of bombing the 2013 Boston Marathon, will be defended by Judy Clarke, an attorney who previously defended the Unabomber, Jared Loughner, and other high-profile killers.

The New York Times reported:

Ms. Clarke is famous for cutting deals that keep her clients off death row. At some point in the process, her clients — including Theodore Kaczynski, the Unabomber; Eric Rudolph, the Olympic Park bomber; and Jared L. Loughner, who killed six people in an assassination attempt on former Representative Gabrielle Giffords — pleaded guilty in exchange for a sentence of life in prison, with no chance of parole.

But here she faces one of her toughest challenges yet: trying to spare the life of a reviled defendant in a case that traumatized and enraged the nation, while federal prosecutors appear determined to put Mr. Tsarnaev to death.

In past defenses, Clarke has emphasized her clients’ personal histories to humanize them, the Times reported:

It is during the sentencing phase that Ms. Clarke would make her case to spare Mr. Tsarnaev’s life. Typically, her strategy is to burrow deeply into her clients’ backgrounds, down to details like their prenatal medical history, to humanize them and help a jury understand what led them to such horrific acts.

The Associated Press in 2013 described Clarke as a “defender of the despised.” In a speech reported by the AP, Clarke voiced her opposition to the death penalty, which federal prosecutors are seeking for Tsarnaev.

“I got a dose of understanding human behavior and I learned what the death penalty does to us,” Clarke said. “I don’t think it’s a secret that I oppose the death penalty.”

“The first clear way death cases are different is the clients,” she added. “Most have suffered from serious severe trauma, unbelievable trauma. We know that from brain research. Many suffer from severe cognitive development issues that affect the core of their being.”

Clarke appears to be taking a similar approach to the Tsarnaev trial. She reportedly plans to characterize Tsarnaev, who was 19 at the time of the bombing and held no criminal record, as manipulated into the attack by his older brother. The Times suggested this strategy will likely focus on Tsarnaev’s sentence — and specifically on preventing the death penalty.

Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
These reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothingThese reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothing
Future Perfect

Crime is falling to historic lows. This economist knows how to make it plunge even faster.

By Bryan Walsh
Podcasts
The influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s homeThe influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s home
Podcast
Podcasts

Are they harming the investigation — or just doing the same thing as CNN?

By Kelli Wessinger and Sean Rameswaram
Policy
The Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own gunsThe Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own guns
Policy

Gun lovers may soon have the right to bear bongs.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
The Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning gunsThe Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning guns
Policy

Do stoners have a right to bear arms?

By Ian Millhiser