Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Daily Show brought back some of its most bizarre guests. They stood by their comments.

The Daily Show has hosted some bizarre guests in its on-the-field pieces during Jon Stewart’s tenure — from racists and homophobes to a prominent pastor who said President Barack Obama is Adolf Hitler. For many viewers, the bizarre comments have raised the question: Are these people real?

Last night, Stewart sat down with Jessica Williams, a correspondent of the show, to get some answers. It all seemed to come down to one thing, Williams explained: “They are real, and they do know who we are, and they don’t care because we bring a camera with us.”

But would these former guests stick to their controversial comments if given another opportunity? Williams followed up with some of the guests to find out.

“You’re doubling down on what you said six years ago?”

The Daily Show/Comedy Central

Take, for instance, James David Manning, the ATLAH World Missionary Church chief pastor who previously equated Obama with Hitler.

“The things that he has accomplished are ultra evil,” Manning said. “It takes a certain amount of evil spirit and demented, if you will, personality to do what he has done.”

“I’m just trying to get this right,” Williams replied. “You’re doubling down on what you said six years ago?”

“You could say that, yes,” Manning responded. “I’m leaning more toward Obama being like the son of Satan.”

Williams said this was the typical response to her follow-up to field guests: Most people didn’t just stand by their comments, they were actually happy that they had appeared on The Daily Show.

“I understood when you asked me to be on the show exactly what it was going to be about,” Manning said. “It was going to be an attempt to make my ideas seem buffoonery. But I agreed to do it anyway, because I didn’t think you would succeed at it. And you didn’t.”

Watch: Why The Daily Show had to change

See More:

More in Culture

Good Medicine
The alcohol crisis quietly hitting high-stress, “high-status” workersThe alcohol crisis quietly hitting high-stress, “high-status” workers
Good Medicine

What The Pitt can teach us about addiction.

By Dylan Scott
Advice
What trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workoutWhat trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workout
Advice

Have we finally unlocked exercise’s biggest secret? Or is this yet another lie perpetrated Big Treadmill?

By Alex Abad-Santos
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
How fan fiction went mainstreamHow fan fiction went mainstream
Podcast
Podcasts

The community that underpins Heated Rivalry, explained.

By Danielle Hewitt and Noel King
Culture
Why Easter never became a big secular holiday like ChristmasWhy Easter never became a big secular holiday like Christmas
Culture

Hint: The Puritans were involved.

By Tara Isabella Burton
Culture
The sticky, sugary history of PeepsThe sticky, sugary history of Peeps
Culture

A few things you might not know about Easter’s favorite candy.

By Tanya Pai