Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

For first time, the Senate will consider legalizing medical marijuana

Sen. Rand Paul is one of three senators sponsoring the medical marijuana bill.
Sen. Rand Paul is one of three senators sponsoring the medical marijuana bill.
Sen. Rand Paul is one of three senators sponsoring the medical marijuana bill.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
  1. Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY), Cory Booker (D-NJ), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) on Tuesday introduced a bill that would legalize medical marijuana at the federal level.
  2. The bill would reclassify marijuana in the federal scheduling system from schedule 1 to 2, which would force the federal government to acknowledge pot has some medical value for the first time.
  3. The bill would also permanently prohibit the federal government from shutting down medical marijuana operations in states where pot is legal for medicinal purposes.

The bill would eliminate federal restrictions on medical marijuana

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is one of three senators sponsoring the medical marijuana bill. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The bill is the first time in history the Senate will consider allowing medical pot, according to the Marijuana Policy Project.

A Senate aide, who walked me through the proposal, said the bill would prevent the Drug Enforcement Administration and other federal agencies from intervening in states’ medical marijuana laws. Since states began enacting their own medical marijuana laws, the DEA has regularly raided and shut down state-legal medical marijuana dispensaries, because pot remains illegal for all purposes under federal law.

A spending deal attempted to end federal interference in December, but the provision in that deal wasn’t permanent. Neither the spending deal nor the new bill prevents federal agencies from intervening with states’ marijuana legalization laws, although the Obama administration has deprioritized the enforcement of pot prohibition in states where the drug is legal.

The Paul-Booker-Gillibrand proposal also goes further than the spending deal by reclassifying marijuana from schedule 1 to 2. Under schedule 1, the federal government considers marijuana to have no medical value and some potential for abuse. Under schedule 2, the feds would acknowledge marijuana has some medical value but a high potential for abuse. So the bill would force the federal government to acknowledge marijuana’s medical value for the first time.

The legislation would also exclude CBD, a nonpsychoactive compound with medicinal properties that’s found in pot, from the definition of marijuana.

The bill would also attempt to unlock more marijuana-related research. It would require the attorney general, acting through the DEA, to issue at least three licenses to FDA-approved research institutions for pot-related studies. And it would eliminate the Public Health Service review for marijuana research, which can sometimes add months or even years to a study’s approval time.

The bill helps address some of the constraints brought on by the federal ban and marijuana’s strict schedule in the 23 states (and Washington, DC) where pot is legal for medical purposes. Several professional groups, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, have called on the federal government to reschedule marijuana to allow for more research into the drug to gauge its medicinal value.

Watch: Ezra Klein on the dangers of alcohol compared to marijuana

Policy
The Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning gunsThe Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning guns
Policy

Do stoners have a right to bear arms?

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
3 winners and 1 loser from Election Day 20233 winners and 1 loser from Election Day 2023
Politics

Democrats had a good night. So did abortion rights. Glenn Youngkin, not so much.

By Andrew Prokop
Money
Is CBD in trouble?Is CBD in trouble?
Money

The FDA just refused to regulate the popular cannabis product as a dietary supplement. So, uh, buyer beware?

By Mary Jane Gibson
Money
Is legal weed doomed to be run by big business?Is legal weed doomed to be run by big business?
Money

Pro-marijuana advocates have become surprising foes of some efforts to legalize. Here’s why.

By Mary Jane Gibson
Video
A fact-checked debate about legal weedA fact-checked debate about legal weed
Play
Video

Two opposing perspectives and six true facts about cannabis legalization.

By Joss Fong and Laura Bult
The 2022 midterm elections, explained
A mixed night for marijuana on the ballotA mixed night for marijuana on the ballot
The 2022 midterm elections, explained

Victories in Maryland and Missouri, losses in Arkansas and the Dakotas.

By Mary Jane Gibson