Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Chris Christie called out Marco Rubio for canned answers. Rubio’s reply? A canned answer.

Chris Christie went after Marco Rubio at the Republican debate Saturday night for giving canned answers.

Rubio’s response: canned answers.

Christie started the exchange by pointing to his record as a can-do governor of New Jersey, contrasting himself with the do-nothing Congress. He said, “Every morning when a United States senator wakes up, they think about, ‘What kind of speech can I give, or what kind of bill can I drop?’ Every morning when I wake up, I think about what kind of problem do I need to solve for the people who actually elected me. It’s a different experience.”

Rubio’s strategy was first to attack Christie — pointing out that New Jersey’s credit rating has been downgraded under him — and then abruptly changing the subject, pointing to Obama: “Let’s dispel with this fiction that Barack Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is trying to change this country. He wants America to become more like the rest of the world. We don’t want to be like the rest of the world. We want to be the United States of America.”

That’s when Christie pounced. He laid out the Rubio strategy: “That’s what Washington, DC, does: the drive-by shot at the beginning, with incorrect and incomplete information, and then the memorized 25-second speech that is exactly what his advisers gave him.”

Rubio didn’t do himself any favors. He repeatedly tried to make the same point about Obama, which gave Christie more and more chances to make the same point about Rubio’s stump speech. It didn’t look good for Rubio.

More broadly, both candidates are trying to land their arguments on experience. Christie is trying to argue that he has the best experience as governor to immediately get to work if he becomes president. Rubio, on the other hand, is trying to argue that experience doesn’t matter as much as vision — and he thinks he has the right vision to reverse the damage he feels Obama has done to the US.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters