Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

National Democrats jump back in to the Kentucky Senate race

Alison Lundergan Grimes
Alison Lundergan Grimes
Alison Lundergan Grimes
Alison Lundergan Grimes for Senate
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

When news broke last week that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) had no plans to air more ads in the Kentucky Senate race, it was frequently viewed — including by me — as a sign that the party was conceding the race to incumbent Mitch McConnell. But on Wednesday afternoon Politico’s Manu Raju reported that the committee is jumping back in, with a new $650,000 ad buy for Alison Lundergan Grimes.

A source told Raju that the DSCC was encouraged by public and private polling showing that independent voters were moving toward Grimes. Perhaps Democrats are truly seeing this in their internal numbers, and perhaps if you squint at the public polling in a certain way you can come to that conclusion:

But it’s also plausible that the party’s taking a risk on Kentucky because Democratic prospects have deteriorated in so many other key races. The party’s candidates in Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Iowa, and Colorado have all looked increasingly beleaguered. Meanwhile, Pat Roberts has regained ground in Kansas, South Dakota remains a mystery, and Michelle Nunn has gained in Georgia but would likely face difficulty in a runoff.

So throwing some cash back into Kentucky might be a long-shot play for the disadvantaged Democrats, resembling the late moves into Pennsylvania by both John McCain and Mitt Romney during their losing presidential bids. To find out which is the case, it's best to keep an eye on the new public polling.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff