Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Elizabeth Warren couldn’t read this letter on the Senate floor. Why did Jeff Merkley get to?

Senate Democrats Hold News Conf. On Genetically Engineered Food Labeling
Senate Democrats Hold News Conf. On Genetically Engineered Food Labeling
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Senate Republicans silenced Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) on the Senate floor late Tuesday night as she read a 1986 letter from Coretta Scott King criticizing the record of attorney general nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL).

But just hours later, Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley returned to the Senate floor to pick up where Warren had left off, reading portions of the same letter.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had found Warren in violation of the Senate’s Rule 19, which prevents senators from using “any form of words [to] impute to another Senator … any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator,” for attempting to read the letter criticizing Sessions. The full Senate body then voted on party lines, 49-43, to prevent Warren from speaking further on the Sessions confirmation debate.

Merkley, noting he’d consulted with the Senate parliamentarian, announced he would read the same letter — but “in a way that’s appropriate under our rules.” It was a gambit designed to call further attention to the letter Republicans didn’t want broadcast, which had already taken off on social media and in the press.

Merkley’s speech omitted portions of the letter that Warren had read, including the line that Sessions had used his office as a prosecutor “to chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens.”

But Merkley concluded his speech with the following quote, which at the very least appears to violate the spirit of Rule 19:

I do not believe Jefferson Sessions possesses the requisite judgment, competence and sensitivity to the rights guaranteed by the federal civil rights laws to qualify for appointment to the federal district court.

Republicans did not censure Merkley for reading that portion of the letter, perhaps because it came at the end of his speech and he had already finished. (By contrast, Warren was cut off in the middle of her talk about Sessions.)

Either way, Merkley’s speech represented how McConnell’s decision to cut off Warren may have backfired. Until well past 2 am, Senate Democrats held the floor talking about their outrage about the decision. Democratic Sens. Cory Booker (NJ), Pat Leahy (VT), and Chris Murphy (CT) all took turns criticizing McConnell for doing so.

Here’s a portion of a speech from Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI):

After she was excluded from the Senate debate, Warren recorded a video on Facebook Live outside the Capitol expressing her frustration. Her video got more than 3 million views. The C-SPAN feed of the Senate floor was being watched by a few hundred people late Tuesday night.


Watch: Warren silenced on Senate floor by GOP

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters