Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Regulators United in Pouring Cold Water on Potential Sprint/T-Mobile Deal

Add FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to the short but powerful list of regulators who aren’t yet convinced a Sprint/T-Mobile merger is a good idea.

Shutterstock

Federal Communications Commission chairman Tom Wheeler didn’t react as positively Monday to a potential merger between T-Mobile and Sprint as company executives would have liked.

The FCC chairman was “highly skeptical” when Sprint chairman Masayoshi Son and CEO Dan Hesse broached the idea of the potential merger Monday, according to an FCC official. They met with Wheeler and a few senior staffers for more than half an hour. Although the chairman raised concerns, he reportedly said he “would keep an open mind” about a deal, the FCC official said.

SoftBank Corp. acquired control of Sprint last year, and the company is now looking at a potential acquisition of T-Mobile, which would combine the third- and fourth-largest wireless carriers in the U.S.

But the willingness of some senior FCC officials to provide such a relatively negative assessment of Wheeler’s reaction to the possible deal is not a good thing for Sprint officials hoping to get it past regulators.

Former FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski made similar (if a little more circumspect) noises in 2011 after AT&T announced a $39 billion deal to acquire T-Mobile. That deal imploded months later after both the Justice Department and FCC officials objected.

Notably, Wheeler echoed some of the same worries at the meeting that were recently expressed publicly by Justice Department antitrust officials about the potential deal, the FCC said.

Last week, William Baer, the chief of the Justice Department’s antitrust division, pointedly raised concerns about the deal in an interview with the New York Times.

“It’s going to be hard for someone to make a persuasive case that reducing four firms to three is actually going to improve competition for the benefit of American consumers,” Baer told the Times, although he didn’t talk specifically about the possible Sprint/T-Mobile deal. “Any proposed transaction would get a very hard look from the antitrust division.”

As Medley Global Advisors telecom analyst Jeffrey Silva said in a research note recently, the administration “has been dropping hints (subtle and otherwise) on its Sprint/T-Mobile thinking” and those hints aren’t promising for the companies.

A Sprint spokesman declined to comment about the FCC meeting on Monday.

Undaunted, Son and Hesse this morning joined President Obama at an event in suburban Maryland to announce a few more details on the White House plan to improve Internet access in schools. Sprint was among seven companies that pledged upward of $750 million in cash, products or services to help kids get online to do their school work.

Sprint offered more than $100 million worth of free wireless service for low-income high school students for the White House plan. Other companies, including Apple, Verizon and Microsoft, are providing similar amounts in services or products for students.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram