Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why WhatsApp Is Worth $19 Billion, and Why the Telecom Industry Should Be Afraid

And the only thing people hate more than telecom companies is cable companies.

Alexander Supertramp/Shutterstock

The past week in tech news has been dominated by Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp for $19 billion ($16 billion + $3 billion retention). Many articles, comments and tweets reference the dot-com bubble and desperation, and are generally negative. But they’re dead wrong.

Messaging is an important part of how people use the Internet. It is an even more important part of how people use their phones. As telecom competition heats up while people make fewer actual phone calls, the telecom companies have attempted to claw more money from their subscribers via increased data and SMS pricing. It’s a frustrating and losing position, especially as alternatives have gained traction.

WhatsApp, like Apple’s Messages, effectively moves SMS from telecom networks to the Internet, where it is transport agnostic — it can run over 3G, 4G, LTE, Wi-Fi or anything else that can get a basic Internet connection, even a bad one. This is critical, and it is a big part of why WhatsApp is growing so fast and has such a broad international footprint.

In terms of SMS messaging, WhatsApp is already as large as half of all global texting traffic. This means that SMS, the fastest growing telecom application (as opposed to straight transport) is about to be overtaken by a third-party app. With a team of about 50 people in four years — welcome to the new world order.

Essentially, Facebook just bought the future of mobile messaging — the next-generation SMS replacement — for 10 percent of the market cap of AT&T, five percent of Verizon, half the cost of Orange, 75 percent of the price of T-Mobile. That should scare the crap out of every telecom company (or even cable, for that matter) in every part of the world. Apple and the app economy it started has now turned them all into transport networks with little or soon-to-be no actual application value.

What Facebook understands, and why the precedent-setting $19 billion figure should seem like a smart if aggressive buy, is that in five years or less, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, et al, will be relegated to networks that no one cares about, other than how fast and how reliable of an Internet connection they can deliver.

And this will also happen to the cable companies. The only thing people hate more than telecom companies is cable companies. Right now, cable companies are doing everything they can to bundle content and lock in customers — just like the telecoms. Comcast just announced plans to buy Time Warner Cable (which is just the cable service, not the media company) to grow its subscriber base and to get more “pipes.” However, Google Fiber and the telecom companies (AT&T, Verizon) will, of course, fight them.

In the short term, all of these players will look the same, even Google Fiber, with cable TV bundles that look like they currently do. However, Netflix and Amazon Prime are leading the charge with “apps” that unbundle the use of the pipes from the content. Sony and Microsoft are building business models around their consoles. And others — both startups and large companies — will continue to push down this path. The very disruption that WhatsApp brought to SMS and that threatens telecoms is also currently being forged in the cable industry.

WhatsApp shows that the power of an app and its associated infrastructure can, for a very low cost and in a relatively short period of time, completely disrupt what many believed was an unassailable piece of a powerful telecom market.

Andrew Busey has pioneered some of the industry’s most important Web technologies — including work on Mosaic, the first Web browser (now part of Microsoft Internet Explorer); creating iChat, the first Web-based chat system and one of the first instant messaging applications; and building WebCenter, the first major Web-based customer service technology (now part of Avaya). He is currently CEO and co-founder of Team Chaos, partner at Chaotic Moon, and is developing Banter, an anonymous social chat network. Reach him @andrewbusey.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel