Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Harriet Tubman will be on the front of the $20 bill, with Andrew Jackson on the back

The Treasury Department will put Harriet Tubman’s face on the $20 bill, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew announced Wednesday. But contrary to previous reports that Tubman would replace Jackson entirely, Lew told reporters that Jackson will still appear on the back of the $20 bill.

It was expected that a woman would replace Jackson on the front of the $20 bill, but it wasn’t known which woman. Tubman’s name had been floated as a likely candidate, however.

Alexander Hamilton’s face will also stay on the front of the $10 bill, Politico reported, and won’t be replaced by a woman as was previously speculated.

That idea was derailed in part by the popularity of the new Broadway musical Hamilton and many pointing out Hamilton is intricately linked to the nation’s monetary policy history. Lew also floated the idea of an odd compromise: keeping Hamilton on the front and putting a woman on the back.

Instead, the back of the $10 bill will now feature leaders in the movement to give women the right to vote, and a redesigned $5 bill will feature leaders of the civil rights era. And rather than letting those changes be the only nod to diversity on new US currency, they will happen alongside changing the face of the $20 bill.

Feminist activists like the group Women on 20s have been calling for a change like this. Other critics, including Vox’s Matt Yglesias, have argued that Jackson deserves to be replaced regardless because of his pro-slavery advocacy, his genocidal actions against Native Americans, and his opposition to paper money as a policy.

Still, the changes will take a while to actually go into effect. The new $20 bills won’t be in circulation until 2030.

It’s ironically appropriate to put Tubman on the $20, Vox’s Phil Edwards notes. In addition to her work on the Underground Railroad, Tubman served in the Civil War as a scout, nurse, cook, and spy for the Union. But she struggled to get the pension she was owed after the war — and eventually was awarded $20 a month, a discounted rate from a full soldier’s pension of $25 a month.

Replacing Jackson with Tubman would have been particularly appropriate, some activists argue, because it replaces a slavery proponent with the nation’s most famous abolitionist and former slave who led other slaves to freedom on the Underground Railroad. But keeping Jackson on the bill with her could present some issues.

And advocates argue that it’s problematic to put Tubman on the $20 at all, given her opposition to slavery as a capitalist enterprise. “Tubman didn’t respect America’s economic system, so making her a symbol of it would be insulting,” Feminista Jones wrote in the Washington Post last year.

Update: This post has been updated with the news that Jackson will still appear on the back of the new $20 bill with Tubman’s face on the front.


See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters