Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Traffic Court Clears Driver Cited for Using Google Glass

Court says it’s not illegal to wear a turned-off device on your head.

In October, a woman pulled over for speeding got an extra citation for wearing Google Glass. Today, she was cleared on both counts in a San Diego traffic court.

Cecilia Abadie is a product manager and member of Google’s “Glass Explorer” program. Abadie said she was wearing the device with the screen turned off while she was driving, but her Glass screen activated when she looked up at the police officer outside her window (that is indeed how Glass is designed, so wearers can access it without pressing a button).

The California Highway Patrol officer who pulled Abadie over cited her for the equivalent of watching television while driving. But the court today found no proof that the device was in operation while she was in motion.

The incident inspired some of Abadie’s fellow Google Glass beta testers to post pictures taken with their own Glass while driving, using the hashtag #freececilia.

However, the traffic court didn’t actually cover whether it’s legally kosher to use Google Glass while driving, since the Abadie decision hinged on the notion that the screen was off.

While it might not be legal in California to watch TV on your Glass while driving, is it legal to take a picture? Use turn-by-turn navigation? Read tweets? That’s unclear.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram