Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Should you use an exclamation mark? Probably not!

Lauren Katz
Lauren Katz is a senior project manager at Vox, focusing on newsroom-wide editorial initiatives as well as podcast engagement strategy.

Deciphering tone in writing has always been a challenge. But as digital messaging spreads, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to pinpoint the emotion behind our words. Using a period can often make the writer seem angry. Using emoticons can make someone seem more likable.

So what about the exclamation mark? This flowchart from HubSpot shows that most of the time, there are better options than tacking on a couple extra exclamation marks to your sentence:

(HubSpot)

Exclamation marks are one of the only pieces of punctuation that clearly state emotion, according to Mary Hiatt's 1977 study The Way Women Write, which looked at women and men's writing styles. "The frequency of use of exclamation points is one indicator of what might be called 'emotionality' or 'excitability,'" she wrote.

But exclamation marks aren't solely used to demonstrate excitement. They can also convey sincerity. A study in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication found that exclamation points can function as markers of friendly interaction and to emphasize intended statements.

Seinfeld, famously, explored exclamation usage:

“Maybe I don’t use my exclamation points as haphazardly as you do,” the man says to Elaine — a great reminder that we should all be more thoughtful when it comes to punctuation.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff