Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Verizon Pays $7.4 Million Fine to Settle FCC Privacy Investigation

The company didn’t tell new customers they could opt out of marketing programs, the FCC says.

Gil C/Shutterstock.com

Verizon Communications paid $7.4 million to settle a Federal Communications Commission complaint that the company didn’t notify subscribers of their privacy rights or their ability to opt out of having their information shared.

FCC staff said that Verizon failed to tell about two million new customers about their rights to opt out of having their information used for marketing purposes. The company failed to provide required notices beginning in 2006 but didn’t discover the problem until six years later. Even then, the FCC charged, Verizon didn’t inform the government of its opt-out omissions until early 2013.

“It is plainly unacceptable for any phone company to use its customers’ personal information for thousands of marketing campaigns without even giving them the choice to opt out,” said Travis LeBlanc, acting chief of the FCC’s enforcement bureau, in a statement.

In addition to the $7.4 million fine, Verizon will now be required to print opt-out notices on every bill, not just the first one sent to customers.

A Verizon spokesman said the problem was an internal issue with sharing of information for marketing purposes and did not involve other companies.

“Verizon takes seriously its obligation to comply with all FCC rules, and once we discovered the issue with the notices we informed the FCC, fixed the problem and implemented a number of measures to ensure it does not recur,” the company said in a statement.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram