Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Watch: Trump fired Sally Yates for doing what Jeff Sessions urged her to do in 2015

On Monday, President Trump fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates after she refused to defend his controversial immigration order in court. Yates, a holdover from the Obama era, said she was not “convinced that the Executive Order is lawful.”

Trump’s team said Yates “betrayed” the department. But back in 2015, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) — Trump’s current pick for attorney general — encouraged Yates to be ready to stand up to the president. “You have to watch out,” Sessions said, “because people will be asking you to do things that you just need to say no about.”

This all came during Yates’s Senate confirmation hearing in 2015. The exchange is more than a little surreal in light of what went down this week:

Sessions: You have to watch out, because people will be asking you to do things that you just need to say no about. Do you think the attorney general has a responsibility to say no to the president if he asks for something that’s improper? A lot of people defended the [Loretta] Lynch nomination by saying well, [then-President Obama] appoints somebody who’s going to execute his views. What’s wrong with that? But if the views that the president wants to execute are unlawful, should the attorney general or the deputy attorney general say no?

Yates: Senator, I believe that the attorney general or the deputy attorney general has an obligation to follow the law and the Constitution, and to give their independent legal advice to the president.

Of course, in 2015, Sessions was encouraging Yates to stand up to President Obama, a president he disliked — not Trump. There’s also little reason to think Sessions will buck President Trump if he gets confirmed as attorney general. According to the Washington Post, Sessions was the driving force between the immigration order and many of Trump’s other early moves. Trump’s chief strategist Steve Bannon calls Sessions “the clearinghouse for policy and philosophy” in Trump’s administration.

(Credit to Michael Scarcella for originally unearthing this clip.)

Further reading

  • Andrew Prokop has a recap of Yates’s refusal to defend the order and subsequent firing. Trump’s new acting attorney general, Dana Boente, has ordered the department to defend the immigration order in court.
  • Not everyone agrees with what Yates did. Jack Goldsmith, a Trump critic and former Department of Justice lawyer, argues that Yates’s reasoning for refusing to defend the order was unpersuasive — and that if she thought it was wrong, she should’ve just resigned.
  • Meanwhile, Marty Lederman, who was deputy assistant attorney general under Obama, argues that Yates did the right thing.
See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters