Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How Baltimore invented neighborhood segregation

This is not an accident.
This is not an accident.
This is not an accident.
Alex Wong/Getty Images

A lot has been written about Baltimore recently, but the most insightful commentary often comes from people who are not directly addressing the news. Back in 2010, Antero Pietila wrote Not in My Neighborhood: How Bigotry Shaped a Great American City about Baltimore (h/t Tyler Cowen). The shaping was not subtle. Indeed, with a 1910 residential segregation ordinance passed by the City Council, Charm City literally invented the idea of legally enforcing neighborhood-level segregation:

Baltimore’s innovation was the use of government legislation to achieve systematic, citywide race separation. “Nothing like it can be found in any statute book or ordinance record of this country,” the New York Times wrote. “It is unique in legislation, Federal, State, or municipal—an ordinance so far-reaching in the logical sequence that must result from its enforcement that it may be said to mark a new era in social legislation.”

Baltimore thus became a national leader in residential segregation. Richmond, Norfolk, Roanoke, and Portsmouth in Virginia passed similar laws. And so did Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Greenville, South Carolina; Birmingham, Alabama; Atlanta, Georgia; Louisville, Kentucky, St. Louis, Missouri; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; New Orleans, Louisiana; Indianapolis, Indiana; and Dallas, Texas. Like Baltimore, all those cities were trying to cope with a black influx. One letter of inquiry came all the way from the Philippines, where the U.S. occupation authorities wanted to know how Baltimore had done it.

There is much more in the book. But suffice it to say that once you corral a minority group into a confined geographical space, you don’t follow that up by providing the space in question with first-rate parks, excellent schools, top-notch police service, useful transportation infrastructure, and high-impact neighborhood business development projects.

A growing body of research indicates that access to quality transportation is a key neighborhood-level determinant of upward mobility. But it’s not some kind of cosmic coincidence that it’s often the heavily African-American neighborhoods where this doesn’t exist. The ghetto was a deliberate policy invention, and investing in a path out of it would have been completely contrary to the point of creating it.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff