Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Rubio: Is Putin a war criminal? Tillerson: “I would not use that term.”

Watch the senator open fire on the secretary of state nominee over Russia at his confirmation hearing.

Getty Images

Early on in secretary of state nominee Rex Tillerson’s confirmation hearing, it became evident that he has an extremely difficult line to walk on Russia.

As Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) grilled him on Russian misdeeds ranging from invading Ukraine to backing the murderous Assad regime in Syria and killing off political dissidents, Tillerson had to strike a balance between sounding adequately tough in representing American interests and not foreclosing the opportunity for his potential future boss to warm relations with Moscow. He mainly achieved that by dodging questions.

Sanctions were a major focal point of the exchange. Analysts think it’s likely that Donald Trump could lift sanctions currently in place against Russia — or push back against new ones — in a bid to improve ties with the Kremlin, and Rubio pressed Tillerson on it.

“If Congress passed a bill imposing mandatory visa bans and asset freeze sanctions on persons who engage in significant activities undermining the cybersecurity of public or private infrastructure and democratic institutions in the United States, would you advise the president to sign it?” Rubio asked.

“I would want to examine all the corners, all four corners of that,” Tillerson answered.

“Those are the four corners,” Rubio retorted. “We would sanction people who are involved in cyberattacks against the United States and interfering in our elections.”

“The threat of cyber attacks is a broad issue which is coming from many, many corners of the world,” Tillerson replied. “Certainly this most recent manifestation, and the new threat posed in terms of how Russia has used this as a tool, that introduces even another element of threat. But cyberattacks are occurring from many nations.”

Tillerson’s description of cyberattacks originating in “many corners of the world” echoes Trump’s response to the intelligence community’s report that Russia tried to tip the presidential election. The subtext of the language is that the US tolerates cyberattacks from competitors and rivals around the world without always responding harshly; thus, slapping sanctions on Russia shouldn’t be considered the only course of action in response.

As the exchange carried on, it became clear: Tillerson did not want to commit to any firm position on using sanctions against Russia.

When Rubio tried to get Tillerson to acknowledge Russian President Vladimir Putin’s support of the Assad regime and other foreign policy adventurism, Tillerson was strikingly coy.

“Is Vladimir Putin a war criminal?” Rubio asked.

“I would not use that term,” Tillerson replied.

Watch the whole exchange here:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters