Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Fed’s inflation hawks are still wrong

Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Plosser dissented from this week’s FOMC statement, arguing that the country needs tighter money faster than Janet Yellen is offering. Then this morning he doubled down in a statement, arguing that the Fed’s current stance is “well behind” where it should be in light of the falling unemployment rate.

It was bold of Plosser to make that statement at 8 AM knowing full well that through a quirk of the calendar, new unemployment data and new inflation data were both coming out at 8:30 AM this morning. And thanks to that quirk, we were able to find out that Plosser was wrong in record time.

First inflation. The Fed’s index of choice is the Personal Consumption Expenditures Deflator (read all about it) and today’s personal income report says it rose 1.6 percent over the past year. That’s lower than the Fed’s target, not higher, indicating that money is too tight not too loose.

Then on unemployment, this month’s jobs report said that employers added over 200,000 new positions but the labor force expanded even faster so the unemployment rate went up slightly.

Both data points in the same direction — the economy is growing, but it has room to grow faster. There are workers hungry for jobs, and price pressures remain moderate. Under the circumstances, the Fed should be pondering ways to give the economy a further boost not pondering ways to slow it down.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff