Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Silicon Valley Companies Agree to Pay $415 Million to Settle “No Poaching” Suit

The suit alleged that the tech giants kept a lid on salaries and reduced job mobility by agreeing not to recruit one another’s employees.

Reuters / Brendan McDermid

Four Silicon Valley companies have agreed to pay $415 million to settle a class action lawsuit brought by technology workers who accused the firms of conspiring to avoid poaching one another’s employees.

The settlement offer, disclosed in a filing Thursday and still requiring court approval, is $90.5 million more than an earlier proposal that had been rejected last year by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, Calif.

The suit, filed in 2011, alleged that some of the region’s biggest and best-known employers — Apple, Google, Adobe Systems and Intel — kept a lid on salaries and reduced job mobility by agreeing not to recruit one another’s employees.

Three other companies that were originally named in the complaint — Lucasfilm, Pixar and Intuit — opted to settle in 2013 for $20 million.

The case was one that attracted a great deal of scrutiny, in part because it featured private correspondence of technology icons including the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, who in one 2007 email exchange with Google’s Eric Schmidt called on the search giant to stop recruiting a prized Apple engineer.

Schmidt was on Apple’s board at the time.

Current and former workers who worked for these companies from 2005 to 2009 would be eligible for compensation under the settlement.

Google and Intel did not respond to requests seeking comment, and Apple and Adobe declined. In the filing, the firms expressly deny any wrongdoing.

Update: Intel provided this comment: “We don’t believe we violated any law, nor do we owe the plaintiffs. We agreed to settle to avoid the risks and distractions of litigation.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram