Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A Grand Theory of Snapchat, as Constructed by Snapchat

Every so often there are glimpses of method behind the Snapchat madness.

In the tech industry, conversations about ephemeral messaging service Snapchat often focus on a few things.

  1. Snapchat turned down a $3 billion dollar offer from Facebook.
  2. The service was hacked. Badly.
  3. CEO Evan Spiegel’s frat boy persona has rubbed some people the wrong way.
  4. It’s all about teen sexting.

But the reality is, Snapchat is a wildly popular app, with more than 400 million messages received every day. Clearly, it has significant appeal.

Every so often there are glimpses of method behind the Snapchat madness. At our Dive Into Mobile conference last year, for example, Spiegel explained that when people live their lives online, the concept of sharing changes. That is: photos shared in the moment and given a short lifespan are a more authentic form of self-expression than those curated and selectively archived on social media.

Here’s another glimpse: Spiegel recently published notes for a speech he gave yesterday, in which he describes the emergence of Snapchat.

Spiegel’s big point: Snapchat is a viable means of communication.

He’s said that before, but he also adds a few interesting observations worth noting on their own:

The selfie makes sense as the fundamental unit of communication on Snapchat because it marks the transition between digital media as self-expression and digital media as communication.

Spiegel explains this as communicating through media, rather than around media, as people would in a caption or comment thread.

Snapchat sets expectations around conversation that mirror the expectations we have when we’re talking in-person.

But if Snapchat is a form of communication, it often isn’t very deep or informative. It’s more about here’s where I am, here’s how I feel, or hey, I’m bored. Spiegel has an explanation for that too.

Snapchat focuses on the experience of conversation — not the transfer of information.

The full speech itself is a bit loopy, but here’s the text as posted by Spiegel:

2014 AXS Partner Summit Keynote by evan3268

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel