Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Patricia Arquette made a great speech about wage equality. What she did next fell short.

Patricia Arquette
Patricia Arquette
Patricia Arquette
Kevin Winter/Getty Images
Alex Abad-Santos
Alex Abad-Santos is a senior correspondent who explains what society obsesses over, from Marvel and movies to fitness and skin care. He came to Vox in 2014. Prior to that, he worked at The Atlantic.

At the Oscars on Sunday night, Patricia Arquette delivered one of the most riveting and well-regarded acceptance speeches of the night when she won for Best Supporting Actress. On a night that’s about honoring actors and actresses at the top of their game, Arquette addressed the gender wage gap — the fact that women do not get paid the same as men for doing the same jobs. The Academy’s own lack of gender and racial diversity had been very much in the spotlight leading up to the Oscars, as well.

After her win, a reporter asked Arquette about her speech backstage. And what she said next was, well, a bit disappointing. Arquette said:

It’s time for all the women in America — and all the men that love women and all the gay people and all the people of color that we’ve all fought for to fight for us now.

Arquette appeared flustered, and perhaps she was stumbling around for words. Giving her the benefit of the doubt, Arquette probably wanted to emphasize that feminism and equality in the US is something that everyone should be behind.

But the sentence that came out of her mouth seemed based on the assumption that “gay people” and “people of color” aren’t doing their part in fighting for women like Arquette.

“The idea that queers & POC have had their time in the struggle spotlight long enough. Eek,” Roxane Gay, the author of Bad Feminist, tweeted. “I think she is great. I said that. I think these particular comments are not great.”

The truth of the matter is that under the insidious umbrella of gender pay gap, that inequality affects women of color disproportionately. Fusion’s Arielle Castillo explains:

The exact numbers may vary by analysis, but here’s some data from the 2012 census that backs up the gap. According to the American Association of University Women, in 2012, white, non-Hispanic women made just 78 cents on a white man’s dollar. For other groups, though, the picture was more grim: black women earned just 64 cents on a white man’s dollar, and Latinas clocked in the lowest, making 53 cents on the dollar.

In a sense, Arquette did, in a roundabout way, shed light on how the fight for equality involves us all.

More in Culture

Advice
What trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workoutWhat trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workout
Advice

Have we finally unlocked exercise’s biggest secret? Or is this yet another lie perpetrated Big Treadmill?

By Alex Abad-Santos
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
How fan fiction went mainstreamHow fan fiction went mainstream
Podcast
Podcasts

The community that underpins Heated Rivalry, explained.

By Danielle Hewitt and Noel King
Culture
Why Easter never became a big secular holiday like ChristmasWhy Easter never became a big secular holiday like Christmas
Culture

Hint: The Puritans were involved.

By Tara Isabella Burton
Culture
The sticky, sugary history of PeepsThe sticky, sugary history of Peeps
Culture

A few things you might not know about Easter’s favorite candy.

By Tanya Pai
The Highlight
The return of resistance craftingThe return of resistance crafting
The Highlight

Want to fight fascism? Join a knitting circle.

By Anna North