Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Megyn Kelly and Marco Rubio got into it on abortion. Here’s why.

Fox moderator Megyn Kelly seemed to have a pretty good way to put the screws to Florida Sen. Marco Rubio in Thursday night’s Republican primary debate.

Update: Coverage of CNN’s Republican debate.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the archbishop of New York, recently said that it’s “preposterous” to provide exceptions to anti-abortion laws in cases of rape and incest. Rubio, who is Roman Catholic, has supported anti-abortion legislation that includes those exceptions, as well as one to preserve the life of the mother.

“If you believe that life begins at conception, as you say you do, how do you justify ending a life just because it begins violently through no fault of the baby?” Kelly asked.

Rubio pushed back.

“Well, Megyn, first of all, I’m not sure that that’s a correct assessment of my record,” he said.

“You don’t favor a rape and incest exemption?” she shot back.

“I have never said that, and I have never advocated that,” Rubio said. He went on to say that he believes abortion is unconstitutional.

It’s true that Rubio has co-sponsored legislation including those exceptions. The “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” in each of the last few Congresses and the PROTECT Act in the 113th Congress are among the bills he’s backed.

But that doesn’t mean that Rubio would only back legislation with the exceptions. It’s a tough call for many Republicans because there’s a political cost to making it harder for women who are victims of rape or incest — or those who could have their own health jeopardized by a pregnancy — to have abortions. Rubio says he wants to restrict abortion as much as he can. So while he supports bills with the exceptions, it’s because he’s trying to limit abortion, according to Rubio spokesperson Alex Conant.

“Marco has sponsored pro-life legislation with and without exceptions because they enhance protections for innocent life,” Conant wrote in an email to Vox.
Interestingly, in this case both Rubio and Democrats want to make clear that Rubio doesn’t support the rape and incest exceptions, which have long been the standard in bills seeking to restrict abortion. Democratic National Committee spokesperson Holly Shulman tweeted as much Thursday night.


More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters