Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

British lord blames rise of ISIS on Snapchat and WhatsApp

ISIS, snapping.
ISIS, snapping.
ISIS, snapping.
(Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock)
Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy, The Reactionary Spirit, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here.

During a Monday debate, a British member of Parliament said that ISIS's rise was "entirely" a result of the group's use of vanishing photo app Snapchat and messaging service WhatsApp. Lord King of Bridgwater, also known as Thomas King, is a Conservative member of the House of Lords and served as UK Defence Minister from 1989 to 1992.

King made the comment while speaking on the House floor in defense of a bill commonly called the Snooper's Charter, which would make it much easier for UK security services to get electronic information without warrants. That's when he proposed his curious theory about ISIS, Snapchat, and WhatsApp:

I’m not a tweeter. But we’ve got Facebook, we’ve got Twitter. The other day, somebody tried to explain to me what WhatsApp is. Somebody tried to explain to me about Snapchat. But, my Lords, I don’t know about them. What is absolutely clear is that the terrorists and jihadists do.

And the understanding is actually that [ISIS], and part of their amazing advance across Syria and Iraq, is that their communication was so good. And the way they kept together was entirely due to one or other of the last two systems that I mentioned.

Here's video (via Ishmael Daro):

While the Snapchat reference is simply baffling, the WhatsApp reference makes a little more sense. Robert Hannigan, the head of the UK’s equivalent of the NSA (the GCHQ), wrote an op-ed in November labeling social networks and online communication apps “the command-and-control networks of choice for terrorists.” He mentioned WhatsApp, along with Facebook and Twitter, as an app ISIS uses to “promote itself, intimidate people, and radicalise new recruits” among the younger set.

That said, there is no evidence that, as Lord King said, ISIS needed WhatsApp, let alone Snapchat, to conduct its broadly conventional offensives in Iraq and Syria.

Lord King’s comments aren’t just goofy. The Snooper’s Charter, which King was proposing as an amendment to a separate counter-terrorism bill, is about warrantless online surveillance. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, it would “require [internet service providers] to harvest and store data taken from their subscribers’ online traffic, and hand this over to the government without a warrant.” That’s troubling in its own right, and doubly so given the justification one of its key proponents has offered.

King ended up withdrawing the amendment, but both the Guardian and EFF believe he and his allies will try to reintroduce it.

This episode speaks to a larger problem: people in positions of power who may not understand the internet are nonetheless seeking to regulate it. Though Lord King admits he has no idea what Snapchat or WhatsApp are, he’s in a position to make the rules that govern their use. That problem is hardly unique to King or the UK.

More in Syria

Today, Explained newsletter
Trump and Netanyahu weren’t on the same page for longTrump and Netanyahu weren’t on the same page for long
Today, Explained newsletter

Fighting in Syria exposes a US-Israel rift.

By Joshua Keating
Today, Explained podcast
Assad is gone. Will Syrian refugees go home?Assad is gone. Will Syrian refugees go home?
Podcast
Today, Explained podcast

The big decision facing millions of Syrian refugees, explained.

By Avishay Artsy and Noel King
World Politics
After 13 years of war, Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria has been defeated. What comes next?After 13 years of war, Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria has been defeated. What comes next?
World Politics

How the Assad regime collapsed slowly, then all at once.

By Joshua Keating
World Politics
How the Syrian rebels’ surprise offensive shocked the worldHow the Syrian rebels’ surprise offensive shocked the world
World Politics

The world had moved on from Syria — but Syrians had other ideas.

By Joshua Keating
Kamala Harris
Biden and Harris say America’s no longer at war. Is that true?Biden and Harris say America’s no longer at war. Is that true?
Kamala Harris

Harris says US troops aren’t fighting in any “war zones.” What about Iraq, Syria, and the Red Sea?

By Joshua Keating
World Politics
Turkey and Syria earthquakes: Aftermath and updates on the humanitarian crisisTurkey and Syria earthquakes: Aftermath and updates on the humanitarian crisis
World Politics

Deadly earthquakes hit Turkey and Syria, where war and economic crises already loomed. Here’s the latest news.

By Vox Staff