Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Correlate This! Facebook Pokes Princeton in Data Science Payback.

Hell hath no fury like a scientist scorned.

Facebook/Mike Develin

Never provoke a data scientist with time on his hands.

A study from a pair of Princeton University researchers made the rounds this week because of a particularly bold claim — that Facebook would lose 80 percent of its user base in the next three years.

The paper compared Facebook’s rise to that of a disease, and as such suggested that the social network would follow similar patterns of dying out as existing disease models.

Not one to take a scientific potshot lying down, Facebook’s Data Science team posted its own “study” on Thursday evening, making the tongue-in-cheek claim that Princeton, too, was in trouble.

“Using the same robust methodology featured in the paper, we attempted to find out more about this ‘Princeton University’ — and you won’t believe what we found!” Facebook data scientist Mike Develin wrote.

“In keeping with the scientific principle ‘correlation equals causation,’ our research unequivocally demonstrated that Princeton may be in danger of disappearing entirely.”

Develin then proceeded to point to a decline of published Princeton research papers over the span of the past decade, a flippant jab at the two scholars’ apparent methods.

It’s pretty funny and, as Develin makes sure to note at the bottom of his post, all in good fun — though a multibillion dollar company debunking a paper from two relative unknowns seems like a pretty sharp poke back.

The harshest part of Facebook’s spurious science? While Princeton is on the decline, Harvard and Yale are doing better than ever.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel