Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

One piece of good news from the August jobs report

Need a reason to feel good about the latest jobs report? Here’s one: The number of workers who are what the Labor Department calls “part-time for economic reasons” fell by a seasonally adjusted 234,000 from July to August, the Labor Department reported. That’s a good-sized monthly decline added to an already strong downward trend.

Part time workers

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

That sharp decline at the very end is the July-August decline. And this decline appears in large part due to current workers seeing their situations improving. The Labor Department separates these involuntary part-time workers into two categories: people who couldn’t find full-time work but wanted it and people who are part-time due to “slack work or business conditions,” like getting their hours cut because of slow business.

The number of people who could only find part-time jobs in fact ticked upward by nearly 70,000. But the number working part-time because of slow business fell by 348,000. So even though the number of new jobs may have been disappointingly low, for some people who already had jobs, there was more work to be done (and more money to be earned).

Of course, put this all into a broader context and it’s less inspiring and more daunting. The number of people working part-time against their wills is still far above where it was during better times. Today, nearly 7.3 million people are part-time for economic reasons, compared to the roughly 4 to 4.5 million in the years leading up to the recession.

Part-time workers since 2000

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff