Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

President Obama just knocked the media’s 2008 coverage of Hillary Clinton. Here’s why.

President Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in September 2012.
President Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in September 2012.
President Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in September 2012.
Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson

President Barack Obama just agreed with something long alleged by Hillary Clinton supporters: The media scrutinized her more than Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary, an imbalance that favored Obama’s campaign.

“There were times where I think the media probably was a little unfair to her and tilted a little my way in the — in calling her out when she was tough and not calling some of our folks out as much when we were tough in ads,” Obama told Politico’s Glenn Thrush in an interview published Monday.

While not offering a formal endorsement, Obama extensively praised Clinton in the interview.

His comments could prove helpful to his former secretary of state, who is back in Iowa, this time running neck and neck with Bernie Sanders.

Obama says his 2008 campaign was too dismissive of the Clinton campaign’s “legitimate questions”

In 2008, Obama’s team rejected questions about his preparedness for the presidency, and his campaign dismissed Clinton’s infamous 3 am “ringing phone” ad as a scare tactic.

After nearly two terms of serving in the White House, however, Obama gave a different assessment of the issues raised by the Clinton campaign.

“The truth is in 2007 and 2008, sometimes my supporters and my staff, I think, got too huffy about what were legitimate questions she was raising,” Obama said in the Politico interview.

There are two main contexts for understanding Obama’s apparent change in tone.

One, of course, is that Obama has spent seven years in the Oval Office and now has an added appreciation for the complexity and rigor of the job.

Another is that the president made the remarks during a Politico interview in which he was signaling support for Clinton in an increasingly close Democratic nomination race.

Obama called Clinton a disciplined, thoughtful leader who “knows every policy inside and out” and can “start here, [on] day one.”

Acknowledging the validity of the Clinton campaign’s “legitimate questions” for Obama in 2008 may be one way of suggesting the legitimacy of posing similar questions to Bernie Sanders, whose foreign policy expertise has come under similar scrutiny in 2016.

Obama and Clinton during the 2008 election. (Jae C. Hong-Pool/Getty Images)

Obama says Clinton had a “tougher job” than he did in the 2008 campaign

In extolling Clinton, Obama didn’t just validate the idea that the media helped his candidacy over hers: He also said she had to work harder, for less credit, than he did — a double standard for women Clinton herself has pointed out before.

“She had to do everything that I had to do, except, like Ginger Rogers, backwards in heels,” Obama said in the interview, published on Monday.

“She had to wake up earlier than I did because she had to get her hair done. She had to, you know, handle all the expectations that were placed on her.”

As Sanders rises in the polls, pundits have been increasingly speculating that Clinton will collapse from her commanding position as the frontrunner, as she did against Obama.

But in the Politico interview, Obama stressed how easily the 2008 race could have gone the other way.

In talking about Clinton’s strengths in 2016, in other words, Obama took care to minimize her weaknesses in 2008.

“She had a tougher job throughout that primary than I did and, you know, she was right there the entire time,” he said. “And had things gone a little bit different in some states or if the sequence of primaries and caucuses been a little different, she could have easily won.”


Be sure to subscribe to Vox on YouTube for more explainer videos.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters