Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Even Strom Thurmond’s son is over the Confederate battle flag now

This statement, from South Carolina Republican state Senator Paul Thurmond, is the New York Times’s quotation of the day for Wednesday:

The statement is, of course, newsworthy not because any of the information about the link between the Confederate battle flag, racism, and slavery is news (it’s not, at all).

It’s because Thurmond’s statement captures the way many Republicans have suddenly, publicly come to terms with this connection, in the wake of the massacre of nine African Americans at Charleston, South Carolina’s Emanuel AME Church by openly racist, Confederate flag-wearing suspect Dylann Roof.

The state senator’s words also stand out because they provide a marked contrast to his father Strom Thurmond’s infamous enthusiasm for preserving slavery’s legacy in the form of racial segregation. (Notably, the “Dixiecrat” party, under whose banner the senior Thurmond ran for president in 1948, used the Confederate flag as its symbol.)

The news around the recent push to remove the flag from statehouse grounds and license plates is important (and developing — read the latest here). But the quote also offers a bigger lesson about American racism: It’s sobering to realize that such a straightforward message — that slavery and white supremacy aren’t sources of pride — is still, in 2015, the kind of thing that would need to be said at all.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff