Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why experts say high school should start after 10 am

Libby Nelson
Libby Nelson was Vox’s editorial director, politics and policy, leading coverage of how government action and inaction shape American life. Libby has more than a decade of policy journalism experience, including at Inside Higher Ed and Politico. She joined Vox in 2014.

High school in the United States starts way too early. Given teenagers’ sleep patterns, the ideal school start time could be as late as 11:30 am— when many high school students have already finished half a school day and are eating lunch.

Researchers from Harvard and Oxford wrote about this new finding in a recent article in the journal Learning, Media, and Technology. In the article, Paul Kelley, Steven W. Lockley, Russell G. Foster, and Jonathan Kelley argue that given when kids and teenagers are biologically conditioned to wake up, 10-year-olds should start school at 8 am, 16-year-olds should start between 10 and 10:30 am, and 18-year-olds should start between 11 and 11:30 am.

There’s been lots of research done on sleep and performance in school — but this article argues that school should start even later than most proposals for a later start time call for.

Teens aren’t lazy — adults need to adjust

This isn’t laziness — sleep patterns are a biological necessity. Reviewing evidence from studies around the world, the researchers argue that starting school later would help students learn more, perform better on tests, and even be less grumpy.

Here’s a sample of what they found across the US:

  • In North Carolina, eighth-grade students who started class an hour later than their peers in the same district had higher test scores. The later start time seemed especially helpful for low-scoring students, and the effects persisted into high school.
  • When the Minneapolis Public Schools moved their start time from 7:15 am to 8:40 am, students liked the change and reported that “attendance, achievement, behavior, and mood improved.” Parents were positive, too: 92 percent said they liked the shift, and parents reported that their kids were easier to live with when they weren’t getting up so early.
  • At the US Air Force Academy, where students were randomly assigned to classes with earlier and later start times, students who started earlier performed worse all day long on those days.

But almost no school districts start after 9 am

Policymakers and pediatricians have been saying school should start later for a while now. The American Academy of Pediatricians recommends a start time of 8:30 am. The researchers in the new journal article go further, arguing that 8:30 am is still too early for teenagers.

But vast majority of school districts in the US start much earlier. The average school start time nationwide is 8:03 am, when many teenagers should probably still be in bed:

The researchers argue that this is partly cultural, and that getting up early is still seen as a virtue to be cultivated rather than something unnatural and unnecessarily challenging. That’s wrong, they write: “A common belief is that adolescents are tired, irritable and uncooperative because they choose to stay up too late, or are difficult to wake in the morning because they are lazy. Educators tend to think that adolescents learn best in the morning and if they simply went to sleep earlier, it would improve their concentration. … The truth is that adults need to be educated.”

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff