Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

In Google’s Shadow, Facebook’s Zuckerberg Pursued Oculus Over Several Months, Ending in Weekend Marathon of Dealmaking

A must-have for Mark.

Adam Tow

According to sources close to the situation, Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg started his quest to buy Oculus VR, the maker of the nifty Rift virtual reality headset, several months ago, before wrapping up the deal this past weekend. It was signed this morning.

Facebook said today that it would pay $2 billion for the startup, forking over $400 million in cash, 23.1 million shares of Facebook common stock and a $300 million earn-out in cash and stock based on future performance.

Sources close to the situation said that Facebook’s initial offer to the Irvine, Calif.-based Oculus came about three months ago at about a $1.5 billion valuation. In fact, in early February, Oculus CEO Brendan Iribe left the DICE gaming conference in Las Vegas to do a personal demo of the device for Zuckerberg.

At the time, Oculus investors — including Andreessen Horowitz, Spark Capital and Matrix Partners — had not wanted the two-year-old company to sell, considering it to be at the forefront of a new platform for consumers.

For this, Oculus had attracted a lot of interest from the media and other tech giants. Google, famous for picking up esoteric device companies, had also apparently seriously sniffed around, although sources said Facebook was the main suitor here. Other obvious buyers — Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Sony, which has its own Project Morpheus in the arena — were not in the mix.

“I had thought it would be Google, that would have not surprised me,” said one person close to the situation. “But Facebook sees this as a major new platform for the future and wants to build on it.”

Indeed, and not for just gaming, as some have noted already. Many think there are a myriad of ways such devices can be deployed, well beyond games, in the same way tablets and even smartphones have developed.

Sources said the push to complete the deal happened this past weekend, with Zuckerberg leading the effort. It’s not dissimilar to his fast push to buy WhatsApp for $19 billion recently and, earlier, Instagram for just over $1 billion. Also involved was Amin Zoufonoun, Facebook’s VP of corporate development, who had also worked on the Instagram deal.

“There are must-haves for Mark and this was not a reaction, but a plan,” said one source inside Facebook.

As Eric Johnson noted:

For the uninitiated: Users wear the Rift on their heads, and it acts as both a monitor and partial controller. A connected PC or Android device does the processing to create a three-dimensional virtual world where turning one’s head in the real world changes their focus in the virtual world.

Although the Irvine, Calif.-based startup initially focused on gaming, since that round it has hinted that the Rift may also be good for non-gaming applications, and that seems to be Facebook’s interest here.

“Mobile is the platform of today, and now we’re also getting ready for the platforms of tomorrow,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was quoted as saying in a press release. “Oculus has the chance to create the most social platform ever, and change the way we work, play and communicate.”

Indeed, another person familiar with the deal said that Facebook was on a most definite futuristic bent after missing the chance to own a big smartphone or tablet device of this era.

“There is more to come here,” said the person. “It’s a bet on the future of the future.”

In a call today about the acquisition, Zuckerberg said that Facebook was still not a hardware company, but would make its money mostly from software and services, as well as leveraging its many relationships on the social network.

That said, it now owns a pricey piece of the Internet of Things.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel