Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Elizabeth Warren: Republicans risk threatening “our democracy itself” over Supreme Court seat

Sen. Elizabeth Warren issued a statement on Sunday about the brewing fight over Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s replacement.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren issued a statement on Sunday about the brewing fight over Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s replacement.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren issued a statement on Sunday about the brewing fight over Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s replacement.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Sen. Elizabeth Warren said Sunday that Republicans who don’t want President Barack Obama to nominate a successor to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia risk threatening “our democracy itself.”

In a short, sharply worded statement, Warren said she couldn’t find the section of the Constitution that tells presidents not to nominate justices “when there’s a year left in the term of a Democratic president.” Scalia died suddenly on Saturday, opening a vacancy on the court.

“Senate Republicans took an oath just like Senate Democrats did,” said Warren, a former Harvard Law professor, in a statement on her Facebook page. “Abandoning the duties they swore to uphold would threaten both the Constitution and our democracy itself.”

Warren’s remarks address the immediate partisan split that emerged within hours after Scalia’s death — one that threatens a constitutional crisis between divided branches of government. They also reflect the growing intensity of what is expected to be a brutal fight over Scalia’s replacement.

Republicans have argued that Obama should wait until after the presidential election to replace Scalia, in part because choosing his replacement could potentially tilt the Court to the left for a generation. Democrats, including Obama and Warren, say the president has a constitutional obligation to fill the empty seat on the high bench.

Here’s Warren’s statement in full:

The sudden death of Justice Scalia creates an immediate vacancy on the most important court in the United States.

Senator McConnell is right that the American people should have a voice in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice. In fact, they did — when President Obama won the 2012 election by five million votes.

Article II Section 2 of the Constitution says the President of the United States nominates justices to the Supreme Court, with the advice and consent of the Senate. I can’t find a clause that says “...except when there’s a year left in the term of a Democratic President.”

Senate Republicans took an oath just like Senate Democrats did. Abandoning the duties they swore to uphold would threaten both the Constitution and our democracy itself. It would also prove that all the Republican talk about loving the Constitution is just that — empty talk.

Go deeper:


More in Politics

Politics
The war in Iran didn’t end; it became something newThe war in Iran didn’t end; it became something new
Politics

Why this conflict is so hard to end.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
The lucky few who can apply for tariff refundsThe lucky few who can apply for tariff refunds
Politics

The Trump administration launched its tariff refund portal. Will the refunds really happen?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
Pete Hegseth’s spiritual leader explains his radical faithPete Hegseth’s spiritual leader explains his radical faith
Podcast
Podcasts

The Christian nationalist pastor swaying the Trump administration discusses Trump, Iran, and the pope.

By Jolie Myers and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
Israel’s critics are winning the battle for the Democratic PartyIsrael’s critics are winning the battle for the Democratic Party
Politics

Democratic voters turned against Israel. Now their politicians are following.

By Andrew Prokop
America, Actually
Rubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it nowRubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it now
America, Actually

An interview with the senator Swalwell called his “best friend.”

By Astead Herndon