Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Rep. Jason Chaffetz on AHCA: Americans might have to choose between iPhones and health insurance

Following the reveal of a highly anticipated Republican Obamacare replacement plan, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) offered a line of reasoning that Republicans chided President Barack Obama for in 2014.

Tuesday morning, on CNN’s New Day, Chaffetz said that when it comes to health care, Americans will have to make a choice between a shiny new iPhone and insurance. It was an early indication that he knows the replacement plan — the American Health Care Act — doesn’t fix all the shortfalls of Obamacare, including cost.

“Americans have choices, and they’ve gotta make a choice,” Chaffetz said. “And so maybe rather than getting that new iPhone that they just love and they want to go spend hundreds of dollars on that, maybe they should invest in their own health care. They’ve gotta make those decisions themselves.”

This is a similar argument to the one Obama made in 2014, in response to a Hispanic constituent’s concerns over Obamacare’s price: “If you looked at their cable bill, their telephone, their cell phone bill, it may turn out that it’s just they haven’t prioritized health care.”

At the time, Obama’s remark received backlash from conservative media for its deal-with-it tone, as in this Daily Caller article, resurfaced by Politico’s Jason Millman:

A trade-off between luxury and insurance, however, is not one President Donald Trump has accounted for in his promises to the American people. He has claimed the Obamacare replacement plan would be more affordable and insure everybody.

But as Vox’s Sarah Kliff explained, Republicans are still not completely sure how much their replacement plan is going to cost, or how many people will be covered. They have decided to move forward without a score from the Congressional Budget Office, which puts an estimate on both those factors. It’s likely the AHCA will insure fewer people and be more expensive for the poor and the sick, Kliff reports.

Chaffetz has acknowledged the possibility.

“More access, but possibly less coverage? That might be the byproduct?” CNN’s Alisyn Camerota asked him.

“Well, yes. I think that’s fair,” Chaffetz said. “But we’re just now consuming this. So more of the analysis has to happen.”

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters