Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The complex process Republicans want to use to repeal Obamacare, explained with a cartoon

Senate Republicans have taken the first step to repealing Obamacare.

They’re doing it through a process called “reconciliation,” which you can read about in-depth here. It can be confusing because it’s a multi-step process — and for each step, Republicans are saying it’s a vote to “repeal Obamacare.” But only after entire process is complete will parts of Obamacare actually be repealed.

So to clear up what’s actually happening, we made this cartoon.


Senate Republicans proposed a budget resolution, which is basically an outline of how the federal government should spend money, and they passed it early Thursday morning.

But here’s what is different about this resolution: There’s a special section called a “reconciliation directive.” It doesn’t repeal Obamacare; instead, it tells the committees that oversee Obamacare to write plans for how they can cut the deficit.

This tool exists because it makes reducing the deficit easier. That’s because once the committees come up with language to change funding for these government programs, it will only take 51 votes to pass, rather than the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster.

Republicans, as it turns out, control 52 seats in the senate right now.

But there are drawbacks to this powerful tool, too. Because it’s specifically for the budget, it can only be used to address budgetary issues — like how much we spend, how much revenue we bring in, and the debt limit.

The resolution passed the Senate — and the House is expected to vote on it later this week. But that does not repeal Obamacare. Instead, it tells committees to make plans to cut parts of Obamacare that involve the budget. This includes Medicaid expansion, the individual mandate, and tax credits for low- and middle-income Americans.

But they can’t propose cutting the parts of the law that don’t cost or save the government money, like allowing kids to be on their parents’ insurance until they’re 26.

It’s unclear if they can cut the portion of Obamacare that bans preexisting conditions — but it’s the most popular part of the law, so Republicans may not go after it anyway.

Once the committees make these plans, they send it to the budget committee, which combines the two plans into one big plan.

Then these proposals go up for vote in the House and Senate.

And, as mentioned before, it only takes 51 votes in the Senate to pass this proposal. A simple majority in the House will also get the bill through.

So where are we now?

On Thursday morning, the Senate passed the resolution.

Now, the House needs to pass the same resolution with identical language.

Then those reconciliation directives kick in, and the committees start drafting language that cuts portions of Obamacare.

After that, both the House and Senate have to pass that reconciliation bill — and only then will these parts of Obamacare be repealed and kick off a transition period where Republicans will figure out a way to replace it. Republicans would have to decide just how quickly the repeal would go into effect, and whether they’d combine it with any sort of replacement.

Here’s the full process in one chart:

Read more

Who pays the lowest taxes in the US?Who pays the lowest taxes in the US?
Play
By Alvin Chang and Madeline Marshall
How online ratings make good schools look badHow online ratings make good schools look bad
Play
By Alvin Chang and Kimberly Mas

More in Obamacare

Supreme Court
Kavanaugh and Barrett appear likely to ride to Obamacare’s rescueKavanaugh and Barrett appear likely to ride to Obamacare’s rescue
Supreme Court

The two Republican justices appeared open to an attack on Obamacare, but ultimately seemed likely to reject it.

By Ian Millhiser
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court case that seeks to make everyone’s health insurance worse, explainedThe Supreme Court case that seeks to make everyone’s health insurance worse, explained
Supreme Court

The Obamacare wars are back.

By Ian Millhiser
Supreme Court
A new Supreme Court case seeks to make it harder to get screened for cancerA new Supreme Court case seeks to make it harder to get screened for cancer
Supreme Court

Becerra v. Braidwood Management threatens to make your health insurance worse.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court’s new abortion pill decision, explainedThe Supreme Court’s new abortion pill decision, explained
Politics

The justices hand down the first decision in the mifepristone litigation saga that is not completely unhinged.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The lawsuit that threatens everything from cancer screenings to birth control, explainedThe lawsuit that threatens everything from cancer screenings to birth control, explained
Politics

A notoriously partisan judge has launched a new attack on one of Obamacare’s key provisions.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
Thanks, Obama! The hilarious reason why a judge just blocked Wyoming’s abortion ban.Thanks, Obama! The hilarious reason why a judge just blocked Wyoming’s abortion ban.
Politics

Republicans just got a painful reminder that political stunts can backfire.

By Ian Millhiser